Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the functional status and adaptation of older Americans and discover the factors that contribute to device use. Method: Using the community participants’ portion of the first round of National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), we demonstrate the prevalence of device use and reduction in activities, creating a multilevel measure of activities of daily living (ADL) functionality as compared with Katz’s dichotomous measure. In determining whether adaptation is universal irrespective of age, sex, race, living arrangement, and income, or dependent on these variables, we create a measure of device use, performing a path analysis of the device use measure and sociodemographic variables, with disability score as an intervening measure. Results: ADL functionality becomes more nuanced between the Katz-ADL and NHATS-ADL. Age, sex, and living arrangement were predictors of device use; income was indirectly, whereas race was not. Discussion: When assessors design service plans, consideration should be given to older adults’ ability, capacity, and resources to adapt.
Administration on Aging. (2012). A profile of older Americans: 2012. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
2.
AgreeE. M.FreedmanV. A. (2011). A quality-of-life scale for assistive technology: Results of a pilot study of aging and technology. Physical Therapy, 91(12), 1780-1788.
3.
AndersonL. A.GoodmanR. A.HoltzmanD.PosnerS. F.NorthridgeM. E. (2012). Aging in the United States: Opportunities and challenges for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 102(3), 393-395.
4.
AndersonW. L.WienerJ. M. (2015). The impact of assistive technologies on formal and informal home care. The Gerontologist, 55(3), 422-433.
5.
BjellandM. J.BruyereS. M.von SchraderS.HoutenvilleA. J.Ruiz-QuintanillaA.WebberD. A. (2010). Age and disability employment discrimination: Occupational rehabilitation implications. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 20(4), 456-471.
6.
BlackwellD. L.HaywardM. D.CrimminsE. M. (2001). Does childhood health affect chronic morbidity in later life?Social Science & Medicine, 52(8), 1269-1284.
7.
BonnetC.GobillonL.Laferrère, A. (2010). The effect of widowhood on housing and location choices. Journal of Housing Economics, 19(2), 94-108.
8.
CalmusD. (2013). The long-term care financing crisis. Washington, DC: Health Care, The Heritage Foundation.
9.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2010). Medicare and home health care. Baltimore, MD: Author.
10.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2012). Chronic conditions among Medicare beneficiaries, Chartbook. Baltimore, MD: Author.
11.
CharlesK. K. (2003). The longitudinal structure of earnings losses among work-limited disabled workers. Journal of Human Resources, 38(3), 618-646.
12.
CotterK. A.LackmanM. E. (2010). Psychosocial and behavioral contributors to health: Age-related increases in physical disability are reduced by physical fitness. Psychology & Health, 25(7), 805-820.
13.
CrimminsE. M.HaywardM. D. (2004). Workplace characteristics and work disability onset for men and women. Social and Preventive Medicine, 49(2), 122-131.
14.
DavisM. A.MoritzD. J.NeuhausJ. M.BarclayJ. D.GeeL. (1997). Living arrangements, changes in living arrangements, and survival among community dwelling older adults. American Journal of Public Health, 87(3), 371-377.
15.
DavisM. F. (2011). Measuring impairment and functional limitations in children with cerebral palsy. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(25-26), 2416-2424.
16.
FalettiM. V. (1984). Using technology to adapt environments. Generations, 8(4), 35-38.
17.
FreedmanV. A.KasperJ. D.CornmanJ. C.AgreeE. M.Bandeen-RocheK.MorV.. . . WolfD. A. (2011). Validation of new measures of disability and functioning in the National Health and Aging Trends Study. The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences, 66(9), 1013-1021.
18.
FreedmanV. A.KasperJ. D.SpillmanB. C.AgreeE. M.MorV.WallaceR. B.WolfD. A. (2014). Behavioral adaptation and late-life disability: A new spectrum for assessing public health impacts. American Journal of Public Health, 104(2), e89-e94.
19.
FreedmanV. A.MartinL. G.SchoeniR. F.CornmanJ. C. (2008). Declines in late-life disability: The role of early- and mid-life factors. Social Science & Medicine, 66(7), 1588-1602.
20.
FreedmanV. A.SchoeniR. F.MartinL. G.CornmanJ. C. (2007). Chronic conditions and the decline in late-life disability. Demography, 44(3), 459-477.
21.
GillT. M.GahbauerE. A.LinH.HanL.AlloreH. G. (2013). Comparisons between older men and women in the trajectory and burden of disability over the course of nearly 14 years. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 14(4), 280-286.
22.
GreaneyA. M.O’MathúnaD. P.ScottP. A. (2012). Patient autonomy and choice in healthcare: Self-testing devices as a case in point. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, 15(4), 383-395.
23.
HardyS. E.AlloreH. G.GuoZ.GillT. M. (2008). Explaining the effect of gender on functional transitions in older persons. Gerontology, 54(2), 79-86.
24.
JollyN. A. (2013). The impact of work-limiting disabilities on earnings and income mobility. Applied Economics, 45(34-36), 5104-5118.
25.
KappM. B. (2007). Patient autonomy in the age of consumer-driven health care: Informed consent and informed choice. Journal of Legal Medicine, 28(1), 91-117.
26.
KasperJ. D.FreedmanV. A. (2012). National Health and Aging Trends Study Round 1 user guide: Final release. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University School of Public Health.
27.
KasperJ. D.FreedmanV. A. (2014). Findings from the 1st round of the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS): Introduction to a special issue. Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 69(7), S1-S7.
28.
KatzS.FordA. B.MoskowitzR. W.JacksonB. A.JaffeM. W. (1963). Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL: A standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. Journal of the American Medical Association, 185(12), 914-919.
29.
KelleyM. E.TuckerS. M. (2011, Spring). Elements of a functional assessment for Medicaid personal care services (CLASS Technical Assistance Brief Series, No. 5). Long Beach, CA: The Scan Foundation.
30.
KraiemD. (2011). Consumer direction in Medicaid long term care: Autonomy, commodification, of family labor, and community resilience. The American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy, and the Law, 19(2), 671-719.
31.
LansleyP.McCreadieC.TinkerA. (2004). Can adapting the homes of older people and providing assistive technology pay its way?Age and Ageing, 33(6), 571-576.
32.
LawtonM. P.BrodyE. M. (1969). Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist, 9(3), 179-186.
33.
LawtonM. P.NahemowL. (1973). Ecology and the aging process. In EisdorferC.LawtonM. P. (Eds.), The psychology of adult development and aging (pp. 619-674). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
34.
LinI.-F.WuH.-S. (2014). Activity limitations, use of assistive devices or personal help, and well-being: Variation by education. Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69(7), S16-S25.
35.
LongJ. S.PavalkoE. (2004). Comparing alternative measures of functional limitation. Medical Care, 42(1), 19-27.
36.
MelzerD.IzmirlianG.LeveilleS. G.GuralnikJ. M. (2001). Educational difference in the prevalence of mobility disability in old age. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Social Sciences, 56(5), S294-S301.
37.
MokW. K. C.MeyerB. D.CharlesK. K.AchenA. C. (2008). A note on “the longitudinal structure of earnings losses among work-limited disabled workers.”Journal of Human Resources, 43(3), 721-728.
38.
National Research Council. (2009). Improving the measurement of late-life disability in population surveys: Beyond ADLs and IADLs—Summary of a workshop. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
39.
NoelkerL. S.BrowdieR. (2014). Sidney Katz, MD: A new paradigm for chronic illness and long-term care. The Gerontologist, 54(1), 13-20.
40.
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. (1994). Summary of long-term care provisions under the Health Security Act. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
41.
OlshanskyS. J.AultA. B. (1986). The fourth stage of the epidemiologic transition: The age of delayed degenerative diseases. The Milbank Quarterly, 64(3), 355-391.
42.
OrtmanJ.VelkoffV. A.HoganH. (2014). An aging nation: The older population in the United States (Current Population Reports. P25-1140). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
43.
SchererM. J.GlueckaufR. (2005). Assessing the benefits of assistive technologies for activities of participation. Rehabilitation Psychology, 50(2), 132-141.
44.
SpanjerJ.GroothoffJ. W.BrouwerS. (2011). Instruments used to assess functional limitations in workers applying for disability benefit: A systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(22-23), 2143-2150.
45.
VerbruggeL. M.JetteA. M. (1994). The disablement process. Social Science & Medicine, 38(1), 1-14.
46.
WallsR. T.DowlerD. L. (2015). Disability and income. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 58(3), 146-153.
47.
White-ChuE. F.GravesW. J.GodfreyS. M.BonnerA.SloaneP. (2009). Beyond the medical model: The culture change revolution in long-term care. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 10(6), 370-378.
48.
WolffJ. L.StarfieldB.AndersonG. (2002). Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly. Archives of Internal Medicine, 162(20), 2269-2276.
