Following a theoretical analysis of factors that may account for the level of commercialization of voluntary sports organizations, commercialization is measured using cross-sectional data at the organizational level. The potential crowding-out effect between (a) commercial resources and (b) public and voluntary resources is investigated. The findings show that the level of commercialization in this sphere is already significant, although dependent on the definition of commercialization. The most commercialized organizations are those that are particularly oriented toward competitions and most dedicated to team sports. The empirical analysis supports the theoretical approach. The greater the facility by which the sport may be transformed into a private good, the more likely it is that the organization will be commercialized. Finally, commercialization does not hinder public sector support nor voluntary work; the most commercialized organizations are also those receiving the largest share of public funds, and increasing commercial resources does not reduce the level of voluntary work.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abraham, B. A.
, & Smith, M. D. (1978). The crowding-out effect of governmental transfers on private charitable contributions. Public Choice, 33(1), 29-37.
2.
Abraham, B. A.
, & Smith, M. D. (1985). The crowding-outeffectof government transfers: Arejoinder. National Tax Journal, 38, 575-576.
3.
Amis, J.
, & Slack, T. (1996). The size-structure relationship in voluntary sport organisations. Journal of Sport Management, 10(1), 76-86.
4.
Anderson, E.
(1990). The ethical limitations of the market. Economics and Philosophy, 6(2), 179-205.
5.
Buchanan, J. M.
(1965). An economic theory of clubs. Economica, 32, 1-14.
6.
Coakley, J.
(2001). Sport in society. New York: McGraw-Hill.
7.
Collins, M. F.
(1993). Sport in Europe, and the single European market. In S. Glyptis (Ed.), Leisure and the environment. London: Behaven.
8.
Cornes, R.
, & Sandler, T. (1986). The theory of externalities, public goods and club goods. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Enjolras, B.
(2000). Coordination failure, property rights and nonprofit organisations. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 71(3), 347-374.
10.
Enjolras, B.
, & Seippel, ø. (1999). Frivillighet, kommersialisering og profesjonalisering: Utfordringer i norsk idrett [Volunteering, commercialization and professionalization: Challenges in Norwegian sport]. Oslo, Norway: Institute for Social Research.
11.
Fehr, E.
, & Gächter, S. (1998). Reciprocity and economics: The economic implications of homo reciprocans. European Economic Review, 42, 845-859.
12.
Gouldner, A. W.
(1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161-178.
13.
Hansmann, H.
(1980). The role of non profit enterprise. Yale Law Journal, 89, 835-898.
14.
Harvey, J.
, & Cantelon, H. (1988). Not just a game. Ottawa, Canada: University of Ottawa Press.
15.
Horch, H. D.
(1994). On the socio-economics of voluntary associations. Voluntas, 5(2), 219-230.
16.
Horne, J.
, Tomlinson, A., & Whannel, G. (1999). Understanding sport. London: Spon.
17.
Hughes, R.
, & Coakley, J. (1984). Mass society and the commercialisation of sport. Sociology of Sport Journal, 1, 57-63.
18.
Ibsen, A. B.
(1992). Frivilligt arbeijde i idræts-foreninger [Voluntary work in sport associations]. København, Norway: DHL/Systime.
19.
James, E.
(1983). How nonprofits grow: A model. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2(3), 350-366.
20.
Kikulis, L.
, Slack, T., & Hinings, C. R. (1996). Sector-specific patterns of organisational design change. Journal of Management Studies, 32, 67-100.
21.
Kingma, B. R.
(1995). Do profits crowd out donation or vice versa?Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 6(1), 21-38.
22.
Lasch, C.
(1980). The culture of narcissism. London: Abacus.
23.
Maguire, J.
(1988). The commercialization of English elite basketball 1972-1988: A figurational perspective. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 23(4), 305-322.
24.
Morgan, W. J.
(1994). Leftist theories of sport. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
25.
Pfeffer, J.
, & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations. A resources dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
26.
Polanyi, K.
(1957). The great transformation. Boston, MA: Beacon.
27.
Polanyi, K.
, Arensberg, C. M., & Pearson, H. W. (Eds.). (1957). Trade and market in the early empires. New York: Free Press.
28.
Real, M. R.
(1996). The postmodern Olympics, technology and the commodification of the Olympic movement. QUEST, 48(1), 9-24.
29.
Robyn, L. J.
, & Kathleen, M. A. (Eds.). (2000). Sociology of sport. White Plains, NY: Longman.
30.
Schiff, J.
(1985). Does government spending crowd out charitable contributions?National Tax Journal, 38(4), 535-546.
31.
Schiff, J.
, & Weisbrod, B. A. (1991). Competition between for-profit and nonprofit organisations in commercial markets. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economy, 62(4), 619-639.
32.
Segal, L. M.
, & Weisbrod, B. A. (1998). Interdependence of commercial and donative revenues. In B. A. Weisbrod (Ed.), To profit or not to profit, the commercial transformation of the nonprofit sector. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Slack, T.
, & Hinings, C. R. (1994). Institutional pressures and isomorphic change: An empirical test. Organisation Studies, 15, 803-827.
34.
Steinberg, R.
(1991). Does government spending crowd out donations?Annals of Public and Cooperative Economy, 62(4), 591-617.
35.
Weisbrod, B. A.
(1977). The voluntary nonprofit sector. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
36.
Weisbrod, B. A.
(1988). The nonprofit economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37.
Weisbrod, B. A.
(1998). Modeling the nonprofit organisation as a multiproduct firm: Aframework for choice. In B. A. Weisbrod (Ed.), To profit or not to profit, the commercial transformation of the nonprofit sector. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Zelizer, V.
(1998). How do we know whether a monetary transaction is a gift, an entitlement or compensation? In A. Ben-Ner & L. Putterman (Eds.), Economics, values and organisations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
