Responses of older adults (> 65 years) from the 1990 National Health Interview Survey and Assistive Device Supplement are analyzed to determine if selected demographic and health variables are associated with the use of assistive devices, multiple-device use, and the expressed need for such devices. Bivariate and multi-variate analyses show that, in general, poorer health is consistently associated with the use of assistive devices, multiple-device use, and expressed need. Demographic characteristics, however, vary in their relationships to assistive device use and need. Findings support the importance of considering multiple-device use and expressed need in studying assistive devices and older adults.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aday, L. A. , & Andersen, R. (1974). A framework for the study of access to medical care. Health Services Research, 9, 208-220.
2.
Aday, L. A. , & Andersen, R. (1975). Development of indices of access to medical care. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press.
3.
Andersen, R. , & Newman, J. (1973). Societal and individual determinants of medical care utilization in the United States. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 5, 95-124.
4.
Evashwick, C. G. , Rowe, G., Diehr, P., & Branch, L. (1984). Factors explaining the use of health care services by the elderly. Health Services Research, 19, 357-382.
5.
Forbes, W. F. , Hayward, L. M., & Agwani, N. (1993). Factors associated with self-reported use and non-use of assistive devices among impaired elderly residing in the community. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 84, 53-57.
6.
Fowles, D. G. (1990). A profile of older Americans: 1990. Washington, DC: American Association of Retired Persons and Administration on Aging.
7.
Gitlin, L. (in press). The role of social science research in understanding technology use among older adults. In M. Ory & G. DeFriese (Eds.), Self-care in late life. New York: Springer.
8.
Gitlin, L. N. , Schemm, R. L., Landsberg, L. & Burgh, D. (1996). Factors predicting assistive device use in the home by older people following rehabilitation. Journal of Aging and Health, 8, 554-575.
9.
Guralnik, J. M. , & LaCroix, A. Z. (1992). Assessing physical function in older populations. In R. B. Wallace & R. F. Woolson (Eds.) The epidemiologic study of the elderly (pp. 159-181). New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
Kincade Norburn, J. E. , Bernard, S. L., Konrad, T. R., Woomert, A., DeFriese, G. H., Kalsbeek, W. D., Koch, G. G. & Ory, M. G. (1995). Self-care and assistance from others in coping with functional status limitations among a national sample of older adults. Journal of Gerontology, 2, S101-S109.
11.
LaPlante, M. P. , Hendershot, G. E., & Moss, A. J. (1992). Assistive technology devices and home accessibility features: Prevalence, payment, need, and trends (Advance data from Vital and Health Statistics, 217). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
12.
Malone, J. F. (1980). An aid to the definition of "aids." In J. Bray & S. Wright (Eds.), The use of technology in the care of the elderly and the disabled (pp. 5-12). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
13.
Mann, W. C. , Hurren, D. & Tomita, M. (1993). Comparison of assistive device use and needs of home-based older persons with difference impairments. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47, 980-987.
14.
Mann, W. C. , Hurren, D., & Tomita, M. (1995). Assistive devices used by home-based elderly persons with arthritis. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49, 810-820.
15.
Mann, W. C. , Hurren, D., Tomita, M., & Charvat, B. A. (1995). The relationship of functional independence to assistive device use of elderly persons living at home. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 14, 225-247.
16.
Mann, W. C. , Karuza, J., Hurren, D., & Tomita, M. (1992). Assistive devices for home-based elderly persons with cognitive impairments. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 8, 35-52.
17.
Manton, K. G. , Corder, L., & Stallard, E. (1993). Changes in the use of personal assistance and special equipment from 1982 to 1989: Results from the 1982 and 1989 NLTCS. The Gerontologist, 33, 168-176.
18.
Massey, J. T. , Moore, T. F., Parsons, V. L., & Tadros, W. (1989). Design and estimation for the National Health Interview Survey, 1985-94 (National Center for Health Statistics). Vital Health Statistics, 2, 110.
19.
Prohaska, T. , Mermelstein, R., Miller, B., & Jack, S. (1993). Functional status and living arrangements. In J. F. Van Nostrand, S. E. Fumer, & R. Suzman (Eds.), Health data on older Americans: United States, 1992 (pp. 23-39). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
20.
Rogers, J. C. , & Holm, M. B. (1992). Assistive technology device use in patients with rheumatic disease: A literature review. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46, 120-127.
21.
SAS Institute, Inc . (1990). SAS procedures guide, version 6 (3rd ed.). Cary, NC: Author.
22.
Scherer, M. J. (1993). Living in the state of stuck: How technology impacts the lives of people with disabilities. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
23.
Shah, B. V. , Barnwell, B. G., Hunt, P. N., & LaVange, L. M. (1991). SUDAAN user's manual, release 6.34. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute.
24.
Suzman, R. , & Riley, M. W. (1985). Introducing the "oldest-old."Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly/Health and Society, 63(2), 177-186.
25.
Technology-Related Assistance for Individuals with Disabilities Act of 1988, Public Law No. 100-407, August 19, 1988. 102 Stat. 1044-1065.
26.
Verbrugge, L. M. , & Jette, A. M. (1993). The disablement process. Social Science and Medicine, 38, 1-14.
27.
Verbrugge, L. M. , Rennert, C., & Madans, J. H. (1997). The great efficacy of personal and equipment assistance in reducing disability. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 384-392.
28.
Wolinsky, F. D. , & Johnson, R. J. (1991). The use of health services by older adults. Journal of Gerontology, 46, S345-S357.
29.
Wylde, M. A. (1995). Technology and aging: Developing and marketing new products for older people. Generations, 19, 1-64.
30.
Zimmer, Z. , & Chappell, N. L. (1994). Mobility restriction and the use of devices among seniors. Journal of Aging and Health, 6, 185-208.
