Periodontal disease is the most prevalent oral condition in companion animals, affecting over 80% of dogs and cats by three years of age. Despite its high incidence and systemic health implications, it is frequently underdiagnosed and undertreated in veterinary practice. This review addresses the pathophysiology, diagnostic tools, and provides evidence-based strategies for prevention and management of periodontal disease in dogs and cats. The review explores the anatomy and physiology of the periodontium and details the mechanisms of disease progression, particularly the role of bacterial biofilm and host immune response. A focus is placed on the RANK/RANKL/OPG signaling pathway, which governs osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, a hallmark of advanced periodontitis. Risk factors such as age, diet consistency, and breed size are examined in relation to disease susceptibility. Current best practices in prevention, including daily tooth brushing, dental chews, antiseptic rinses, barrier sealants, and mechanical debridement, are reviewed alongside emerging therapies such as ozone treatment and regenerative procedures using platelet-rich fibrin, synthetic bone grafts and hyaluronic acid.
FernandesNABorgesAPBReisECC, et al.Prevalence of periodontal disease in dogs and owners’ level of awareness: a prospective clinical trial. Rev Ceres. 2012;59(4):446–451. doi:10.1590/S0034-737X2012000400003
2.
ElseddawyFDBeheryAEHendyEA, et al.Dental disorders in dogs and cats: a retrospective study. J Vet Dent. 2023;37(4):247–253.
3.
BrookI. Microbiology and management of periodontal infections. Gen Dent. 2003;51(5):424–428.
4.
OmiMMishinaY. Roles of osteoclasts in alveolar bone remodeling. Genesis. 2022;60(11-12):e23490. doi:10.1002/dvg.23490
5.
Varela-LópezAGiampieriFBullónP, et al.A systematic review on the implication of minerals in the onset, severity and treatment of periodontal disease. Molecules. 2016;21(9):1183. doi:10.3390/molecules21091183
6.
ReiterAMGracisM. BSAVA Manual of Canine and Feline Dentistry and Oral Surgery. British Small Animal Veterinary Association; 2018.
7.
WatanabeKKikuchiMBarrogaEF, et al.The formation of apical delta of the permanent teeth in dogs. J Vet Med Sci. 1997;59(5):375–378.
OmiMKaartinenVMishinaY. Activin A receptor type 1–mediated BMP signaling regulates RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis via canonical SMAD-signaling pathway. J Biol Chem. 2019;294(45):17818–17836. doi:10.1074/jbc.RA119.009521
14.
SchroederHE. The Periodontium. Springer; 2012.
15.
ManolagasSC. Birth and death of bone cells: basic regulatory mechanisms and implications for the pathogenesis and treatment of osteoporosis. Endocr Rev. 2000;21(2):115–137.
16.
MartinTJSimsNA. Osteoclast-derived activity in the coupling of bone formation to resorption. Trends Mol Med. 2005;11(2):76–81. doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2004.12.004
17.
ChaichanasakulTKangBBezouglaiaO, et al.Diverse osteoclastogenesis of bone marrow from mandible versus long bone. J Periodontol. 2014;85(6):829–836. doi:10.1902/jop.2013.130376
18.
AzariASchoenmakerTde Souza FaloniAP, et al.Jaw and long bone marrow-derived osteoclasts differ in shape and their response to bone and dentin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;437(2):249–255.
19.
JensenEDPhamLBillingtonCJ, et al.Bone morphogenic protein 2 directly enhances differentiation of murine osteoclast precursors. J Cell Biochem. 2010;109(4):672–682. doi:10.1002/jcb.22462
20.
FrostHM. Bone “mass” and the “mechanostat”: a proposal. Anat Rec. 1987;219(1):1–9. doi:10.1002/ar.1092190104
21.
MavropoulosAKiliaridisSBresinA, et al.Effect of different masticatory functional and mechanical demands on the structural adaptation of the mandibular alveolar bone in young growing rats. Bone. 2004;35(1):191–197. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2004.03.020
22.
LiuDYaoSWiseGE. Effect of interleukin-10 on gene expression of osteoclastogenic regulatory molecules in the rat dental follicle. Eur J Oral Sci. 2006;114(1):42–49. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00283.x
23.
ReichartPDürrUMTriadanH, et al.Periodontal disease in the domestic cat: a histopathologic study. J Periodontal Res. 1984;19(1):67–75. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0765.1984.tb01197.x
24.
HaleFA. Periodontal disease in dogs and cats.
25.
KleinT. Predisposing factors and gross examination findings in periodontal disease. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract. 2000;15(4):189–196. doi:10.1053/svms.2000.22244
26.
YasudaJYasudaHNomuraR, et al.Investigation of periodontal disease development and Porphyromonas gulae FimA genotype distribution in small dogs. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):5360. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-55842-8
27.
MarshPD. Microbiology of dental plaque biofilms and their role in oral health and caries. Dent Clin North Am. 2010;54(3):441–454. doi:10.1016/j.cden.2010.03.002
28.
AlbuquerqueCMorinhaFRequichaJ, et al.Canine periodontitis: the dog as an important model for periodontal studies. Vet J. 2012;191(3):299–305. doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.08.017
29.
KhudaFBaharinBAnuarNNM, et al.Effective modalities of periodontitis induction in rat model. J Vet Dent. 2024;41(1):49–57. doi:10.1177/08987564231178459
30.
PercivalSLKnottenbeltDCCochraneCA. Biofilms and Veterinary Medicine. Springer; 2011.
31.
KolenbranderPEAndersenRNKazmerzakKM, et al.Coaggregation and coadhesion in oral biofilms. Symp Soc Gen Microbiol. 2000;59(65):65–86.
32.
ZhangWJuJRigneyT, et al.Porphyromonas gingivalis infection increases osteoclastic bone resorption and osteoblastic bone formation in a periodontitis mouse model. BMC Oral Health. 2014;14(1):1–9. doi:10.1186/1472-6831-14-89
33.
DwarakanathCD. Carranza's Clinical Periodontology. 2nd South Asia ed. Elsevier; 2016.
34.
ClarkeDE. The crystalline components of dental calculus in the domestic cat. J Vet Dent. 1999;16(4):165–168. doi:10.1177/089875649901600402
35.
IkebuchiYAokiSHonmaM, et al.Coupling of bone resorption and formation by RANKL reverse signalling. Nature. 2018;561(7723):195–200. doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0482-7
36.
LynchCCHikosakaAAcuffHB, et al.MMP-7 promotes prostate cancer-induced osteolysis via the solubilization of RANKL. Cancer Cell. 2005;7(5):485–496. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2005.04.013
37.
HikitaAYanaIWakeyamaH, et al.Negative regulation of osteoclastogenesis by ectodomain shedding of receptor activator of NF-κB ligand. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(48):36846–36855. doi:10.1074/jbc.M606656200
38.
OnoTHayashiMSasakiF, et al.RANKL Biology: bone metabolism, the immune system, and beyond. Inflamm Regen. 2020;40(1):2. doi:10.1186/s41232-019-0111-3
39.
TobeihaMMoghadasianMHAminN, et al.RANKL/RANK/OPG pathway: a mechanism involved in exercise-induced bone remodeling. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020(1):6910312. doi:10.1155/2020/6910312
40.
CarreiraLMDiasDAzevedoP. Relationship between gender, age, and weight and the serum ionized calcium variations in dog periodontal disease evolution. Top Companion Anim Med. 2015;30(2):51–56. doi:10.1053/j.tcam.2015.07.001
41.
HarveyCEShoferFSLasterL. Association of age and body weight with periodontal disease in north American dogs. J Vet Dent. 1994;11(3):94–105. doi:10.1177/089875649401100301
42.
EmilyPSan RománFTroboJ, et al.Atlas de Odontología en Pequeños Animales, 1998.
43.
LobpriseHB. Periodontal disease: periodontitis. In: Blackwell’s Five Minute Veterinary Consult Clinical Companion: Small Animal Dentistry. Iowa State University Press; 2007:172-180.
44.
KortegaardHEEriksenTBaelumV. Periodontal disease in research beagle dogs: an epidemiological study. J Small Anim Pract. 2008;49(12):610–616. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5827.2008.00609.x
45.
StellaJLBauerAECroneyCC. A cross-sectional study to estimate prevalence of periodontal disease in a population of dogs (Canis familiaris) in commercial breeding facilities in Indiana and Illinois. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0191395. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0191395
46.
WatsonADJ. Diet and periodontal disease in dogs and cats. Aust Vet J. 1994;71(10):313–318. doi:10.1111/j.1751-0813.1994.tb00905.x
47.
LoganEI. Dietary influences on periodontal health in dogs and cats. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2006;36(6):1385–1401. doi:10.1016/j.cvsm.2006.09.002
48.
SvanbergGLindheJHugosonA, et al.Effect of nutritional hyperparathyroidism on experimental periodontitis in the dog. Odontol Revy. 1973;81(2):155–162.
49.
WallisCSaitoEKSaltC, et al.Association of periodontal disease with breed size, breed, weight, and age in pure-bred client-owned dogs in the United States. Vet J. 2021;275(105717). doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2021.105717
50.
TurnerAS. Animal models of osteoporosis: necessity and limitations. Eur Cell Mater. 2001;1(13):66–81.
51.
GrazianiFKarapetsaDAlonsoB, et al.Nonsurgical and surgical treatment of periodontitis: how many options for one disease?Periodontol 2000. 2017;75(1):152–188. doi:10.1111/prd.12201
52.
HennetPRHarveyCE. Spirochetes in periodontal disease in the dog: a review. J Vet Dent. 1991;8(1):16–17. doi:10.1177/089875649100800301
53.
MankodiSBerkowitzHDurbinK, et al.Evaluation of the effects of brushing on the removal of dental plaque. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1998;9(3):57–60.
54.
GorrelCRawlingsJM. The role of tooth-brushing and diet in the maintenance of periodontal health in dogs. J Vet Dent. 1996;13(4):139–143. doi:10.1177/089875649601300405
55.
WatanabeKHayashiKKijimaS, et al.Tooth brushing inhibits oral bacteria in dogs. J Vet Med Sci. 2015;77(10):1323–1325. doi:10.1292/jvms.14-0193
56.
ZdravkovićNStanisavljevićNMaleševićM, et al.The effects of electrolytic technology toothbrush application on the clinical parameters and bacteria associated with periodontal disease in dogs. Vet Sci. 2024;14(12):3067.
57.
QuestBW. Oral health benefits of a daily dental chew in dogs. J Vet Dent. 2013;30(2):84–87. doi:10.1177/089875641303000203
58.
MateoATorreCCrusafontJ, et al.Evaluation of efficacy of a dental chew to reduce gingivitis, dental plaque, calculus, and halitosis in toy breed dogs. J Vet Dent. 2020;37(1):22–28. doi:10.1177/0898756420926766
59.
NiemiecBAGaworJNemecA, et al.World small animal veterinary association global dental guidelines. J Small Anim Pract. 2020;61(Suppl 1):E36–E161. doi:10.1111/jsap.13132
60.
CousidoMCTomás CarmonaIGarcía-CaballeroL, et al.In vivo substantivity of 0.12% and 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthrinses on salivary bacteria. Clin Oral Investig. 2010;14(4):397–402. doi:10.1007/s00784-009-0320-2
61.
HarrapGJSaxtonCABestJS. Inhibition of plaque growth by zinc salts. J Periodontal Res. 1983;18(6):634–642. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0765.1983.tb00400.x
62.
GenglerWRKunkleBNRomanoD, et al.Evaluation of a barrier dental sealant in dogs. J Vet Dent. 2005;22(3):157–159. doi:10.1177/089875640502200302
63.
PalmaPVCunhaROLeiteICG. Effectiveness of ozone therapy in the treatment of periodontal diseases: a systematic review. Rev Gaucha Odontol. 2023;71(e20230004). doi:10.1590/1981-86372023000420210085
64.
AzarpazhoohALimebackH. The application of ozone in dentistry: a systematic review of literature. J Dent. 2008;36(2):104–116. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2007.11.008
65.
Abreu-VillelaPFerraroMRodriguesRR, et al.Ozone therapy in the prevention of dental plaque formation in dogs. J Vet Dent. 2021;38(1):18–23. doi:10.1177/08987564211013920
66.
GaworJJankMHarveyCE, et al.Effectiveness of dental homecare protocols in unscaled dogs. J Vet Dent. 2024;42(3):176–181. doi:10.1177/08987564241292769
67.
NiemiecBA. Periodontal therapy. Top Companion Anim Med. 2008;23(2):81–90. doi:10.1053/j.tcam.2008.02.004
68.
MartelDPFoxPRLambKE, et al.Comparison of closed root planing with versus without concurrent doxycycline hyclate or clindamycin hydrochloride gel application for the treatment of periodontal disease in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2019;254(3):373–379. doi:10.2460/javma.254.3.373
69.
CopulosTALowSBWalkerCB, et al.Comparative analysis between a modified ultrasonic tip and hand instruments on clinical parameters of periodontal disease. J Periodontol. 1993;64(8):694–700. doi:10.1902/jop.1993.64.8.694
70.
ObeidPRD'hooreWBercyP. Comparative clinical responses related to the use of various periodontal instrumentation. J Clin Periodontol. 2004;31(3):193–199. doi:10.1111/j.0303-6979.2004.00467.x
71.
BeuchatMBusslingerASchmidlinP, et al.Clinical comparison of the effectiveness of novel sonic instruments and curettes for periodontal debridement after 2 months. J Clin Periodontol. 2001;28(12):1145–1151. doi:10.1111/j.1600-051X.2001.281209.x
72.
LeonLEVogelRI. A comparison of the effectiveness of hand scaling and ultrasonic debridement in furcations as evaluated by differential dark-field microscopy. J Periodontol. 1987;58(2):86–92. doi:10.1902/jop.1987.58.2.86
73.
SculeanANikolidakisDSchwarzF. Regeneration of periodontal tissues: combinations of barrier membranes and grafting materials—biological foundation and preclinical evidence: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35(Suppl 8):106–116. doi:10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01263.x
74.
FeiginKShopeB. Use of platelet-rich plasma and platelet-rich fibrin in dentistry and oral surgery: introduction and review of the literature. J Vet Dent. 2019;36(2):109–123. doi:10.1177/0898756419876057
75.
PradeepARaoNSAgarwalE, et al.Comparative evaluation of autologous platelet-rich fibrin and platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of 3-wall intrabony defects in chronic periodontitis: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2012;83(12):1499–1507. doi:10.1902/jop.2012.110705
76.
IlgenliTDündarNIlhan KalB. Demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft and platelet-rich plasma vs platelet-rich plasma alone in infrabony defects: a clinical and radiographic evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;11(1):51–59.
77.
GiannoudisPArtsJCSchmidmaierG, et al.What should be the characteristics of the ideal bone graft substitute?Injury. 2011;42(Suppl 2):S1–S2.
78.
DelloyeCCornuODruezV, et al.Bone allografts: what they can offer and what they cannot. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(5):574–580. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.89B5.19039
79.
HanninkGArtsJJ. Bioresorbability, porosity and mechanical strength of bone substitutes: what is optimal for bone regeneration?Injury. 2011;42(Suppl 2):S22–S25. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.008
80.
WangWYeungKWK. Bone grafts and biomaterial substitutes for bone defect repair: a review. Bioact Mater. 2017;2(4):224–247.
81.
LeiWWuYYuanH, et al.Establishing rabbit critical-size bone defects to evaluate the bone-regeneration potential of porous calcium phosphate ceramics. Bioact Mater. 2025;12(1):1524133.
82.
FergusonELRobertsJLMoseleyR, et al.Evaluation of the physical and biological properties of hyaluronan and hyaluronan fragments. Int J Pharm. 2011;420(1):84–92. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.08.031
83.
LaurentTCFraserJRE. Hyaluronan. FASEB J. 1992;6(7):2397–2404. doi:10.1096/fasebj.6.7.1563592
84.
PirnazarPWolinskyLNachnaniS, et al.Bacteriostatic effects of hyaluronic acid. J Periodontol. 1999;70(4):370–374. doi:10.1902/jop.1999.70.4.370
ShirakataYImafujiTNakamuraT, et al.Cross-linked hyaluronic acid gel with or without a collagen matrix in the treatment of class III furcation defects: a histologic and histomorphometric study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 2020;47(1):94–102.
87.
ShirakataYNakamuraTSetoguchiF, et al.Histological evaluation of nonsurgical periodontal treatment with and without the use of sodium hypochlorite/amino acids and cross-linked hyaluronic acid gels in dogs. Clin Oral Investig. 2024;28(1):281–289. doi:10.1007/s00784-024-05674-7
