A growing population of seniors in North America, coupled with increasing life expectancies, means there will likely be increased future demand for products to alleviate mobility problems commonly faced by elders. Although past research has documented the prevalence of mobility restriction among elderly populations, and the tendency of some to seek personal assistance to alleviate their difficulties, there is little research that looks at the use of assistive devices. This study examines use among those faced with at least one of four common mobility problems. Logistic regression and analysis of variance reveal the overwhelming importance of the sheer number of mobility restrictions in determining the likelihood that an individual is a device user, over and above factors such as the severity of problems, social network characteristics, and predisposition factors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, R. , & Newman, J. F. (1972). Societal and individual determinants of medical care utilization in the United States. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 51, 95-124.
2.
Avery, R. , Speare, A. Jr., & Lawton, L. (1989). Social support, disability and independent living of elderly persons in the United States. Journal of Aging Studies, 3, 279-293.
3.
Bagley, S. P. , & Williams, T. F. (1988). Technology and aging: The new frontier. In G. Lesnoff-Caravaglia (Ed.), Aging in a technological society (pp. 19-25). New York: Human Science.
4.
Breakwell, G. M. , & Fife-Schaw, C. (1988). Ageing and the impact of new technology. Social Behaviour, 3, 119-130.
5.
Chappell, N. L. (1981). Measuring functional ability and chronic health conditions among the elderly: A research note on the adequacy of three instruments. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 22, 90-102.
6.
Chappell, N. L. (1989). Health and helping among the elderly: Gender Difference. Journal of Aging and Health, 1, 102-120.
7.
Chappell, N. L. , & Blandford, A. A. (1987). Health service utilization by elderly persons. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 12, 195-215.
8.
Czaja, S. J. (1988). Safety and security of the elderly: Implications for smart house design. International Journal of Aging and Technology, 1, 49-66.
9.
Eilers, M. L. (1989). Older adults and computer education: Not to Have the World Close a Door. International Journal of Aging and Technology, 2, 56-76.
10.
Evashwick, C. G. , Rowe, G., Diehr, P., & Branch, L. (1984). Factors explaining the use of health care services by the elderly. Health Services Research, 19, 357-382.
11.
Fulton, J. P. , Katz, S., Jack, S. S., & Hendershot, G. E. (1989). Physical functioning of the aged: United States, 1984 (Vital Health Statistics 10 167). National Center for Health Statistics.
12.
George, L. K. , & Bearon, L. B. (1980). Quality of life in older persons. New York: Human Science.
13.
Hahm, W. , & Bikson, T. (1989). Retirees using email and networked computers. International Journal of Technology and Aging, 2, 113-123.
14.
Hiatt, L. G. (1988). Smart houses for older people: General considerations. International Journal of Technology and Aging, 1, 11-30.
15.
Katz, S. , Downs, T. D., Cash, H. R., & Grotz, R. C. (1970). Progress in the development of the index of ADL. The Gerontologist, 10, 20-30.
16.
Kerschner, P. A. , & Chelsvig Hart, K. (1984). The aged user and technology. In R. E. Dunkle, M. R. Haug, & M. Rosenberg (Eds.), Communications technology and the elderly (pp. 135-144). New York: Springer.
17.
La Buda, D. R. (1988). Education, leisure and older persons: Implications for smart house design. International Journal of Technology and Aging, 1, 31-48.
18.
Manton, K. G. , Corder, L., & Stallard, E. (1993). Changes in the use of personal assistance and special equipment from 1982 to 1989: Results from the 1982 and 1989 NLTCS. The Gerontologist, 33, 168-176.
19.
National Center for Health Statistics , Fitti, J. E., & Kovar, M. G. (1987). The Supplement on aging to the 1984 National Health Interview Survey (Vital and Health Statistics, Series 1, No. 21; DHHS Publication No. PHS 87-1323). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
20.
Osberg, S. J. , McGinnis, G. E., DeJong, G., & Seward, M. L. (1987). Life satisfaction and quality of life among disabled elderly adults. Journal of Gerontology, 42, 228-230.
21.
Rice, D. P. (1989). The characteristics and health of the elderly. In C. Eisdorfer, D. A. Kessler, & A. N. Spector (Eds.), Caring for the Elderly (pp. 31-49). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
22.
Spector, W. D. , Katz, S., Murphy, J. B., & Fulton, J. P. (1987). The hierarchical relationship between activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 40, 481-489.
23.
Stoller, E. P. , & Earl, L. L. (1983). Help with activities of everyday life: Sources of support for the noninstitutionalized elderly. The Gerontologist, 23, 64-70.
24.
Struyk, R. J. , & Katsura, H. M. (1987). Aging at home: How the elderly adjust their housing without money. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 4(1), 190.
25.
Tabachnick, B. G. , & Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper Collins.
26.
Verbrugge, L. M. (1984). Longer life but worsening health? Trends in health and mortality of middle aged and older persons. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 62, 475-519.
27.
Wilkins, R. , & Adams, O. B. (1981). Health expectancy in Canada, late 1970s: Demographic, regional and social dimensions. In D. Coburn, C. D'Arcy, G. M. Torraine & P. New (Eds.), Health and Canadian Society (pp. 36-56). Markham, Ontario: Fstzhenry & Whiteside.
28.
Wolinsky, F. D. , & Coe, R. M. (1984). Physician and hospital utilization among non-institutionalized elderly adults: An analysis of the Health Interview Survey. Journal of Gerontology, 39, 334-351.
29.
Zimmer, Z. , & Segall, A. (1992). Needs assessment survey methodology. Technical report written for the Canadian Aging Research Network. Centre on Aging, University of Manitoba.
