Much of what is known about volunteering to public agencies emanates from surveys of city and county governments. Little research has addressed the magnitude and other characteristics of volunteering to state government organizations. This study presents and analyzes the results of the first systematic national survey of volunteering to state government agencies. The study investigates two models, the first to explain volunteer use by state agencies, and the second to explain the realization of benefits from volunteer involvement. Empirical analysis shows that the rate of volunteer involvement in state government is substantial, reaching 36% of the agencies sampled. However, according to the personnel managers surveyed, simply having volunteers is not sufficient. The authors demonstrate that to achieve the full benefits of the approach as perceived by personnel managers, agencies must engage in effective management of their volunteer programs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allen, J. W.
, Chi, K. S., Devlin, K. A., Fall, M., Hatry, H. P., & Masterman, W. (Eds.). (1989). The private sector in state service delivery: Examples of innovative practices. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
2.
Brudney, J. L.
(1990). Fostering volunteer programs in the public sector: Planning, initiating, and managing voluntary activities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3.
Brudney, J. L.
(1992). Administrators of volunteer services: Their needs for training and research. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 2, 271-282.
4.
Brudney, J. L.
(1993). Volunteer involvement in the delivery of public services: Advantages and disadvantages. Public Productivity and Management Review, 16, 283-297.
5.
Cnaan, R. A.
, & Amrofell, L. (1996). Mapping volunteer activity. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 23, 335-351.
6.
Cnaan, R. A.
, & Goldberg-Glen, R. S. (1990). Comparison of volunteers in public and nonprofit human service agencies. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 19, 345-358.
7.
Cnaan, R. A.
, Handy, F., & Wadsworth, M. (1996). Defining who is a volunteer: Conceptual and empirical considerations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25, 364-383.
8.
Dillman, D. A.
(1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: John Wiley.
9.
Duncombe, S.
(1985). Volunteers in city government: Advantages, disadvantages and uses. National Civic Review, 74(9), 356-364.
10.
Duncombe, S.
(1986). Volunteers in city government: Getting more than your money’s worth. National Civic Review, 75(5), 291-301.
11.
Ellis, S. J.
(1996). From the top down: The executive role in volunteer program success (Rev. ed.). Philadelphia: Energize.
12.
Fisher, J. C.
, & Cole, K. M. (1993). Leadership and management of volunteer programs: Aguide for volunteer administrators. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13.
Herman, R., & Associates
. (1994). The Jossey-Bass handbook of nonprofit leadership and management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
Hodgkinson, V. A.
, Weitzman, M. S., Abrahams, J. A., Crutchfield, E. A., & Stevenson, D. R. (1996). Nonprofit almanac, 1996-1997: Dimensions of the independent sector. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15.
Kearney, R. C.
(1992). Labor relations in the public sector (2nd ed.). New York: Marcel Dekker.
16.
Lane, P.
, & Shultz, C. (1996). Volunteerism in County Government Survey Results. Washington, DC: National Association of Counties.
17.
Levine, C. H.
(1984). Citizenship and service delivery: The promise of coproduction. Public Administration Review, 44, 178-189.
18.
Lyons, M.
, Wijkstrom, P., & Clary, G. (1998). Comparative studies of volunteering: What is being studied?Voluntary Action, 1(1), 45-54.
19.
Macduff, N.
(1997). Solving the hazards of unions and volunteer relations in government organizations. Journal of Volunteer Administration, 16(1), 34-40.
20.
Macduff, N.
, & Brudney, J. L. (1997, December). Acynical public loves its government? An overview of volunteering in the public sector. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, Indianapolis, IN.
21.
McCurley, S.
, & Lynch, R. (1996). Volunteer management: Mobilizing all the resources in the community. Downers Grove, IL: Heritage Arts.
22.
Miranda, R.
, & Andersen, K. (1994). Alternative service delivery in local government. In Municipal year book, 1994. Washington, DC: International City Management Association.
23.
Morley, E.
(1989). Patterns in the use of alternative service delivery approaches. In Municipal year book, 1994. Washington, DC: International City Management Association.
24.
Perkins, K. B.
(1990). Volunteer fire and rescue corporations: Structure, process, and survival. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 19, 359-370.
25.
Putnam, R. D.
(1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 65-78.
26.
Putnam, R. D.
, Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
Pynes, J. E.
(1997). The anticipated growth of nonprofit unionism. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 7(4), 355-371.
28.
Reeves, T. Z.
(1988). The politics of the Peace Corps and VISTA. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama.
29.
Smith, D. H.
(1994). Determinants of voluntary association participation and volunteering: A literature review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 23, 243-263.
30.
Smith, D. H.
, & Schen, C. (1996). Factors characterizing the most effective nonprofits managed by volunteers. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 6(3), 271-289.
31.
Sundeen, R. A.
(1990). Citizens serving government: The extent and distinctiveness of volunteer participation in local public agencies. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 19, 329-344.
