Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article describes trends in three areas of state long-term care policy for elderly low-income Medicaid beneficiaries—providing home care services to residents in subsidized housing and assisted living; offering nursing home residents opportunities to relocate to community settings; and integrating acute and long-term care services for beneficiaries who are dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid. The information was obtained from reports and studies on state policy, site visits, and interviews with state officials. Multiple initiatives responding to consumer preferences and fragmentation of the delivery systems were identified. Key components were consumer demand; the availability of nursing facility alternatives; and state priorities for controlling expenditure growth. States use Medicaid to develop broad service menus that include in-home, community, residential, and institutional services. Several states are conducting demonstration programs that improve coordinating or integration of longterm care with the acute care system

Keywords

elderly managed care dual eligibles assisted living state policy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Booth, M. , Fralich, J. , Saucier, P. , Mollica, R. , & Riley, T. (1997). Integration of acute and long term care for dually eligible beneficiaries through managed care (Technical assistance paper prepared for The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Medicare∕Medicaid Integration Program). College Park: University of Maryland Center on Aging.

Coleman, B. (1996). New directions for state long term care systems: Volume I: Overview (# 9602). Washington, DC: American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) Public Policy Institute.

Coleman, B. (1998). New directions for state long term care systems, second edition (#9809). Washington, DC: AARP Public Policy Institute.

Feder, J. (1997). Medicare∕medicaid dual eligibles: Fiscal and social responsibility for vulnerable populations. Washington, DC: The Kaiser Commission for the Future of Medicaid.

Harrington, C. , Carrillo, H. , Welling, V. , Miller, N. , & LeBanc, A. (2000). Predicting state Medicaid home and community based wavier participants and expenditures, 1992-1997. San Francisco: University of California.

Health Care Financing Administration . (1997). A profile of dually eligible beneficiaries. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Kassner, E. , & Shirley, L. (2000). Medicaid financial eligibility for older people: State variations in access to home and community based waiver and nursing home services (#2000-06). Washington, DC: AARP Public Policy Institute.

Ladd, R. C. , Kane, R. L. , & Kane, R. A. (1999). State LTC profiles report, 1996. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, School of Public Health.

McCall, N. , Korb, J. , Paringer, L. , Balaban, D. , Wrightson, C. W. , Wilkin, J. , et al. (1993). Evaluation of Arizona’s health care cost containment system demonstration, Second outcome report. San Francisco: Laguna Research Associates.

10.

Mollica, R. L. (1997). Managed care and assisted living. Washington, DC: American Association of Homes and Services for the Aging.

11.

Mollica, R. L. (2002). State assisted living policy: 2002. Portland, ME: National Academy for State Health Policy.

12.

Mollica, R. L. , & Riley, T. (1997). Managed care for low income elders dually eligible for Medicaid and Medicare. Portland, ME: National Academy for State Health Policy.

13.

Mollica, R. L. , Saucier, P. , Riley, T. , & Booth, M. (1997). Protecting low income beneficiaries of Medicare and Medicaid in managed care, volume II: Coordination of benefits, payment mechanisms and quality management. Portland, ME: National Academy for State Health Policy.

14.

National Investment Conference . (1998). National survey of assisted living residents: Who is the customer? Paper presented at the National Investment Conference, Annapolis, MD.

15.

Parker, P. (1998). Testimony before the special Medicare commission. St. Paul: Minnesota Department of Human Services.

16.

Pynoos, J. (1997). Supportive housing for the elderly: Past, present and future (Vol. 8, Issue 2). In R. H. Hudson (Ed.), The public policy and aging report (pp. 14-15). Washington, DC: National Academy for Aging.

17.

Rhoades, J. A. , & Krauss, N. A. (1999). Nursing home trends, 1987 and 1996 (MEPS Chartbook No. 3., AHRQ Pub. No. 99-0032). Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.

18.

Rosenbach, M. , & Young, C. (1999). Care coordination in Medicaid managed care: A primer for states, managed care organizations, providers and advocates. Princeton, NJ: Center for Health Care Strategies.

19.

Rosenbaum, S. (2000). Olmstead vs. L.C.: Analysis and implications for Medicaid policy. Princeton, NJ: Center for Health Care Strategies.

20.

Stone, R. I. (1996). Thoughts on the future of integrating acute and long-term care. R. Newcomer and A. Wilkerson (eds.), Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Volume 16. New York: Springer.

21.

Strahan, G. W. (1997). An overview of nursing homes and their current residents: Data from the 1995 national nursing home survey (No. 280). Washington, DC: National Center for Health Statistics, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

22.

Wiener, J. M. , & Stevenson, D. G. (1998). State policy on long-term care for the elderly. Health Affairs, 17(3), 81-100.

Coordinating Services Across the Continuum of Health,Housing,and Supportive Services

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References