Objective: Investigate direct and indirect associations between markers of socioeconomic position (SEP) across the life course and midlife cognitive ability while addressing methodological limitations in prior work. Method: Longitudinal data from the Danish Metropolit cohort of men born in 1953 (N = 2,479) who completed ability tests at age 12, 18, and 56-58 linked to register-based information on paternal occupational class, educational attainment, and occupational level. Associations were assessed using structural equation models, and different models were estimated to examine the importance of accounting for childhood ability and measurement error. Results: Associations between adult SEP measures and midlife ability decreased significantly when adjusting for childhood ability and measurement error. The association between childhood and midlife ability was by far the strongest. Discussion: The impact of adult SEP on later life ability may be exaggerated when not accounting for the stability of individual differences in cognitive ability and measurement error in test scores.
BaltesP. B.LindenbergerU.StaudingerU. M. (2006). Life span theory in developmental psychology. In DamonW.LernerR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 569-664). New York, NY: John Wiley.
3.
BradleyR. H.CorwynR. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 371-399.
4.
CalvinC. M.DearyI. J.FentonC.RobertsB. A.DerG.LeckenbyN.BattyG. D. (2011). Intelligence in youth and all-cause-mortality: Systematic review with meta-analysis. International Journal of Epidemiology, 40, 626-644.
5.
CapronC.DuymeM. (1989). Assessment of effects of socio-economic status on IQ in a full cross-fostering study. Nature, 340(6234), 552-554.
6.
ChristensenG. T.MolboD.AngquistL. H.MortensenE. L.ChristensenK.SorensenT. I. A.OslerM. (2015). Cohort profile: The Danish Conscription Database (DCD): A cohort of 728 160 men born from 1939 through 1959. International Journal of Epidemiology, 44, 432-440.
7.
ChristensenU.KrølnerR.NilssonC. J.LyngbyeP. W.HougaardC. Ø.NygaardE.. . . LundR. (2014). Addressing social inequality in aging by the Danish occupational social class measurement. Journal of Aging and Health, 26, 106-127.
8.
DugravotA.GueguenA.KivimakiM.VahteraJ.ShipleyM.MarmotM. G.Singh-ManouxA. (2009). Socioeconomic position and cognitive decline using data from two waves: What is the role of the Wave 1 cognitive measure?Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 63, 675-680.
9.
EndersC. K.BandalosD. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 430-457.
10.
ForsS.LennartssonC.LundbergO. (2009). Childhood living conditions, socioeconomic position in adulthood, and cognition in later life: Exploring the associations. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 64B, 750-757.
11.
GlymourM. M.WeuveJ.BerkmanL. F.KawachiI.RobinsJ. M. (2005). When is baseline adjustment useful in analyses of change? An example with education and cognitive change. American Journal of Epidemiology, 162, 267-278.
12.
GonzalezH. M.TarrafW.BowenM. E.Johnson-JenningsM. D.FisherG. G. (2013). What do parents have to do with my cognitive reserve? Life course perspectives on twelve-year cognitive decline. Neuroepidemiology, 41, 101-109.
13.
GowA. J.JohnsonW.PattieA.BrettC. E.RobertsB.StarrJ. M.DearyI. J. (2011). Stability and change in intelligence from age 11 to ages 70, 79, and 87: The Lothian Birth Cohorts of 1921 and 1936. Psychology and Aging, 26, 232-240.
14.
HaanM. N.Zeki Al-HazzouriA.AielloA. E. (2011). Life-span socioeconomic trajectory, nativity, and cognitive aging in Mexican Americans: The Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 66B(Suppl. 1), i102-i110.
15.
HackmanD. A.FarahM. J.MeaneyM. J. (2010). Socioeconomic status and the brain: Mechanistic insights from human and animal research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 651-659.
16.
HansenE. J. (1984). Socialgrupper i Danmark [Social groups in Denmark]. Copenhagen, Denmark: The Social Research Institute.
17.
HärnqvistK. (1968). Relative changes in intelligence from 13 to 18. I. Background and methodology. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 9, 50-64.
18.
HauserR. M.RoanC. L. (November, 2007). Work complexity and cognitive functioning at midlife: Cross-validating the Kohn-Schooler hypothesis in an American cohort (CDE Working Paper No. 2007-08). Madison, WI.
19.
HertzogC.SchaieK. W. (1986). Stability and change in adult intelligence: I. Analysis of longitudinal covariance structures. Psychology and Aging, 1, 159-171.
20.
HollandC. A.RabbittP. (1991). The course and causes of cognitive change with advancing age. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, 1, 81-96.
21.
HorvatP.RichardsM.MalyutinaS.PajakA.KubinovaR.TamosiunasA.. . . BobakM. (2014). Life course socioeconomic position and mid-late life cognitive function in Eastern Europe. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 69, 470-481.
22.
International Labor Office. (2012). International Standard Classification of Occupations: ISCO-08 (Vol. 1). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
23.
JeffersonA. L.GibbonsL. E.RentzD. M.CarvalhoJ. O.ManlyJ.BennettD. A.JonesR. N. (2011). A life course model of cognitive activities, socioeconomic status, education, reading ability, and cognition. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 59, 1403-1411.
24.
JohnsonW.GowA. J.CorleyJ.StarrJ. M.DearyI. J. (2010). Location in cognitive and residential space at age 70 reflects a lifelong trait over parental and environmental circumstances: The Lothian Birth Cohort 1936. Intelligence, 38, 402-411.
25.
KohnM.SchoolerC. (1983). Work and personality: An enquiry into the impact of social stratification. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
26.
LittleT. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford.
27.
LundR.MortensenE. L.ChristensenU.BruunsgaardH.Holm-PedersenP.FiehnN.-E.. . . OslerM. (2016). Cohort profile: The Copenhagen Aging and Midlife Biobank (CAMB). International Journal of Epidemiology, 45, 1044-1053.
28.
LyuJ.BurrJ. A. (2016). Socioeconomic status across the life course and cognitive function among older adults: An examination of the latency, pathways, and accumulation hypotheses. Journal of Aging and Health, 28, 40-67.
29.
MortensenE. L.Flensborg-MadsenT.MolboD.FagerlundB.ChristensenU.LundR.. . . AvlundK. (2014). The relationship between cognitive ability and demographic factors in late midlife. Journal of Aging and Health, 26, 37-53.
30.
MortensenE. L.KlevenM. (1993). A WAIS longitudinal study of cognitive development during the life span from ages 50 to 70. Developmental Neuropsychology, 9, 115-130.
31.
OslerM.AvlundK.MortensenE. L. (2013). Socio-economic position early in life, cognitive development and cognitive change from young adulthood to middle age. The European Journal of Public Health, 23, 974-980.
32.
OslerM.LundR.KriegbaumM.ChristensenU.AndersenA. M. N. (2006). Cohort profile: The Metropolit 1953 Danish male birth cohort. International Journal of Epidemiology, 35, 541-545.
33.
PavlikV. N.de MoraesS. A.SzkloM.KnopmanD. S.MosleyT. H.Jr.HymanD. J. (2003). Relation between cognitive function and mortality in middle-aged adults: The Atherosclerosis risk in communities study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 157, 327-334.
34.
RichardsM.HatchS. L. (2011). A life course approach to the development of mental skills. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 66B(Suppl. 1), i26-i35.
35.
RichardsM.SackerA. (2003). Lifetime antecedents of cognitive reserve. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 25, 614-624.
36.
RönnlundM.SundströmA.PudasS. (2017). Midlife level and 15-year changes in general cognitive ability in a sample of men: The role of education, early adult ability, BMI, and pulse pressure. Intelligence, 61, 78-84.
37.
SchaieK. W. (1994). The course of adult intellectual development. American Psychologist, 49, 304-313.
38.
SchoolerC.MulatuM. S.OatesG. (1999). The continuing effects of substantively complex work on the intellectual functioning of older workers. Psychology and Aging, 14, 483-506.
39.
SchwartzmanA. E.GoldD.AndresD.ArbuckleT. Y.ChaikelsonJ. (1987). Stability of intelligence: A 40-year follow-up. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne De Psychologie, 41, 244-256.
40.
Singh-ManouxA.RichardsM.MarmotM. (2005). Socioeconomic position across the lifecourse: How does it relate to cognitive function in mid-life?Annals of Epidemiology, 15, 572-578.
41.
StaffR. T.ChapkoD.HoganM. J.WhalleyL. J. (2016). Life course socioeconomic status and the decline in information processing speed in late life. Social Science & Medicine, 151, 130-138.
42.
StrenzeT. (2007). Intelligence and socioeconomic success: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal research. Intelligence, 35, 401-426.
43.
StuckA. E.WalthertJ. M.NikolausT.BülaC. J.HohmannC.BeckJ. C. (1999). Risk factors for functional status decline in community-living elderly people: A systematic literature review. Social Science & Medicine, 48, 445-469.
44.
TeasdaleT. W. (2009). The Danish draft board’s intelligence test, Børge Priens Prøve: Psychometric properties and research applications through 50 years. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50, 633-638.
45.
TurrellG.LynchJ. W.KaplanG. A.EversonS. A.HelkalaE. L.KauhanenJ.SalonenJ. T. (2002). Socioeconomic position across the lifecourse and cognitive function in late middle age. Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 57(1), S43-S51.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
