Types of Caregiving Experience and Their Association With Caregiver Depressive Symptoms and Quality of Life

Abstract

Objective

This study examines distinct types of caregiving experience, each formed by varied combinations of caregiving burden and benefits, and their association with caregiver depressive symptoms and quality of life. Methods: We apply latent profile analysis and multivariable regression to data on 278 caregivers participating in the Caregiving Transitions among Family Caregivers of Elderly Singaporeans (TraCE) study in 2019–2020. Results: We identify four caregiving experience types: (1) balanced (low burden and moderate benefits, 40% of caregivers), (2) satisfied (low burden and high benefits, 33%), (3) intensive (high burden and high benefits, 17%), and (4) dissatisfied (moderate burden and low benefits, 10%). Caregivers with dissatisfied and intensive caregiving experience tend to report higher depressive symptoms and lower quality of life compared to those with satisfied caregiving experience. Discussion: A person-centered approach helps capture the heterogeneity in caregiving experience. Policymakers should develop tailored interventions by caregiving experience types for promoting caregiver well-being.

Keywords

caregiving burden and benefits caregiver depressive symptoms caregiver quality of life latent profile analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adelman

R. D.

Tmanova

L. L.

Delgado

Dion

Lachs

M. S.

(2014). Caregiver burden: A clinical review. JAMA, 311(10), 1052-1060. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.304

Agency for Integrated Care . (2020). Financial schemes: A guide to eldercare subsidies. https://www.aic.sg/resources/Documents/Brochures/All%20in%201%20Brochures/Financial%20Schemes%20Brochure%20(Eng).pdf

Bachner

Y. G.

Morad

Sroussi

O’Rourke

(2020). Direct and indirect predictors of burden among Bedouin caregivers of family members with terminal cancer in Israel. Aging & Mental Health, 24(4), 575-581. DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1570080

(2018). Caregivers of older adults in Singapore: An overview and synthesis of empirical studies. Centre for Ageing Research and Education (CARE). https://www.duke-nus.edu.sg/docs/librariesprovider3/research-policy-brief-docs/care-research-brief-6---caregivers-of-older-adults-in-singapore---an-overview-and-synthesis-of-empirical-studies-(online).pdf?sfvrsn=d3098e53_4

Chan

Malhotra

Manap

N. B.

Ting

Y. Y.

Visaria

Cheng

G. H.-L.

Goh

V. S. M.

Tay

P. K. C.

Lee

J. M. L.

Maulod

(2018). Transitions in health, employment, social engagement and intergenerational transfers in Singapore study (THE SIGNS study) – I: Descriptive statistics and analysis of key aspects of successful ageing. Centre for Ageing Research and Education (CARE). https://www.duke-nus.edu.sg/docs/librariesprovider3/research-policy-brief-docs/the-signs-study---i-report.pdf

Chan

Saito

Matchar

D. B.

Østbye

Malhotra

Ang

Malhotra

(2019). Cohort profile: Panel on health and ageing of singaporean elderly (PHASE). International Journal of Epidemiology, 48(6), 1750-1751f. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyz172

(2002). Burden and well-being among caregivers: Examining the distinction. The Gerontologist, 42(6), 772-780. DOI: 10.1093/geront/42.6.772

(2000). Predicting caregiver burden and depression in Alzheimer'sdisease. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 55(1), S2-S13. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/55.1.s2

(2010). Latent class and latent transition analysis: With applications in the social, behavioral, and health sciences (Vol. 718). John Wiley & Sons.

(2019). The association between subjective caregiver burden and depressive symptoms in carers of older relatives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE, 14(5), e0217648. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217648

(2020). Positive aspect of caregiving among primary informal dementia caregivers in Singapore. PLOS ONE, 15(8), e0237677. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237677

(2002). Issues of race, ethnicity, and culture in caregiving research: A 20-year review (1980–2000). The Gerontologist, 42(2), 237-272. DOI: 10.1093/geront/42.2.237

13.

Epidemiology and Disease Control Division, Ministry of Health . (2019). The burden of disease in Singapore, 1990–2017: an overview of the global burden of disease study 2017 results. WI, Seattle: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation.

(2019). Caregiving intensity and mortality in older women, accounting for time-varying and lagged caregiver status: The caregiver-study of osteoporotic fractures study. The Gerontologist, 59(5), e461-e469. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gny135

(2013). Associations between filial responsibility and caregiver well-being: Are there differences by cultural group? Research on Aging, 35(1), 78-95. DOI: 10.1177/0164027511422450

16.

Graham

J. W.

(2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 549-576. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530

(1999). Relationship between caregiver burden and health-related quality of life. The Gerontologist, 39(5), 534-545. DOI: 10.1093/geront/39.5.534

(1993). Two shorter forms of the CES-D depression symptoms index. Journal of Aging and Health, 5(2), 179-193. DOI: 10.1177/089826439300500202

19.

Kramer

B. J.

(1997). Gain in the caregiving experience: Where are we? what next?1. The Gerontologist, 37(2), 218-232. DOI: 10.1093/geront/37.2.218

20.

Lai

D. W. L.

(2010). Filial piety, caregiving appraisal, and caregiving burden. Research on aging, 32(2), 200-223. DOI: 10.1177/0164027509351475

21.

Loke

A. Y.

(2013). The positive aspects of caregiving for cancer patients: a critical review of the literature and directions for future research. Psycho-Oncology, 22(11), 2399-2407. DOI: 10.1002/pon.3311

22.

Lin

F.-J.

(2008). Solving multicollinearity in the process of fitting regression model using the nested estimate procedure. Quality & Quantity, 42(3), 417-426. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-006-9055-1

Jr (2011). Five-factor personality traits and subjective health among caregivers: The role of caregiver strain and self-efficacy. Psychology and Aging, 26(3), 592-604. DOI: 10.1037/a0022209

(2018). The aging of a young nation: Population aging in Singapore. The Gerontologist, 59(3), 401-410. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gny160

(2012). Validity and reliability of the Caregiver Reaction Assessment scale among primary informal caregivers for older persons in Singapore. Aging & Mental Health, 16(8), 1004-1015. DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2012.702728

(2020). Care demands and well-being of primary and secondary non-spousal caregivers of aging adults. Clinical Gerontologist, 43(5), 558-571. DOI: 10.1080/07317115.2020.1759748

(2021). Informal caregiving and all-cause mortality: A meta-analysis of longitudinal population-based studies. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 40(7), 781-791. DOI: 10.1177/0733464819893603

(2017). Experiences of formal and informal caregivers of older persons in Singapore. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 32(3), 373-385. DOI: 10.1007/s10823-017-9329-1

(2016). The burden of filial piety: A qualitative study on caregiving motivations amongst family caregivers of patients with cancer in Singapore. Psychology & Health, 31(11), 1293-1310. DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2016.1204450

(1999). Measuring both negative and positive reactions to giving care to cancer patients: Psychometric qualities of the Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA). Social Science & Medicine, 48(9), 1259-1269. DOI: 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00426-2

(2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535-569. DOI: 10.1080/10705510701575396

32.

Oberski

(2016). Mixture models: Latent profile and latent class analysis. In Robertson

Kaptein

(Eds.), Modern Statistical Methods for HCI (pp. 275-287). Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-26633-6_12

(2015). Caregiving reduces mortality risk for most caregivers: a census-based record linkage study. International Journal of Epidemiology, 44(6), 1959-1969. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyv172

(2013). Does support from foreign domestic workers decrease the negative impact of informal caregiving? results from Singapore survey on informal caregiving. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 68(4), 609-621. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbt042

(1994). Caregiving: The unexpected career. Social Justice Research, 7(4), 373-390. DOI: 10.1007/BF02334863

(1990). Caregiving and the stress process: An overview of concepts and their measures1. The Gerontologist, 30(5), 583-594. DOI: 10.1093/geront/30.5.583

(2019). Predictors of the personal benefits and positive aspects of informal caregiving. Aging & Mental Health, 23(11), 1533-1538. DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2018.1501662

38.

Pinquart

Sörensen

(2004). Associations of caregiver stressors and uplifts with subjective well-being and depressive mood: a meta-analytic comparison. Aging & Mental Health, 8(5), 438-449. DOI: 10.1080/13607860410001725036

39.

Pinquart

Sörensen

(2005). Ethnic differences in stressors, resources, and psychological outcomes of family caregiving: A meta-analysis. The Gerontologist, 45(1), 90-106. DOI: 10.1093/geront/45.1.90

40.

Pristavec

(2019). The burden and benefits of caregiving: A latent class analysis. The Gerontologist, 59(6), 1078-1091. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gny022

(2019). Influence of positive and negative dimensions of dementia caregiving on caregiver well-being and satisfaction with life: Findings from the IDEAL study. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 27(8), 838-848. DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2019.02.005

(2015). Informal caregiving and its impact on health: A reappraisal from population-based studies. The Gerontologist, 55(2), 309-319. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnu177

(1996). The transitions of caregiving: subjective and objective definitions1. The Gerontologist, 36(5), 614-626. DOI: 10.1093/geront/36.5.614

(2005). Caregiver burden and depressive symptoms: Analysis of common outcomes in caregivers of elderly patients. Journal of Aging and Health, 17(2), 125-147. DOI: 10.1177/0898264304274179

(2017). Validity and reliability of the positive aspects of caregiving (PAC) scale and development of its shorter version (S-PAC) among family caregivers of older adults. The Gerontologist, 57(4), e75-e84. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnw198

(2007). The caregiver stress process and health outcomes. Journal of Aging and Health, 19(6), 871-887. DOI: 10.1177/0898264307308568

(2004). Positive aspects of caregiving: contributions of the REACH project to the development of new measures for Alzheimer’s caregiving. Research on Aging, 26(4), 429-453. DOI: 10.1177/0164027504264493

(1992). Assessment of behavioral problems in dementia: The revised memory and behavior problems checklist. Psychology and Aging, 7(4), 622-631. DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.7.4.622

49.

THE WHOQOL GROUP . (1998). Development of the world health organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28(3), 551-558. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291798006667

(2014). Family caregiver challenges in dementia care in Australia and China: A critical perspective. BMC Geriatrics, 14(1), 6. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2318-14-6

(2021). Coping patterns among primary informal dementia caregivers in Singapore and its impact on caregivers—implications of a latent class analysis. The Gerontologist, 61(5), 680-692. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnaa080

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.13 MB