Nonprofits reflect and shape community conditions. Understanding the nature of this relationship is important if we are to fully comprehend the role nonprofits play in contemporary society and if policy makers are to make effective use of the sector to implement local responses to community needs. Using data on Internal Revenue Service–registered nonprofits for Indian acounties, the authors examine how theories of demand, supply, and social structure predict the overall density of nonprofits in local communities. The authors find substantial county-level variations in the densities of nonprofits overall and of charitable, advocacy, and mutual-benefit nonprofits. Using multiple regression techniques, they are able to explain 20% to 46% of overall variation (depending on legal category involved) in nonprofit densities. Their findings support the supply and social structure, but not demand, explanations and reveal somewhat divergent patterns for the various types of nonprofits.The authors note several important caveats to the findings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Angell, R.
(1974). The moral integration of American cities: II. American Journal of Sociology, 80, 607-629.
2.
Ben-Ner, A.
, & Van Hoomissen, T. (1992). An empirical investigation of the joint determination of the size of the for-profit, non-profit and voluntary sectors. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 63, 391-415.
3.
Bielefeld, W.
(2000). Metropolitan nonprofit sectors: Findings from the NCCS data. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29, 298-314.
4.
Bielefeld, W.
, & Corbin, J. J. (1996). The institutionalization of nonprofit human service delivery: The role of political culture. Administration and Society, 28, 362-389.
5.
Booth, A.
, Higgins, D., & Cornelius, R. (1989). Community influences on funds raised by human service volunteers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 18, 81-82.
6.
Boris, E. T.
(1998). Introduction—Nonprofit organizations in a democracy: Varied roles and responsibilities. In E. T. Boris & C. E. Steuerle (Eds.), Nonprofits and government: Collaboration and conflict (pp. 99-117). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
7.
Bradley, M. B.
, Green, N. M., Jr., Jones, D. E., Lynn, M., & McNeil, L. (1992). Churches and church membership in the United States, 1990: An enumeration by region, state, and county, based on data reported for 133 church groupings. Atlanta, GA: Glenmary Research Center.
8.
Chaves, M.
(1998). The religious ethic and the spirit of nonprofit entrepreneurship. In W. Powell & E. S. Clemens (Eds.), Private action and the public good (pp. 47-68). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
Corbin, J. J.
(1999). Astudy of factors influencingthe growth of nonprofits in social services. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28, 296-314.
10.
Curtis, J. E.
, Grabb, E. G., & Baer, D. E. (1992). Voluntary association membership in 15 countries—A comparative analysis. American Sociological Review, 57, 139-152.
11.
Douglas, J.
(1987). Political theories of nonprofit organizations. In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 43-54). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
12.
Elazar, D. J.
(1972). American federalism: A view from the states (2nd ed.). New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
13.
Esping-Anderson, G.
(1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
Galper, J. (1999). An exploration of social capital, giving and volunteering at the United States county level [Online]. A workingpaper of the Urban Institute available from: http://www.urban.org/cnp/galper/galper.htm
15.
Gamm, G.
, & Putnam, R. (1999). The growth of voluntary associations in America, 1840-1940. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 29, 511-557.
16.
Grønbjerg, K.
(1990). Poverty and nonprofit organizational behavior, contingencies, and linkages. Social Service Review, 64, 208-243.
17.
Grønbjerg, K.
(1994). The NTEE: Human service and regional applications. Voluntas, 5, 301-328.
18.
Guterbock, T. M.
, & Fries, J. C. (1997). Maintaining America’s social fabric: The AARP Survey of Civic Involvement. Washington, DC: American Association of Retired Persons.
19.
Hansmann, H.
(1987a). Economic theories of nonprofit organizations. In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 27-42). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20.
Hansmann, H.
(1987b). The effect of tax exemption and other factors on the market share of nonprofits versus for-profit firms. National Tax Journal, 40, 71-82.
21.
Hansmann, H.
(1996). The ownership of enterprise. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
Hunter, F.
(1953). Community power structure: A study of decision makers. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.
23.
Indiana Business Research Center
. (2000). Indiana factbook, 1998/99. Bloomington: Indiana University, Indiana Business Research Center.
24.
James, E.
(1987). The nonprofit sector in comparative perspective. In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 397-415). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25.
James, E.
(1989). Preface. In E. James (Ed.), The nonprofit sector in international perspective: Studies in comparative culture and policy (pp. ix-xii). New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
Jencks, C.
(1987). Who gives to what? In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: Aresearch handbook (pp. 321-339). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27.
Lincoln, J. R.
(1977). The urban distribution of voluntary organizations. Social Science Quarterly, 58, 472-480.
28.
Lynd, R. S.
, & Lynd, H. M. (1929). Middletown: A study in American culture. New York: Harcourt Brace.
29.
Lynd, R. S.
, & Lynd, H. M. (1937). Middletown in transition: A study in cultural conflicts. New York: Harcourt Brace.
30.
Marsh, F. K.
(1995). The state of nonprofit Detroit: Facts, figures, and agendas. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University.
31.
Putnam, R. D.
(1993). Making democracy work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
Salamon, L.
, & Anheier, H. (1998). Social origins of civil society: Explaining the nonprofit sector cross-nationally. Voluntas, 9, 213-248.
33.
Salamon, L. M.
(1987). Partners in public service: The scope and theory of government-nonprofit relations. In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 99-117). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
34.
Salamon, L. M.
(1997). Private action/public good: Maryland’s nonprofit sector in a time of change. Baltimore: Maryland Association of Nonprofits.
35.
Scherr, S.
(1999, November). A study of America’s nonprofit sector in metropolitan communities: Putting theory to the test. Paper presented at the annual meetings of ARNOVA, Washington, DC.
36.
Skocpol, T.
, Ganz, M., & Munson, Z. (2000). A nation of organizers: The institutional origins of civic voluntarism in the United States. American Political Science Review, 94, 527-546.
37.
Smith, D. H.
(1997a). Grassroots associations are important: Some theory and a review of the impact literature. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 26, 269-306.
38.
Smith, D. H.
(1997b). The rest of the nonprofit sector: Grassroots associations as the dark matter ignored in prevailing ‘flat earth’ maps of the sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 26, 114-131.
39.
Smith, D. H.
, & Shen, C. (2000, November). Atheory of voluntary association prevalence: Application to data on larger contemporary nations. Paper presented at the annual ARNOVA Conference, New Orleans, LA.
40.
Stevenson, D. R.
, Pollak, T. H., & Lampkin, L. M. (1997). State nonprofit almanac: Profiles of charitable organizations. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
41.
Tocqueville, A. de
(1961). Democracy in America. New York: Schoeken Books. (Original work published 1835)
42.
U.S. Bureau of the Census
. (1999). Consolidated federal funds report, FY 1998: State and county areas. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
43.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2001, September 17). Small area income and poverty estimates: 1989 census state and county FTP files and description [Online]. Available: http://www.census.gov/housing/saipe/estcen89/estCN_IN.dat
44.
Warren, D. I.
(1975). Black neighborhoods: An assessment of community power. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
45.
Weisbrod, B. A.
(1988). The nonprofit economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46.
Wiewel, W.
, & Hunter, A. (1985). The interorganizational network as a resource. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 482-496.
47.
Wilensky, H. L.
, & Lebeaux, C. N. (1965). Industrial society and social welfare: The impact of industrialism on the supply and organization of social welfare services in the United States. New York: Free Press.
48.
Wolch, J. R.
, & Geiger, R. K. (1983). The distribution of urban voluntary resources: An exploratory analysis. Environment and Planning, 15, 1067-1082.
49.
Wolpert, J.
(1989). Key indicators of generosity in communities. In V. A. Hodgkinson & R. W. Lyman (Eds.), The future of the nonprofit sector (pp. 377-402). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
50.
Zakour, M. J.
, & Gillespie, D. F. (1998). Effects of organizational type and localism on volunteerism and resource sharing during disasters. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27, 49-65.
