Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objectives: 1. To describe perceived stress and changes in anxiety and coping among older adults between 2018 and 2020. 2. To examine the moderating roles of social support, exercise, alcohol use, and smoking on the relationship between perceived stress and anxiety. Methods: Longitudinal data collected from 3275 participants (M = 68.1 years) as part of the NZ Health, Work, and Retirement study’s 2018 and 2020 biennial surveys, were analyzed using hierarchical regression. Results: Older adults perceived COVID-19 as a low-level source of stress. Social support and alcohol use moderated the relationship between perceived mental stress and anxiety. At high-stress levels, only social support exerted a protective effect against the negative impact of stress on anxiety. Discussion: These findings support the general resilience of many older adults and highlight the effectiveness of coping strategies used by those groups who are more likely to be vulnerable to mental stress during a pandemic.

Keywords

COVID-19 older adults stress coping social support anxiety transactional model of stress

Introduction

The threat of illness from COVID-19 and the public health measures implemented to contain the pandemic were possible sources of stress for older people (Arpino et al., 2021; Kasar & Karaman, 2021). In this study, we consider the effects of coping strategies used by older adults to mitigate the early stressors of the pandemic in Aotearoa/New Zealand (NZ).

Globally, confinement potentially induced feelings of anxiety and isolation (Ammar et al., 2021; Brooks et al., 2020). Additionally, stressors such as job loss and food insecurity may also have long-term repercussions in terms of mental and emotional well-being (Officer et al., 2022). As age was related to more severe outcomes of COVID-19 infection (Fang et al., 2020), the public health measures were expected to exacerbate loneliness and anxiety disproportionately among the older adult population (ESCAP, 2022; Verhage et al., 2021). Cross-sectional studies during the pandemic indicated an increase in self-reported depression and anxiety symptoms among older people (e.g., Falvo et al., 2021; Kurniawidjaja et al., 2022; Meng et al., 2020).

Following findings that older people were often less emotionally vulnerable than younger people (e.g., Dragioti et al., 2022), several studies have examined the role of coping strategies in mitigating the effects of stress on mental and emotional well-being. Qualitative studies identified coping strategies such as staying busy, seeking social support, having a positive attitude (Fuller & Huseth-Zosel, 2021), physical exercise, playing music (Chan et al., 2022), use of technology for social connection, and prior life experience (Greenwood-Hickman et al., 2021) aiding older adults in mitigating stress. However, such studies have included non-representative samples and the theoretical approach to the role of “coping” was not described.

The transactional model (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984) conceptualizes stress and coping as a series of dynamic transactions between the individual and an environmental stressor (Biggs et al., 2017) which occurs in three interrelated phases: cognitive appraisal, coping, and the outcome. Appraisal leads to the stressor being defined as benign, irrelevant, or stressful. A situation threatening loss or harm to well-being (such as potential COVID-19 infection) is appraised as stressful (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984). Following appraisal, coping is defined as an individual “constantly engaging in cognitive and behavioral modifications to manage external and internal demands of the stressor” (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984, p. 141). Coping strategies have been broadly categorized as active or passive coping strategies.

Active coping strategies, including seeking support (information and emotional) from social contacts and engaging in physical activity (Faulkner et al., 2020; Heffer & Willoughby, 2017), have been associated with better adaptation to the stressor and a positive effect on emotional well-being (Oker et al., 2022). During the COVID-19 pandemic, higher social support was associated with lower anxiety and lower financial distress (Chen et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2021; Sharif Nia et al., 2021) and with positive emotional well-being (Wilson et al., 2020) including more rapid improvement in anxiety symptoms (Fluharty et al., 2021). Isolation from social contacts during the pandemic negatively altered the perception of social support and increased COVID-19-related worries (Szkody et al., 2021). However, very little work has explored the role of social support among older people.

Physical activity has been well-established as an active coping strategy during stressful life events (Kim & McKenzie, 2014). Salman et al. (2021) reported that individuals who engaged in less physical activity during the pandemic also experienced low mood and loneliness, while individuals who engaged in physical activity reported enhanced physical and emotional well-being (Wright et al., 2021).

Passive coping strategies such as substance use (alcohol use or tobacco smoking), avoidance, and denial, aid in avoiding the stressor (Little, 2018) and are commonly used to provide momentary relief from stress-related emotions (Biggs et al., 2017) but have an overall negative impact on emotional well-being (Gurvich et al., 2021) including during times of crisis (Brown & Nicassio, 1987). International studies (e.g., Foster et al., 2021; Rao et al., 2022) reported increased alcohol consumption and hazardous drinking among older adults induced by the pandemic and public health measures. There is little evidence regarding changes in smoking behavior among older adults, although qualitative interviews indicated that pandemic-related stressors were associated with increased smoking and reduced motivation to quit (Cordon et al., 2021).

The third stage of the transactional model is the health outcome which may be negative or positive according to the cognitive appraisal and coping strategies used (Walinga, 2014). One outcome that has been widely researched in the coping literature is emotional well-being including anxiety. A systematic review of 103 early studies worldwide (Kan et al., 2021) revealed that older adults were significantly more likely to suffer from anxiety. The transactional model suggests a clear pathway from a stressor, through appraisal and the coping strategies utilized, to anxiety symptoms.

Research Aims

Aotearoa/NZ’s first confirmed case of COVID-19 was reported on February 28^th, 2020. The public health response was described as going “hard” and “early” to eliminate the virus’s transmission in the community (Ministry of Health, 2020). Initial measures included enforced lockdown, no public gatherings, strict adherence to small household “bubbles,” work from home, and closure of education facilities, and these were not eased until June 2020 (Jefferies et al., 2020). Despite the successful implementation of the public health response and reduced burden of disease, the public health measures may have negatively impacted older people’s mental and emotional well-being.

The aim of the current study was two-fold; to explore whether older adults in Aotearoa/NZ perceived the COVID-19 pandemic as stressful and to investigate whether coping strategies (social support, physical activity, alcohol, and smoking) used moderated the impact of perceptions of stress on anxiety among older adults.

Research Question 1

Was the COVID-19 pandemic perceived as a source of stress by older adults in Aotearoa/NZ?

Research Question 2

Were there any changes in older adult’s coping strategies and anxiety between 2018 (pre-COVID) and 2020 (post-first lockdown)?

Hypothesis 1:

Coping strategies will moderate the relationship between stress and anxiety symptoms for older adults in 2020.

H1a:

The relationship between perceived stress and anxiety symptoms will be weaker for those reporting higher social support and physical activity (active coping strategies) during 2020.

H1b:

The relationship between perceived stress and anxiety symptoms will be stronger for those reporting higher alcohol use and regular tobacco smoking (passive coping strategies) during 2020.

Method

Data were collected in 2018 (pre-COVID-19) and 2020 (post-first COVID-19 lockdown) as part of the New Zealand Health, Work, and Retirement (NZHWR) longitudinal Study (Allen et al., 2019). The NZHWR has biennially surveyed a cohort of New Zealanders aged 55+ (randomly selected from the NZ Electoral Roll) since 2006. The NZHWR oversamples participants of Māori descent to represent Aotearoa/NZ’s indigenous population adequately.

Participants who responded to the 2018 and 2020 surveys on the variables of interest (perceived stress from COVID-19, social support, physical activity, alcohol, smoking, and anxiety) were included (N = 3275). Table 1

Table 1.

Demographic Characteristics of the Study Sample in 2020 (N = 3275).

	N	Valid %	Mean (SD)
Age			68.1 (7.5)
55–59	461	14.1
60–64	666	20.3
65–69	902	27.5
70–74	583	17.8
75+	663	20.2
Sex
Female	1826	55.8
Male	1401	42.8
Gender diverse	2	.10
Marital status
Married or de facto	2351	71.8
Not married or de facto	881	26.9
Level of education
No qualifications	621	19.0
Secondary school	765	23.4
Post-secondary/trade	1102	33.6
University degree	750	22.9
Economic living standards (ELSs)
Hardship	503	16.1
Comfortable	489	15.7
Good	2128	68.2

Note. N = number of participants. SD = standard deviation. N total = 3756, Ns will vary due to missing data.

shows the demographic characteristics of the sample. N = 690 did not respond in 2020 for reasons of death, lost to contact, or withdrawal from the study. There were no significant differences between this group and the 2020 sample on any demographic variables apart from Economic Living Standards; those in hardship remained at 16.1%, while 25% reported comfortable living standards (cf. 16% for the 2020 sample) and 46% reported good living standards (cf. 68% in 2020). The Massey University Human Ethics Committee approved all sampling and survey processes.

Measures

Demographic Variables

Age was measured in years in 2020. Gender was coded as: 1 = male; 2 = female or gender diverse for analysis. Marital status was coded as a dichotomous variable: 1 = married or in a de facto relationship; 2 = unmarried or not in de facto relationship.

Economic living standards (ELSs) were assessed with the Economic Living Standards Index short form (ELSI-SF; Jensen et al., 2005) which aims to represent financial aspects of well-being. Scores range from 0 to 31, with scores ranging from 31 to 25 interpreted as “good,” 24–17 as “comfortable,” and 16–0 as “hardship.” The higher the score, the better the ELS (Jensen et al., 2005). In the present sample, M = 25.37, SD = 5.51, and alpha = .88.

Perceived Stress

Perceived stress induced by COVID-19 was measured using three items that assessed perceptions of the impact of the pandemic by asking:

“To what degree would you say the COVID-19 pandemic has had a negative impact on your overall: a. Physical health, b. mental health, and c. economic health.” Responses were recorded on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1(not at all impacted) to 5 (extremely impacted). These self-reported perceptions were used to indicate perceived stress and labelled: Physical Stress, Mental Stress, and Economic Stress.

Coping-Related Measures

Social Support was measured using the Social Provision Scale (SPS; Cutrona & Russell, 1987). SPS includes 24 items which are rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). An overall score was calculated by summing scores on all items; a higher total score indicates higher perceived social support. In the present sample, M = 80.41, SD = 9.96, and alpha = .92.

Physical Activity was measured with one item adapted from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (Smith et al., 2015). The item categorized physical activity into vigorous, moderate, and mild on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from more than once a week (1) to hardly ever or never (4). The responses for the moderately active category (e.g., dancing and walking at a moderate pace) were used to compute a categorical dummy variable aligning with the current health guidelines recommending moderate physical activity every day as a universal goal (Yang, 2019). The dummy variable conceptualized the responses of more than once a week as high level of physical activity (1) and the responses of once a week, hardly ever, or never as low level of physical activity (0).

Alcohol Consumption was assessed with AUDIT-C (Bush et al., 1998), a brief alcohol screening instrument designed to identify hazardous drinking, by assessing the frequency and quantity of alcohol use. The three questions (How often did you have a drink containing alcohol in the past year? How many drinks did you have on a typical day when you were drinking in the past year? How often did you have six or more drinks on one occasion in the past year?) measure the frequency of drinking and typical quantity consumed, as well as the frequency of heavy drinking on occasions (Higgins-Biddle & Babor, 2018) on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 4. The total score ranges from 0 to 12; the higher the AUDIT-C score, the higher the frequency and/or quantity of consumption. In the present sample, M = 3.54 and SD = 2.27. For females, M = 2.94 and SD = 1.91 and for males M = 4.27 and SD = 2.41.

Smoking was measured with one item, which asked participants, “If you currently consider yourself a regular smoker, how many do you think you would smoke on an average day?” For analysis, a dichotomous categorical variable was computed with the response of not a regular smoker (0) and all other responses denoted as a regular smoker (1).

Anxiety

Anxiety symptoms were measured using the short form of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (Byrne & Pachana, 2011; GAI – SF which comprises five items that assess anxiety symptoms in the past seven days. A forced choice response format (agree = 1; disagree = 0) for each item is summed to yield total scores ranging from 0 to 5 in which the higher scores mean higher levels of anxiety symptoms. In the present sample, M = .81, SD = 1.40, and alpha = .84.

Analyses

All analyses were conducted in IBM SPSS version 28.0.1.1 (15). Data were screened for missing values and outliers and met the assumptions of multiple regression for normality, linearity, independence of residuals, homoscedasticity, and multicollinearity. Missing data values for all variables were below the acceptable threshold of 5% (Schafer, 1999).

To answer research questions 1 and 2, paired t-tests were used to test the null hypothesis that there were no changes in coping strategies and anxiety between 2018 (pre-COVID) and 2020 (post-COVID).

Hierarchical regression was utilized to explore the relationship between perceived stress and anxiety and the moderating effects of coping strategies on the relationship between stress and anxiety in older adults. Anxiety was the DV and the IVs were entered in four blocks:

The first block included age and ELSI-SF (correlated with the DV) as controls.

The second block included Physical Stress, Mental Stress, and Economic Stress scores.

The third block included the four coping strategies: Social Support, Physical Activity, Alcohol, and Smoking.

The fourth block included 12 interaction terms (each stress variable multiplied by each coping variable) to test the moderation effect of the coping strategies on perceived stress.

Unstandardized Beta coefficients with corresponding p values were utilized to assess the contribution of the variables in the model at every step.

The ModGraph-I program (Jose, 2013) was used to plot the interaction terms to visualize significant moderation effects.

Results

Perceived Stress During the COVID-19 Lockdown

Table 2

Table 2.

Perception of Stress on Various Domains of Health After First COVID-19 Lockdown Relaxation.

To What Degree Would You Say the COVID-19 Pandemic Has Had a Negative Impact on Your Overall	M	SD
Physical Stress	1.36	.72
Mental Stress	1.57	.84
Economic Stress	1.70	.95

shows the means and standard deviations for perceptions of Physical, Mental, and Economic Stress. Mean scores indicate that the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdowns negatively impacted all three domains. However, the mean was lower than 2 (“a little bit”).

Changes in Older Adult’s Coping Strategies and Emotional Well-Being

Paired t-tests revealed no differences in Social Support, Alcohol, and Physical Activity between 2018 and 2020. The mean scores for Smoking were 1.89 in 2018 and .11 in 2020 (t (1975) = 136.14, SEM = .013, p < .001) indicating a reduction in smoking levels.

There was no change in the mean scores of Anxiety between 2018 and 2020.

Hypothesis 1: Coping Strategies Will Moderate the Relationship Between Stress and Anxiety

Table 3

Table 3.

Summary of Hierarchical Regression Analysis for Variables and Moderators Predicting Anxiety Scores (GAI).

Predictor Variables	Unstandardized B	Standardized β	R ²	R² Change	t	Sig
Block 1			.080
Age	−.081	−.075			−11.468	.000**
ELSI-SF	−.068	−.265			−3.229	.000**
Block 2			.166	.088
Physical Stress	.098	.048			1.895	.058
Mental Stress	.492	.290			11.275	.000**
Economic Stress	−.045	−.030			−1.250	.211
Block 3			.185	.020
Social Support	−.020	−.143			5.969	.000**
Physical Activity	−.108	−.037			−1.610	.108
Alcohol	−.003	−.005			−.216	.829
Smoking	.104	.021			.915	.360
Block 4			.189	.009
Physical Stress *Social Support	−.001	−.040			−.219	.827
Mental Stress *Social Support	−.010	−.450			−2.573	.010*
Economic Stress *Social Support	−.001	−.051			−.277	.782
Physical Stress *Physical Activity	.079	.042			.726	.468
Mental Stress *Physical Activity	.014	.009			.152	.879
Economic Stress *Physical Activity	.022	.016			.287	.774
Physical Stress *Alcohol
Mental Stress *Alcohol	.041	.132			2.342	.019*
Economic Stress*Alcohol	−.011	−.042			−.706	.480
Physical Stress*Smoking	.098	.092			.656	.512
Mental Stress*Smoking	−.121	−.138			.943	.346
Economic Stress*Smoking	−.110	−.142			.962	.336

Note. **p < .001, *p < .01.

displays the summary statistics for the hierarchical multiple regression model with Anxiety as the DV. At block 1, Age and ELSI-SF contributed significantly to the model (F (2, 1746) = 76.59, p < .001) and accounted for 8% of the variance in Anxiety.

Stress measures added in the second block significantly explained an additional 8.8% of the variance (F (3, 1743) = 61.53, p < .001). Only Mental Stress contributed significantly.

Four coping strategies in the third block explained an additional 2.0% of the variance in anxiety scores (F (4, 1739) = 10.77, p < .001). Only Social Support contributed significantly to the total variance explained.

Two interaction terms added in the fourth block were significant (Mental Stress* AUDIT-C and Mental Stress*Social Support) explaining an additional .9% of the variance in Anxiety (F 11, 1728) = 1.86, p < .05) (see Table 4

Table 4.

Mean Anxiety Scores at Varying Levels of Mental Stress, Social Support, and Alcohol.

	Social Support			Alcohol
	Low	Med	High	Low	Med	High
Low Mental Stress	1.94	2.45	2.97	2.49	3.63	4.78
Med Mental Stress	1.85	2.29	2.73	2.45	3.67	4.89
High Mental Stress	1.77	2.13	2.48	2.41	3.71	5.01

and Figures 1 and 2

Figure 1.

Moderation of the effect of mental stress on anxiety by social support.

Figure 2.

Moderation of the effect of perceived mental stress on anxiety by alcohol consumption.

). The regression model explained 18.9% of the variance in Anxiety.

Discussion

There were three main findings. First, COVID-19 was perceived, on average, to be slightly stressful in that the pandemic negatively impacted older adults’ physical, mental, and economic well-being. Second, there were no changes in social support, physical activity, and alcohol consumption before (2018) and after (2020) the first lockdown, although there was a significant reduction in smoking. Third, two coping strategies moderated the relationship between perceived stress and anxiety in 2020, with only social support being protective against stress. These findings highlight the impact of social support in mitigating the perceived negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the emotional well-being of older adults. Here, we discuss each of these findings in turn and in relation to each other.

Our finding that there was no change in anxiety after the first lockdown in 2020, while there was a significant relationship between COVID-19-related perceived mental stress on measures of anxiety, suggests a relationship between trait-anxiety and perceptions of stress during the pandemic. Those who were already more likely to report anxiety symptoms in 2018 were also more likely to report mental stress and anxiety in the face of the pandemic. International research has reported mixed results regarding the perception of stress associated with the COVID-19 pandemic among older adults. Some older adults perceived the pandemic as stressful and feared even stepping outside, whereas others disagreed with the vulnerability label (Falvo et al., 2021; Verhage et al., 2021). These mixed results emphasize the heterogeneity of older adults and highlight the need to be aware of groups who are vulnerable to negative outcomes rather than labelling all older adults as vulnerable. Despite earlier fears for the mental health of older people, meta-analyses have shown that younger people were at higher risk of mental health effects than older people (Dragioti et al., 2022) while among older people, specific sub-populations were most at risk (Yan, et al., 2022).

The generally low perception of stress among older adults during the pandemic may be accounted for by those who were able to enjoy the early lockdown situations. Older adults in Aotearoa/NZ who were retired, able to work from home or eligible for wage subsidy, and were able to connect with family and friends, described their lockdown experience as enjoyable (Stephens & Breheny, 2022) while public health measures were often reassuring rather than alarming (Greyling et al., 2021). The present findings reinforce these early indications that older adults were generally resilient in the face of a potentially stressful time.

This primary appraisal for much of the population can also explain the lack of significant change in coping strategies such as physical activity, alcohol consumption, and social support. Although smoking levels did change, this was not in the direction predicted by the transactional model. This reduction in smoking behavior has been reported in the United States (Denlinger-Apte et al., 2022) and Japan (Koyama et al., 2021). Explanations for this change include the elimination of contextual situations such as bars or parties following the pandemic (Denlinger-Apte et al., 2022) or enforced stays at home with family (O’Donnell et al., 2021).

The coping strategies which did moderate the relationship between perceived stress and anxiety were social support and alcohol use. Those who reported greater social support reported the lowest anxiety scores at the highest level of perceived stress, while those with the lowest social support were increasingly more anxious as perceived stress increased. Other studies among younger populations in China (Liu et al., 2021), the United States (Szkody et al., 2021), and among nurses (Schierberl Scherr et al., 2021) have reported a moderating role of social support on the relationship between perceived stress during the COVID-19 pandemic and mental health symptoms. The present results show a similar relationship among older adults.

The transactional model suggests that social support might moderate the effects of perceived stress by promoting cognitive reappraisal. Social support networks providing information, advice, and guidance during a crisis may promote the reappraisal of the stressor as more controllable and manageable (Szkody et al., 2021). In a high social support context, individuals report a sense of understanding and safety that is further associated with emotional stability and positive reappraisal (Padhy & Angiel, 2021; Van Knippenberg et al., 2007). As the reappraisal alters the appraisal stage in the transactional model, it may also have a positive impact on emotional well-being (Holmstrom, 2015). The availability of informational and emotional support from social connections can promote cognitive reappraisal and alleviate negative emotions associated with the stressor.

Because there was no change in levels of social support after the first lockdown, it seems that older people bring their social support networks into a stressful situation (rather than respond to stress by seeking social support) and this accords with previous research and theorizing regarding convoys of support (Antonucci et al., 2014). However, this understanding of social support does not support its definition as an “active” coping strategy in terms of the transactional model. Although social support clearly moderates stress, its role in a stressful situation requires more nuanced theorizing. In practical terms, this finding does indicate that older people with lower social support may be targeted as a more vulnerable group in a pandemic situation.

Alcohol consumption was the only other proposed coping strategy that moderated the relationship between mental stress and anxiety among older adults. As predicted, at high mental stress levels during the COVID-19 pandemic, high alcohol consumption was associated with higher anxiety scores compared to moderate and low alcohol consumption, supporting the prediction that this is not a useful coping mechanism. Alcohol consumption has been previously associated with interfering with the cognitive processes involved in processing information and formulating an appraisal (Sayette, 1999). However, despite international evidence that risky drinking among older people increased (e.g., Rao et al., 2022) or that older people were more likely to buy alcohol for entertainment or emotional reasons during lockdowns (e.g., Foster et al., 2021), older adults in our sample did not increase alcohol consumption during the pandemic. The strengthening of the relationship between alcohol use and anxiety at high levels of perceived stress suggests that those with higher levels of alcohol use are another group in the population who are vulnerable to increased stress. However, this is a weak effect and must be replicated in future research. Given the marked differences observed between the consumption scores for males and females which is not unexpected (see French et al., 2014), further research could also fruitfully examine the gendered effects of perceived stress and alcohol use on anxiety. Previous research has demonstrated that older women are more likely to experience anxiety symptoms than men, and that consumption of alcohol is also associated with anxiety (e.g., Forlani et al., 2014). Such findings suggest complex interactions between stress, gender, and alcohol use among older people.

Limitations

The use of cross-sectional data to examine the moderating effects limits our interpretations of those effects. For example, it is equally likely that symptoms of anxiety could increase the consumption of alcohol, rather than alcohol use contributing to increases in anxiety; there is evidence that having a pre-existing anxiety disorder Garnett et al. (2021) or reporting mental distress in 2020 (Biddle et al., 2020), predicted increased alcohol use during the pandemic. Further research on the role of alcohol as a stress reliever among older adults will be required to untangle these relationships. The correlational nature of the results for the role of social support are not so problematic since the role of social support as a buffer of stress and in promoting mental health is more strongly established (Taylor, 2011).

Another important limitation is the measure of perceived stress utilized in this study. The measure of people’s understanding of the impact of the pandemic on their mental health is believed to indicate higher levels of perceived stress. However, this assumption requires further validation.

Those lost to the study in 2020 were more likely to report “comfortable” rather than “good” economic living standards, while the proportion in “hardship” remained the same. It is possible that the loss of participants who were more likely to report lower living standards also affected the mean scores of other study variables, particularly economic stress.

Conclusion

The current study provided limited support for the use of Lazarus and Folkman’s (1984) transactional model of stress and coping in accounting for the coping strategies of older people during the COVID-19 pandemic. The generally low perception of stress and no detectable changes in the emotional well-being of older adults between 2018 and 2020, aligned with the model. As the pandemic was not generally perceived as threatening or stressful at that time, no downstream changes in coping strategies or the potential outcome of increased anxiety were observed.

Two coping strategies, social support and alcohol consumption, moderated the relationship between perceptions of stress and anxiety. Rather than revealing the outcomes of individual coping strategy choices under stress, these findings point to the importance of recognizing the heterogeneity of older people prior to stress. Different groups of older people have different needs during a stressful period such as a pandemic.

Those who regularly use alcohol at higher levels may be at a greater risk of higher levels of poorer mental health. The strongest result showed that older people with low levels of social support are at the greatest risk of increased anxiety symptoms when they perceive that the pandemic is harmful to their mental well-being. These are the people who are more vulnerable and to whom additional support may be targeted in times of stress.

These findings highlight the heterogeneity of older adults. The implications for future public health responses are that, rather than treat older people as a single group in terms of age alone, interventions may be more appropriately targeted to those who are in need of support. Here, the needs of those with higher alcohol use and lower social support have been highlighted.

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The collection of data for this study was funded by the New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation, & Employment (MAUX1705).

ORCID iD

Navneet Kaur

References

Allen

Alpass

F. M.

Stephens

C. V.

(2019). New Zealand health, work, and retiirement longitudinal study. In Gu

Dupre

(Eds.), Encyclopedia of gerontology and population aging. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69892-2_977-2

Ammar

Trabelsi

Brach

Chtourou

Boukhris

Masmoudi

Bouaziz

Bentlage

How

Ahmed

Mueller

Hammoouda

Paineirass-Domingos

Braakman-Jansen

Wrede

Bastoni

Pernambuco

Mataryna

Hoekelmann

(2021). Effects of home confinement on mental health and lifestyle behaviours during the COVID-19 outbreak: Insights from the ECLB-COVID19 multicentre study. Biology of Sport, 38(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2020.96857

Antonucci

T. C.

Ajrouch

K. J.

Birditt

K. S.

(2014). The convoy model: Explaining social relations from a multidisciplinary perspective. The Gerontologist, 54(1), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnt118

Arpino

Pasqualini

Bordone

Solé-Auró

(2021). Older people’s nonphysical contacts and depression during the COVID-19 lockdown. The Gerontologist, 61(2), 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnab014

Biddle

Edwards

Gray

Sollis

(2020). Alcohol consumption during the COVID-19 period: May 2020. ANU Research. https://csrm.cass.anu.edu.au/research/publications/alcohol-consumption-during-covid-19-period-may-2020

Biggs

Brough

Drummond

(2017). Lazarus and Folkman’s psychological stress and coping theory. In Cooper

Quick

(Eds.), The handbook of stress and health: A guide to research and practice (pp. 351–364). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118993811.ch21

Brooks

S. K.

Webster

R. K.

Smith

L. E.

Woodland

Wessely

Greenberg

Rubin

G. J.

(2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet, 395(10227), 912–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8

Brown

G. K.

Nicassio

P. M.

(1987). Development of a questionnaire for the assessment of active and passive coping strategies in chronic pain patients. Pain, 31(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(87)90006-6

Bush

Kivlahan

D. R.

McDonell

M. B.

Fihn

S. D.

Bradley

K. A.

Project

A. C. Q. I.

(1998). The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): An effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Archives of Internal Msedicine, 158(16), 1789–1795. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.158.16.1789

10.

Byrne

G. J.

Pachana

N. A.

(2011). Development and validation of a short form of the geriatric anxiety inventory–the GAI-SF. International Psychogeriatrics, 23(1), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610210001237

11.

Chan

S. M.

Chung

G. K. K.

Chan

Y. H.

Chung

R. Y. N.

Wong

Yeoh

E. K.

Woo

(2022). Resilience and coping strategies of older adults in Hong Kong during COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed methods study. BMC Geriatrics, 22(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03009-3

12.

Chen

Zou

Gao

(2021). Role of neighborhood social support in stress coping and psychological wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from Hubei, China. Health & Place, 69(102532), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102532

13.

Cordon

Eyestone

Hutchison

Dunlap

Smith

Williams

R. M.

Kim

Kao

J. Y.

Hurtado-de-Mendoza

Stanton

(2021). A qualitative study exploring older smokers’ attitudes and motivation toward quitting during the COVID-19 pandemic. Preventive Medicine Reports, 22(9), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101359

14.

Cutrona

C. E.

Russell

D. W.

(1987). The provisions of social relationships and adaptation to stress. Advances in Personal Relationships, 1(1), 37–67. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271507385

15.

Denlinger-Apte

Suerken

C. K.

Ross

J. C.

Reboussin

B. A.

Spangler

Wagoner

K. G.

Sutfin

E. L.

(2022). Decreases in smoking and vaping during COVID-19 stay-at-home orders among a cohort of young adults in the United States. Preventive Medicine, 156, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.106992

16.

Dragioti

Tsitsas

Lee

K. H.

Choi

Kim

Choi

Y. J.

Tsamakis

Estradé

Agorastos

Vancampfort

Tsiptsios

Thompson

Mosina

Vakadaris

Fusar-Poli

Carvalho

A. F.

Correll

C. U.

Han

Y. J.

Solmi

(2022). A large‐scale meta‐analytic atlas of mental health problems prevalence during the COVID‐19 early pandemic. Journal of Medical Virology, 94(5), 1935–1949. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.27549

17.

Economic and Social Commission for Asian and Pacidic (ESCAP) . (2022). COVID-19 and older persons in the Asia-Pacific region: The health, social and economic impacts of a global pandemic. Economic and Social Commission for Asian and Pacidic (ESCAP). https://www.unescap.org/kp/2022/covid-19-and-older-persons-asia-pacific-region-health-social-and-economic-impacts-global

18.

Falvo

Zufferey

M. C.

Albanese

Fadda

(2021). Lived experiences of older adults during the first COVID-19 lockdown: A qualitative study. PLoS One, 16(6), 0252101. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252101

19.

Fang

Wang

Zhang

Chen

Cheng

Jia

(2020). Epidemiological, comorbidity factors with severity and prognosis of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging, 12(13), 12493–12503. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.103579

20.

Faulkner

Rhodes

R. E.

Vanderloo

L. M.

Chulak-Bozer

O'Reilly

Ferguson

Spence

J. C.

(2020). Physical activity as a coping strategy for mental health due to the COVID-19 virus: A potential disconnect among Canadian adults? Frontiers in Communication, 5(74), 571833. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.571833

21.

Fluharty

Steptoe

Fancourt

(2021). Coping strategies and mental health trajectories during the first 21 weeks of COVID-19 lockdown in the United Kingdom. Social Science & Medicine, 279(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113958

22.

Forlani

Morri

Belvederi Murri

Bernabei

Moretti

Attili

Biondini

De Ronchi

Atti

A. R.

(2014). Anxiety symptoms in 74+ community-dwelling elderly: Associations with physical morbidity, depression and alcohol consumption. PLoS One, 9(2), Article e89859.

23.

Foster

J. H.

Martin

C. R.

Davis

J. P.

(2021). Alcohol consumption during the COVID-19 lockdown period: Predictors of at-risk drinking at different AUDIT-C cut-off thresholds. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(24), 13042.

24.

French

D. J.

Sargent‐Cox

K. A.

Kim

Anstey

K. J.

(2014). Gender differences in alcohol consumption among middle‐aged and older adults in Australia, the United States and Korea. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 38(4), 332–339.

25.

Fuller

H. R.

Huseth-Zosel

(2021). Lessons in resilience: Initial coping among older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Gerontologist, 61(1), 114–125. https://doi-org/10.1093/geront/gnaa170

26.

Garnett

Jackson

Oldham

Brown

Steptoe

Fancourt

(2021). Factors associated with drinking behaviour during COVID-19 social distancing and lockdown among adults in the UK. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 219(10152), 461–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108461

27.

Greenwood-Hickman

M. A.

Dahlquist

Cooper

Holden

McClure

J. B.

Mettert

K. D.

Perry

S. R.

Rosenberg

D. E.

(2021). “They’re going to zoom it”: A qualitative investigation of impacts and coping strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic among older adults. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 679976. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.679976

28.

Greyling

Rossouw

Adhikari

(2021). The good, the bad and the ugly of lockdowns during Covid-19. PLoS One, 16(1), 0245546. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245546

29.

Gurvich

Thomas

E. H.

Hudaib

A.-R.

Sood

Fabiatos

Sutton

Isaacs

Arunogiri

Sharp

(2021). Coping styles and mental health in response to societal changes during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 67(5), 540–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764020961790

30.

Heffer

Willoughby

(2017). A count of coping strategies: A longitudinal study investigating an alternative method to understanding coping and adjustment. PLoS One, 12(10). 0186057. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186057

31.

Higgins-Biddle

J. C.

Babor

T. F.

(2018). A review of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT), AUDIT-C, and USAUDIT for screening in the United States: Past issues and future directions. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 44(6), 578–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2018.1456545

32.

Holmstrom

A. J.

(2015). Emotional appraisal/reappraisal in social support. In: Berger

Roloff

S. R.

Wilson

J. P.

Dillards

Slomon

(Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Interpersonal Communication, (pp.1–10). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic058

33.

Jefferies

French

Gilkison

Graham

Hope

Marshall

McElnay

McNeill

Muellner

Paine

(2020). COVID-19 in New Zealand and the impact of the national response: A descriptive epidemiological study. The Lancet Public Health, 5(11), 612–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30225-5

34.

Jensen

Spittal

Krishnan

(2005). ELSI short form: User manual for a direct measure of living standards. Ministry of Social Development. https://www.msd.govt.nz/about-msd-and-our-work/publications-resources/monitoring/living-standards/elsi-short-form.html

35.

Jose

P. E.

(2013). A programme to compute cell means for the graohical dissplay of moderational analyses: The internet version. Victoria University of Wellington. https://psychology.victoria.ac.nz/modgraph/

36.

Kan

F. P.

Raoofi

Rafiei

Khani

Hosseinifard

Tajik

Raoofi

Ahmadi

Aghalou

Torabi

Dehnad

Rezaei

Hosseinipalangi

Ghashghaee

(2021). A systematic review of the prevalence of anxiety among the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Affective Disorders, 293, 391–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.06.073

37.

Kasar

K. S.

Karaman

(2021). Life in lockdown: Social isolation, loneliness and quality of life in the elderly during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review. Geriatric Nursing, 42(5), 1222–1229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2021.03.010

38.

Kim

J. H.

McKenzie

L. A.

(2014). The impacts of physical exercise on stress coping and well-being in university students in the context of leisure. Health, 6(19), 2570–2580. https://doi.org/10.4236/health.2014.619296

39.

Koyama

Tabuchi

Okawa

Kadobayashi

Shirai

Nakatani

Miyashiro

(2021). Changes in smoking behavior since the declaration of the COVID-19 state of emergency in Japan: A cross-sectional study from the osaka health app. Journal of Epidemiology, 31(6), 378–386. https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20200533

40.

Kurniawidjaja

Susilowati

I. H.

Erwandi

Kadir

Hasiholan

B. P.

Al Ghiffari

(2022). Identification of depression among elderly during COVID-19. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health, 13, 21501319221085380. https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319221085380

41.

Lazarus

R. S.

Folkman

(1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.

42.

Little

(2018). Passive coping strategies. In Zeigler-Hill

Shackelford

(Eds.), Enclyclopedia of personality and individual differences (pp, 1–3). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1867-1

43.

Liu

Huang

Zhang

Feng

X. L.

Guo

(2021). Relationship between risk perception, social support, and mental health among general Chinese population during the COVID-19 pandemic. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 14, 1843–1853. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S302521

44.

Meng

Dai

Zhang

Liu

Yang

(2020). The psychological impact of COVID-19 among the elderly population in China. Psychiatry Research, 289, 112983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112983

45.

Ministry of Health . (2020). Aotearoa/NZ/New Zealand’s COVID-19 elimination stratgey: An overview. Ministry of Health. https://www.health.govt.nz/covid-19-novel-coronavirus/covid-19-response-planning/covid-19-minimisation-and-protection-strategy-Aotearoa/NZ-new-zealand

46.

O’Donnell

Eadie

Stead

Dobson

Semple

(2021). ‘I was smoking a lot more during lockdown because I can’: A qualitative study of how UK smokers responded to the COVID-19 lockdown. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(11), 5816–5830. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115816

47.

Officer

T. N.

Imlach

McKinlay

Kennedy

Pledger

Russell

Churchward

Cumming

McBride-Henry

(2022). COVID-19 pandemic lockdown and wellbeing: Experiences from Aotearoa/NZ New Zealand in 2020. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4), 2269–2292. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042269

48.

Oker

Reinhardt

Schmelowszky

Á.

(2022). The effects of COVID-19 on mental health and its relationship with death attitudes and coping styles among Hungarian, Norwegian and Turkish psychology students. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(65), 812720. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.812720

49.

Padhy

Angiel

P. R.

(2021). Social support and emotion regulation as predictors of well-being. In Pradan

R. K.

Kumar

(Eds.), Emotion, well-being, and resilience (pp. 61–76). Apple Academic Press.

50.

Rao

Mueller

Broadbent

(2022). Risky alcohol consumption in older people before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom. Journal of Substance Use, 27(2), 212–217.

51.

Salman

Beaney

Robb

de Jager Loots

C. A.

Giannakopoulou

Udeh-Momoh

Ahmadi-Abhari

Majeed

Middleton

L. T.

McGregor

A. H.

(2021). The impact of social restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic on the physical activity levels of older adults: A baseline analysis of the CHARIOT COVID-19 rapid response prospective cohort study. British Medical Jounral Open, 11(8), 05680. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050680

52.

Sayette

M. A.

(1999). Does drinking reduce stress? Alcohol Research & Health, 23(4), 250–255. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6760384/

53.

Schafer

J. L.

(1999). Multiple imputation: A primer. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1191/096228099671525676

54.

Schierberl Scherr

A. E.

Ayotte

B. J.

Kellogg

M. B.

(2021). Moderating roles of resilience and social support on psychiatric and practice outcomes in nurses working during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sage Open Nursing, 7, 24213. https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608211024213

55.

Sharif Nia

Gorgulu

Naghavi

Robles-Bello

M. A.

Sánchez-Teruel

Khoshnavay Fomani

She

Rahmatpour

Allen

K.-A.

Arslan

(2021). Spiritual well-being, social support, and financial distress in determining depression: The mediating role of impact of event during COVID-19 pandemic in Iran. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 1854–1864. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.754831

56.

Smith

Gardner

Fisher

Hamer

(2015). Patterns and correlates of physical activity behaviour over 10 years in older adults: Prospective analyses from the English longitudinal study of ageing. BMJ Open, 5(4), 007423. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007423

57.

Stephens

Breheny

(2022). Diverse experiences among older adults in aotearoa/NZ/New Zealand during COVID‐19 lockdown: A qualitative study. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 41(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.12995

58.

Szkody

Stearns

Stanhope

McKinney

(2021). Stress‐buffering role of social support during COVID‐19. Family Process, 60(3), 1002–1015. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12618

59.

Taylor

S. E.

(2011). Social support: A review. In Friedman

H. S.

(Ed.), The oxford handbook of health psychlogy (pp. 189–214). Oxford University Presss.

60.

Van Knippenberg

Van Dick

Tavares

(2007). Social identity and social exchange: Identification, support, and withdrawal from the job. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(3), 457–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00168.x

61.

Verhage

Thielman

De Kock

Lindenberg

(2021). Coping of older adults in times of Covid-19: Considerations of temporality among Dutch older adults. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 76(7), 290–299. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbab008

62.

Walinga

(2014). Stress and coping. Introduction to psychology (pp. 750–761). Open Library. https://opentextbc.ca/introductiontopsychology/chapter/15-2-stress-and-coping/

63.

Wilson

J. M.

Weiss

Shook

N. J.

(2020). Mindfulness, self-compassion, and savoring: Factors that explain the relation between perceived social support and well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 152, 109568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109568

64.

Wright

L. J.

Williams

S. E.

Veldhuijzen van Zanten

J. J.

(2021). Physical activity protects against the negative impact of coronavirus fear on adolescent mental health and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.580511

65.

Yan

Lai

Ren

(2022). Prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms among Chinese older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 35(2), 182–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887221078556

66.

Yang

Y. J.

(2019). An overview of current physical activity recommendations in primary care. Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 40(3), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.19.0038

An Examination of Coping Strategies that Moderated the Effects of COVID-19-Related Stress on Anxiety Among Older Adults in Aotearoa/NZ

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Research Aims

Method

Measures

Demographic Variables

Perceived Stress

Coping-Related Measures

Anxiety

Analyses

Results

Perceived Stress During the COVID-19 Lockdown

Changes in Older Adult’s Coping Strategies and Emotional Well-Being

Hypothesis 1: Coping Strategies Will Moderate the Relationship Between Stress and Anxiety

Discussion

Limitations

Conclusion

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

ORCID iD

References