Higher Education-Community Partnerships: Assessing Progress in the Field

Abstract

Urban universities and colleges have increasingly been investing in partnerships with their local communities. As this burgeoning movement emerges from its infancy stages, numerous questions about assessing and funding these efforts arise. The author relies on his experiences as a participant observer, evaluator, and researcher to address the following questions: What are effective measurements of progress in higher education community partnerships? What is the significance of this movement’s stage in development regarding the availability of resources and the appropriateness of assessment? The author also relies on his observations of the field of corporate social responsibility to see if it sheds any light on how one should think about resources and assessment of higher education-community partnerships. Although measurable outcomes of these efforts are essential, process is a major factor, given the significance of relationships to success. For example, if trust and communication do not exist between partners, effective outcomes will remain elusive.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alperson, M. (1996). Measuring corporate community involvement. New York: Conference Board.

Aspen Institute . (1997). Voices from the field: Learning from the early work of comprehensive community initiatives. Washington, DC: Author.

Bollier, D. (1996). Aiming higher: 25 stories of how companies prosper by combining sound management and social vision. New York: American Management Association.

Brummer, J. J. (1991). Corporate responsibility and legitimacy: An interdisciplinary analysis. Westport, CT: Greenwood.

Burke, E. M. (1999). Corporate community relations: The principle of the neighbor of choice. Westport, CT: Quorum.

Connel, J. P. , & Kubisch, A. (1998). Applying a theory of change approach to the evaluation of comprehensive community initiatives: Progress, prospects, and problems. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.

Denzin, N. K. , & Lincoln, Y. (2000). The handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Karake-Shalhoub, Z. A. (1999). Organizational downsizing, discrimination, and corporate social responsibility. Westport, CT: Quorum.

Letts, C. , Ryan, W. , & Grossman, A. (1997, March-April). Virtuous capital: What foundations can learn from venture capitalists. Harvard Business Review.

10.

Light, P. (2000). Making nonprofits work: A report on the tides of nonprofit management reform. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute and Brookings Institution Press.

11.

Maurrasse, D. (2001). Beyond the campus: How colleges and universities partner with their communities. New York: Routledge.

12.

Nelson, C. , & Watt, S. (1999). Academic keywords: A devil’s dictionary for higher education. New York: Routledge.

13.

Plein, L. C. , Williams, D. G. , & Hardwick, D. M. (2000). Making engagement work: University outreach and welfare reform in West Virginia. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 6.

14.

Waddock, S. , & Smith, N. (2000, Winter). Corporate responsibility audits: Doing well by doing good. Sloan Management Review.