Objective: Despite the growing evidence against artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH) use among patients with advanced dementia, little is known about the perspectives of the health care team. This study examined the knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of physicians and other health care providers regarding the use of ANH at the end of life (EOL). Methods: A cross-sectional survey explored the provision of EOL care using a hypothetical case scenario of a patient with advanced dementia and dysphagia. Questionnaire items were analyzed using parametric and nonparametric approaches. Results: In this sample of 323 respondents, statistical significance was found between physicians and other health care providers’ views on ANH and its related beneficial effects or health outcomes in EOL care. Discussion: Results indicate knowledge deficits in physicians and other health care professionals and highlight the need for comprehensive continuing education programs on EOL topics. Conclusion: Differences in knowledge, attitudes and beliefs regarding ANH in EOL among healthcare providers were observed and education regarding evidence based clinical guidelines are necessary.
BitoS.YamamotoT.TominagaH.InvestigatorsJ. (2015). Prospective cohort study comparing the effects of different artificial nutrition methods on long-term survival in the elderly: Japan Assessment Study on Procedures and Outcomes of Artificial Nutrition (JAPOAN). Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 39, 456-464. doi:10.1177/0148607114522486
2.
BlumensteinI.ShastriY. M.SteinJ. (2014). Gastroenteric tube feeding: Techniques, problems and solutions. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 20, 8505-8524. doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i26.8505
3.
BorasioG. D.JoxR. J. (2016). Choosing wisely at the end of life: The crucial role of medical indication. Swiss Medical Weekly, 146, w14369. doi:10.4414/smw.2016.14369
4.
CoffeyA.McCarthyG.WeathersE.FriedmanM. I.GalloK.EhrenfeldM.. . . FitzpatrickJ. J. (2013). Nurses’ preferred end-of-life treatment choices in five countries. International Nursing Review, 60, 313-319. doi:10.1111/inr.12024
5.
DrumlC.BallmerP. E.DrumlW.OehmichenF.ShenkinA.SingerP.. . . BischoffS. C. (2016). ESPEN guideline on ethical aspects of artificial nutrition and hydration. Clinical Nutrition, 35, 545-556. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2016.02.006
HayM. C.WeisnerT. S.SubramanianS.DuanN.NiedzinskiE. J.KravitzR. L. (2008). Harnessing experience: Exploring the gap between evidence-based medicine and clinical practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 14, 707-713. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01009.x
8.
KlekS.HermanowiczA.DziwiszekG.MatysiakK.SzczepanekK.SzybinskiP.GalasA. (2014). Home enteral nutrition reduces complications, length of stay, and health care costs: Results from a multicenter study. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 100, 609-615. doi:10.3945/ajcn.113.082842
9.
LeheupB. F.PiotE.GoetzC.QuilliotD.NiemierJ. Y.WaryB.DucrocqX. (2015). Withdrawal of artificial nutrition: Influence of prior experience on the perception of caregivers. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, 32, 401-406. doi:10.1177/1049909114522688
10.
MitchellS. L.TenoJ. M.KielyD. K.ShafferM. L.JonesR. N.PrigersonH. G.. . . HamelM. B. (2009). The clinical course of advanced dementia. The New England Journal of Medicine, 361, 1529-1538. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0902234
11.
MitchellS. L.TenoJ. M.RoyJ.KabumotoG.MorV. (2003). Clinical and organizational factors associated with feeding tube use among nursing home residents with advanced cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 290, 73-80. doi:10.1001/jama.290.1.73
12.
MoritaT.ShimaY.AdachiI.Japan Palliative Oncology Study Group. (2002). Attitudes of Japanese physicians toward terminal dehydration: A nationwide survey. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 20, 4699-4704.
13.
PazartL.CretinE.GrodardG.CornetC.Mathieu-NicotF.BonnetainF.. . . ALIM-K Study Investigational Group. (2014). Parenteral nutrition at the palliative phase of advanced cancer: The ALIM-K study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 15, Article 370. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-370
14.
RaynardB. (2013). Care and continuation of artificial nutrition. Nutrition Clinique et Metabolisme, 27, 276-280.
15.
Torres-VigilI.MendozaT. R.Alonso-BabarroA.De LimaL.Cardenas-TuranzasM.HernandezM.. . . BrueraE. (2012). Practice patterns and perceptions about parenteral hydration in the last weeks of life: A survey of palliative care physicians in Latin America. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 43, 47-58. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.03.016
16.
UlvenesL. V.AaslandO.NylennaM.KristiansenI. S. (2009). Norwegian physicians’ knowledge of and opinions about evidence-based medicine: Cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE, 4(11), e7828. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007828
van de VathorstS. (2014). Artificial nutrition at the end of life: Ethical issues. Best Practice & Research: Clinical Gastroenterology, 28, 247-253. doi:10.1016/j.bpg.2014.02.005
19.
VolkertD.ChourdakisM.Faxen-IrvingG.FruhwaldT.LandiF.SuominenM. H.. . . SchneiderS. M. (2015). ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in dementia. Clinical Nutrition, 34, 1052-1073. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2015.09.004
YamaguchiT.MoritaT.ShinjoT.InoueS.TakigawaC.ArugaE.. . . UchitomiY. (2012). Effect of parenteral hydration therapy based on the Japanese national clinical guideline on quality of life, discomfort, and symptom intensity in patients with advanced cancer. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 43, 1001-1012. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.06.028
22.
YingI. (2015). Artificial nutrition and hydration in advanced dementia. Canadian Family Physician, 61, 245-248.
