Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In the Swedish education of nurses, teaching should be focused in a way that the students develop a holistic view of caring. Swedish health care and medical care should be carried out in a way that promotes a holistic view. It seems that the education of nurses has prerequisites to develop, and often does present, a holistic view to the students, but this view is not always carried over to practice. Student nurses think they have a theoretical understanding of a holistic view, but they cannot manage to transform their knowledge to practice. It is proposed that this failure to transfer knowledge of holistic care principles into practice is partly based on the fact that medical and technological thought dominate practice in the caring disciplines. This article explores some factors influencing caring theory and praxis and possible causes for the gap between these areas. The question of gender is proposed as a reason for the identified difference between theory and praxis. From a gender theoretical perspective, the difference can be understood as a collision between feminine and masculine cognitive styles. It is proposed that the caring ideals of holism are emphasized by the woman-dominated nursing schools, but these ideals are not able to influence practice of the caring professions, which are dominated by men.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dahlberg, K. (1992). Helhetssyn i vården. En uppgift för sjuksköterskeut-bildningen [The holistic perspective in nursing education]. (Ph.D. thesis). Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. Göteborg Studies in Educational Sciences, 91.

Ethelberg, E. (1985). Självkänsla kontra realitet-ett dilemma [Self-esteem contra reality—a dilemma]. Kvinnovetenskaplig tidskrift Uournal of Women's Studies], 6(6), 4-15.

Jorfeldt, I. (1992). Omvardnad och genus. Oversikt av sjuksköterskeyrket ur kvinnoperspektiv [Caring and gender. The nursing profession from a female perspective]. Omvdrdaren [The Caregiver], 39(5/6), 14-20.

Juvkam, R. A. (1985). Sykepleieforskning i Norge. Vitenskapsteori og praksis [Nursing research in Norway. Philosophy of science and practice]. Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag.

Öhrn, E. (1993). Gender influence and resistance in school. British Journal of Sociology and Education, 14(2), 143-158.

Pilhammar Andersson, E. (1992). Det dr vi som dr dom. Sjukskbterskes-tuderandes fdrestallningar och perspektiv under utbildningstiden [Now we are them! Registered nurse students' perceptions and perspectives during the Nurse Training Program]. (Ph.D. thesis). Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. Goteborg Studies in Education Sciences, 83.

Sandin, I. (1988). Att forskningsanknyta vårdprolem-om motet mellan kunskap-straditioner [Linking health care problems to research-on the meeting between different knowledge traditions]. (Ph.D. thesis). Department of Education, University of Stockholm.

SÖ UHA (1981). Utbildningsplan for Hälso-och sjukvardslinjen [The nursing education curriculum]. Dnr 80:820 reg.nur 211-2099-81. Stockholm.

Ve, H. (1982). Makt, intresse och socialization [Power, interests and socialization]. Kvinnovetenskaplig tidskrift Uournal of Women's Studies], 3(2), 23-32.

10.

Ve, H. (1989). Gender difference in rationality. On the difference between technical limited and responsible rationality. Paper presented at NFPF:s conference in Uppsala, Sweden.

The Collision between Caring Theory and Caring Practice as a Collision between Feminine and Masculine Cognitive Style

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References