Objective: To comprehensively evaluate the psychometric properties of the relatively new Everyday Ageism Scale. Methods: Data were from the 2021–2023 Experiences of Aging in Society project (N = 237, ages 50+, multiracial/multiethnic, 72.6% female). We assessed the multidimensional structure, reliability, and validity of the Everyday Ageism Scale. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis generally substantiated the three-factor structure of the Everyday Ageism Scale: exposure to ageist messages, ageism in interpersonal interactions, and internalized ageism. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were satisfactory for the full scale and two of the three subscales. The scale demonstrated acceptable validity for convergence within measure, convergence criterion with three other scales used to measure ageism, and prediction of concurrent health (number of chronic physical health conditions, mental health condition). Discussion: Findings establish the Everyday Ageism Scale as a valid and reliable, multidimensional scale, while recommending ongoing attention to messages subscale limitations.
AllenJ. O.EliasL. K.GreenwoodJ. C. (2023). Differences and disparities in ageism affecting older adults: A review. Current Epidemiology Reports, 10(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40471-022-00316-6
AllenJ. O.MoïseV.OnishiS. (2025). Black-white differences related to ageism and health: Evidence from the experiences of aging in society project. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities. Online first. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-025-02326-8
5.
AllenJ. O.MoïseV.SolwayE.CheneyM. K.LarsonD.MalaniP. N.SingerD.KullgrenJ. T. (2024). How old do I look? Aging appearance and experiences of aging among US adults ages 50-80. Psychology and Aging, 39(5), 551–564. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000800
6.
AllenJ. O.MoïseV.WhiteC. J.SharmaP.KieferM.SikoraN.OnishiS.MahatoS.CunnynghamK.GreenwoodJ. C. (2024). Experiences of aging in society project, July 2024 report. Stress and Health Disparities Lab. https://hdl.handle.net/11244/340562
7.
AllenJ. O.SikoraN. (2023). Aging stigma and the health of US adults over 65: What do we know?Clinical Interventions in Aging, 18, 2093–2116. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S396833
8.
AllenJ. O.SolwayE.KirchM.SingerD.KullgrenJ. T.MalaniP. N. (2022). The everyday ageism scale: Development and evaluation. Journal of Aging and Health, 34(2), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/08982643211036131
9.
AllenJ. O.SolwayE.KirchM.SingerD.KullgrenJ. T.MoïseV.MalaniP. N. (2022). Experiences of everyday ageism and the health of older US adults. JAMA Network Open, 5(6), Article e2217240. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.17240
10.
AllenJ. O.WhiteC. J.MoïseV.MahatoS.KieferM.SikoraN.OnishiS.GreenwoodJ. C.CunnynghamK. (2023). Experiences of aging in society project, July 2023 report. Stress and Health Disparities Lab. https://hdl.handle.net/11244/338894
11.
AyalonL.DolbergP.MikulionieneS.Perek-BiałasJ.RapolieneG.StypinskaJ.WillinskaM.de la Fuente-NunezV. (2019). A systematic review of existing ageism scales. Ageing Research Reviews, 54, Article 100919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2019.100919
12.
BastosJ. L.HarnoisC. E. (2020). Does the everyday discrimination scale generate meaningful cross-group estimates? A psychometric evaluation. Social Science & Medicine, 265, Article 113321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113321
13.
Bravo-SegalS.VillarF. (2020). Older people representation on the media during COVID-19 pandemic: A reinforcement of ageism?Revista Espanola de Geriatria y Gerontologia, 55(5), 266–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regg.2020.06.002
ChangE. S.KannothS.LevyS.WangS. Y.LeeJ. E.LevyB. R. (2020). Global reach of ageism on older persons’ health: A systematic review. PloS One, 15(1), Article e0220857. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220857
ComerfordS.O’KaneE.RoeD.AlsharedahH.O’NeillB.WalshM.BriggsR. (2024). Everyday ageism experienced by community-dwelling older people with frailty. European Geriatric Medicine, 15(6), 1763–1769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-024-01048-0
18.
DoyleD. M.MolixL. (2015). Perceived discrimination and social relationship functioning among sexual minorities: Structural stigma as a moderating factor. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy: ASAP, 15(1), 357–381. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12098
19.
GeronimusA. T.HickenM.KeeneD.BoundJ. B. (2006). Weathering and age patterns of allostatic load scores among blacks and whites in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 96(5), 826–833. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2004.060749
20.
GuyA. A.MurphyM. J.ZelayaD. G.KahlerC. W.SunS. (2024). Data integrity in an online world: Demonstration of multimodal bot screening tools and considerations for preserving data integrity in two online social and behavioral research studies with marginalized populations. Psychological Methods. Online first. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000696
21.
HarnoisC. E.BastosJ. L.CampbellM. E.KeithV. M. (2019). Measuring perceived mistreatment across diverse social groups: An evaluation of the everyday discrimination scale. Social Science & Medicine, 232, 298–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.05.011
22.
HarrisP. A.ScottK. W.LeboL.HassanN.LighterC.PulleyJ. (2012). ResearchMatch: A national registry to recruit volunteers for clinical research. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 87(1), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31823ab7d2
23.
HolmanD.WalkerA. (2021). Understanding unequal ageing: towards a synthesis of intersectionality and life course analyses. European Journal of Ageing, 18, 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-020-00582-7
24.
HopfS.WalshK.FlynnE.GeorgantziN. (2021). The relationship between ageism and well-being as mediated through COVID-19-related experiences and discourses. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(19), Article 10490. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910490
25.
HuR. X.LuoM.ZhangA.LiL. W. (2020). Associations of ageism and health: A systematic review of quantitative observational studies. Research on Aging, 43(7-8), 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027520980130
JusterR. P.McEwenB. S.LupienS. J. (2010). Allostatic load biomarkers of chronic stress and impact on health and cognition. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.10.002
28.
KennyD. A.KashyD.BolgerN. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In GilbertD.FiskeS.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 233–265). McGraw-Hill.
29.
KimE.ParkJ. (2024). Validation of the Korean version of the ageism scale in everyday life. Journal of the Korean Psychological Association: Culture and Social Issues, 30(1), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.20406/kjcs.2024.2.30.1.81
30.
KrekulaC.NikanderP.WilińskaM. (2018). Multiple marginalizations based on age: Gendered ageism and beyond. In AyalonL.Tesch-RömerC. (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on ageism (pp. 33–50). Springer International.
31.
LaidlawK.KishitaN.ShenkinS. D.PowerM. J. (2018). Development of a short form of the attitudes to ageing questionnaire (AAQ). International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 33(1), 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.4687
32.
LamontR. A.SwiftH. J.AbramsD. (2015). A review and meta-analysis of age-based stereotype threat: Negative stereotypes, not facts, do the damage. Psychology and Aging, 30(1), 180–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038586
33.
LevasseurM.NaudD.LagacéM.RaymondÉ.GénéreuxM.LordS.BédardM.-È. (2025). Adults aged 75+ happy in conventional dwelling or independent living facility but associated with thriving and ageism. Research on Aging, 47(7-8), 404–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/01640275251328591
LevyB. R.SladeM. D.ChangE.KannothS.WangS. Y. (2020). Ageism amplifies cost and prevalence of health conditions. The Gerontologist, 60(1), 174–181. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny131
36.
LichtenbergP. A. (2011). The generalizability of a participant registry for minority health research. The Gerontologist, 51(Suppl 1), S116–S124. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnr021
37.
LichtensteinB. (2021). From “Coffin Dodger” to “Boomer remover”: Outbreaks of ageism in three countries with divergent approaches to coronavirus control. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 76(4), e206–e212. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa102
38.
LudwigV.WarnerL. M.LorenzT.KesslerE. M. (2024). Perceived ageism: A systematic review of existing measures and appraisal of their psychometric quality. Educational Gerontology, 51(8), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2024.2417455
39.
MeisnerB. A. (2012). A meta-analysis of positive and negative age stereotype priming effects on behavior among older adults. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 67(1), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbr062
PrevitaliF.KeskinenK.NiskaM.NikanderP. (2022). Ageism in working life: A scoping review on discursive approaches. The Gerontologist, 62(2), e97–e111. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa119
42.
ReyesM. E. S.ChanJ. C.RoblesA. J. J.RomeroJ. B.SenierV. M. B.TorrecampoA. D.PacquingM. C. T.ArugueteM. S. (2024). Is age just a number? Ageism and quality of life among Filipino LGBT older adults. Sexuality & Culture, 28(6), 2720–2744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-024-10251-x
43.
Sargent-CoxK. A.AnsteyK. J.LuszczM. A. (2012). The relationship between change in self-perceptions of aging and physical functioning in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 27(3), 750–760. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027578
44.
SarkisianC. A.SteersW. N.HaysR. D.MangioneC. M. (2005). Development of the 12-item expectations regarding aging survey. The Gerontologist, 45(2), 240–248. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/45.2.240
45.
SkinnerC. S.TiroJ. A.RodriguezS. A. (2024). The health belief model. In GlanzK.RimerB. K.ViswanathK. (Eds.), Health behavior: Theory, research, and practice (6th edition, pp. 44–55). Jossey-Bass.
46.
SmithI. A.GriffithsA. (2022). Microaggressions, everyday discrimination, workplace incivilities, and other subtle slights at work: A meta-synthesis. Human Resource Development Review, 21(3), 275–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843221098756
47.
SwiftH. J.AbramsD.LamontR. A.DruryL. (2017). The risks of ageism model: How ageism and negative attitudes toward age can be a barrier to active aging. Social Issues and Policy Review, 11(1), 195–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12031
48.
SwiftH. J.ChasteenA. L. (2021). Ageism in the time of COVID-19. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations: GPIR, 24(2), 246–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220983452
49.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2020). Current population survey, annual social and economic supplement [Dataset].
50.
WilliamsD. R.GonzálezH. M.WilliamsS.MohammedS. A.MoomalH.SteinD. J. (2008). Perceived discrimination, race and health in South Africa: Findings from the South Africa stress and health study. Social Science and Medicine, 67, 441–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.021
51.
WilliamsD. R.YuY.JacksonJ. S.AndersonN. B. (1997). Racial differences in physical and mental health: Socioeconomic status, stress, and discrimination. Journal of Health Psychology, 2(3), 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910539700200305
ZhouY.SunY.PanY.DaiY.XiaoY.YuY. (2025). Prevalence of successful aging in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 128, Article 105604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2024.105604
