This review provides an in-depth comparison of advantages and disadvantages of different types of dental cements as they are used for cementing base metal alloy crowns in dogs.
HillEE. Dental cements for definitive luting: a review and practical clinical considerations. Dent Clin North Am. 2007;51(3):643–658.
2.
WiskottHWA.Try-In and Cementation. In: WiskottHWA, ed. Fixed Prosthodontics Principles and Clinics. London: Quintessence Publishing; 2011:691.
3.
CraigRG. Restorative Dental Materials. 10th ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1997:137.
4.
RosenstielSFLandMFCrispinBJ. Dental luting agents: a review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80(3):280–301.
5.
BergenholtzGCoxCFLoescheSayed SA. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: its effect on the dental pulp. J Oral Pathol. 1982;11(6):439–450.
6.
RayHATorpeM. Periapical status of endodontically treated teeth in relation to technical quality of the root filling and the coronal restoration. Int Endod J. 1995;28(1):12–18.
7.
CheungGS. Endodontic failures—changing the approach. Int Dent J. 1996;46(3):131–138.
8.
SongMKimHCLeeWKimE. Analysis of the cause of failure in nonsurgical endodontic treatment by microscopic inspection during endodontic microsurgery. J Endod. 2011;37(11):1516–1519.
9.
AquilinoSACaplanDJ, Relationship between crown placement and the survival of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87(3):256–263.
KamposioraPPapavasiliousGBayneSCFeltonDA. Finite element analysis estimates of cement microfracture under complete veneer crowns, Crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;71(5):435–441.
12.
WhiteSNYuZ. Compressive and diametral tensile strengths of current adhesive luting agents. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;69(6):568–572.
13.
WhiteSNYuZ. Physical properties of fixed prosthodontic, resin composite luting agents. Int J Prosthod. 1993;6(4):384–389.
14.
Cattani-LorenteMAGodinCMeyerJM. Early strength of glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater. 1993;9(1):57–62.
15.
McCarthyMFHondrumSO. Mechanical and bond strength properties of light-cured and chemically cured glass ionomer cements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;105(2):135–141.
16.
KerbyREMcGlumphyEAHollowayJA. Some physical properties of implant abutment luting cements. Int J Prosthod. 1992;5(4):321–325.
17.
BanSHasegawaJAnusaviceKJ. Effect of loading conditions on bi-axial flexure strength of dental cements. Dent Mater. 1992;8(2):100–104.
18.
CanaySHersekNAkçaKCiftciY. The effect of weight loss of liquid on the diametral tensile strengths of various kinds of luting cements. Int Dent J. 1996;46(1):52–58.
19.
GalunEASalehNLewinsteinI. Diametral tensile strength and bonding to dentin of type I glass ionomer cements. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;72(4):424–429.
LiJvon BeetzenMSundstromF. Strength and setting behavior of resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Acta Odontol Scand. 1995;53(5):311–317.
22.
ScherrerSSde RijkWGBelserUCMeyerJM. Effect of cement film thickness on the fracture resistance of a machinable glass-ceramic. Dent Mater. 1994;10(3):172–177.
23.
MuellerHJ. Fracture toughness and fractography of dental cements, lining, build-up, and filling materials. Scanning Microsc. 1990;4(2):297–307.
24.
WilsonADHillRGWarrensCPLewisBG. The influence of polyacid molecular weight on some properties of glass ionomer cements. J Dent Res. 1989;68(2):89–94.
25.
SakaguchiRLPowersJM. Testing of dental materials and biomechanics. In: Craig’s Restorative Dental Materials. 13th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Mosby; 2012:85.
26.
SakaguchiRLPowersJM. Testing of dental materials and biomechanics. In: Craig’s Restorative Dental Materials. 13th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Mosby; 2012:86.
FeilzerAJKakabouraAIde GeeAJDavidsonCL. The influence of water sorption on the development of setting shrinkage stress in traditional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater. 1995;11(3):186–190.
34.
SakaguchiRLPowersJM. Materials for adhesion and luting. In: Craig’s Restorative Dental Materials. 13th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Mosby; 2012:338.
35.
RosenstielSFLandMFFujimotoJ. Materials and structures. In: Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics. 2nd ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1995:151–153.
36.
SmithDC. Dental cements current status and future prospects. Dent Clin North Am. 1983;6(3):763–793.
FeilzerAJde GeeAJDavidsonCL. Relaxation of polymerization con-traction shear stress by hygroscopic expansion. J Dent Res. 1990;69(1):36–39.
39.
KawaiKIsenbergBPLeinfelderKF. Effect of gap dimension on composite resin cement wear. Quintessence Int. 1994;25(1):53–58.
40.
FrazierKBSarrettDC. Wear resistance of dual-cured resin luting agents. Am J Dent. 1995;8(4):161–164.
41.
HaleFA. Dental caries in the dog. J Vet Dent. 1998;15(2):79–83.
42.
Sunico-SegarraMSegarraA. A Practical Clinical Guide to Resin Cements. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin; 2015. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-43842-8.
43.
YuZStrutzJMKipnisVWhiteSN. Effect of dynamic loading methods on cement film thickness in vitro. J Prosthodont. 1995;4(4):252–255.
44.
LevineWA. An evaluation of the film thickness of resin luting agents. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;62(2):175–178.
45.
WhiteSNKipnisV. The three-dimensional effects of adjustment and cementation on crown seating. Int J Prosthodont. 1993;6(3):248–254.
46.
BrackettWWVickeryJM. The influence of mixing temperature and powder/liquid ratio on the film thickness of three glass ionomer cements. Int J Prosthodont. 1994;7(1):13–16.
47.
Van MeerbeekBInokoshi S DavidsonCL. Dual cure luting composites—part II: clinically related properties. J Oral Rehabil. 1994;21(1):57–66.
48.
StrutzJMWhiteSNYuZKaneCL. Luting cement-metal surface physicochemical interactions on film thickness. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;72(2):128–132.
49.
OsmanSAMcCabeJFWallsAW. Film thickness and rheological properties of luting agents for crown cementation. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2006;14(1):23–27.
50.
TjanAHLiT. Seating and retention of complete crowns with a new adhesive resin cement. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;67(4):478–483.
51.
AbdullahHPearsonGJ. The effect of temperature change on the working and setting time of two luting cements. Asian J Aesthet Dent. 1993;1(2):91–94.
52.
Jost-BrinkmannPGRabeHMiethkeRR. Materials properties of zinc phosphate cements after delayed setting on refrigerated slabs. Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1989;50(1):1–11.
53.
FrickerJHirotaKTamiyaY. The effects of temperature on the setting of glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) cements. Aust Dent J. 1991;36(3):240–242.
54.
GriggsJAShenCAnusaviceKJ. Sensitivity of catalyst/base ratio on curing of resin luting agents: polymerization exotherm analysis. Dent Mater. 1994;10(5):314–318.
55.
ShortallACBaylisRLFisherSEHarringtonE. Operating variables affecting the working time of a dual-cure composite luting cement. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 1993;1(4):185–188.
56.
PrenticeLHTyasMJBurrowMF. The effect of mixing time on the handling and compressive strength of encapsulated glass ionomer cement. Dent Mater. 2005;21(8):704–708.
57.
PaulettoNLahiffeBJWaltonJN. Complications associated with excess cement around crowns on osseointegrated implants: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14(6):865–868.
LindquistTJConnollyJ. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85(3):292–298.
62.
RossettiPHdo ValleALde CarvalhoRMDe GoesMFPegoraroLF. Correlation between margin fit and microleakage in complete crowns cemented with three luting agents. J Appl Oral Sci. 2008;16(1):64–69.
63.
PiwowarczykALauerHCSorensenJA. In vitro shear bond strength of cementing agents to fixed prosthodontic restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92(3):265–273.
64.
PameijerCHJefferiesSR. Retentive properties and film thickness of 18 luting agents and systems. Gen Dent. 1996;44(6):524–530.
65.
BrauerGM. Zinc oxide-eugenol as dental material. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1976;31(11):824–834.
GorodovskySZidanO. Retentive strength, disintegration, and marginal quality of luting cements. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68(2):269–274.
68.
GregoryWAGriffithsLIrwinG. Effects of intra-core mechanical interlocks and cement type on full crown retention. Am J Dent. 1991;4(1):29–32.
69.
AkaseKYataniHKondoYYamashitaA. Influence of luting materials on marginal fitness and tensile strength of full veneer crowns. Comparison between conventional dental cements and adhesive luting resins. Nippon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi. 1989;33(1):8–16.
70.
SmithDC. A new dental cement. Br Dent J. 1968;124(9):381–384.
KhoroushiMMansoori-KarvandiTHadiS. The effect of pre-warming and delayed irradiation on marginal integrity of a resin-modified glass ionomer. Gen Dent. 2012;60(6):e383–e388.
77.
CrispSWilsonAD. Reactions in glass ionomer cements: V. Effect of incorporating tartaric acid in the cement liquid. J Dent Res. 1976;55(6):1023–1031.
78.
CurtisSRRichardsMWMeiersJC. Early erosion of glass ionomer at crown margins. Int J Prosthodont. 1993;6(6):553–557.
79.
OgimotoTOgawaT. Simple and sure protection of crown margins from moisture in cementation. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;78(2):225.
80.
MountGJ. An Atlas of Glass Ionomer Cements, a Clinician’s Guide. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Martin Dunitz; 2002.
81.
ChoSYChengAC. A review of glass ionomer restorations in the primary dentition. J Can Dent Assoc. 1999;65(9):491–495.
82.
SidhuSKWatsonTF. Resin-modified glass ionomer materials. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent. 1995;8(1):59–67.
83.
de la MacorraJCPradiesG. Conventional and adhesive luting cements. Clin Oral Investig. 2002;6(4):198–204.
84.
CoutinhoEYoshidaYInoueS. Gel phase formation at resin-modified glass ionomer/tooth interfaces. J Dent Res. 2007;86(7):656–661.
85.
MitchellCADouglasWHChengYS. Fracture toughness of conventional, resin-modified glass ionomer and composite luting cements. Dent Mater. 1999;15(1):7–13.
86.
JungeTNichollsJIPhillipsKMLibmanWJ. Load fatigue of compromised teeth: a comparison of 3 luting cements. Int J Prosthodont. 1998;11(6):558–564.
EversonPAddisonOPalinWMBurkeFJ. Improved bonding of zirconia substructures to resin using a “glaze-on” technique. J Dent. 2012;40(4):347–351.
99.
ValentinoTABorgesGABorgesLHPlattJACorrer-SobrinhoL. Influence of glazed zirconia on dual-cure luting agent bond strength. Oper Dent. 2012;37(2):181–187.
100.
PereiraCNBuonoVTMotaJM. The influence of silane evaporation procedures on microtensile bond strength between a dental ceramic and a resin cement. Indian J Dent Res. 2010;21(2):238–243.
101.
AyadMFJohnstonWMRosenstielSF. Influence of tooth preparation taper and cement type on recementation strength of complete metal crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;102(6):354–361.
102.
TakimotoMIshiiRIinoM. Influence of temporary cement contamination on the surface free energy and dentine bond strength of self-adhesive cements. J Dent. 2012;40(2):131–138.
103.
OliveiraMCesarPFGianniniMRueggebergFARodriguesJArraisCA. Effect of temperature on the degree of conversion and working time of dual-cured resin cements exposed to different curing conditions. Oper Dent. 2012;37(4):370–379.
104.
SonYHHanCHKimS. Influence of internal-gap width and cement type on the retentive force of zirconia copings in pullout testing. J Dent. 2012;40(10):866–872.
105.
MakkarSMalhotraN. Self-adhesive resin cements: a new perspective in luting technology. Dent Update. 2013;40(9):758–760, 763–764, 767–768.
GoracciCSadekFTFabianelliATayFRFerrariM. Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts to intraradicular dentin. Oper Dent. 2005;30(5):627–635.
110.
Pisani-ProençaJErhardtMCAmaralRValandroLFBottinoMADel Castillo-SalmerónR. Influence of different surface conditioning protocols on microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to dentin. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;105(4):227–235.
111.
BrunzelSYangBWolfartSKernM. Tensile bond strength of a so-called self-adhesive luting resin cement to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2010;12(2):143–150.
112.
LinJShinyaAGomiHShinyaA. Bonding of self-adhesive resin cements to enamel using different surface treatments: bond strength and etching pattern evaluations. Dent Mater J. 2010;29(4):425–432.
113.
BenettiPFernandesVVTorresCRPaganiC. Bonding efficacy of new self-etching, self-adhesive dual-curing resin cements to dental enamel. J Adhes Dent. 2011;13(3):231–234.
114.
KasazACPenaCEde AlexandreRS. Effects of a peripheral enamel margin on the long-term bond strength and nanoleakage of composite/dentin interfaces produced by self-adhesive and conventional resin cements. J Adhes Dent. 2012;14(3):251- 263.
115.
UludagBOzturkOOzturkAN. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;102(4):235–241.
116.
ViottiRGKasazAPenaCEAlexandreRSArraisCAReisAF. Microtensile bond strength of new self-adhesive luting agents and conventional multistep systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;102(5):306–312.
117.
ChenCKleverlaanCJFeilzerAJ. Effect of an experimental zirconia-silica coating technique on micro tensile bond strength of zirconia in different priming conditions. Dent Mater. 2012;28(8):e127–e134.
118.
ChaiJChuFCChowTW. Effect of surface treatment on shear bond strength of zirconia to human dentin. J Prosthodont. 2011;20(3):173–179.
119.
PiwowarczykABenderROttlPLauerHC. Long-term bond between dual-polymerizing cementing agents and human hard dental tissue. Dent Mater. 2007;23(2):211–217.
120.
LuHMehmoodAChowAPowersJM. Influence of polymerization mode on flexural properties of esthetic resin luting agents. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94(6):549–554.
121.
FonsecaRGCruzCAAdaboGL. The influence of chemical activation on hardness of dual-curing resin cements. Braz Oral Res. 2004;18(3):228–232.
122.
NicholsonJ. Polyacid-modified composite resins (“compomers”) and their use in clinical dentistry. Dent Mater. 2007;23(5):615–622.
