Voluntary associations are often ascribed a fundamental role in the formation of social capital. However, scholars disagree on the extent to which face-to-face contact, that is, active participation, is necessary to create this resource. This article examines the impact of participation in associations on social capital using three dimensions: intensity (active vs. passive participation), scope (many vs. few affiliations) and type (nonpolitical vs. political purpose). Whereas those affiliated display higher levels of social capital than outsiders, the difference between active and passive members is absent or negligible. The only cumulative effect of participation occurs when a member belongs to several associations simultaneously, preferably with different purposes. The article challenges the notion that active participation is necessary for the formation of social capital and suggests that more attention should be paid to the importance of passive and multiple affiliations within associations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Almond, G.
, & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
Anderson, B.
(1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origins and spread of nationalism (Rev. ed.). London: Verso.
3.
Berman, S.
(1997). Civil society and the collapse of the Weimar Republic. World Politics, 49, 401-429.
4.
Bourdieu, P.
(1985). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood.
5.
Coleman, J. S.
(1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S121.
6.
Dekker, P.
, Koopmans R., & van den Broek, A. (1997). Voluntary associations, social movements and individual political behavior in Western Europe. In J. W. van Deth (Ed.), Private groups and public life (pp. 220-241). London: Routledge.
7.
Dekker, P.
, & van den Broek, A. (1998). Civil society in comparative perspective: Involvement in voluntary associations in North America and Western Europe. Voluntas, 9, 11-38.
8.
Foley, M. W.
, & Edwards, B. (1996). The paradox of civil society. Journal of Democracy, 7, 38-52.
9.
Granovetter, M.
(1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
10.
Hallenstvedt, A.
, & Trollvik, J. (1993). Norske organisasjoner. Oslo: Fabritius Forlag.
11.
Maloney, W. A.
(1999). Contracting out the participation function. Social capital and cheque-book participation. In J. W. van Deth, M. Maraffi, K. Newton, & P. F. Whiteley (Eds.), Social capital and European democracy (pp. 3-24). London: Routledge.
12.
Mouzelis, N. P.
(1995). Sociological theory: What went wrong. Diagnosis and remedies. London: Routledge.
13.
Newton, K.
(1997). Social capital and democracy. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 575-586.
14.
Newton, K.
(1999). Social capital and democracy in modern Europe. In J. W. van Deth, M. Maraffi, K. Newton, & P. F. Whiteley (Eds.), Social capital and European democracy (pp. 3-24). London: Routledge.
15.
Portes, A.
(1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1-24.
16.
Putnam, R. D.
(1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17.
Putnam, R. D.
(1995a, January). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 1, 65-78.
18.
Putnam, R. D.
(1995b). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. Political Science and Politics, 28, 664-683.
19.
Putnam, R. D.
(2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
20.
Quigley, K.F.F.
(1996). Human bonds and social capital. Orbis, 40, 333-343.
21.
Rueschemeyer, D.
(1998). The self-organization of society and democratic rule: Specifying the relationship. In D. Rueschemeyer, M. Rueschemeyer, & B. Wittrock (Eds.), Participation and democracy: East and west. Comparisons and interpretations. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
22.
Scott, J.
(1991). Social network analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23.
Selle, P.
, & Stromsnes, K. (1998). Organized environmentalists: Democracy as a key value?Voluntas, 9, 319-343.
24.
Selle, P.
, & Stromsnes, K. (2001). Membership and democracy: Should we take passive support seriously. In P. Dekker & E. M. Uslaner (Eds.), Social capital and politics in everyday life. London: Routledge.
25.
Skocpol, T.
(1999a). Advocates without members: The recent transformation of American civic life. In T. Skocpol & M. P. Fiorina (Eds.), Civic engagement in American democracy (pp. 461-509). Washington, DC: Brookings/Russell Sage Foundation.
26.
Skocpol, T.
(1999b, March-April). Unraveling from above. The American Prospect, 25.
27.
Skocpol, T.
, & Fiorina, M. P. (1999). Making sense of the civic engagement debate. In T. Skocpol & M. P. Fiorina (Eds.), Civic engagement in American democracy (pp. 1-23). Washington, DC: Brookings/Russell Sage Foundation.
28.
Stolle, D.
, & Rochon, T. R. (1999). The myth of American exceptionalism: Athree-nation comparison of associational membership and social capital. In J. W. van Deth, M. Maraffi, K. Newton, & P. F. Whiteley (Eds.), Social capital and European democracy (pp. 3-24). London: Routledge.
29.
Stromsnes, K. (2001). Demokrati i bevegelse. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Bergen, Norway, Department of Comparative Politics.
30.
Tocqueville, A.
(1954). Democracy in America. New York: Random House. (Original work published 1835)
31.
Torcal, M.
, & Montero, J. R. (1999). Facets of social capital in new democracies: The formation and consequences of social capital in Spain. In J. W. van Deth, M. Maraffi, K. Newton, & P. F. Whiteley (Eds.), Social capital and European democracy (pp. 167-191). London: Routledge.
32.
Torpe, L. (1998). Lokal organisasjonsdeltakelse og demokrati. Mellem individ og faellesskab samt borger og styre. Bergen, Norway: LOS-senteret. 9816.
33.
van Deth, J. W.
(1997). Introduction: social involvement and democratic politics. In J. W. van Deth (Ed.), Private groups and public life. London: Routledge.
34.
Whiteley, P. F.
(1999). The origins of social capital. In J. W. van Deth, M. Maraffi, K. Newton, & P. F. Whiteley (Eds.), Social capital and European democracy (pp. 3-24). London: Routledge.
35.
Williams, B.
(1988). Formal structures and social reality. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
36.
Wollebaek, D. (2000). Participation in voluntary associations and the formation of social capital. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Bergen, Norway, Department of Comparative Politics.
37.
Wollebaek, D., Selle, P., & Lorentzen, H. (1998). Undersokelse om frivillig innsats. Dokumentasjonsrapport. Bergen, LOS-senteret. 9834.
38.
Wollebaek, D.
, Selle, P., & Lorentzen, H. (2000a). Frivillig innsats. Oslo: Fagbokforlaget.
39.
Wollebaek, D.
, Selle, P., & Lorentzen, H. (2000b). Giving and volunteering in Norway. Abrief summary of results from a national survey. Bergen, Norway: LOS-Centre/Institute for Social Research.
40.
Woolcock, M.
(1998). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 22, 151-208.
