HarveyCE. Periodontal disease in dogs: Etiopathogenesis, prevalence, and significance. In: HolmstromSE, ed. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract1998; 28: 1111–1128.
2.
WiggsRBLobpriseHB. Periodontology, oral anatomy and physiology. In: WiggsRBLobpriseHB, eds. Veterinary dentistry principles and practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997; 55–86, 186–232.
3.
GroveTK. Treatment of periodontal disease. In: HolmstromSE, ed. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract1998; 28 (5): 1147–1166.
4.
WiggsRBLobpriseHBMitchellPQ. Oral and periodontal tissue: Maintenance, augmentation, rejuvenation and regeneration. In: HolmstromSE, ed. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract1998; 28: 1165–1188.
5.
CarranzaFACamargoPM. The periodontal pocket. Carranza FA. Bone loss and patterns of bone destruction. Carranza FA, Takei HH. Radiographic aids in the diagnosis of periodontal disease. Pattison GL, Pattison AM. Scaling and root planing. Carranza FA, Takei HH. Gingival curettage. Takei HH, Carranza FA. The periodontal flap. Carranza FA, Takei HH. The flap technique for pocket therapy. Carranza FA, McLain PK, Schallhorn RG. Regenerative osseous surgery. In: NewmanMGTakeiHHCarranzaFA, eds. Carranza's clinical periodontology, 9th ed.Philadelphia: Saunders, 2002; Chapters 22, 23, 31, 47, 57, 60, 61, 63.
6.
VerstraeteFJ. Self assessment color review of veterinary dentistry. Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1999; 62.
7.
BarrintonEP. Scaling, root planing and gingival curettage. Donnenfeld OW. The surgical flap. Taub H. Mucogingival surgery. Yunka RA. Synthetic bone grafts in periodontics. In: LevineN, ed. Current treatment in dental practice. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1986; 218–261.
HennetPRBellowsJ. Canine periodontics. In: ColmeryBHDeForgeDH, eds. An atlas of veterinary dental radiology. Ames: Iowa State University Press, 2000; 59–70.
10.
DupontG. Periodontal surgery. In: Proceedings of the World Veterinary Dental Congress. Philadelphia, 1994, 19–23.
11.
LevinJ. A new perspective on prophylaxis and homecare. In: Proceedings of the Fourth World Veterinary Dental Congress. Vancouver BC, Canada, 1995, 17.
JohnsonMWSullivanSM. Regeneration of peri-implant infrabony defects using perioGlass; a pilot study in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res1999; 46: 301–304.
14.
AllanLNewmanH. Particulate bioglass reduces the viability of bacterial biofilms formed on its surface in an in vitro model. Clin Oral Implants Res2002; 13: 53–58.
15.
FrommSJWeinbergMA. Comparison of bioactive glass synthetic bone graft particles and open debridement in the treatment of human periodontal defects. Novabone.com. 2004.
16.
OonishiHKushihaniS. Particulate bioglass compared with hydroxyapatite as a bone graft substitute. Clin Orthop1997; 334: 316–325.
17.
LeonorIBItoA. In situ study of partially crystallized bioglass and hydroxyapatite in vitro bioactivity using atomic force microscopy. J BioMed Mater Res2002; 62: 82–88.
18.
Consil: product information and instruction, Nutramax Laboratories, Edgewood, MD.
19.
HenchLLWestJK. Biological applications of bioactive glasses. Life Chem Rep1996; 13: 187–241.
20.
WheelerDLStokesKE. Effect of bioactive glass particle size on osseous regeneration of cancellous defects. J BioMed Mater Res1998; 41: 527–533.
21.
WheelerDLEschbachEJ. Assessment of resorbable bioactive material for grafting of critical size cancellous defects. J Orthop Res2000; 18: 140–148.
22.
FujishiroYHenchLL. Quantitative rates of in vivo bone generation for bioglass and hydroxyapatite particles a bone graft substitute. J Mater Science: Materials in Med1977; 8: 649–52.