Objectives: This study examines how current marital status is associated with epigenetic aging. Methods: Data from the 2016 Health and Retirement Study were used to examine marital status differences in the four epigenetic clocks, that is, GrimAge, DunedinPoAm, PhenoAge, and Zhang (N = 3765). Weighted ordinary least square regression models were estimated separately for men and women. Results: Remarried, cohabiting, divorced/separated and widowed older adults showed greater epigenetic aging than the continuously married similarly among men and women. Distinct sex difference was observed among the never married. While never-married women exhibited greater epigenetic aging than their continuously married counterparts, older men in lifelong singlehood showed comparable epigenetic aging to their continuously married peers. Discussion: The findings speak to the importance of marital context for epigenetic aging in later life and the biological risk associated with lifelong singlehood for older women in the US.
BellC. G.LoweR.AdamsP. D.BaccarelliA. A.BeckS.BellJ. T.ChristensenB. C.GladyshevV. N.HeijmansB. T.HorvathS.IdekerT.IssaJ. P. J.KelseyK. T.MarioniR. E.ReikW.ReltonC. L.SchalkwykL. C.TeschendorffA. E.WagnerW.RakyanV. K. (2019). DNA methylation aging clocks: Challenges and recommendations. Genome Biology, 20(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-019-1824-y
2.
BelskyD. W.CaspiA.ArseneaultL.BaccarelliA.CorcoranD. L.GaoX.HannonE.HarringtonH. L.RasmussenL. J. H.HoutsR.HuffmanK.KrausW. E.KwonD.MillJ.PieperC. F.PrinzJ. A.PoultonR.SchwartzJ.SugdenK.MoffittT. E. (2020). Quantification of the pace of biological aging in humans through a blood test, the DunedinPoAm DNA methylation algorithm. Elife, 9, e54870. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.54870
3.
BrodyG. H.MillerG. E.YuT.BeachS. R. H.ChenE. (2016a). Supportive family environments ameliorate the link between racial discrimination and epigenetic aging: A replication across two longitudinal cohorts. Psychological Science, 27(4), 530–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615626703
4.
BrodyG. H.YuT.ChenE.BeachS. R. H.MillerG. E. (2016b). Family‐centered prevention ameliorates the longitudinal association between risky family processes and epigenetic aging. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57(5), 566–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12495
5.
BrownL.NeedhamB.AilshireJ. (2017a). Telomere length among older US adults: Differences by race/ethnicity, gender, and age. Journal of Aging and Health, 29(8), 1350–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264316661390
6.
BrownS. L.BulandaJ. R.LeeG. R. (2005). The significance of nonmarital cohabitation: Marital status and mental health benefits among middle-aged and older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 60(1), S21–S29. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/60.1.s21
BrownS. L.LeeG. R.BulandaJ. R. (2006). Cohabitation among older adults: A national portrait. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61B(2), S71–S79. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/61.2.s71
9.
BrownS. L.ManningW. D.PayneK. K. (2017b). Relationship quality among cohabiting versus married couples. Journal of Family Issues, 38(12), 1730–1753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x15622236
10.
CarrD.Bodnar-DerenS. (2009). Gender, aging and widowhood. In International handbook of population aging (pp. 705–728). Springer.
CarrD.UtzR. L. (2020). Families in later life: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 346–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12609
13.
ChampagneF. A. (2010). Epigenetic influence of social experiences across the lifespan. Developmental Psychobiology, 52(4), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.20436
CrimminsE.KimJ. K.FisherJ.FaulJ. (2020). HRS epigenetic clocks - release 1. : Survey Research Center, Univeristy of Michigan.
16.
CrimminsE. M.FaulJ. D.ThyagarajanB.WeirD. R. (2017). Venous blood collection and assay protocol in the 2016 Health and Retirement Study. Survey Research Center, Univeristy of Michigan.
17.
CrimminsE. M.ThyagarajanB.LevineM. E.WeirD. R.FaulJ. (2021). Associations of age, sex, race/ethnicity, and education with 13 epigenetic clocks in a nationally representative US sample: The health and retirement study. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 76(6), 1117–1123. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glab016
18.
DonohoC. J.CrimminsE. M.SeemanT. E. (2013). Marital quality, gender, and markers of inflammation in the MIDUS cohort. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75(1), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.01023.x
HorvathS.GurvenM.LevineM. E.TrumbleB. C.KaplanH.AllayeeH.RitzB. R.ChenB.LuA. T.RickabaughT. M.JamiesonB. D.SunD.LiS.ChenW.Quintana-MurciL.FagnyM.KoborM. S.TsaoP. S.ReinerA. P.AssimesT. L. (2016). An epigenetic clock analysis of race/ethnicity, sex, and coronary heart disease. Genome Biology, 17(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-1030-0
21.
HorvathS.RajK. (2018). DNA methylation-based biomarkers and the epigenetic clock theory of ageing. Nature Reviews. Genetics, 19(6), 371–384. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-018-0004-3
22.
JenkinsK. R.OfstedalM. B.WeirD. (2008). Documentation of health behaviors and risk factors measured in the health and retirement study. HRS/AHEAD.
23.
Kiecolt-GlaserJ. K. (2018). Marriage, divorce, and the immune system. American Psychologist, 73(9), 1098–1108. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000388
24.
KnowlesL. M.RuizJ. M.O’ConnorM.-F. (2019). A systematic review of the association between bereavement and biomarkers of immune function. Psychosomatic Medicine, 81(5), 415–433. https://doi.org/10.1097/psy.0000000000000693
25.
LevineM. E. (2020). Assessment of epigenetic clocks as biomarkers of aging in basic and population research. Oxford University Press.
26.
LevineM. E.LuA. T.QuachA.ChenB. H.AssimesT. L.BandinelliS.HouL.BaccarelliA. A.StewartJ. D.LiY.WhitselE. A.WilsonJ. G.ReinerA. P.AvivA.LohmanK.LiuY.FerrucciL.HorvathS. (2018). An epigenetic biomarker of aging for lifespan and healthspan. Aging, 10(4), 573–591. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.101414
27.
LincolnK. D.LloydD. A.NguyenA. W. (2019). Social relationships and salivary telomere length among middle-aged and older african american and white adults. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 74(6), 1053–1061. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbx049
MainousA. G.IIIEverettC. J.DiazV. A.BakerR.ManginoM.CoddV.SamaniN. J. (2010). Leukocyte telomere length and marital status among middle-aged adults. Age and Ageing, 40(1), 73–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afq118
30.
McCroryC.FioritoG.HernandezB.PolidoroS.O’HalloranA. M.HeverA.Ni CheallaighC.LuA. T.HorvathS.VineisP.KennyR. A. (2021). GrimAge outperforms other epigenetic clocks in the prediction of age-related clinical phenotypes and all-cause mortality. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 76(5), 741–749. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaa286
31.
McFarlandM. J.HaywardM. D.BrownD. (2013). I’ve got you under my skin: Marital biography and biological risk. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75(2), 363–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12015
32.
MusickK.BumpassL. (2012). Reexamining the case for marriage: Union formation and changes in well‐being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00873.x
33.
National Research Council (2001). Preparing for an aging world: The case for cross-national research. National Academy Press.
34.
OblakL.van der ZaagJ.Higgins-ChenA. T.LevineM. E.BoksM. P. (2021). A systematic review of biological, social and environmental factors associated with epigenetic clock acceleration. Ageing Research Reviews, 69(5), 101348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2021.101348
RAND Corporation (2021). RAND HRS longtitudinal files 2018 (V1). Produced by the RAND Center for the Study of Aging, with funding from the National Institute on Aging and the Social Security Administration.
37.
RendallM. S.WedenM. M.FavreaultM. M.WaldronH. (2011). The protective effect of marriage for survival: A review and update. Demography, 48(2), 481–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-011-0032-5
SchmitzL. L.ZhaoW.RatliffS. M.GoodwinJ. K.MiaoJ.LuQ.GuoX.TaylorK. D.DingJ.LiuY. (2021). The socioeconomic gradient in epigenetic aging clocks: Evidence from the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis and the health and retirement study. MedRxiv.
42.
SimonsR. L.OngM. L.LeiM.-K.KlopackE.BergM.ZhangY.PhilibertR.BeachS. S. R. (2021). Unstable childhood, adult adversity, and smoking accelerate biological aging among middle-age African Americans: Similar findings for GrimAge and PoAm. Journal of Aging and Health. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/08982643211043668
43.
ThomeerM. B.UmbersonD.ReczekC. (2020). The gender‐as‐relational approach for theorizing about romantic relationships of sexual and gender minority mid‐to later‐life adults. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 12(2), 220–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12368
UmbersonD.ThomeerM. B. (2020). Family matters: Research on family ties and health, 2010 to 2020. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 404–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12640
46.
WaiteL. J.GallagherM. (2000). The case for marriage: Why married people are happier, healthier and better off financially?Doubleday Books.
47.
WaldronI.WeissC. C.HughesM. E. (1997). Marital status effects on health: Are there differences between never married women and divorced and separated women?Social Science & Medicine, 45(9), 1387–1397. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(97)00065-8
48.
WhismanM. A.RobustelliB. L.SbarraD. A. (2016). Marital disruption is associated with shorter salivary telomere length in a probability sample of older adults. Social Science & Medicine, 157, 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.03.029
49.
WilliamsK.UmbersonD. (2004). Marital status, marital transitions, and health: A gendered life course perspective. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 45(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/002214650404500106
50.
WrightM. R.BrownS. L. (2017). Psychological well‐being among older adults: The role of partnership status. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79(3), 833–849. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12375
51.
YuY.-L.LiuH. (2021). Marital quality and salivary telomere length Among older men and women in the United States. Journal of Aging and Health, 33(5–6), 300–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0898264320980250
52.
ZannasA. S.ArlothJ.Carrillo-RoaT.IuratoS.RöhS.ResslerK. J.NemeroffC. B.SmithA. K.BradleyB.HeimC.MenkeA.LangeJ. F.BrucklT.IsingM.WrayN. R.ErhardtA.BinderE. B.MehtaD. (2015). Lifetime stress accelerates epigenetic aging in an urban, African American cohort: Relevance of glucocorticoid signaling. Genome Biology, 16(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0828-5
53.
ZhangY.WilsonR.HeissJ.BreitlingL. P.SaumK.-U.SchöttkerB.HolleczekB.WaldenbergerM.PetersA.BrennerH. (2017). DNA methylation signatures in peripheral blood strongly predict all-cause mortality. Nature Communications, 8(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14617
54.
ZhangZ. (2006). Marital history and the burden of cardiovascular disease in midlife. The Gerontologist, 46(2), 266–270. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/46.2.266
55.
ZhangZ.HaywardM. D. (2006). Gender, the marital life course, and cardiovascular disease in late midlife. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(3), 639–657. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00280.x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
