Abstract
Civilian gunshot wounds to the head (GSWH) carry high mortality yet lack standardized, imaging-based triage tools. Because initial noncontrast head computerized tomography (HCT) is universally obtained but not leveraged with validated, rapid, and reproducible methods, we developed and evaluated an interpretable, attention-based multiple-instance learning (MIL) model to predict in-hospital mortality from the initial HCT. In a retrospective cohort at a single level I trauma center (May 1, 2018–October 31, 2023), we included consecutive adults (≥16 years) with GSWH who underwent HCT, excluding those dead on arrival or without HCT. Of 222 patients, 106 (47.8%) survived to discharge and 116 (52.2%) died. We used a stratified random split to create a development set (n = 168, 75.7%) and an independent test set (n = 54, 24.3%); the development set was repeatedly partitioned 100 times into training and validation subsets to quantify performance uncertainty, and each of the 100 models was evaluated once on the test set. The MIL algorithm produced a prognostic severity score with case-level interpretability via attention maps. On the independent test set, discrimination for mortality was high (area under the curve: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.87–0.94) with sensitivity 0.88 (95% CI: 0.78–0.97) and specificity 0.87 (95% CI: 0.74–0.96) at the optimal operating point. Attention visualizations consistently highlighted brainstem, deep midline, and ventricular injury in high-mortality predictions, aligning with established high-risk neuroanatomy. These findings demonstrate that an interpretable, HCT-based MIL model can deliver objective, reproducible risk estimates and transparent case-level explanations, supporting early prognostication and imaging-first triage in penetrating brain injury.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
