Objective: This study examines relationships between local-area age structure and health at older ages. Method: We estimate random intercept models for two disability measures using four waves of data from a national panel study of 3,580 Japanese older adults. Results: Elderly living in relatively older areas reported more difficulties with activities of daily living compared with those living in an “average” age structure. Controlling for individual characteristics and time did little to change this relationship; while a similar relationship between older age structure and functional limitations emerged. Discussion: Residents of relatively older areas tended to have lower socioeconomic status, but this “disadvantage” was offset by their higher rates of employment and marriage. These compositional differences highlight the role of local-area age structure in identifying and understanding elderly health variation between places.
BradleyD. E.LonginoC. F. (2009). Geographic mobility and aging in place. In UhlenbergP. (Ed.), International handbook of population aging (pp. 319-339). New York, NY: Springer.
2.
BrownJ. W.LiangJ.KrauseN.AkiyamaH.SugisawaH.FukayaT. (2002). Transitions in living arrangements among elders in Japan: Does health make a difference?Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57, 209-220.
3.
BrowningC. R.WallaceD.FeinbergS. L.CagneyK. A. (2006). Neighborhood social processes, physical conditions, and disaster-related mortality: The case of the 1995 Chicago heat wave. American Sociological Review, 71, 661-678.
4.
CagneyK. A. (2006). Neighborhood age structure and its implications for health. Journal of Urban Health, 83, 827-834.
5.
ClarkeP.AilshireJ. A.LantzP. (2009). Urban built environments and trajectories of mobility disability: Findings from a national sample of community-dwelling American adults (1986-2001). Social Science & Medicine, 69, 964-970.
6.
ClarkeP.NieuwenhuijsenE. R. (2009). Environments for healthy ageing: A critical review. Maturitas, 64, 14-19.
7.
Diez RouxA. V. (2001). Investigating neighborhood and area effects on health. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 1783-1789.
8.
GavrilovaN. S.GavrilovL. A. (2009). Rapidly aging populations: Russia/Eastern Europe. In UhlenbergP. (Ed.), International handbook of population aging (pp. 113-131). New York, NY: Springer.
9.
GerstorfD.RamN.GoebelJ.SchuppJ.LindenbergerU.WagnerG. G. (2010). Where people live and die makes a difference: Individual and geographic disparities in well-being progression at the end of life. Psychology and Aging, 25, 661-676.
10.
HeW.SchachterJ. P. (2003). Internal migration of the older population: 1995 to 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
11.
JayG. M.LiangJ.LiuX.SugisawaH. (1993). Patterns of nonresponse in a national survey of elderly Japanese. Journal of Gerontology, 48(3), S143-S152.
12.
JonesC. A.KandelW.ParkerT. (2007). Population dynamics are changing the profile of rural areas. Amber Waves, 5(2), 30-35.
13.
KawachiI.BerkmanL. F. (2003). Neighborhoods and health. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
14.
KawaseA.NakazawaK. (2009). Long-term care insurance facilities and interregional migration of the elderly in Japan. Economics Bulletin, 29, 2981-2995.
15.
KinsellaK. (2001). Urban and rural dimensions of global population aging: An overview. The Journal of Rural Health, 17, 314-322.
16.
KinsellaK.HeW. (2009). An aging world: 2008. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
17.
KubzanskyL. D.SubramanianS. V.KawachiI.FayM. E.SoobaderM. J.BerkmanL. F. (2005). Neighborhood contextual influences on depressive symptoms in the elderly. American Journal of Epidemiology, 162, 253-260.
18.
LeveilleS. G.PenninxB.MelzerD.IzmirlianG.GuralnikJ. M. (2000). Sex differences in the prevalence of mobility disability in old age: The dynamics of incidence, recovery, and mortality. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 55, 41-50.
19.
LiangJ.BennettJ.KrauseN.KobayashiE.KimH.BrownJ. W. . . . JainA. (2002). Old age mortality in Japan: Does the socioeconomic gradient interact with gender and age?Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57, S294-S307.
20.
LiangJ.ShawB.BennettJ.KrauseN.KobayashiE.FukayaT.SugiharaY. (2007). Intertwining courses of functional status and subjective health among older Japanese. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 62, S340-S348.
21.
LinG. (2000). Regional assessment of elderly disability in the U.S. Social Science & Medicine, 50, 1015-1024.
22.
LindeboomM.KerkhofsM. (2009). Health and work of the elderly: Subjective health measures, reporting errors and endogeneity in the relationship between health and work. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 24, 1024-1046.
23.
LynchS. M.BrownJ. S.TaylorM. G. (2009). Demography of disability. In UhlenbergP. (Ed.), International handbook of population aging (pp. 567-582). New York, NY: Springer.
24.
MacintyreS.EllawayA.CumminsS. (2002). Place effects on health: How can we conceptualise, operationalise and measure them?Social Science & Medicine, 55, 125-139.
25.
MalenfantÉ. C.MilanA.CharronM.BélangerA. (2007). Demographic changes in Canada from 1997 to 2001 across an urban-to-rural gradient. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Demography Division, Statistics Canada.
26.
MurakamiK.AttertonJ.GilroyR. (2008). Planning for the ageing countryside in Britain and Japan: City-regions and the mobility of older people. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Centre for Rural Economy, Newcastle University.
27.
NagiS. Z. (1991). Disability concepts revisited: Implications for prevention. In PopeA. M.TarlovA. R. (Eds.), Disability in America: Toward a national agenda for prevention (pp. 309-327). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
28.
National Institute of Population and Social Security Research. (2008). Population statistics of Japan 2008. Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo: Author.
29.
National Institute of Population and Social Security Research. (2009). Population projections by municipality, Japan: 2005-2035. Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo: Author.
30.
PattersonP. K.ChapmanN. J. (2004). Urban form and older residents’ service use, walking, driving, quality of life, and neighborhood satisfaction. American Journal of Health Promotion, 19, 45-52.
31.
PorellF. W.MiltiadesH. B. (2002). Regional differences in functional status among the aged. Social Science & Medicine, 54, 1181-1198.
32.
RaymoJ. M.LiangJ.KobayashiE.SugiharaY.FukayaT. (2008). Work, health, and family at older ages in Japan. Research on Aging, 31, 180-206.
33.
RobertS. (1998). Community-level socioeconomic status effects on adult health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 39, 18-37.
34.
SchoeniR. F.LiangJ.BennettJ.SugisawaH.FukayaT.KobayashiE. (2006). Trends in old-age functioning and disability in Japan, 1993-2002. Population Studies, 60, 39-53.
35.
ShermanS. R.WardR. A.LagoryM. (1985). Socialization and aging group consciousness: The effect of neighborhood age concentration. Journal of Gerontology, 40, 102-109.
36.
SloggettA.JoshiH. (1998). Deprivation indicators as predictors of life events 1981-1992 based on the UK ONS longitudinal study. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 52, 228-233.
37.
SprangersM. A. G.SchwartzC. E. (1999). Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: A theoretical model. Social Science & Medicine, 48, 1507-1515.
38.
StreetD.BurgeS. W. (2012). Residential context, social relationships, and subjective well-being in assisted living. Research on Aging. Advance online publication.
39.
SubramanianS. V.KubzanskyL.BerkmanL.FayM.KawachiI. (2006). Neighborhood effects on the self-rated health of elders: Uncovering the relative importance of structural and service-related neighborhood environments. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61, 153-160.
40.
TakagiE.SilversteinM. (2006). Intergenerational coresidence of the Japanese elderly. Research on Aging, 28, 473-492.
41.
United Nations Population Fund. (2012). Ageing in the 21st century: A celebration and a challenge.
42.
VerbruggeL. M.JetteA. M. (1994). The disablement process. Social Science & Medicine, 38, 1-14.
43.
Von HippelP. T. (2007). Regression with missing Ys: An improved strategy for analyzing multiply imputed data. Sociological Methodology, 37, 83-117.
44.
WaiteL. J. (2009). Marital history and well-being in later life. In UhlenbergP. (Ed.), International handbook of population aging (pp. 691-704). New York, NY: Springer.
45.
YenI. H.MichaelY. L.PerdueL. (2009). Neighborhood environment in studies of health of older adults: A systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37, 455-463.
