Medical professionals are increasingly faced with ethical dilemmas of caring for older patients who are decisionally incapacitated. Most often they rely on family to serve as surrogate decision makers. Does that practice agree with the preferences of the elderly themselves? Examined are the exploratory and qualitative findings of a sample of men and women, age 65 to 91 (N = 71). Comparisons are made between those elderly who have families and those who do not have families regarding the use of and interest in advance directives and proxy appointments. The findings suggest that elderly persons with families prefer to rely on relatives to conduct substitute decision making informally, unencumbered by legally executed living wills or proxy documents. Those without families view friends and doctors as their surrogate resource and endorse the use of legal proxy appointments. Implications for the use of advance directives and further public policy are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Areen, J. (1987). The legal status of consent obtained from families of adult patients to withhold or withdraw treatment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 258, 229-235.
2.
Branch, L. , & Jette, A. (1982). A prospective study of long-term care institutionalization among the aged. American Journal of Public Health, 72, 1373-1379.
3.
Brody, J. A. (1987). The best of times/the worst of times: Aging and dependency in the 21st century. In S. F. Spicker, S. R. Wingman, & I. R. Lawson (Eds.), Ethical dimensions of geriatric care (pp. 3-21). Boston: U. Reidel.
4.
Cicirelli, V. G. (1989). Relationship of personality characteristics to belief in paternalism in parent caregiving situations. Paper presented at the 42nd annual meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, Minneapolis, MN.
5.
Clark, P. G. (1987). Individual autonomy, cooperative empowerment, and planning for long-term care decision making. Journal of Aging Studies, 1, 65-76.
6.
Evans, D. A. , Funkenstein, H. H., Albert, M. S., Scherr, P. A., Cook, N. R., Chown, M. J., Hebert, L. E., Hennekens, C. H., & Taylor, J. O. (1989). Prevalence of Alzheimer's disease in a community population of older persons. Journal of the American Medical Association, 262, 2551-2556.
7.
Harper, M. S. , & Lebowitz, B. (1984). Mental illness in nursing homes: Agenda for research. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health.
8.
High, D. M. (1987). Planning for decisional incapacity: A neglected area in ethics and aging. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 35, 814-820.
9.
High, D. M. (1988). All in the family: Extended autonomy and expectations in surrogate health care decision-making. Gerontologist, 28(Suppl. June), 46-51.
10.
High, D. M. (1989). Standards for surrogate decision making: What the elderly want. Journal of Long-Term Care Administration, 17, 8-13.
11.
High, D. M. (in press). Old and alone: Surrogate health care decision-making for the elderly without families. Journal of Aging Studies.
12.
High, D. M. , & Turner, H. B. (1987). Surrogate decision-making: The elderly's familial expectations. Theoretical Medicine, 8, 303-320.
13.
Horowitz, A. , & Shindelman, L. W. (1983). Reciprocity and affection: Past influences on current caregiving. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 5, 5-20.
14.
Jecker, N. S. (1990). The role of intimate others in medical decision making. Gerontologist, 30, 65-71.
15.
Jordan, S. M. (1985). Decision making for incompetent persons. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
16.
Kovar, M. G. (1986, May 9). Aging in the eighties, age 65 years and over and living alone, contacts with family, friends, and neighbors. Advance Data From Vital and Health Statistics, pp. 1-8.
17.
Lo, B. , McLeod, G. A., & Saika, G. (1986). Patient attitudes to discussing life-sustaining treatment. Archives of Internal Medicine, 146, 1613-1615.
18.
Many doctors favor end of life-support gear in some cases . (1988, June 9). Wall Street Journal, p.95.
19.
President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research . (1982). Making health care decisions, Vol. 1. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
20.
Rhoden, N. (1988). Litigating life and death. Harvard Law Review, 102, 375-446.
21.
Schneiderman, L. J. , & Arras, J. D. (1985). Counseling patients to counsel physicians on future care in the event of patient incompetence. Annals of Internal Medicine, 102, 693-698.
22.
Society for the Right to Die . (1987). Newsletter, Spring, p. 3.
23.
Society for the Right to Die. (1985 & 1988). The Physician and the Hopelessly Ill Patient & Supplement. New York: Author.
24.
Solnick, P. B. (1985). Proxy consent for incompetent non-terminally ill adult patients. Journal of Legal Medicine, 6, 1-49.
25.
Special Committee on Aging, U.S. Senate . (1987).A matter of choice: Planning ahead for health care decisions. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
26.
Tomlinson, T. , Howe, K., Notman, M., & Rossmiller, D. (1990). An empirical study of proxy consent for elderly persons. Gerontologist, 30, 54-64.
27.
Uhlmann, R. F. , Pearlman, R. A., & Cain, K. A. (1988). Physician's and spouses' predictions of elderly patients' resuscitation preferences. Journal of Gerontology, 43, M115-M121.
28.
Zweibel, N. R. , & Cassel, C. K. (1989). Treatment choices at the end of life: A comparison of decisions by older patients and their physician-selected proxies. Gerontologist, 29, 615-621.
