Intentional or unintentional pulp exposure of cat canines can lead to periapical disease, osteomyelitis, and oral pain. Root canal therapy (RCT) allows the retention of cat canines with pulp exposure by removing the infected pulp and replacing it with an inert material. This study used MTA Fillapex™ as a root canal sealant with gutta percha single cone obturation in 37 cats (50 canine teeth). Roots were classified as “successful,” “no evidence of failure (NEF),” or “failed” at 6-month radiographic reviews. Therapy was considered “successful” if a preoperative periapical lucency had healed or not formed after treatment and any preoperative external inflammatory root resorption (EIRR) had stabilized without progression. Therapy was categorized as “NEF” if a periapical lucency had remained the same or decreased in size but not completely resolved and any preoperative EIRR had stabilized without progression. “Failed” if a periapical lucency had occurred or increased in size posttreatment or if EIRR had developed or progressed posttreatment. Thirty-two canine teeth (64%) were classified as “successful,” 14 canine teeth (28%) were classified as “NEF,” and 4 canine teeth (8%) were classified as “failed”. The study concluded that RCT using MTA Fillapex as a root canal sealant is a suitable endodontic treatment for fractured cat canines, especially those that are periodontally or endodontically challenged.
NiemiecBA. Fundamentals of endodontics. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2005;35(4):837–868.
2.
VerstraeteFJVan ArdeRJNieuwoudtBAMauerEKassPH. The dental pathology of feral cats on Marion Island, Part 1: congenital, developmental and traumatic abnormalities. J Comp Pathol. 1996;1115(3):265–282.
3.
BonnerSEReiterAMLewisJR. Orofacial manifestations of high-rise syndrome in cats: a retrospective study of 84 cases. J Vet Dent. 2011;29(1):10–18.
4.
HolmstromSE. Feline endodontics. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 1992;22(6):1433–1451.
5.
StromPCArziBLommerMJ, et al.Radiographic outcome of root canal treatment of canine teeth in cats: 32 cases (1998-2016). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2018;252(5):572–580.
6.
EisnerE. Malocclusions in cats and dogs: recognising dental alignments. Vet Med. 1998;83:1006–1032.
7.
ConstantarasMECharlierCJ. Maxillofacial injuries and diseases that cause an open mouth in cats. J Vet Dent. 2014;13(3):168–176.
8.
MilellaL. Occlusion and malocclusion in the cat: what’s normal, what’s not and when’s the best time to intervene?J Feline Med Surg. 2015;17(1):5–20.
9.
LothamerCWSoukupJW. Treatment of bignathic malocclusions with multistage active force orthodontic movements in a cat. J Vet Dent. 2016;33(1):7–17.
10.
Van de WeteringA. Orthodontic correction of a base narrow mandibular canine tooth in a cat. J Vet Dent. 2007;24(1):22–28.
11.
ClarkeDE. Endodontics of dogs and cats: an alternative to extraction. Aust Vet J. 1995;72(10):383–389.
12.
GirardNSoutherdenPHennetP. Root canal treatment in dogs and cats. J Vet Dent. 2008;23(3):148–160.
13.
Kuntsi-VaattovaaraHVerstraeteFJMKassPH. Results of root canal treatment in dogs: 127 cases (1995-2000). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2002;220(6):775–780.
14.
ThakurSEmilJPaulaianB. Evaluation of mineral trioxide aggregate as root canal sealer: a clinical study. J Conserv Dent. 2013;16(6):494–498.
15.
CzarneckaBColemanNShawHNicholsonJW. The use of mineral trioxide aggregate in endodontics—status report. Dent Med Probl. 2008;45(1):5–11.
16.
MohammadiZYazdizadelrMKhademiA. Sealing ability of MTA and a new root filling material. J Dent Clin Res. 2006;2(5):367–371.
17.
MarcianoMABramanteCMDuarteMAHDelgadoRJROrdinola-ZapataRGarciaRB. Evaluation of single root canals filled using the lateral compaction, tagger’s hybrid, microseal and guttaflow techniques. Braz Dent J. 2010;21(5):411–415.
18.
VidottoAPMCunhaRSZeferinoEGRochaDGPSigrist de MartinABuenoCES. Comparison of MTA Fillapex radiopacity with five root canal sealers. Revista Sul-Brasilieria de Odontologia. 2010;8(4):404–409.
19.
TorabinejadM. Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Properties and Clinical Applications. John Wiley & Sons; 2014.
20.
DemirizLKocakMMKocakSSaglamBCTurkerSA. Evaluation of the dentinal wall adaption ability of MTA Fillapex using stereo electron microscope. J Conserv Dent. 2016;19(3):220–224.
21.
JafariFAghazadehMJafariSKhakiFKabiriF. In vitro cytotoxicity comparison of MTA Fillapex, AH-26 and apatite root canal sealer at different setting times. Iran J Endod. 2017;12(2):162–167.
22.
TestarelliLNoccaGLupiA, et al.Biocompatibility of root canal filling materials: differences between vitality and functionality tests. Eur J Inflamm. 2012;10(1):105–110.
23.
SevimaySDalatD. Evaluation of penetration and adaptation of three different sealers: A SEM study. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30(9):951–955.
24.
IshleyDJElDeebME. An in vitro assessment of the quality of apical seal of thermomechanically obturated canals with and without sealer. J Endodontol. 1983;9(6):242–245.
25.
FouzanKAAwadhMBadweianM, et al.Marginal adaption of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) to root dentin surface with orthograde/retrograde application techniques: a microcomputed tomographic analysis. J Conserv Dent. 2015;18(2):109–113.
26.
JafariFSobhaniESamadi-KafilHPirzadehAJafariS. In vitro evaluation of the sealing ability of three newly developed root canal sealers: a bacterial microleakage study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2016;8(5):561–565.
27.
RobertsHWTothJMBerzinsDWCharltonDG. Mineral trioxide aggregate use in endodontic treatment: a review of the literature. Dent Mat. 2008;24(2):149–164.
28.
VasudevSKGoelBRTyagiS. Root end filling materials—a review. J Endodontol. 2003;15:12–18.
29.
YildirimTGencogluN. Use of mineral trioxide aggregate in the treatment of large periapical lesions: reports of three cases. Eur J Dent. 2010;4(4):468–474.
30.
MalhotraNAgarwalAMalaK. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a review of physical properties. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013;34(2):25–32.
31.
ShakyaVKGuptaPTikkuAP, et al.An in vitro evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy and flow characteristics for AH plus, MTA Fillapex, CRCS and Gutta flow 2 root canal sealer. J Clin Diagn Res.2016;10(8):104–108.
32.
NaikRMPudakalkattiPSHattarkiSA. Can MTA be: miracle trioxide aggregate?J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2014;18(1):5–8.
33.
GrossmanLI. An improved root canal cement. J Am Dent Assoc. 1958;56(3):381–385.
34.
TorabinejadMPitt FordTRAbediHRKariyawasamSPTangH. Tissue reaction to implanted root-end filling materials in the tibia and mandible of guinea pigs. J Endod. 1998;24(7):468–471.
35.
American Dental Association. Specification No. 57 for endodontic filling materials; 1983.
36.
Angelus. Scientific Profile: MTA Fillapex Endodontic Sealer. Centre for the Development and Control of Biomaterials (Brazil). Published 2011.
37.
TorabinejadMParirokhMDummerPMH. Mineral trioxide aggregate and other bioactive endodontic cements: an updated overview—part 1: Vital pulp therapy. Int Endod J. 2018;51(2):177–205.
38.
SinglaRPoonamB. Mineral Trioxide Aggregate. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing; 2013.
39.
TorabinejadMWhiteD. Tooth filling material and use. US Patent 1995, No. 5415547.
40.
BaekSPlenkHKimS. Periapical tissue responses and cementum regeneration with amalgam, SuperEBA, and MTA as root-end filling materials. J Endod. 2005;31(6):444–449.
41.
HaWNShakibaieFKahierBWalshLJ. Deconvolution of the particle size distribution of ProRoot MTA and MTA angelus. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2016;1(1):7–11.
42.
FeiginKShopeB. Regenerative endodontics. J Vet Dent. 2017;34(3):161–179.
43.
FroughreyhaniMMilaniASBarakateinBShiezadehV. Treatment of strip perforation using root MTA: a case report. Iran J Endodontol. 2013;8(2):80–83.
44.
JurigaSManfra MarrettaSNiederbergerV. Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) for apexification of non-vital immature permanent teeth. J Vet Dent. 2007;24(4):274–277.
45.
JurigaSManfra MarrettaSWeeksSM. Endodontic treatment of a non-vital permanent tooth with an open root apex using mineral trioxide aggregate. J Vet Dent. 2008;25(3):189–195.
46.
MilaniASShakouieSBomaZDeljavanASJafarabadiMAAzarFP. Evaluating the effect of resection on the sealing ability of MTA and CEM cement. Iran Endod J. 2012;7(3):134–138.
47.
TorabinejadMHongCULeeSJMonsefMPitt FordTR. Investigation of mineral trioxide aggregate for root end filling in dogs. J Endod. 1995;21(12):603–608.
48.
TorabinejadMParirokhMDummerPMH. Mineral trioxide aggregate and other bioactive endodontic cements: an updated overview—Part 2: other clinical applications and complications. Int Endod J. 2018;51(3):284–317.
49.
TorabinejadMPitt FordTRMc KendryJDAbediHRMillerDAKariyawasamSP. Histologic assessment of mineral trioxide aggregate as a root-end filling in monkeys. J Endod. 1997;23(4):225–228.
50.
DominguezMSWitherspoonDEGutmannJLOppermanLA. Histological scanning electron microscopy assessment of various vital pulp therapy materials. J Endod. 2003;29(5):324–333.
51.
RazmiHZarrabianMSharifianMRSharifiDSasaniFRamezankhaniN. A histologic evaluation on tissue reaction to three implanted materials (MTA, root MTA and portland cement type 1) in the mandible of cats. J Dent. 2004;1(3):62–69.
52.
ShinMChenJWTsaiCY, et al.Cytotoxicity and antimicrobial effects of a new fast-set MTA. Biomed Res Int. 2017;(2017):1–6.
53.
SchwartzRSMaugerMClementDJWalkerWAIII. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a new material for endodontics. J Am Dent Assoc. 1999;130(7):967–975.
54.
TorabinejadMCivianN. Clinical applications of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 1999;25(3):197–205.
55.
LeeSJMonsefMTorabenejadM. Sealing ability of a mineral trioxide for repair of lateral root perforations. J Endod. 1993;19(11):541–544.
56.
Da SilvaWSSouzaPHCRosaEARCuryAADBRachedRN. Mineral trioxide aggregate as a root canal filling material: comparative study of physical properties. Revista Odonto Ciencia. 2010;25(4):386–390.
57.
HennetPGirardN. Surgical endodontics in dogs: a review. J Vet Dent. 2005;22(3):148–156.
58.
TorabinejadMWatsonTPitt FordTR. Sealing ability of a mineral trioxide aggregate when used as a root end filling material. J Endod. 1993;19(12):591–595.
59.
BaklandLK. Management of traumatically injured pulps in immature teeth using MTA. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2000;28(11):855–859.
60.
LiuHZhouQQinM. Mineral trioxide aggregate versus calcium hydroxide for pulpotomy in primary molars. Chin J Dent Res. 2011;14(2):121–125.
61.
HollandRMazuqueliLSouzaVMurataSSDezan JuniorESuzukiP. Influence of the type of vehicle and limit of obturation on apical and periapical tissue response in dogs teeth after root canal filling with mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 2007;33(6):693–697.
62.
YeungP. A quantitative comparison of the fill density of MTA produced by two different placement techniques. J Endod. 2006;32(5):456–459.
63.
HollandRSouzaVNeryMJFilhoJAOBernabePFEDezanE. Reaction of dogs’ teeth to root canal filling with mineral trioxide aggregate or a glass ionomer sealer. J Endod. 1999;25(11):728–730.
64.
Gomes-FilhoJEWatanabeSBernabéPFde Moraes CostaMT. A mineral trioxide aggregate sealer stimulated mineralization. J Endod. 2009;35(2):256–260.
65.
ChangSWLeeSYKangSKKumKYKimED. In vitro biocompatibility, inflamatory response and osteogenic potential of 4 root canal sealers: sealapex, sankin apatite tooth sealer, MTA Fillapex and iRoot SP root canal sealer. J Endod. 2014;40(10):1642–1648.
66.
JafariFJafariSKafilHSMomeniTJamlooH. Antifungal acitivity of two root canal sealers against different strains of candidia. Iran J Endod. 2016;1(1):98–102.
67.
NikhilVBansalPSawaniS. Effect of technique of sealer agitation on percentage and depth of MTA Fillapex sealer penetration: a comparative in-vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2015;18(2):119–123.
68.
Consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology on Quality Guidelines for Endodontic Treatment. Int Endod J. 1994;27(3):115–124.
69.
European Society of Endodontology. Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. Int Endod J. 2006;39(12):921–930.
70.
GorrelCRobinsonJ. Endodontics in small carnivores. In: CrossleyDAPenmanS, eds. Manual of Small Animal Dentistry. 2nd ed. British Small Ani-mal Veterinary Association; 1995:168–181.
71.
NiemiecBA. Feline dental radiography and radiology: a primer. J Feline Med Surg. 2014;16(11):887–899.
72.
O’SullivanSHartwellGR. Obturation of a retained primary mandibular second molar using mineral trioxide aggregate: a case report. J Endod. 2001;27(11):703–705.
73.
SimonSRillardFBerdalAMachtouP. The use of mineral trioxide aggregate in one-visit apexification treatment: a prospective study. Int J Endod. 2007;40(3):186–197.
74.
ParirokhMTorabinejadM. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review—Part III: clinical applications, drawbacks, and mechanism of action. J Endod. 2010;36(3):400–413.
75.
Al-HezaimiKNaghshbandiJOglesbySSimonJHSRotsteinI. Human saliva penetration of root canals obturated with two types of mineral trioxide aggregate cements. J Endod. 2005;31(6):453–456.
76.
SönmezISObaAASonmezDAlmazME. In vitro evaluation of apical microleakage of a new MTA-based sealer. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2012;13(5):252–255.
77.
TorabinejadMHigaRKMcKendryDJPitt FordTR. Dye leakage of four root-end filling materials: effects of blood contamination. J Endodontol. 1994;20(4):159–163.
78.
PeakJD. The success of endodontic treatment in general practice: a retrospective clinical and radiographic study. Prim Dent Care. 1994;1(1):9–13.
79.
OrstavikD. Time course and risk analyses of the development and healing of chronic apical periodontitis in man. Int J Endodontol. 1996;29(3):150–155.
80.
AsgarySEhsaniS. MTA resorption and periradicular healing in an open-apex incisor: a case report. Saudi Dent J. 2012;24(1):55–59.
81.
FarsiNAlamoudiNBaltoKMushaytAA. Clinical assessment of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) as direct pulp capping in young permanent teeth. J Paediatr Dent. 2006;31(2):72–76.
82.
PanzariniSRSonodaCKSaitoCTMHHamanakaEFPoiWR. Delayed tooth replantation: MTA as a root canal filling. Braz Oral Res. 2014;28(1):1–7.
83.
Pitt FordTRTorabinejadMMc KendryJDHongCUKariyawasamSP. Use of mineral trioxide aggregate for repair of furcation perforations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol. 1995;79(6):756–762.
84.
SerperAUcerOOnurREtikanI. Comparative neurotoxic effects of root canal filling materials on rat sciatic nerve. J Endodontol. 1998;24(9):592–594.
85.
SeltzerS.SoltanoffWSmithJ. Biologic aspects of endodontics. V. Periapical tissue reactions to root canal instrumentation beyond the apex and root canal fillings short of and beyond the apex. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol. 1973;36(5):725–737.
86.
AbediHTorabinejadMPitt FordTRBacklandLK. The use of mineral trioxide aggregate cement (MTA) as a direct pulp-capping agent. J Endod. 1996;22:199.
87.
TahanECelikDErKTaşdemirT. Effect of unintentionally extruded mineral trioxide aggregate in treatment of tooth with periradicular lesion: a case report. J Endod. 2010;36(4):760–763.
88.
GirardNServetEBiourgeVHennetP. Periodontal health status in a colony of 109 cats. J Vet Dent. 2009;26(3):147–155.
89.
GorrelC. Tooth resorption in cats. J Feline Med Surg. 2015;17(1):37–43.
90.
AndreasenJ. External root resorption: its implications in dental traumatology, paedodontics, periodontics, orthodontics and endodontics. Int Endod J. 1985;18(2):109–118.
91.
HammarströmLBlomlöfLLindskogS. Dynamics of dentoalveolar ankylosis and associated root resorption. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1989;5(4):163–175.
92.
VerstraeteFJM. Radiological evaluation of endodontic disease and endodontic procedures. In: 13th Annual Veterinary Dental Forum 1999. Baltimore, MD; 1999:174–176.
93.
LuotonenNKuntsi-VaattovaaraHSarkiala-KesselEJunnilaJJTLaitinen-VapaavuoriOVerstraeteFJM. Vital pulp therapy in dogs: 190 cases (2001-2011). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2014;244(4):449–459.
94.
ZakariazenKLScottDAJansenJR. Endodontic recall radiographs: how reliable is our interpretation of endodontic success or failure and what factors affect our reliability. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1984;57(3):343–347.
95.
Garcia de Paula-SilvaFWHassanBBezerra da SilvaLA, et al.Outcome of root canal treatment in dogs determined by periapical radiography and cone-beam computed tomography scans. J Endod. 2009;35(5):723–726.
96.
KvistT.Endodontic retreatment. Aspects of decision making and clinical outcome. Swed Dent J. 2001;(144):1–57.
97.
VizgirdaJLiewehrFRPattonWRMcPhersonJCBuxtonTB. A comparison of laterally condensed gutta-percha, thermoplasticized gutta-percha, and mineral trioxide aggregate as root canal filling materials. J Endod. 2004;30(2):103–106.
98.
BoutsioukisCNoulaGLambrianidisT. Ex vivo study of the efficiency of two techniques for the removal of mineral trioxide aggregate used as a root canal filling material. J Endod. 2008;34(10):1239–1242.
