KnowlesKHammondNBiggsS, et al.Incidence of instrument separation using LightSpeed rotary instruments. J Endod. 2006;32(1):14-16. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.008
2.
BaumannM. Nickel-titanium: options and challenges. Dent Clin N Am. 2004;48(1):55-67. doi:10.1016/j.cden.2003.11.001
3.
HaapasalaMShenY. Evolution of nickel-titanium instruments: from past to future. Endod Topics. 2013;29(1):3-17. doi:10.1111/etp.12049
4.
OunsiHFNassifWGrandiniS, et al.Evolution of nickel-titanium alloys in endodontics. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017;18(11):1090-1096. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2181
5.
ThompsonSA. An overview of nickel-titanium alloys used in dentistry. Int Endod J. 2000;33(4):297-310. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00339.x
6.
HargreavesKMBermanLH. Cohen’s Pathways of the Pulp. 11th ed. Mosby Elsiever; 2016.
GalviniGSantosMDCaldeiraCL, et al.Nickel-titanium instruments in endodontics: a concise reivew of the state of the art. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32(suppl 1):44-64.
10.
RevathiMRaoCVNLakshminarayananL. Revolutions in endodontic instruments—a review. Endodontology. 2001;13(3):43-50.
11.
AnusaviceKShenCRawlsHR. Mechanical properties of dental materials. In: ShenCHRawlsREsquivel-UpshawJ, eds. Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials. Elsevier; 2013:48-67.
12.
WaliaHMBrantleyWAGersteinH. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properites of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod. 1988;18(11):346-351. doi:10.1016/S0099-2399(88)80196-1
13.
PeterOAPlaqueF. Current developments in rotary root canal instrument technology and clinical use: a review. Quintessence Int. 2010;41(6):479-488.
14.
ZhouHPengBZhengY. An overview of the mechanical properities of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. Endod Topics. 2013;29(1):42-54. doi:10.1111/etp.12045
15.
OtsukajKRenX. Physical metallurgy of Ni-Ti based shape memory alloys. Prog Mater Sci. 2005;50(5):511-678. doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2004.10.001
16.
KuhnGTavernierBJordanL. Influence of structure on nickel-titanium endodontic instrument failure. J Endod. 2001;27(8):516-520. doi:10.1097/00004770-200108000-00005
17.
HaJHKimSKCohencaN, et al.Effect of R-phase heat treatment on torsional resistance and cyclic fatigue fracture. J Endod. 2013;39(3):389-393. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.028
18.
ShenYZhouHCoilJM, et al.Profile vortex and vortex blue nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use. J Endod. 2015;41(6):937-942. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2015.02.003
19.
KuzekananiM. Nickel-titanium rotary instruments: development of the single-file systems. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2018;8(5):386-390. doi:10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_225_18
20.
ShenYZhouHMZhengYF, et al.Metallurgical characterization of controlled memory wire nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod. 2011;40(9):1566-1571. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2011.08.005
21.
HouXYahataYHayashiY, et al.Phase transformation behaviour and bending property of twisted nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. Int Endod J. 2011;44(3):253-258. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01818.x
22.
InanUGurelM. Evaluation of surface characteristics of rotary nickel-titanium instruments produced by different manufacturing methods. Nigerian J of Clin Pract. 2017;20(2):143-146. doi:10.4103/1119-3077.164342
23.
SattapanBNervoGJPalamaraJE, et al.Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J Endod. 2000;26(3):161-165. doi:10.1097/00004770-200003000-00008
24.
OhSHHaJHKwakSW, et al.The effects of torsional preloading on the torsional resistance of nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod. 2017;43(1):157-162. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2016.10.005
25.
Liu CSGSC. A retrospective study of endodontic treatment outcome between nickel-titanium rotary and stainless steel hand filing techniques. J Endod. 2009;35(7):938-942. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.016
26.
PohlMHeBingCFrenzelJ. Electrolytic processing of NiTi shape memory alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 2004;378(1-2):191-199. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2003.11.080
27.
PraisarntiCChangJWWCheungGSP. Electropolishing enhances the resistance of nickel-titanium rotary files to corrosion–fatigue failure in hypochlorite. J Endod. 2010;36(8):1354-1357. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2010.02.025
28.
BoesslerCPaqueFPetersOA. The effect of electropolishing on torque and force during simulated root canal preparation with ProTaper shaping files. J Endod. 2009;39(3):102-106. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2008.09.008
29.
BragaLCFariaSBuonoVT, et al.Impact of heat treatments on the fatigue resistance of different rotary nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod. 2014;37(11):1494-1497. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2014.03.007
30.
RuddleCJMachouPWestJD. The shaping movement: fifth-generation technology. Dent Today. 2013;32(4):94-99.
31.
MetzerZTeperovichEZaryR, et al.The Self-Adjusting File (SAF) part 1: respecting the root canal anatomy—a new concept of endodontic files and its implementation. J Endod. 2010;36(4):679-690. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.036
32.
PlotinoGGiansiracusaRAGrandeNM, et al.Cutting efficiency of Reciproc and WaveOne reciprocating instruments. J Endod. 2014;40(8):1228-1230. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2014.01.041
33.
OzyurekT. Cyclic fatigue resistance of Reciproc, WaveOne, and WaveOne gold nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod. 2016;42(10):1536-1539. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2016.06.019
IqbalMBanfieldBLavoriniA, et al.A comparsion of LightSpeed LS1 and LightSpeed LSX NiTi rotary instruments in apical transportation and length control in simulated root canals. J Endod. 2007;33(3):268-271. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2006.10.013
36.
LinsuwanontPParashosPMesserHH. Cleaning of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. Int Endod J. 2004;37(1):19-28. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00747.x
37.
Baugh DWJ. The role of apical instrumentation in root canal treatment: a review of the literature. J Endod. 2005;31(5):333-340. doi:10.1097/01.don.0000145422.94578.e6
38.
ArensFCHoenMMSteimanHR, et al.Evaluation of single-use rotary nickel titanium instruments. J Endod. 2003;29(10):664-666. doi:10.1097/00004770-200310000-00013
39.
TopcuogluHSTopcuogluG. Cyclic fatigue resistance of Reciproc blue and Reciproc files in an S-shaped canal. J Endod. 2017;43(10):1679-1682. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2017.04.009
40.
KimHCKwakSWCheungGS. Cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of two new nickel-titanium instruments usein reciprocation motion: Reciproc vs WaveOne. J Endod. 2012;38(4):541-544. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2011.11.014
41.
WebberJ. Shaping canals with confidence: WaveOne GOLD single-file reciprocating system. Int Dent J Afr. 2015;6(3):6-17.
42.
GarciaPRResendePDLopesNIA, et al.Structural characteristics and torsional resistance evaluation of WaveOne and WaveOne gold instruments after simulated clinical use. J Endod. 2019;45(8):1041-1046. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2019.04.009
43.
Al-ObaidaMIMerdadKAlanaziMS, et al.Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of 5 heat-treated nickel-titanium reciprocating systems in canals with single and double curvatures. J Endod. 2019;45(10):1237-1241. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2019.06.011
