Learning Barriers,Engagement,and Interests Among Low-Income Latino Older Adults: Highlighting the Privilege of Learning and Retirement

Abstract

Objectives

Engagement in learning new skills can potentially foster cognitive and functional growth among low-income Latinos, a population at high risk for developing Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. However, they may face unique barriers to learning. The present qualitative study identified learning barriers, learning engagement, and learning interests among low-income Latino older adults.

Methods

Twenty Spanish-speaking participants were interviewed utilizing a semi-structured interview protocol. The data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach.

Results

Some of the identified barriers include lacking good health, finances, learning opportunities, technology, proficiency in English, transportation, and motivation. Participants were most interested in learning technology, English, sewing skills, and culinary arts to primarily improve their financial situation.

Discussion

These findings highlight the privilege of prioritizing leisure activities for novel skill learning in old age for those with more financial resources. Our findings promote the need to provide tailored novel skill learning opportunities for underserved populations.

Keywords

novel skill learning qualitative study cognitive disparities

Introduction

Current cognitive health disparities in the United States between minoritized and majority older adults show that Latinos are 1.5 times more likely than Whites to have Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD; Alzheimer’s Association, 2020). Disparities in cognitive health are of particular concern among the Latino population as it is anticipated that, by 2060, they will experience the greatest increase in ADRD in contrast to other races/ethnicities (Matthews et al., 2019). Despite awareness of these disparities, there is a surprising dearth of research investigating how to improve cognitive and functional abilities among Latinos and minoritized adults in general (Tzuang et al., 2018). Therefore, there is an urgent need to address this gap with Latino older adults, especially those with low income. The stress and access limitations (e.g., health care) of having low financial resources may further compromise their cognition and ability to engage in healthy lifestyles (McMaughan et al., 2020).

Engagement in novel skill learning offers a promising route for inducing cognitive and functional development in adulthood (Leanos et al., 2023; Nguyen et al., 2020; Park et al., 2014). Novel skill learning can be understood as the process of gaining content/procedural knowledge regarding any given new skill with the goal of mastering it (Sheffler et al., 2022). Several learning interventions conducted with older adults (primarily middle-to-high income Whites) have demonstrated that learning new skills can increase a range of cognitive abilities (e.g., executive functioning) as well as functional abilities related to the learned skills (Bugos et al., 2007; Bugos & Wang, 2022; Chan et al., 2016; Leanos et al., 2023; Park et al., 2014). For example, Chan et al., (2016) conducted a 3-month intervention where older adults learned to use technological devices (e.g., tablets) and found that, in contrast to 2 comparison control groups (a placebo and social group), those who learned to use tablets demonstrated increases in episodic memory and processing speed. On the functional side, learning technological skills as older adults is useful in facilitating independence in doing day-to-day activities such as accessing online banking and ordering online groceries (Chan et al., 2016; Charness & Boot, 2009).

Based on the benefits associated with learning new skills in older adulthood, Rodriguez et al. (2022) proposed a framework that states how engagement in novel skill learning could serve as a potential pathway to helping low-income minoritized older adults increase their cognitive and functional abilities and, in turn, foster healthy aging. However, this novel pathway has yet to be tested with low-income minoritized adults, partially because there might be learning barriers present among these populations. The framework specifically describes that the potential learning barriers one must consider that individuals could face can be categorized across 3 types of barriers: (1) indirect learning barriers, which indirectly influence a person’s ability to feasibly engage in learning a new skill, such as time and health status; (2) direct learning barriers, which directly relate to learning any given skill, such as materials, tools, and information; and (3) learning motivation barriers, which include mental/psychological reasons and/or perceptions that hamper an individual’s drive to engage in learning (Rodriguez et al., 2022). Learning new skills is considered an important privilege because not everyone has access to the resources that are required to engage in learning new abilities (Wu et al., 2021). Low-income Latino older adults in particular may face unique barriers and challenges, compared with other minoritized groups. For instance, some individuals in this ethnic group might experience language barriers if they primarily speak Spanish and lack proficiency in English, which has been linked with a lower use of services (Barrio et al., 2003). Also, the Latino population has one of the highest immigration rates in the United States (Budiman, 2020; Israel & Batalova, 2020), and as such, they might undergo further resource constraints due to potential immigration challenges (e.g., marginalization, fear of deportation for those undocumented, and acculturation stress; Hacker et al., 2015; Torres et al., 2012). Moreover, Latino individuals have some of the lowest levels of educational attainment compared to other racial/ethnic groups (Budiman, 2020; Duffin, 2021; Schneider et al., 2006). Thus, identifying and addressing their direct and indirect learning barriers and interests is key to encouraging and increasing feasibility and engagement in novel skill learning with the goal of improving cognitive and functional abilities.

The present study identified the resource barriers and perceived challenges to novel skill learning faced by low-income Latino older adults. This study also investigated their learning interests and current engagement in novel skill learning. These objectives are meant to inform ongoing learning programs and help create tailored learning interventions that adequately address resource needs and learning interests in this underserved population. Identifying learning barriers and needs to help generate tailored learning opportunities for older adults at risk of developing ADRD is a crucial step toward mitigating the cognitive health disparities that affect these individuals. As opposed to conducting a comparative study, the presented research takes on a within-group, qualitative approach to better understand potential inequities and diversity of experiences within low-income Latino older adults.

Method

Participants

Participants were recruited via word-of-mouth and English/Spanish flyers, and they were informed about study procedures and screened to qualify. Participants had to (a) identify as Latino, (b) be at least 55 years of age or older (based on qualification for senior benefits), (c) have a low income (calculated using the Pew Research Calculator, which takes into account the cost of living within one’s area and size-adjusted household income to determine one’s income tier; Fry, 2024), (d) be Spanish/English speakers, (e) have no prior diagnosis of cognitive impairment, and (f) have access to an email address (to receive compensation). Participants were compensated with a $60 e-gift card from either Amazon or Target (based on their preference) given that the study was conducted entirely remotely. Notably, university regulations required compensation via Amazon or Target e-gift cards, but participants strongly preferred cards for local, low-cost stores. Ethical approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the University of California, Riverside (HS 21-121).

Procedure and Materials

Participants completed a semi-structured interview (audio-recorded via Google Voice) and a demographics survey, lasting approximately 1.5 hours. The interviews were conducted by the first author, a Latina student who emigrated from Mexico and whose native language is Spanish. The interview protocol included questions (see Supplementary Appendix A) that prompted participants to discuss their experiences with and access to different (indirect and direct) learning resources, learning engagement and interests, and perceived challenges or impediments to learning new skills, subjective age, and beliefs about the existence of any age caps/limits to learning. The questions were created using the Rodriguez et al., (2022) framework. All 20 interviews were conducted in Spanish due to participants’ preferred language. Data collection concluded once saturation was established (Brod et al., 2009), as there were no more nuances in the participants’ responses by the time we reached 20 interviews.

Qualitative Data Analyses

The audio-recorded semi-structured interviews were transcribed in Microsoft Word by a team of 3 bilingual research assistants who spoke Spanish as their first language. The transcripts were then checked for accuracy by comparing the written documents to the audio recordings by the first author.

The collected qualitative data from the interviews were analyzed primarily utilizing a deductive thematic analysis approach (Bingham & Witkowsky, 2022; Boyatzis, 1998; Braun & Clarke, 2006). Deductive thematic analysis involves developing a set of predetermined coding schemes based on prior theory to identify the presence of such codes in the data when searching for themes. With a deductive approach as the basis, we also used an inductive approach to incorporate new themes/codes that emerged from the data. The data were analyzed via the following steps: (1) familiarization with the data transcripts, (2) generation of codes, (3) formulation of themes and categorization of codes under each theme, (4) revision of the themes, (5) selection of final themes, and (6) production of the final report (Braun & Clarke, 2006).

To address the first part of our study goal (identify resource barriers and perceived challenges to novel skill learning among our sample), we generated a coding scheme using the aforementioned theoretical framework proposed by Rodriguez et al. (2022). Following this framework, we identified the presence/absence of barriers to learning across participant responses. On a spreadsheet, participant answers were organized in individual cells according to each question included in the interview protocol. Cells were color-coded to denote barriers in each of their answers: red for “present barrier” or green for “absent barrier.” Next, we labeled each of our codes to create a codebook of identified barriers, and we categorized each set of barriers by type as defined by our guiding framework (indirect, direct, and motivation barriers; Rodriguez et al., 2022). Found themes were grouped under each category.

To address the second part of our study goal, we focused on responses regarding participants’ current learning engagement, learning interests, reasons for such interests, perceived benefits of learning, and learning format preferences. For current learning engagement, answers were color-coded using the red/green binary coding scheme: red for “not learning” and green for “currently learning.” For the remaining questions related to learning interests/benefits/preferences, a codebook was created based on the common patterns derived from participants’ responses across each topic, and themes were generated accordingly. We provide the percentage of participants with mentions associated with the themes that emerged from our analysis as a guide. The percentages provided should not be interpreted as population estimates.

To ensure reliability of the analyses, the interviewer and three trained research assistants independently analyzed the data using the generated coding scheme. The analysis team discussed their independent analyses and any additional codes/themes found. There was high interrater reliability based on the identified codes/themes (average k = 0.83; Cohen, 1960).

Results

Sample Characteristics

Twenty low-income, Spanish-speaking, Latino older adults (16 females and 4 males, M_age = 67.80, SD_age = 7.99, range: 55–80) residing in Southern California participated in this study. Table 1 provides a detailed breakdown regarding participants’ demographic information. Participants had income ranging from $0 to $46,000 (M = 24,835, SD = 14,151), with one individual reporting no income, given that they were 100% dependent on other family members to cover their basic needs. All participants were immigrants from Latin America. Sixty percent were retired, and 40% were still working, including 1 participant who reported to be unemployed and looking for a job. The top 3 primary occupations reported (either currently or prior to retirement) were Seamstress (25%), Housekeeper (15%), and Caregiver/Babysitter (15%). With regards to education levels, 12 (60%) participants reported to have 6 or less years of education, 2 (10%) had some high school education but no diploma, 1 (5%) had received an associate degree, 3 (15%) had received some college education with earned credits but no title/diploma, and 2 (10%) had a 4-year university degree. All of the participants mentioned that their educational attainment was done in their country of origin. Regarding marital status, 14 (70%) participants reported to be married, 2 (10%) stated that they were widowed, 2 (10%) were separated, 1 (5%) was divorced, and 1 (5%) was single. The majority of participants (85%) also said that they lived with a spouse/partner and/or with other family members. All participants reported that they were not dependent on others to conduct activities of daily living (i.e., they were functionally independent).

Table 1.

Participants’ Demographic Information.

Characteristic	n	%
Retirement status
Retired	12	60%
Working	8	40%
Top primary occupations
Seamstress	5	25%
Housekeeper	3	15%
Caregiver/Babysitter	3	15%
Education level^a
6 years or less	12	60%
Some high school education (no diploma)	2	10%
Some college (earned credits, no diploma)	3	15%
Associate degree	1	5%
4-Year university degree	2	10%
Marital status
Married	14	70%
Widowed	2	10%
Separated	2	10%
Divorced	1	5%
Single	1	5%
Living situation
With a spouse/partner	13	65%
With other family members	4	20%
Alone	2	10%
Living with someone else	1	5%
Country of origin
Mexico	15	75%
Colombia	3	15%
El Salvador	1	5%
Nicaragua	1	5%
Southern California county of residence
Los Angeles County	12	60%
Orange County	7	35%
San Bernardino	1	5%

^aAll of the participants mentioned that their educational attainment was from their country of origin.

Learning Barriers

The learning barriers identified across responses are shown in Table 2. The learning barriers were broken down into three categories: (1) indirect learning barriers; (2) direct learning barriers; and (3) learning motivation barriers (which were further investigated as a direct learning barrier theme). Themes were grouped under these categories, and within each category, themes of barriers were organized in order of frequency, from most common to least common.

Table 2.

Identified Learning Indirect, Direct, and Motivation Barriers Among Low-Income Latino Older Adults.

Barrier categories and themes	Participants (%)	Example quotes
Barrier categories and themes	N = 20	Example quotes
Indirect learning barriers
Health problems	80%	“Tengo 2 problemas de salud crónicos, ya por muchos años. Yo tengo artritis reumatoide y fibromialgia…son condiciones muy muy dolorosas y… mis condiciones médicas me hacen caer mucho en depresión porque es muy muy limitante cuando no puedes hacer tus cosas que tú estabas acostumbrada antes.”
Health problems	80%	“I have 2 chronic health problems, for many years now. I have rheumatoid arthritis and fibromyalgia…they are very very painful conditions and…my medical conditions make me fall into depression a lot because it is very very limiting when you cannot do your things that you were used to before.”
Lack of finances	80%	“Una vez fui a ese [nombre de parque] que decía que hacían artesanía, pero pues no, yo fui dos días, pero no, no, ya no quise ir porque ahí se necesita dinero porque ahí no les dan nada a uno. Uno tiene que comprar todo para hacer sus artesanías. Uno tiene que comprarlo y no, pues a uno no le alcanza.”
Lack of finances	80%	“Once, I went to that [name of park] that said they did handicrafts, but no, I went for two days, but no, no, I didn’t want to go anymore because you need money there because they don’t give one anything there. One has to buy everything to make their crafts. One has to buy it and no, I cannot afford that.”
Lack of English language proficiency	65%	“Yo he querido entrar a la escuela, pero siento que no, no puedo porque a veces necesitas escribir y yo no sé escribir en Inglés...entonces para mí es difícil un poco el acceso a la educación porque no entiendo el Inglés y hay clases que no las puedes agarrar en Español...yo trabajé en un hospital desde el 2007 hasta el 2016…y en ese tiempo mi meta era llegar a ser CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant]...pero, ¿qué me lo impidió? El Inglés.”
Lack of English language proficiency	65%	“I have been wanting to enter school, but I feel that no, I can’t because sometimes you need to write and I do not know how to write in English…so, for me it is difficult a bit the access to education because I do not understand English and there are classes that you can’t take in Spanish… I worked in a hospital from 2007 to 2016…and during that time, my goal was to become a CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant]...but, what stopped me? The English [language].”
Lack of reliable transportation	55%	“Me gustaba ir a la escuela, pero dejé de estar yendo porque a veces no se podía ir por la [falta de] transportación.”
Lack of reliable transportation	55%	“I liked going to school, but I stopped going because sometimes it was not possible to go because of [the lack of] transportation.”
Time constraints	45%	“Ahorita, mi problema [para aprender] nomás es porque no tengo el tiempo.”
Time constraints	45%	“Right now, my problem [to learn] is just because I do not have the time.”
Immigrant-related limitations	45%	“...ese es uno de los miedos a los que me refiero cuando llenamos formas, no estamos seguros de que estamos haciéndolo correcto, no queremos estar en lo ilegal y no queremos meternos en problemas ¿verdad? Y entonces siempre hay que estar checando si esto o el otro está bien para inmigrantes [indocumentados] o no.”
Immigrant-related limitations	45%	“...that’s one of the fears I am referring to when we fill out forms, we are not sure that we are filling it out correctly, we do not want to be illegal and we do not want to get in trouble, right? And so, we are always checking whether this or that is ok for [undocumented] immigrants or not.”
Physical/cognitive functional limitations (achaques)	45%	“Como no miro, eso es lo que no me permite hacer habilidades que me gustan. Yo digo que si tuviera mi vista buena, sí lo hago, porque sí me gusta, me gusta aprender más cosas, pero pues, mi vista no me ayuda. Todo lo miro borroso y eso es lo principal para uno poder aprender algo más.”
Physical/cognitive functional limitations (achaques)	45%	“Since I can’t see, that is what does not allow me to do abilities that I like. I say that if I had good vision, I would do it, because I do like it, I like learning more things, but well, my eyesight does not help me. I see everything blurry and that is key for one to be able to learn something more.”
Lack of support	20%	“Lo que me impide es que a veces mis hijas me quieren detener de que yo haga las cosas…a veces la misma familia quiere apachurrar a los ancianos, a que no se mueva uno...tambien si el esposo no te da permiso, no lo puedes hacer, como en mi juventud, yo quise aprender Inglés y me prohibió, me quitó, y no me dejó.”
Lack of support	20%	“What prevents me is that sometimes my daughters want to stop me from doing things…sometimes the family itself wants to squash older adults, to have one not move...also, if the husband does not give you permission, you cannot do it, like in my youth, I wanted to learn English and he prohibited me, removed me, and did not let me.”
Direct learning barriers
Lack of awareness/knowledge of learning opportunities	75%	“No conozco lugares así donde uno va a aprender.”
Lack of awareness/knowledge of learning opportunities	75%	“I do not know places like that where one goes to learn.”
Lack of technology access/literacy	75%	“La verdad que he luchado, pero nadie me lo ha enseñado, yo agarre un teléfono porque yo quería aprender un teléfono, como dices tú, inteligente, diferente al de abrir y cerrar que tengo. Lo tuve un año y pues no. Le encuentro más a esos de abrir y cerrar…pero esos de planchita no pude mija, la verdad no pude, no tuve quien me enseñara pero si hubiera quien me enseñara, yo aprendería, pero yo les pregunto y pues no, se voltean por otra parte y cuando yo veo que alguien no se interesa en enseñarme, ya no, no le agarro interés. Porque digo yo, bueno, si nadie me va a enseñar, ¿cómo voy a aprender?”
Lack of technology access/literacy	75%	“I have honestly tried, but no one has taught it to me, I got a phone because I wanted to learn how to use a phone, as you say, that is smart, different from the flip phone that I have. I had it for a year and, well no. I find the flip phones easier to use…but those flat ones I could not, I honestly could not, I did not have anyone to teach me, but if I had someone to teach me, I would learn, but I ask them and well no, they turn away and when I see that someone is not interested in teaching me, I no longer take interest. That’s why I say, well, if nobody is going to teach me, how will I learn?”
Lack of motivation	50%	“No creo que tenga algo de magia para motivarme [a aprender nuevas habilidades]. No, porque yo ya estoy pensando más en el otro lado que en este mundo…pues ya llega uno a viejo…y la vejez es muy triste.”
Lack of motivation	50%	“I do not think I have some magic to motivate me [to learn new skills]. No, because I am already thinking more about the other side than in this world… one arrives at old age… and old age is very sad.”
Not knowing what to learn	20%	“Mija pues ahorita no tengo nada en la mente… si no sabes qué quieres aprender pues está un poco más difícil porque pues no sabes que quieres. Pero si hubiera alguna cosa…como…un centro comunitario o una cosa ahí para que le digan cuáles son los programas [de aprendizaje], que como son, y que hacen, y que necesitas, pues se podría ver a ver que puede hacer uno y que le gustaría.”
Not knowing what to learn	20%	“Mija as of right now I have nothing in mind…if you do not know what you want to learn it is a bit harder because you do not know what you want. If I had something…like…a community center or something there so that they could tell one which are the [learning] programs, how they are, and what they do, and what you need, well one could see what one could do or what one would like.”
Learning motivation barriers
Age (being “old”)	50%	“¿Para qué? Ya tengo 72 años…te digo que ya estoy muy grande para poder desempeñar algo bonito. Y a veces ya los años ya… a veces sí pesan. No es como cuando uno está joven, que está bien hábil para todo.”
Age (being “old”)	50%	“For what? I am already 72 years old…I am telling you that I am too old to be able to develop something nice. And sometimes the years already… sometimes they do weigh. It is not like when one is young, that is skilled for everything.”
Tiredness/lacking energy	35%	“Si no saldría tan cansado del trabajo yo estaría más motivado [para aprender una nueva habilidad].”
Tiredness/lacking energy	35%	“If I didn’t get out of work so tired, I would be more motivated [to learn a new skill].”
Lack of confidence/self-efficacy	25%	“En parte tengo mucho interés en aprender, pero en parte pienso que ya no puedo aprender mucho por mi edad.”
Lack of confidence/self-efficacy	25%	“Partly, I have a lot of interest to learn, but partly, I think that I can no longer learn much because of my age.”
Frustration/lack of patience	10%	“Necesitaría que alguien con paciencia me enseñara.”
Frustration/lack of patience	10%	“I would need someone with patience to teach me.”

Indirect Learning Barriers

Eight indirect learning barriers were identified that can act as precursive impediments to learning engagement.

Health Problems

A large percentage of participants (80%) reported having physical and/or mental health issues. Participants described how some of their conditions negatively affected their daily living due to having pain that physically and mentally constrained them, leaving them with no energy to do other things. Health issues act as a barrier to learning if the physical and mental energy of individuals to engage in learning is compromised as a result of chronic pain and/or mental health problems.

Lack of Finances

Eighty percent of the participants also described facing financial struggles and lacking monetary resources which made it a barrier for them to afford and pay for different basic needs. Indeed, some participants were still working past retirement because they did not have enough money (even when they were receiving social security funds). Participants specifically noted their lack of finances as a barrier to affording materials/tools and class fees for engaging in learning new skills. Some described instances when they wanted to engage in learning a new ability but, because they lacked the money to pay for the required tools and materials, they had to give it up. Another participant noted that they sometimes tried to save money so that they could pay for a class, yet there were always other priorities over learning that led them to spend that money in other ways (e.g., fixing something in their home).

Lack of English Language Proficiency

Language was another common barrier, as several participants (65%) mentioned that not knowing English with enough proficiency had presented challenges to communicating and understanding service providers when attempting to seek information or resources. Participants specifically noted that their lack of English prevented them from partaking in learning programs. A participant shared that not knowing how to write in English was a barrier for them to receive more education and to find a better job.

Lack of Reliable Transportation

Not having reliable transportation was a barrier for 55% of participants in the study. Unreliable transportation was classified as anything other than owning their own vehicle or having reliable access to transportation. Most of the participants who did not have their own vehicle reported that they depended on family members, close friends, or neighbors to drive them around to get groceries, get to their job, go to medical appointments, etc. Alternatives to family members/close friends included walking, bicycling, and taking the bus (or Uber for some). Relying on these methods for transportation was described as difficult and limiting. Some participants shared that not having their own car prevented them from taking classes.

Time Constraints

Forty-five percent of participants expressed facing time constraints due to working, babysitting grandchildren, taking care of their spouse or other family members, completing house chores/duties, and partaking in church-related activities (e.g., reading the Bible, attending mass, and making visits to members of the church). These responsibilities left them with limited time to engage in other activities, and several mentioned it was a primary barrier for them to learning.

Immigrant-Related Limitations

In terms of accessibility of resources in their community, 45% of participants described that being an immigrant (or undocumented) limited them. One participant shared that he and his wife were sometimes scared of seeking resources and filling out paperwork that might not apply to them due to their undocumented status because they did not want to get in any trouble. This immigration-related fear could discourage undocumented Latino older adults from enrolling in learning opportunities even when situations would be safe.

Physical/Cognitive Functional Limitations (“Achaques”)

Aside from the health-related problems described earlier, participants (45%) also expressed experiencing age-related physical and/or cognitive declines, as well as aches and pains (“achaques de la vejez/de la edad” in the Latino culture). This theme differs from the health-related problems theme in that it includes physical/mental declines and pains that are not linked to any particular disease or medical condition but rather related to the normative physiological process of getting older. These declines and achaques were noted as potential challenges to learning new skills, such as memory and vision problems, not being able to walk very well, back pain, and knee pain. In particular, lack of vision seemed to be a common problem that participants felt impeded them from learning.

Lack of Support

Although most participants shared that they would likely receive support from family members, friends, etc., if they wanted to learn new skills, 20% said that they did not think that they would receive support in this way. One participant mentioned that his support network would think that he was too old to engage in learning: “Me dirían ‘no pues ya estás viejo’...por eso, no me apoyarían” (“They would say ‘no, you are already old’...that’s why, they would not support me”). Another participant said that she thought that her daughters would not support her to learn new skills because they tend to stop her from doing things in general due to her being an older adult.

Direct Learning Barriers

Four direct learning barriers were identified relating to knowledge/awareness of available learning opportunities, technology accessibility and/or literacy, motivation to learn, and knowing what to learn.

Lack of Awareness/Knowledge of Learning Opportunities

One of the most frequently described direct barriers to learning was lack of awareness/knowledge of learning opportunities in their community. Altogether, 75% of participants said that they did not know of any places where they could go to learn a new skill.

Lack of Technology Access/Literacy

Another top direct learning barrier was lack of technology access and literacy, as 75% of participants reported not having access to technology (e.g., computers, smartphones, tablets, and internet) or not knowing how to use technological devices even if they had them available at home. For participants with smartphones, they mentioned primarily using them just to make phone calls because they did not understand how to navigate the other features on their phone. A common phrase used across participants was, “Mi teléfono es inteligente, pero yo no” (“My phone is smart, but I am not”). Furthermore, some participants mentioned having a flip phone because they could not afford a smartphone or because they did not feel comfortable having a more advanced phone. One participant indicated that they tried using a smartphone for a while but decided to go back to using a flip phone because she could not learn how to use it and there was no one willing to teach her.

Lack of Motivation

The third most common direct learning barrier found across 50% of participants was lack of motivation to learn a new skill. When participants were prompted to talk about their motivation to learn, several discussed that they did not feel motivated at all or that they had low motivation to do so. Participants gave specific reasons for feeling unmotivated/lacking motivation, which are described and broken down into themes under the learning motivation barriers section further below.

Not Knowing what to Learn

In addition to the aforementioned barrier of not knowing where to go to learn, 20% of participants noted that they did not know what to learn. These participants had trouble thinking about what they would be interested in learning when asked to discuss their learning interests. Some of the participants indicated that they had nothing in mind regarding what they would want to learn and that they would have to see what options are available in order for them to choose what would be interesting for them. One participant mentioned that he would benefit from having a community center where he could go and be provided with guidance on class options he could take.

Learning Motivation Barriers

A total of 4 themes relating to learning motivation barriers were extracted from the data. These themes were derived from participants’ descriptions of what they perceived to be the reasons/barriers that hampered their motivation to engage in learning new skills. Although a lot of the barriers already described can negatively affect learning motivation, participants noted the following barriers as specifically impacting their learning motivation.

Age (Being “Old”)

Half of the participants in the study discussed age as being a reason for their lack of motivation for learning. Some participants stated that at their age, they simply felt that there was no point in learning, and referenced youth as being the life stage to learn. For instance, when asked about their motivation to learn, one participant said: “Tal vez si estuviera un poco más joven, tal vez tendría más motivación” (“Maybe if I was a bit younger, maybe I would have more motivation”).

Tiredness/Lacking Energy

Among those who reported having little to no motivation, 35% stated that being tired and lacking energy to learn new skills contributed to their lack of motivation. Some older adults attributed their tiredness to their age and indicated that they rather rest than engage in learning: “Los viejitos lo que queremos es descansar” (“What we older adults want is to rest”). Those who still worked mentioned that they were too tired from work to have the motivation to learn: “porque trabajo y ya vengo cansada, ya no tengo ánimos de ir a la escuela” (“because I work and I already come home tired, I don’t have the spirit to go to school”).

Lack of Confidence/Self-Efficacy

Lacking motivation to learn was also connected to lacking confidence and having low learning self-efficacy for 25% of the participants. They stated that they did not feel secure/confident in their ability to learn. Some specified that they felt unintelligent or that they simply could not learn easily (e.g., “soy muy burro”/ “I am very dumb”; “no soy fácil de aprender”/ “I cannot learn easily”). Closely related to the theme of age (being “old”), some participants also said they lacked learning self-efficacy due to their age.

Frustration/Lack of Patience

A less frequent but notable barrier mentioned by 10% of participants was experiencing frustration and lacking patience, resulting in reduced motivation to learn. Participants mentioned that they did not have the same patience that they once did and that they get frustrated easily. Participants also mentioned that others were impatient towards them when they wanted to learn. For example, one participant wanted to learn how to use a computer and joined an intergenerational course at a local community college. He felt that he was not patient with himself and that the instructor was not patient with him and with other older adults in the class. The participant expressed feeling demotivated to try again and never went back to any other courses since then.

Learning Engagement and Interests

This second section presents findings on current learning engagement and learning interests among low-income Latino older adults. We also explored the reasons for such interests, perceived benefits of learning, and learning format preferences. Identified themes regarding learning benefits and reasons for learning engagement are displayed in Table 3. Only 35% of participants shared that they were currently engaged in learning. Of the 35%, more than half learned in an informal manner by learning on their own or through a family member (e.g., grandchildren). Two were formally learning new skills through a class with an instructor. Reasons for why the remaining 65% of participants were not engaged in learning new skills are reflected in the barriers presented in the results section above.

Table 3.

Identified Learning Benefits and Reasons for Learning Engagement Among Low-Income Latino Older Adults.

Learning benefits/reasons	Participants (%)	Example quotes
Learning benefits/reasons	N = 20	Example quotes
Find a job/make more money	45%	“Aprender más profesional el Inglés para tal vez conseguir un mejor trabajo donde me esforzaría menos y ganaría un poquito más.”
Find a job/make more money	45%	“Learn English more professionally to maybe get a better job where I would exert less effort and earn a little bit more.”
Keep an occupied/active mind	25%	“Me beneficiaría porque yo pienso que mi mente estaría más ocupada porque a veces no tengo nada que hacer y nomás estoy en la cama viendo la televisión y eso me imagino que es malo en vez de aprender alguna habilidad.”
Keep an occupied/active mind	25%	“It would benefit me because I think that my mind would be more occupied because sometimes I have nothing to do and I am just in bed watching television and I imagine that that is bad instead of learning a new skill.”
Improve communication	25%	“Aprender a usar la technología para poderme comunicar con mi familia que está lejos.”
Improve communication	25%	“Learn to use technology to be able to communicate with my family that is far away.”
Be more independent	10%	“Molesto mucho a mi nieta, ‘hija, manda por favor este mensaje aquí y mándame este número’ y ya quisiera no estar dependiente de otra persona [para cosas de la tecnología].”
Be more independent	10%	“I bother my granddaughter a lot, ‘hija, please send this message here and send me this number’, and I would want to no longer be dependent on another person [for technology things].”

Skill Learning Interests

Ten skills that participants would have liked to learn were identified. Out of the 10 identified skills, there were 4 main skills of interest that were mentioned by at least 25% of participants. Forty percent of the participants wanted to learn how to use technology, including smartphones, computers, and tablets. The second most frequent skill mentioned by 35% of participants was learning English. Sewing-related skills, such as crocheting and embroidery, were mentioned by 25% of participants, as were culinary skills, including making desserts and gourmet dishes. The other 6 skills were mentioned once each: gardening, floral arts, fixing home appliances, driving, cosmetology, and finance/investing.

Perceived Learning Benefits/Reasons for Learning

Four themes relating to participants’ perceived benefits of/reasons for learning were obtained from the data (see Table 3). Most of the learning reasons described align with the top 4 learning interests (reported in the subsection above).

Find a Job/Make More Money

The main perceived learning benefit/reason indicated by 45% of participants was finding a (better) job and/or making more money. Several participants said that engaging in learning would be something beneficial if it could result in them making more money. For instance, one participant mentioned: “Si yo puedo conseguir algún dinero extra por eso que he aprendido, ¡qué bueno sería!” (“If I can get some extra money because of what I have learned, how good would that be!”). Participants interested in learning to sew mentioned that knowing how to fix or make clothes would be financially rewarding to have “cositas para vender” (“things to sell”). Other participants said that learning English would be advantageous because it would help them find a (better) job, leading to financial gains.

Keep an Active/Occupied Mind

Twenty-five percent of participants said that learning new skills would be overall beneficial for their mind. Participants described that learning would help them have “una mente activa” (“an active mind”) and “la mente más ocupada” (“a more occupied mind”). Some participants said that learning would be great for keeping their mind entertained and not be bored when they have nothing to do: “Aprender sería fabuloso porque está la mente entretenida” (“Learning would be fabulous because the mind is entertained”).

Improve Communication

Another perceived benefit/reason derived specifically from learning English and technology was improved communication, which 25% of participants noted. In terms of learning English, participants said that it would help them communicate better with service providers and medical specialists who only speak English without the need of an interpreter. One participant commented that it would benefit them by enabling them to express themselves and to have “más conversaciones abiertas” (“more open conversations”) with other English speakers. With regards to learning to use technology, participants mentioned that they saw value in learning this skill because it could also improve their long-distance communication with loved ones/family.

Be More Independent

Although less frequent, becoming more independent was also identified as a potential benefit and reason to engage in learning among 10% of participants. In relation to learning English, one participant shared: “Si yo aprendo bien el Inglés, ya no necesito estar con mi hija que me esté ayudando a llevarme al doctor, sería más independiente” (“If I learn English well, I no longer need to have my daughter help take me to the doctor, I would be more independent”). Another participant described that learning technology would also help them not be so dependent on her granddaughter to navigate technology.

Learning Format Preferences

To understand the learning format preferences that our participants had, we asked them whether they would be most interested in learning in person or online, as well as whether they preferred learning individually or in a group. Table 4 shows the themes regarding the preferred learning formats identified. We also asked them to provide their reasoning behind their preferred learning format. All 20 participants stated their chosen preference for either in-person or online learning, but 5 participants declared that they had no preference between learning individually or in a group. This subsection presents the learning preferences and provides the qualitative responses for these preferences.

Table 4.

Preferred Learning Formats Among Low-Income Latino Older Adults.

Format	Participants (%)	Example quotes
Format	N = 20	Example quotes
In-person learning	70%	“Le digo que yo no sé usar nada de eso [tecnología], si me van a enseñar pues prefiero que me enseñen en persona.”
In-person learning	70%	“I am telling you that I do not know how to use any of that [technology], if they are going to teach me, then I prefer that they teach me in person.”
Online learning	30%	“Ahorita me siento más segura en línea porque no me quiero enfermar.”
Online learning	30%	“Right now I feel safer online because I do not want to get sick.”
In a group	60%	“En persona me conecto con la gente, entonces me gusta en persona 100%, en persona y en grupo… me gusta ver a las personas, ver sus emociones, sentir su energía, socializar…”
In a group	60%	“In person I connect with people, so I like it in person 100%, in person and in a group…I like to see people, see their emotions, feel their energy, socialize…”
Individually	15%	“Yo pienso que es mejor individualmente porque a veces en grupo lo que pasa es que se ríen de uno porque uno no pronuncia [el inglés] bien. Eso me pasó un tiempo que fui a la escuela.”
Individually	15%	“I think it is better individually because sometimes in a group what happens is that they laugh at you because you do not pronounce [English] well. That happened to me during the time that I went to school.”

In-Person Learning

Seventy percent of participants said that they preferred learning in person. Participants explained that they generally believed they learn better in person than online (e.g., “En persona se aprende mejor”/ “In person one learns better”; “En línea no aprendes igual”/ “Online you don’t learn the same”; “En línea no entendería nada”/ “I would not understand anything online”). Many participants also lacked technology access/literacy to learn online, which was another key reason for preferring in-person learning.

Online Learning

Online learning was preferred by 30% of participants. Among those who chose this learning format, some participants said that learning online would be the most feasible way they could engage in learning because they have physical limitations, they are homebound, or do not have reliable transportation to go learn somewhere in person (e.g., “En línea puedo hacerlo porque no puedo salir”/ “Online I can do it because I can’t go out”). Two participants also mentioned that they would feel more comfortable and confident learning online (e.g., “Me sentiría mejor y con más confianza”/ “I would feel better and with more confidence”). Another participant mentioned that she felt safer learning online to protect herself from being exposed to COVID-19.

Learning in a Group

Sixty percent of participants indicated that they favored learning in a group. Learning in a group was considered best by many because people can “aprender más de los demás” (“learn more from others”). Participants also described that when people learn in a group, they can ask each other questions if they need help understanding something (e.g., “poder preguntarle a la gente cuando uno no entiende”/ “being able to ask people when one does not understand”). Another popular motive for wanting to learn in a group was being able to socialize and connect with others.

Learning Individually

Only 15% of participants preferred to learn individually rather than in a group. One participant shared that they thought learning individually was better because if you are learning in a group and make friends, they distract you from learning: “Cuando te haces amigos, no te dejan aprender, ya no te dejan estar atento” (“When you make friends, they don’t let you learn, they no longer let you pay attention”). Another participant mentioned that she preferred to learn individually because she had prior negative experiences from when she was going to a class to learn English and her peers made fun of her for mispronouncing some words.

Discussion and Implications

Cognitive health disparities show that low-income Latinos face a higher risk for developing ADRD than majority individuals (Alzheimer’s Association, 2020; Matthews et al., 2019). Surprisingly, there is a lack of research aiming to find new methods to help mitigate such disparities. Learning new skills has been identified as a potential pathway to increasing cognitive and functional abilities among older adults. Nonetheless, this pathway has yet to be tested with low-income Latinos, as they may face barriers to learning engagement that are not properly accounted for. Therefore, this qualitative study investigated and identified important themes on the learning barriers, learning engagement, and learning interests among low-income Latino older adults. Our findings are a first step toward understanding how we can best tailor feasible learning opportunities for this underserved population to improve their cognition and functional abilities with the goal of preventing declines and attenuating the pervasive cognitive health disparities that affect them.

The themes on learning barriers found in this study support the theoretical assumption that low-income Latino older adults have a wide range of barriers to learning engagement (Rodriguez et al., 2022). In terms of indirect learning barriers, we found that health problems, lack of finances, lack of English proficiency, lack of reliable transportation, time constraints, immigrant-related limitations, physical/cognitive limitations, and lack of social support were all perceived as potential challenges or obstacles to engaging in novel skill learning. In terms of direct learning barriers, lack of awareness/knowledge of learning opportunities, lack of technology access/literacy, lack of motivation, and not knowing what to learn were also identified as potential impediments to learning new skills. These results on the barriers to learning engagement closely align with the findings of previous studies that have focused on identifying barriers to research participation and retention among Latinos and other racial/ethnic minoritized groups (e.g., Calderon et al., 2006; George et al., 2014).

Among the participants who reported lacking motivation to learn, we found that age (being “old”), feeling tired/lacking energy, lacking confidence/self-efficacy, and experiencing frustration/lack of patience (either with themselves or from others) were perceived as factors that hindered their learning motivation. The themes found about age (being “old”) and lacking confidence/self-efficacy as demotivators to learning new skills reflect ageist stereotypes that exist in our society and have been internalized by older adults (Achenbaum, 2015; Köttl et al., 2021; Levy et al., 2022). The societal expectations of learning being reserved for younger populations could also have contributed to these themes (Wu et al., 2021). Furthermore, our theme that frustration and lack of patience results in lower motivation is consistent with previous research on barriers to technology use among older adults. Wang et al. (2019) found that experiencing frustration when trying to learn new technology led older adults to lack the motivation to further pursue using and learning technology. Experiencing frustration/lack of patience from instructors (whether formal or informal) when trying to learn a new skill was also found to be demotivating, as described by some of our participants. This finding suggests that when teaching older adults new skills, not only should their frustration be properly addressed to prevent declines in learning motivation but also the instructors themselves should have patience and avoid showing their own frustration toward the older adult learners.

Our results on the learning engagement of the participants in our sample showed that only 35% were currently engaged in learning new skills. However, from that 35%, most were learning informally from a family member and with little-to-no structure. We also found that participants were most interested in learning skills related to technology, English, sewing, and culinary arts. Technology was the top skill of interest among our participants, which contradicts beliefs that older adults are not interested in learning new technologies and that they consider technology to be useless (Wandke et al., 2012).

We also found that the primary motivator/reason for engaging in learning new skills was to find a (better) job and/or make more money, suggesting that our sample might be more extrinsically motivated to learn rather than intrinsically. Importantly, these findings contradict the Socioemotional Selectivity Theory (SST), which states that as individuals become older, they become more intrinsically motivated to engage in things that they view as valuable to their enjoyment and happiness (Carstensen et al., 1999; Kooij et al., 2011). The discrepancy between prior findings that support SST and our findings highlights the privilege of being able to prioritize enjoyment and happiness in old age when one has more financial resources. The individuals in our sample faced monetary struggles and, as a result, they would benefit more from learning practical skills that help better their financial situation rather than learning leisure skills that promote happiness. More research should examine aspects of current theories on aging that are based on privilege. The entire concept of “retirement” may be based on privilege (Ayon et al., 2022). Careful consideration is required when making theory-driven assumptions across individuals of different socioeconomic, cultural, and racial/ethnic backgrounds.

Aside from skill learning interests, we explored learning format preferences and found that the majority of participants had a preference for learning in person and in a group. Many noted lack of technology access/literacy as the main reason for supporting in-person learning. Providing technology access and teaching older adults how to navigate technology could be a primary step to helping these older adults feasibly engage in online learning. Online learning can also help mitigate several of the learning barriers identified in our study (e.g., lack of transportation). Learning with a group was favored because participants described that they could learn and receive help from others, as well as socialize. Socializing has been shown to be a motivating factor for older adults to engage in volunteering opportunities (Warburton et al., 2001), suggesting that this could also be used as a tool to encourage older adults to join a learning program/class, as long as negative aspects of social comparison and ridiculing are minimized.

Based on the findings from this study, future research should design tailored learning interventions for low-income Latino older adults to test whether novel skill learning leads to long-term cognitive and functional improvements in this at-risk population (Rodriguez et al., 2022). Once older adults better understand how to engage in learning opportunities and have reduced learning barriers, perhaps continued learning engagement would drive long-term cognitive and functional growth. Current learning program leaders could also take into consideration the learning barriers and interests in this population. By doing so, learning needs could be better addressed and enrollment may increase. For instance, learning programs could be made more widely available for free or at a low cost, incorporate transportation services, provide individuals with any required learning materials/tools, have flexible meeting times, be offered in Spanish, and make necessary adjustments for those with physical limitations. Policymakers could also implement strategies to mitigate learning barriers among older adults of all backgrounds and raise more awareness about the potential benefits of learning engagement. Funding could be allocated towards learning opportunities that are affordable and accessible for underserved older adult populations, and importantly, based on need. Lastly, future research could study the potential learning barriers and interests of other minoritized populations. These efforts could be essential for mitigating or even preventing cognitive decline in high-risk populations.

Supplemental Material

Supplemental Material - Learning Barriers, Engagement, and Interests Among Low-Income Latino Older Adults: Highlighting the Privilege of Learning and Retirement

Supplemental Material for Learning Barriers, Engagement, and Interests Among Low-Income Latino Older Adults: Highlighting the Privilege of Learning and Retirement by Tania M. Rodriguez, Xitlaly Neri, and Rachel Wu in Journal of Aging and Health.

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank our participants for sharing their perspectives and experiences with us and without whom we would not have been able to conduct the study. We are also grateful for our team of research assistants, Xitlaly Neri, Alicia Perez, and Sabrina Sarmiento, for transcribing and helping with coding the data. Due to the nature of our qualitative data, it is not available to other researchers or to the public to maintain confidentiality of our participants’ responses. This study was not pre-registered.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study is supported by the National Institute on Aging at the National Institutes of Health (grant number P30AG059298).

ORCID iD

Tania M. Rodriguez

Supplemental Material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

Achenbaum

W. A.

(2015). A history of ageism since 1969. Generations: Journal of the American Society on Aging, 39(3), 10–16. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26556123

Alzheimer’s Association . (2020). Race, ethnicity, and Alzheimer’s [fact sheet]. https://aaic.alz.org/downloads2020/2020_Race_and_Ethnicity_Fact_Sheet.pdf (Accessed 15 December 2022).

Ayón

Deniz-Zaragoza

Marshall

Hernandez

(2022). Retirement is not an option for the undocumented: Undocumented latinx older adults’ perceptions of financial (in) security in the United States. Social Work Research, 47(1), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/svac030

Barrio

Yamada

A.-M.

Hough

Hawthorne

Garcia

Jeste

D. V.

(2003). Ethnic disparities in use of public mental health case management services among patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatric Services, 54(9), 1264–1270. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.54.9.1264

Bingham

A. J.

Witkowsky

(2022). Deductive and inductive approaches to qualitative data analysis. In Vanover

Mihas

Saldaña

(Eds.), Analyzing and interpreting qualitative data: After the interview (pp. 133–146). Sage Publications.

Boyatzis

R. E.

(1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage.

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brod

Tesler

L. E.

Christensen

T. L.

(2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9

Budiman

(2020). Key findings about U.S. immigrants. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/08/20/key-findings-about-u-s-immigrants/ (Accessed 16 December 2022).

10.

Bugos

J. A.

Perlstein

W. M.

McCrae

C. S.

Brophy

T. S.

Bedenbaugh

P. H.

(2007). Individualized piano instruction enhances executive functioning and working memory in older adults. Aging & Mental Health, 11(4), 464–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860601086504

11.

Bugos

J. A.

Wang

(2022). Piano training enhances executive functions and psychosocial outcomes in aging: Results of a randomized controlled trial. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 77(9), 1625–1636. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbac021

12.

Calderón

J. L.

Baker

R. S.

Fabrega

Conde

J. G.

Hays

R. D.

Fleming

Norris

(2006). An ethno-medical perspective on research participation: A qualitative pilot study. Medscape General Medicine, 8(2), 23.

13.

Carstensen

L. L.

Isaacowitz

D. M.

Charles

S. T.

(1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54(3), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.165

14.

Chan

M. Y.

Haber

Drew

L. M.

Park

D. C.

(2016). Training older adults to use tablet computers: Does it enhance cognitive function? The Gerontologist, 56(3), 475–484. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu057

15.

Charness

Boot

W. R.

(2009). Aging and information technology use: Potential and barriers. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 253–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01647.x

16.

Cohen

(1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104

17.

Duffin

(2021). Percentage of educational attainment in the United States in 2018, by ethnicity. U.S. Census Bureau. https://www.statista.com/statistics/184264/educational-attainment-by-enthnicity/ (Accessed 21 December 2022).

18.

Fry

(2024). Are you in the American middle class? Find out with our income calculator. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/09/16/are-you-in-the-american-middle-class/ (Accessed 20 September 2024).

19.

George

Duran

Norris

(2014). A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders. American Journal of Public Health, 104(2), e16–e31. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301706

20.

Hacker

Anies

Folb

B. L.

Zallman

(2015). Barriers to health care for undocumented immigrants: A literature review. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 8, 175–183. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S70173

21.

Israel

Batalova

(2020). Mexican immigrants in the United States. Migration Policy Institute. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/mexican-immigrants-united-states-2019 (Accessed 16 December 2022).

22.

Kooij

D. T. A. M.

de Lange

A. H.

Jansen

P. G. W.

Kanfer

Dikkers

J. S. E.

(2011). Age and work-related motives: Results of a meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(2), 197–225. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.665

23.

Köttl

Gallistl

Rohner

Ayalon

(2021). “But at the age of 85? Forget it!”: Internalized ageism, a barrier to technology use. Journal of Aging Studies, 59, Article 100971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100971

24.

Leanos

Kürüm

Strickland-Hughes

C. M.

Ditta

A. S.

Nguyen

Felix

Yum

Rebok

G. W.

(2023). The impact of learning multiple real-world skills on cognitive abilities and functional independence in healthy older adults. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 78(8), 1305–1317. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbad053

25.

Levy

S. R.

Lytle

Macdonald

(2022). The worldwide ageism crisis. Journal of Social Issues, 78(4), 743–768. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12568

26.

Matthews

K. A.

Gaglioti

A. H.

Holt

J. B.

Croft

J. B.

Mack

McGuire

L. C.

(2019). Racial and ethnic estimates of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias in the United States (2015–2060) in adults aged ≥ 65 years. Alzheimer's and Dementia, 15(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2018.06.3063

27.

McMaughan

D. J.

Oloruntoba

Smith

M. L.

(2020). Socioeconomic status and access to healthcare: Interrelated drivers for healthy aging. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, 231. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00231

28.

Nguyen

Leanos

Natsuaki

M. N.

Rebok

G. W.

(2020). Adaptation for growth via learning new skills as a means to long-term functional independence in older adulthood: Insights from emerging adulthood. The Gerontologist, 60(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny128

29.

Park

D. C.

Lodi-Smith

Drew

Haber

Hebrank

Bischof

G. N.

Aamodt

(2014). The impact of sustained engagement on cognitive function in older adults: The Synapse Project. Psychological Science, 25(1), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613499592

30.

Rodriguez

T. M.

Sheffler

Ferguson

L. E.

Rebok

G. W.

(2022). Cognitive and functional improvement via novel skill learning for low-income minoritized middle-aged and older adults. Prevention Science, 24(5), 926–935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-022-01413-0

31.

Schneider

Martinez

Owens

(2006). Barriers to educational opportunities for Hispanics in the United States. In Tienda

Mitchell

(Eds.), Hispanics and the future of America (pp. 179–227). The National Academies Press.

32.

Sheffler

Rodriguez

T. M.

Cheung

C. S.

(2022). Cognitive and metacognitive, motivational, and resource considerations for learning new skills across the lifespan. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 13(2), Article e1585. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1585

33.

Torres

Driscoll

M. W.

Voell

(2012). Discrimination, acculturation, acculturative stress, and Latino psychological distress: A moderated mediational model. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 18(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026710

34.

Tzuang

Owusu

J. T.

Spira

A. P.

Albert

M. S.

Rebok

G. W.

(2018). Cognitive training for ethnic minority older adults in the United States: A review. The Gerontologist, 58(5), e311–e324. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw260

35.

Wandke

Sengpiel

Sönksen

(2012). Myths about older people's use of information and communication technology. Gerontology, 58(6), 564–570. https://doi.org/10.1159/000339104

36.

Wang

Bolling

Mao

Reichstadt

Jeste

Kim

H. C.

Nebeker

(2019). Technology to support aging in place: Older adults' perspectives. Healthcare, 7(2), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare7020060

37.

Warburton

Terry

D. J.

Rosenman

L. S.

Shapiro

(2001). Differences between older volunteers and nonvolunteers: Attitudinal, normative, and control beliefs. Research on Aging, 23(5), 586–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027501235004

38.

Zhao

Cheung

Natsuaki

M. N.

Rebok

G. W.

Strickland-Hughes

C. M.

(2021). Learning as an important privilege: A life span perspective with implications for successful aging. Human Development, 65(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1159/000514554