This article examines the nonprofit sector’s impact on good government. Through a brief synthesis of several literatures, the author constructs two competing hypotheses. In the first, nonprofit activity acts as a self-correcting force for the public sector; in the second, the third sector accelerates bad government’s downward spiral.The authors hows that the key element in deciding between these hypotheses is the relationship between confidence in government and participation in civil society.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Boix, C.
, & Posner, D. N. (1998). Social capital: Explaining its origins and effects on government performance. British Journal of Political Science, 28, 686-693.
2.
Brehm, J.
, & Rahn, W. (1997). Individual level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 999-1023.
3.
Brooks, A. C.
, & Lewis, G. B. (2001). Giving, volunteering, and mistrusting government. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20765-770.
4.
Farazmand, A.
(1989). Crisis in the U.S. administrative state. Administration & Society, 21, 173-199.
5.
Goodsell, C. T.
(1994). The case for bureaucracy: A public administration polemic (3rd ed.). Chatham, NJ: U.S. Chatham House.
6.
Gore, A.
(1993). Creating a government that works better and costs less: Report of the National Performance Review. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
7.
Government Accounting Standards Board
. (1993). Proposed statement of the Government Accounting Standards Board on concepts related to service efforts and accomplishments reporting. Norwalk, CT: Author.
8.
Gregory, R. J.
(1999). Social capital theory and administrative reform: Maintaining ethical probity in public service. Public Administration Review, 59, 63-75.
9.
Is there a crisis? (1999, July 17). The Economist, 49-50.
10.
McGowan, R. P.
(1995). Total quality management: Lessons from business and government. Public Productivity and Management Review, 18, 321-331.
11.
Miller, A. H.
, & Listhaug, O. (1990). Political parties and confidence in government: Acomparison of Norway, Sweden, and the United States. British Journal of Political Science, 20, 357-386.
12.
Niskanen, W. A.
(1973). Bureaucracy—servant or master? Lessons from America. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
13.
Putnam, R. D.
(1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 65-78.
14.
Putnam, R. D.
(2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
15.
Putnam, R. D.
, Leonardi, R. & Nanetti, R. Y. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
Stiefel, L.
, Rubenstein, R., & Schwartz, A. E. (1999). Using adjusted performance measures for evaluating resource use. Public Budgeting and Finance, 19, 67-87.
17.
Stopping the rot in public life. (2000, September 16). The Economist, 41-42.
