Transparent research is a strategy in which the subjects of ethnographic research are fully involved in designing the research project, collecting the data, and analyzing results. Transparent research is a variety of action research in that inquiry is designed to serve the needs of the people studied. However, it is also scholarly research intended to serve disciplinary goals. An advantage of this approach is that theoretical and practical knowledge gained by practitioners that would not otherwise be known by academic scholars is incorporated into research results. This article develops the idea of transparent research by presenting two case studies. One concerns the emergency medicine department of a medium-sized community hospital. The other concerns a congregational development project, developed in partnership with an Episcopal diocese, and focused on a single congregation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allen, C.
(1997). Spies like us. Lingua Franca, 7(9), 30-40.
2.
Ammerman, N. T.
(1997). Congregation and community. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
3.
Bosk, C.
(1979). Forgive and remember: Managing medical failure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Cassell, E. J.
(1997). Doctoring: The nature of primary care medicine. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
Coleman, J. S.
(1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
6.
Demerath, N. J.
, Hall, P. D., Schmitt, N. J., & Williams, R. (1998). Sacred companies: Organizational aspects of religion and religious aspects of organizations. New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
Erickson, K. T.
(1967). A comment on disguised observation in sociology. Social Problems, 14(4), 366-373.
8.
Fox, R.
(1989). The sociology of medicine: A participant observer’s view. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9.
Freidson, E.
(1970). Profession of medicine. A study of the sociology of applied knowledge. New York: Harper & Row.
10.
Freidson, E.
(1975). Doctoring together: A study of professional social control. New York: Elsevier.
11.
Geertz, C.
(1973). Thick description: Towards an interpretive theory of culture. In The interpretation of cultures (pp. 3-30). New York: Basic Books.
12.
Greenwood, D. J.
(1998). Introduction to action research: Social research for social change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Greenwood, D. J.
(Ed.). (1999). Action research: From practice to writing in an international action research development program. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
14.
Hall, P. D.
(1992). Cultures of trusteeship in the United States. In Inventing the nonprofit sector and other essays on philanthropy, voluntarism, and nonprofit organizations (pp. 135-206). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
15.
Heimer, C. A.
, & Staffan, L. R. (1998). For the sake of the children: The social organization of responsibility in the hospital and the home. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Holland, T. P.
, & Sachs, W. L. (1999). The Zacchaeus Project: Discerning Episcopal identity at the dawn of the new millennium. New York: The Episcopal Church Foundation.
17.
Homans, C. G.
(1950). The human group. New York: Harcourt Brace.
18.
Hopewell, J. F.
(1987). Congregation: Stories and structure. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.
19.
Hughes, E. C.
(1960). The professions in society. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 26, 54-61.
20.
Lipsky, M.
(1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
21.
Mann, A.
(1998). The in-between church: Navigating size transitions in congregations. Bethesda, MD: Alban Institute.
22.
Meehan, E.
(1968). Explanation in social science: A system paradigm. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
23.
Millman, M.
(1976). The unkindest cut: Life in the backrooms of medicine. New York: William Morrow.
24.
Milofsky, C.
(1987). Neighborhood-based organizations: Amarket analogy. In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector. A research handbook (pp. 277-295). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25.
Milofsky, C.
(Ed.). (1988). Structure and process in community self-help organizations. In Community organizations: Studies in resources mobilization and exchange (pp. 183-216). New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
Milofsky, C.
(1999, November). The Episcopal diocese as a mediating structure. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, Washington, DC.
27.
Milofsky, C.
, & Elworth, J. T. (1985). Charitable associations. In N. Hobbs & J. M. Perrin (Eds.), Issues in the care of children with chronic illness (pp. 790-810). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28.
Milofsky, C.
, & Messer, J. G. (1998, April). Building social capital in the community: A case study of a virtual organization. Paper presented at meetings of the Southern Sociological Society, Atlanta, GA.
29.
Murphy, R. F.
(1990). Body silent. New York: Norton.
30.
O’Connor, G. T.
, Quinton, H. B., Traven, N. D., Ramunno, L. D., Dodds, T. A., Marciniak, T. A., & Wennberg, J. E. (1999). Geographic variation in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Journal of the American Medical Association, 281(7), 627-627.
31.
Parsons, T.
(1951). The social system. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
32.
Petersdorf, R. G.
, & Feinstein, A. R. (1981). An informal appraisal of the current status of “medical sociology”. Journal of the American Medical Association, 245, 943-950.
33.
Roethlisberger, F. J.
, & Dickson, W. J. (1939). Management and the worker: An account of a research program conducted by the Western Electric Company, Hawthorne Works, Chicago. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
Roof, W. C.
, & McKinney, W. (1987). American mainline religion: Its changing shape and future. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
35.
Rothschild, J.
, & Whitt, J. A. (1986). The cooperative workplace: Potentials and dilemmas of organizational democracy and participation (ASA-Rose Monograph Series). New York: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Ruderman, F. A.
(1981). What is medical sociology?Journal of the American Medical Association, 245, 927-929.
37.
Stinchcombe, A. L.
(1983). Economic sociology. New York: Academic Press.
38.
Vosk, A.
, & Milofsky, C. (1999). The sociology of emergency medicine (PONPO Working Paper No. 257). New Haven, CT: Program on Nonprofit Organizations, Yale University.
39.
Warner, R. S.
(1993). Work in progress toward a new paradigm for the sociological study of religion in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1044-1093.
40.
Warner, R. S.
(1994). The place of the congregation in the contemporary American religious configuration. In J. P. Wind & J. W. Lewis (Eds.), American congregations (Vol. 2, pp. 54-99). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41.
Warren, R. L.
(1957). Research for undergraduates in sociology. Sociology and Social Research, 41(3), 209-213.
42.
Wennberg, J. E.
(1999). Understanding geographic variations in health care delivery. The New England Journal of Medicine, 340(1), 52-52.
43.
Whyte, W. F.
(1948). Human relations in the restaurant industry. New York: McGraw-Hill.
44.
Whyte, W. F.
(Ed.). (1991). Participatory action research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
45.
Wood, M. M.
(1992). Is governing board behavior cyclical?Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 3(2), 139-162.
