To investigate factors associated with residents’ choice of type of Medicaid-funded community residential care setting in western Washington State. Method: Prospective cohort design including residents new to any of three setting types (264 residents entering 170 different facilities), using data from state and Medicaid databases and in-person interviews. The authors used analysis of variance and multinomial logistic regression to examine bivariate associations and estimate effects of resident and facility characteristics on choice of facility type at baseline. Results: Several resident characteristics appear to be associated with choice of community residential care setting, including age, marital status, education, functional status, and reported memory and behavior problems. Facility policies differ significantly among types of facilities and also appear to be associated with choice of setting. Discussion: Selection processes operate in choice of community residential care setting, with residents choosing facility type based on the fit of their needs with facility characteristics.
Blanchette, K. (1997). New directions for state long-term care systems volume III: Supportive housing: Public policy institute. Washington, DC: Public Policy Institute, American Association of Retired Persons.
2.
Curtis, M. P., Sales, A. E., Sullivan, J. H., Gray, S. L., & Hedrick, S. C. (2005). Satisfaction with care among community residential care residents. Journal of Aging and Health, 17, 3-27.
3.
Hawes, C., & Phillips, C. (2000). High service or high privacy assisted living facilities, their residents and staff: Results from a national survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
4.
Hawes, C., Rose, M., & Phillips, C. (1999). A national study of assisted living for the frail elderly executive summary: Results of a national survey of facilities. Washington, DC: Office of Disability, Aging and Long-Term Care Policy, and the Public Policy Institute, American Association of Retired Persons.
5.
Hedrick, S. C., Sales, A. E., Sullivan, J. H., Gray, S. L., Tornatore, J., Curtis, M., et al. (2003). Resident outcomes of Medicaid funded community residential care. The Gerontologist, 43, 473-482.
6.
Kane, R. A. (1995). Expanding the home care concept: Blurring distinctions among home care, institutional care, and other long-term-care services. Milbank Quarterly, 73, 161-186.
7.
Katzman, R., Brown, T., Fuld, P., Peck, A., Schechter, R., & Schimmel, H. (1983). Validation of a short Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test of cognitive impairment. American Journal of Psychiatry, 140, 734-739.
8.
Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
9.
Mollica, R. L. (2000). State assisted living policy: 2000. Portland, ME: National Academy for State Health Policy.
10.
Moos, R. H., & Lemke, S. (1994). Evaluating residential facilities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
Morris, J. N., Hawes, C., Fries, B. E., Phillips, C. D., Mor, V., Katz, S., et al. (1990). Designing the national resident assessment instrument for nursing homes. Gerontologist, 30, 293-307.
12.
Simon-Rusinowitz, L., & Hofland, B. F. (1993). Adopting a disability approach to home care services for older adults. The Gerontologist, 33, 159-167.
13.
Sloane, P. D., Zimmerman, S. I., & Ory, M. G. (2001). Care for persons with dementia. In S. I. Zimmerman, P. D. Sloane, & J. K. Eckert (Eds), Assisted living: Needs, practices, and policies in residential care for the elderly (pp. 242-270). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
14.
Teri, L., Truax, P., Logsdon, R., Uomoto, J., Zarit, S., & Vitaliano, P. P. (1992). Assessment of behavioral problems in dementia: The revised memory and behavior problems checklist. Psychology & Aging, 7, 622-631.
15.
Ware, J., Jr., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1996). A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care, 34, 220-233.
