Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-10
Longitudinal Associations Between Cognition and Grip Strength,Differentiated by Sex and Physical Activity: A Population-Based Study in Older Adults From 17 European Countries
Objectives (1) To investigate longitudinal associations between grip strength (GS) and cognition over 4 years in European older adults, (2) to examine differences in temporal associations between men and women and between levels of physical activity, (3) to explore in each year 2015 and 2019 associations between GS quartiles and cognitive performance, and (4) to explore longitudinal associations between GS quartiles (year 2015) and cognitive performance (year 2019). Methods: 25,281 individuals (14,200 women) from 17 European countries aged ≥50 years responded to waves 6th and 8th of the SHARE project. We analyzed GS, a general cognition index, and physical activity level. Results: Panel analyses revealed a bidirectional relationship over 4 years between GS and cognition, with differences between sex, as well as between participants with moderate-to-vigorous and low physical activity levels. Conclusion: Women and participants with low physical activity were more likely to experience cognitive performance deficits 4 years later.
AdamoD. E.AndersonT.KoochakiM.FritzN. E. (2020). Declines in grip strength may indicate early changes in cognition in healthy middle-aged adults. PLoS One, 15(4), Article e0232021. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232021
2.
AngelB.AjnakinaO.AlbalaC.LeraL.MárquezC.LeipoldL.BilovichA.DobsonR.BendayanR. (2022). Grip strength trajectories and cognition in English and Chilean older adults: A cross-cohort study. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 12(8), 1230. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12081230
3.
BarterJ. D.FosterT. C. (2018). Aging in the brain: New roles of epigenetics in cognitive decline. The Neuroscientist: A Review Journal Bringing Neurobiology, Neurology and Psychiatry, 24(5), 516–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858418780971
4.
BischkopfJ.BusseA.AngermeyerM. C. (2012). Mild cognitive impairment–areview of prevalence, incidence and outcome according to current approaches. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 196(6), 403–414. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.01417.x
5.
BorgesM. K.CanevelliM.CesariM.AprahamianI. (2019). Frailty as a predictor of cognitive disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers of Medicine, 6(February), 26–28. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2019.00026
6.
Börsch-SupanA.BrandtM.HunklerC.KneipT.KorbmacherJ.MalterF.SchaanB.StuckS.ZuberS.SHARE Central Coordination Team. (2013). Data resource profile: The survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe (SHARE). International Journal of Epidemiology, 42(4), 992–1001. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyt088
7.
BrownP. J.CiarleglioA.RooseS. P.Montes GarciaC.ChungS.FernandesS.RutherfordB. R. (2022). Frailty and depression in late life: A high-risk comorbidity with distinctive clinical presentation and poor antidepressant response. The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 77(5), 1055–1062. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glab338
8.
CaiZ.LiH. (2020). An updated review: Androgens and cognitive impairment in older men. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 11(November), 586909. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.586909
9.
CanB.KaraO.KizilarslanogluM. C.ArikG.AycicekG. S.SumerF.CivelekR.DemirtasC.UlgerZ. (2017). Serum markers of inflammation and oxidative stress in sarcopenia. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 29(4), 745–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-016-0626-2
ChaoY.-P.WuC. W.LinL.-J.LaiC.-H.WuH.-Y.HsuA.-L.ChenC.-N. (2020). Cognitive load of exercise influences cognition and neuroplasticity of healthy elderly: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, 40(3), 391–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-020-00522-x
12.
ChenB.WangM.HeQ.WangY.LaiX.ChenH.LiM. (2022). Impact of frailty, mild cognitive impairment and cognitive frailty on adverse health outcomes among community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers of Medicine, 9(October), 1009794. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1009794
CooperA. J. M.SimmonsR. K.KuhD.BrageS.CooperR.NSHD scientific and data collection team. (2015). Physical activity, sedentary time and physical capability in early old age: British birth cohort study. PLoS One, 10(5), Article e0126465. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126465
15.
CooperR.StamatakisE.HamerM. (2020). Associations of sitting and physical activity with grip strength and balance in mid‐life: 1970 British cohort study. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 30(12), 2371–2381. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13793
16.
CuiM.WangJ.DengM.MengH.FanY.KuC.WangR.WuB.DaiM.PingZ.PingZ. (2024). Longitudinal relationship between grip strength and cognitive function in a European population older than 50 years: A cross-lagged panel model. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 122(July), Article 105396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2024.105396
17.
DalleS.RossmeislovaL.KoppoK. (2017). The role of inflammation in age-related sarcopenia. Frontiers in Physiology, 8(December), 1045. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.01045
18.
de MelloR. G. B.Dalla CorteR. R.GiosciaJ.MoriguchiE. H. (2019). Effects of physical exercise programs on sarcopenia management, dynapenia, and physical performance in the elderly: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Journal of Aging Research, 2019(November), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1959486
19.
DeweyM. E.PrinceM. J. (2005). Cogntive function. In Börsch-SupanA.BrugiaviniA.JürgesH.MackenbachJ.SiegristJ.WeberG. (Eds.), Health, ageing and retirement in Europe - first results from the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe (p. 352). Mannheim Research Institute.
20.
DuchownyK. A.AckleyS. F.BrenowitzW. D.WangJ.ZimmermanS. C.CauncaM. R.GlymourM. M. (2022). Associations between handgrip strength and dementia risk, cognition, and neuroimaging outcomes in the UK Biobank cohort study. JAMA Network Open, 5(6), Article e2218314. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.18314
21.
EricksonK. I.HillmanC.StillmanC. M.BallardR. M.BloodgoodB.ConroyD. E.MackoR.MarquezD. X.PetruzzelloS. J.PowellK. E.FOR 2018 PHYSICAL ACTIVITY GUIDELINES ADVISORY COMMITTEE*. (2019). Physical activity, cognition, and brain outcomes: A review of the 2018 physical activity guidelines. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 51(6), 1242–1251. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001936
22.
FranceschiC.GaragnaniP.MorsianiC.ConteM.SantoroA.GrignolioA.MontiD.CapriM.SalvioliS. (2018). The continuum of aging and age-related diseases: Common mechanisms but different rates. Frontiers of Medicine, 5(March), 61. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2018.00061
23.
FritzN. E.McCarthyC. J.AdamoD. E. (2017). Handgrip strength as a means of monitoring progression of cognitive decline – a scoping review. Ageing Research Reviews, 35(May), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2017.01.004
24.
GheysenF.PoppeL.DeSmetA.SwinnenS.CardonG.De BourdeaudhuijI.ChastinS.FiasW. (2018). Physical activity to improve cognition in older adults: Can physical activity programs enriched with cognitive challenges enhance the effects? A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 15(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-018-0697-x
25.
HaagsmaA. B.SouzaD. L. B.VasconcellosG. M.OlandoskiM.Jerez-RoigJ.BaenaC. P. (2023). Longitudinal relationship between handgrip strength and cognitive function in a European multicentric population older than 50 years. Physical Therapy, 103(10), pzad057. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzad057
JeongS.ChoiS.KimK.KimS. M.KimS.ParkS. M. (2018). Association among handgrip strength, body mass index and decline in cognitive function among the elderly women. BMC Geriatrics, 18(1), 225. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0918-9
28.
JiangR.WestwaterM. L.NobleS.RosenblattM.DaiW.QiS.SuiJ.CalhounV. D.ScheinostD.Author (2022). Associations between grip strength, brain structure, and mental health in > 40,000 participants from the UK Biobank. BMC Medicine, 20(1), 286. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02490-2
29.
KelaiditiE.CesariM.CanevelliM.van KanG. A.OussetP.-J.Gillette-GuyonnetS.RitzP.DuveauF.SotoM. E.ProvencherV.NourhashemiF.SalvàA.RobertP.AndrieuS.RollandY.TouchonJ.FittenJ. L.VellasB.IANA/IAGG. (2013). Cognitive frailty: Rational and definition from an (I.A.N.A./I.A.G.G.) international consensus group. The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging, 17(9), 726–734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-013-0367-2
30.
KimG. R.SunJ.HanM.NamC. M.ParkS. (2019). Evaluation of the directional relationship between handgrip strength and cognitive function: The Korean longitudinal study of ageing. Age and Ageing, 48(3), 426–432. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afz013
31.
LeeS.OhJ. W.SonN.-H.ChungW. (2022). Association between handgrip strength and cognitive function in older adults: Korean longitudinal study of aging (2006–2018). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1048. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031048
32.
MarquesA.PeraltaM.MartinsJ.de MatosM. G.BrownsonR. C. (2017). Cross-sectional and prospective relationship between physical activity and chronic diseases in European older adults. International Journal of Public Health, 62(4), 495–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-016-0919-4
33.
McGrathR.VincentB. M.HackneyK. J.Robinson-LaneS. G.DownerB.ClarkB. C. (2020). The longitudinal associations of handgrip strength and cognitive function in aging Americans. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 21(5), 634–639.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2019.08.032
34.
MuñozP.ArdilesÁ. O.Pérez-EspinosaB.Núñez-EspinosaC.Paula-LimaA.González-BillaultC.Espinosa-ParrillaY. (2020). Redox modifications in synaptic components as biomarkers of cognitive status, in brain aging and disease. Mechanism of Ageing and Development, 189(5), Article 111250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mad.2020.111250
35.
NascimentoM. D. M.IhleA.GouveiaÉ. R.MarquesA. (2024). Dynamic associations between frailty and cognition over 4 years: A population-based study on adults aged ≥50 from 12 European countries. Journal of Affective Disorders, 354(February), 536–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.03.049
36.
NuzzoJ. L. (2024). Sex differences in skeletal muscle fiber types: A meta‐analysis. Clinical Anatomy, 37(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.24091
37.
OkelyJ. A.CorleyJ.WelsteadM.TaylorA. M.PageD.SkarabelaB.RedmondP.CoxS. R.RussT. C. (2021). Change in physical activity, sleep quality, and psychosocial variables during COVID-19 lockdown: Evidence from the lothian birth cohort 1936. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010210
38.
OksuzyanA.MaierH.McGueM.VaupelJ. W.ChristensenK. (2010). Sex differences in the level and rate of change of physical function and grip strength in the Danish 1905-cohort study. Journal of Aging and Health, 22(5), 589–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264310366752
39.
OschwaldJ.GuyeS.LiemF.RastP.WillisS.RöckeC.JänckeL.MartinM.MérillatS. (2019). Brain structure and cognitive ability in healthy aging: A review on longitudinal correlated change. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 31(1), 1–57. https://doi.org/10.1515/revneuro-2018-0096
40.
OudbierS. J.GohJ.LooijaardS. M. L. M.ReijnierseE. M.MeskersC. G. M.MaierA. B. (2022). Pathophysiological mechanisms explaining the association between low skeletal muscle mass and cognitive function. The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 77(10), 1959–1968. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glac121
41.
PetridouE. (2020). Cognitive frailty: A brief review. Journal of Research and Practice on the Musculoskeletal System, 4(4), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.22540/JRPMS-04-113
42.
ProkopidisK.GiannosP.IspoglouT.KirkB.WitardO. C.DionyssiotisY.ScottD.MacphersonH.DuqueG.IsanejadM. (2023). Handgrip strength is associated with learning and verbal fluency in older men without dementia: Insights from the NHANES. GeroScience, 45(2), 1049–1058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-022-00703-3
43.
RamseyK. A.RojerA. G. M.D’AndreaL.OttenR. H. J.HeymansM. W.TrappenburgM. C.VerlaanS.WhittakerA. C.MeskersC. G. M.MaierA. B. (2021). The association of objectively measured physical activity and sedentary behavior with skeletal muscle strength and muscle power in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Research Reviews, 67(1–115), Article 101266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2021.101266
44.
RobertsH. C.DenisonH. J.MartinH. J.PatelH. P.SyddallH.CooperC.SayerA. A. (2011). A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: Towards a standardised approach. Age and Ageing, 40(4), 423–429. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afr051
45.
SchneiderS. L. (2013). The international standard classification of education 2011. In The international standard classification of education 2011 (Vol. 30, pp. 365–379). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0195-6310(2013)0000030017
46.
SchuurmanN. K.FerrerE.de Boer-SonnenscheinM.HamakerE. L. (2016). How to compare cross-lagged associations in a multilevel autoregressive model. Psychological Methods, 21(2), 206–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000062
47.
SheoranS.VintsW. A. J.ValatkevičienėK.KušleikienėS.GleiznienėR.ČesnaitienėV. J.HimmelreichU.LevinO.MasiulisN. (2023). Strength gains after 12 weeks of resistance training correlate with neurochemical markers of brain health in older adults: A randomized control 1H-mrs study. GeroScience, 45(3), 1837–1855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-023-00732-6
48.
SternängO.ReynoldsC. A.FinkelD.Ernsth-BravellM.PedersenN. L.Dahl AslanA. K. (2016). Grip strength and cognitive abilities: Associations in old age. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 71(5), 841–848. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbv017
49.
SterniczukR.TheouO.RusakB.RockwoodK. (2015). Cognitive test performance in relation to health and function in 12 European countries: The SHARE study. Canadian Geriatrics Journal: CGJ, 18(3), 144–151. https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.18.154
50.
TalsmaK.SchüzB.SchwarzerR.NorrisK. (2018). I believe, therefore I achieve (and vice versa): A meta-analytic cross-lagged panel analysis of self-efficacy and academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 61(October), 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.015
51.
Tangestani FardM.StoughC. (2019). A review and hypothesized model of the mechanisms that underpin the relationship between inflammation and cognition in the elderly. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 11(March), 56. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2019.00056
52.
TinôcoM. A.NascimentoM. d. M.MarquesA.GouveiaÉ. R.MiguelS.SantosF.IhleA. (2023). The relationship between physical fitness and cognitive functions in older people: A systematic review. Sustainability, 15(23), Article 16314. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316314
53.
UrsachiG.HorodnicI. A.ZaitA. (2015). How reliable are measurement scales? External factors with indirect influence on reliability estimators. Procedia Economics and Finance, 20(15), 679–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00123-9
WuR.DelahuntE.DitroiloM.LoweryM.De VitoG. (2016). Effects of age and sex on neuromuscular-mechanical determinants of muscle strength. Age, 38(3), 57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-016-9921-2
58.
ZammitA. R.RobitailleA.PiccininA. M.Muniz-TerreraG.HoferS. M. (2019). Associations between aging-related changes in grip strength and cognitive function in older adults: A systematic review. The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 74(4), 519–527. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/gly046
59.
ŽerovnikJ.Rupnik PoklukarD. (2017). Elementary methods for computation of quartiles. Teaching Statistics, 39(3), 88–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/test.12133
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
