Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) increases the risk for skin complications, including the development of decubitus ulcers, that is, pressure sores. The mechanisms by which SCI adversely affects skin health are poorly understood. To better understand how SCI affects the normal progression of wound healing, two mouse models of cutaneous wound healing were used. Mice received a high-level (T3) SCI or sham injury (Lam) over the first week postinjury. Mice received standardized skin wounds on the dorsum below the injury level (punch biopsy or compression/ischemia wounds). Planimetric analysis revealed that wound closure was consistently delayed and impaired after SCI. Subsequent analyses of the expression of genes and proteins responsible for regulating cell migration and recruitment, particularly of neutrophils, were reduced in SCI mice as early as 1 day post-wounding. This impaired chemotactic signaling was associated with a corresponding decrease in neutrophil recruitment to the wounds of SCI mice. At later phases of healing, the expression of inflammatory genes and the accumulation of wound myeloid cells with an elevated capacity for arginine catabolism was enhanced in SCI mice relative to Lam. Overall, data in this report show that impaired wound closure in SCI mice is associated with early and prolonged disruption of the expression of genes and proteins needed to coordinate the sequential progression through all phases of wound healing. Consequently, skin wounds in SCI mice exhibit prolonged inflammation, characteristic of complicated wound healing. Thus, targeting signaling pathways during the inflammatory phase of healing of decubitus ulcers after SCI could improve wound closure and limit further complications.
StoverSL, HaleAM, BuellAB. Skin complications other than pressure ulcers following spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1994; 75(9):987–993.
2.
BlamOG, VaccaroAR, VanichkachornJS, et al.Risk factors for surgical site infection in the patient with spinal injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2003; 28(13):1475–1480; doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000067109.23914.0A
3.
ChenY, DevivoMJ, JacksonAB. Pressure ulcer prevalence in people with spinal cord injury: Age-period-duration effects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2005; 86(6):1208–1213; doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.12.023
4.
ByrneDW, SalzbergCA. Major risk factors for pressure ulcers in the spinal cord disabled: A literature review. Spinal Cord, 1996; 34(5):255–263; doi: 10.1038/sc.1996.46
5.
LonjonG, DauzacC, FourniolsE, et al.; French Orthopaedic Surgery Traumatology Society. Early surgical site infections in adult spinal trauma: A prospective, multicentre study of infection rates and risk factors. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2012; 98(7):788–794; doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.07.006
6.
RichardsonRR, MeyerPR.Jr., Prevalence and incidence of pressure sores in acute spinal cord injuries. Paraplegia, 1981; 19(4):235–247; doi: 10.1038/sc.1981.47
7.
GarberSL, RintalaDH. Pressure ulcers in veterans with spinal cord injury: A retrospective study. J Rehabil Res Dev, 2003; 40(5):433–441; doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2003.09.0433
8.
BassonMD, BurneyRE. Defective wound healing in patients with paraplegia and quadriplegia. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1982; 155(1):9–12.
9.
CruseJM, WangH, LewisRE, et al.Cellular and molecular alterations in spinal cord injury patients with pressure ulcers: A preliminary report. Exp Mol Pathol, 2002; 72(2):124–131; doi: 10.1006/exmp.2002.2420
10.
VaziriND, EltoraiI, GonzalesE, et al.Pressure ulcer, fibronectin, and related proteins in spinal cord injured patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1992; 73(9):803–806.
11.
AllmanRM, GoodePS, BurstN, et al.Pressure ulcers, hospital complications, and disease severity: Impact on hospital costs and length of stay. Adv Wound Care, 1999; 12(1):22–30.
12.
WinslowC, BodeRK, FeltonD, et al.Impact of respiratory complications on length of stay and hospital costs in acute cervical spine injury. Chest, 2002; 121(5):1548–1554; doi: 10.1378/chest.121.5.1548
13.
GarberSL, RintalaDH, HartKA, et al.Pressure ulcer risk in spinal cord injury: Predictors of ulcer status over 3 years. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2000; 81(4):465–471; doi: 10.1053/mr.2000.3889
14.
KumarS, YarmushML, DashBC, et al.Impact of complete spinal cord injury on healing of skin ulcers in mouse models. J Neurotrauma, 2018; 35(6):815–824; doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5405
15.
KonyaD, GercekA, AkakinA, et al.The effects of inflammatory response associated with traumatic spinal cord injury in cutaneous wound healing and on expression of transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-A at the wound site in rats. Growth Factors, 2008; 26(2):74–79; doi: 10.1080/08977190802025339
16.
EngelhardtE, ToksoyA, GoebelerM, et al.Chemokines IL-8, GROalpha, MCP-1, IP-10, and Mig are sequentially and differentially expressed during phase-specific infiltration of leukocyte subsets in human wound healing. Am J Pathol, 1998; 153(6):1849–1860; doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)65699-4
17.
LeibovichSJ, RossR. The role of the macrophage in wound repair. A study with hydrocortisone and antimacrophage serum. Am J Pathol, 1975; 78(1):71–100.
18.
MirzaR, KohTJ. Dysregulation of monocyte/macrophage phenotype in wounds of diabetic mice. Cytokine, 2011; 56(2):256–264; doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2011.06.016
19.
LucasT, WaismanA, RanjanR, et al.Differential roles of macrophages in diverse phases of skin repair. J Immunol, 2010; 184(7):3964–3977; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0903356
20.
Abd-El-AleemSA, FergusonMWJ, AppletonI, et al.Expression of nitric oxide synthase isoforms and arginase in normal human skin and chronic venous leg ulcers. J Pathol, 2000; 191(4):434–442; doi: 10.1002/1096-9896(2000)9999:9999<::AID-PATH654>3.0.CO;2-S
21.
PyterLM, HusainY, CaleroH, et al.Tumors alter inflammation and impair dermal wound healing in female mice. PLoS One, 2016; 11(8):e0161537; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161537
22.
PyterLM, YangL, McKenzieC, et al.Contrasting mechanisms by which social isolation and restraint impair healing in male mice. Stress, 2014; 17(3):256–265; doi: 10.3109/10253890.2014.910761
23.
AnsellDM, CampbellL, ThomasonHA, et al.A statistical analysis of murine incisional and excisional acute wound models. Wound Repair Regen, 2014; 22(2):281–287; doi: 10.1111/wrr.12148
24.
GurtnerGC, WernerS, BarrandonY, et al.Wound repair and regeneration. Nature, 2008; 453(7193):314–321; doi: 10.1038/nature07039
WalzA, BurgenerR, CarB, et al.Structure and neutrophil-activating properties of a novel inflammatory peptide (ENA-78) with homology to interleukin 8. J Exp Med, 1991; 174(6):1355–1362; doi: 10.1084/jem.174.6.1355
27.
AhujaSK, MurphyPM. The CXC chemokines growth-regulated oncogene (GRO) alpha, GRObeta, GROgamma, neutrophil-activating peptide-2, and epithelial cell-derived neutrophil-activating peptide-78 are potent agonists for the type B, but not the type A, human interleukin-8 receptor. J Biol Chem, 1996; 271(34):20545–20550; doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.34.20545
28.
EashKJ, GreenbaumAM, GopalanPK, et al.CXCR2 and CXCR4 antagonistically regulate neutrophil trafficking from murine bone marrow. J Clin Invest, 2010; 120(7):2423–2431; doi: 10.1172/JCI41649
29.
SmithML, OlsonTS, LeyK. CXCR2- and E-selectin-induced neutrophil arrest during inflammation in vivo. J Exp Med, 2004; 200(7):935–939; doi: 10.1084/jem.20040424
30.
DaleyJM, ThomayAA, ConnollyMD, et al.Use of Ly6G-specific monoclonal antibody to deplete neutrophils in mice. J Leukoc Biol, 2008; 83(1):64–70; doi: 10.1189/jlb.0407247
31.
CarpenterRS, MarbourgJM, BrennanFH, et al.Spinal cord injury causes chronic bone marrow failure. Nat Commun, 2020; 11(1):3702; doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17564-z
32.
StirlingDP, YongVW. Dynamics of the inflammatory response after murine spinal cord injury revealed by flow cytometry. J Neurosci Res, 2008; 86(9):1944–1958; doi: 10.1002/jnr.21659
33.
CruseJM, LewisRE, BishopGR, et al.Adhesion molecules and wound healing in spinal cord injury. Pathobiology, 1996; 64(4):193–197; doi: 10.1159/000164047
34.
HomburgCH, de HaasM, von Dem BorneAE, et al.Human neutrophils lose their surface Fc gamma RIII and acquire Annexin V binding sites during apoptosis in vitro. Blood, 1995; 85(2):532–540.
35.
YangW, TaoY, WuY, et al.Neutrophils promote the development of reparative macrophages mediated by ROS to orchestrate liver repair. Nat Commun, 2019; 10(1):1076; doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09046-8
36.
DaleyJM, ReichnerJS, MahoneyEJ, et al.Modulation of macrophage phenotype by soluble product(s) released from neutrophils. J Immunol, 2005; 174(4):2265–2272; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.4.2265
37.
DasA, GhatakS, SinhaM, et al.Correction of MFG-E8 resolves inflammation and promotes cutaneous wound healing in diabetes. J Immunol, 2016; 196(12):5089–5100; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1502270
38.
SklarLA, OadesZG, FinneyDA. Neutrophil degranulation detected by right angle light scattering: Spectroscopic methods suitable for simultaneous analyses of degranulation or shape change, elastase release, and cell aggregation. J Immunol, 1984; 133(3):1483–1487.
39.
McNeilPL, KennedyAL, WaggonerAS, et al.Light-scattering changes during chemotactic stimulation of human neutrophils: Kinetics followed by flow cytometry. Cytometry, 1985; 6(1):7–12; doi: 10.1002/cyto.990060103
40.
EvansTJ, ButteryLD, CarpenterA, et al.Cytokine-treated human neutrophils contain inducible nitric oxide synthase that produces nitration of ingested bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1996; 93(18):9553–9558; doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.18.9553
41.
JacobsenLC, Theilgaard-MönchK, ChristensenEI, et al.Arginase 1 is expressed in myelocytes/metamyelocytes and localized in gelatinase granules of human neutrophils. Blood, 2007; 109(7):3084–3087; doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-06-032599
42.
CurranJN, WinterDC, Bouchier-HayesD. Biological fate and clinical implications of arginine metabolism in tissue healing. Wound Repair Regen, 2006; 14(4):376–386; doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00151.x
43.
ShearerJD, RichardsJR, MillsCD, et al.Differential regulation of macrophage arginine metabolism: A proposed role in wound healing. Am J Physiol, 1997; 272(2 Pt 1):E181–E90; doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1997.272.2.E181
44.
GhasemlouN, ChiuIM, JulienJP, et al.CD11b+Ly6G- myeloid cells mediate mechanical inflammatory pain hypersensitivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2015; 112(49):E6808–E17; doi: 10.1073/pnas.1501372112
45.
ClementsM, GershenovichM, ChaberC, et al.Differential Ly6C expression after renal ischemia-reperfusion identifies unique macrophage populations. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2016; 27(1):159–170; doi: 10.1681/ASN.2014111138
46.
RapplLM. Physiological changes in tissues denervated by spinal cord injury tissues and possible effects on wound healing. Int Wound J, 2008; 5(3):435–444; doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2007.00360.x
47.
Rubin-AsherD, ZeiligG, KliegerM, et al.Dermatological findings following acute traumatic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 2005; 43(3):175–178; doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101697
48.
HanZA, ChoiJY, KoYJ. Dermatological problems following spinal cord injury in Korean patients. J Spinal Cord Med, 2015; 38(1):63–67; doi: 10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000154
49.
MacneilBJ, NanceDM. Skin inflammation and immunity after spinal cord injury. In: NeuroImmune Biology. (BercziI, GorczynskiRM. eds.) Elsevier; 2001; pp. 459–473.
SchubertV, FagrellB. Postocclusive reactive hyperemia and thermal response in the skin microcirculation of subjects with spinal cord injury. Scand J Rehabil Med, 1991; 23(1):33–40.
52.
LiZ, LeungJY, TamEW, et al.Wavelet analysis of skin blood oscillations in persons with spinal cord injury and able-bodied subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2006; 87(9):1207–1212; quiz 1287; doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.025
53.
La FountaineMF, CirnigliaroCM, AzareloIF, et al.Cutaneous microvascular perfusion responses to insulin iontophoresis are differentially affected by insulin resistance after spinal cord injury. Exp Physiol, 2017; 102(9):1234–1244; doi: 10.1113/EP086239
54.
LinZQ, KondoT, IshidaY, et al.Essential involvement of IL-6 in the skin wound-healing process as evidenced by delayed wound healing in IL-6-deficient mice. J Leukoc Biol, 2003; 73(6):713–721; doi: 10.1189/jlb.0802397
55.
BrubakerAL, RendonJL, RamirezL, et al.Reduced neutrophil chemotaxis and infiltration contributes to delayed resolution of cutaneous wound infection with advanced age. J Immunol, 2013; 190(4):1746–1757; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1201213
56.
SemeradCL, LiuF, GregoryAD, et al.G-CSF is an essential regulator of neutrophil trafficking from the bone marrow to the blood. Immunity, 2002; 17(4):413–423; doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(02)00424-7
57.
SimpsonDM, RossR. The neutrophilic leukocyte in wound repair a study with antineutrophil serum. J Clin Invest, 1972; 51(8):2009–2023; doi: 10.1172/JCI107007
58.
MartinP, D’SouzaD, MartinJ, et al.Wound healing in the PU.1 null mouse–tissue repair is not dependent on inflammatory cells. Curr Biol, 2003; 13(13):1122–1128; doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00396-8
NishioN, OkawaY, SakuraiH, et al.Neutrophil depletion delays wound repair in aged mice. Age (Dordr), 2008; 30(1):11–19; doi: 10.1007/s11357-007-9043-y
61.
PhillipsonM, KubesP. The healing power of neutrophils. Trends Immunol, 2019; 40(7):635–647; doi: 10.1016/j.it.2019.05.001
62.
FilardyAA, PiresDR, NunesMP, et al.Proinflammatory clearance of apoptotic neutrophils induces an IL-12(low)IL-10(high) regulatory phenotype in macrophages. J Immunol, 2010; 185(4):2044–2050; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000017
63.
KhannaS, BiswasS, ShangY, et al.Macrophage dysfunction impairs resolution of inflammation in the wounds of diabetic mice. PLoS One, 2010; 5(3):e9539; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009539
64.
MirzaR, DiPietroLA, KohTJ. Selective and specific macrophage ablation is detrimental to wound healing in mice. Am J Pathol, 2009; 175(6):2454–2462; doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.090248
65.
JiangL, DaiY, CuiF, et al.Expression of cytokines, growth factors and apoptosis-related signal molecules in chronic pressure ulcer wounds healing. Spinal Cord, 2014; 52(2):145–151; doi: 10.1038/sc.2013.132
66.
SindrilaruA, PetersT, WieschalkaS, et al.An unrestrained proinflammatory M1 macrophage population induced by iron impairs wound healing in humans and mice. J Clin Invest, 2011; 121(3):985–997; doi: 10.1172/JCI44490
67.
LootsMA, LammeEN, ZeegelaarJ, et al.Differences in cellular infiltrate and extracellular matrix of chronic diabetic and venous ulcers versus acute wounds. J Invest Dermatol, 1998; 111(5):850–857; doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1998.00381.x
68.
AshcroftGS, JeongM-J, AshworthJJ, et al.Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) is a therapeutic target for impaired cutaneous wound healing. Wound Repair Regen, 2012; 20(1):38–49; doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2011.00748.x
69.
WetzlerC, KampferH, StallmeyerB, et al.Large and sustained induction of chemokines during impaired wound healing in the genetically diabetic mouse: Prolonged persistence of neutrophils and macrophages during the late phase of repair. J Invest Dermatol, 2000; 115(2):245–253; doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2000.00029.x
70.
Romana-SouzaB, SantosJS, BandeiraLG, et al.Selective inhibition of COX-2 improves cutaneous wound healing of pressure ulcers in mice through reduction of iNOS expression. Life Sci, 2016; 153:82–92; doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2016.04.017
71.
BronteV, SerafiniP, De SantoC, et al.IL-4-induced arginase 1 suppresses alloreactive T cells in tumor-bearing mice. J Immunol, 2003; 170(1):270–278; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.1.270
72.
RodriguezGP, Claus-WalkerJ, KentMC, et al.Adrenergic receptors in insensitive skin of spinal cord injured patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1986; 67(3):177–180; doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(86)90073-0
73.
LairdAS, CarriveP, WaitePM. Cardiovascular and temperature changes in spinal cord injured rats at rest and during autonomic dysreflexia. J Physiol, 2006; 577(Pt 2):539–548; doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.116301
74.
ParkJW, SeoCH, HanSH, et al.Sympathetic influence on biomechanical skin properties after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 2011; 49(2):236–243; doi: 10.1038/sc.2010.95
75.
Claus-WalkerJ, SinghJ, LeachCS, et al.The urinary excretion of collagen degradation products by quadriplegic patients and during weightlessness. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1977; 59(2):209–212.
76.
RodriguezGP, Claus-WalkerJ, KentMC, et al.Collagen metabolite excretion as a predictor of bone- and skin-related complications in spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1989; 70(6):442–444; doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(89)90003-8
77.
RodriguezGP, Claus-WalkerJ. Biochemical changes in skin composition in spinal cord injury: A possible contribution to decubitus ulcers. Paraplegia, 1988; 26(5):302–309; doi: 10.1038/sc.1988.45
78.
BrantJO, LopezMC, BakerHV, et al.A comparative analysis of gene expression profiles during skin regeneration in Mus and Acomys. PLoS One, 2015; 10(11):e0142931; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142931
79.
BaumCL, ArpeyCJ. Normal cutaneous wound healing: Clinical correlation with cellular and molecular events. Dermatol Surg, 2005; 31(6):674–686; discussion 686; doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2005.31612
80.
LehmannKG, LaneJG, PiepmeierJM, et al.Cardiovascular abnormalities accompanying acute spinal cord injury in humans: Incidence, time course and severity. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1987; 10(1):46–52; doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(87)80158-4
81.
JanYK, LiaoF, RiceLA, et al.Using reactive hyperemia to assess the efficacy of local cooling on reducing sacral skin ischemia under surface pressure in people with spinal cord injury: A preliminary report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2013; 94(10):1982–1989; doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.03.022
82.
StoverS, SahgalV, GayRE. Dermal fibrosis secondary to autonomic dysfunction following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 1984; 22(3):198.
83.
StoverSL, GayRE, KoopmanW, et al.Dermal fibrosis in spinal cord injury patients: A scleroderma variant? Arthritis Rheum, 1980; 23(11):1312–1317; doi: 10.1002/art.1780231115
84.
StoverSL, OmuraEF, BuellAB. Clinical skin thickening following spinal cord injury studied by histopathology. J Am Paraplegia Soc, 1994; 17(2):44–49; doi: 10.1080/01952307.1994.11735915
85.
ChengC, GuoGF, MartinezJA, et al.Dynamic plasticity of axons within a cutaneous milieu. J Neurosci, 2010; 30(44):14735–14744; doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2919-10.2010
86.
ChengC, SinghV, KrishnanA, et al.Loss of innervation and axon plasticity accompanies impaired diabetic wound healing. PLoS One, 2013; 8(9):e75877; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075877
87.
GalianoRD, MichaelsJ, DobryanskyM, et al.Quantitative and reproducible murine model of excisional wound healing. Wound Repair Regen, 2004; 12(4):485–492; doi: 10.1111/j.1067-1927.2004.12404.x
88.
WangX, GeJ, TredgetEE, et al.The mouse excisional wound splinting model, including applications for stem cell transplantation. Nat Protoc, 2013; 8(2):302–309; doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.002
89.
DunnL, ProsserHC, TanJT, et al.Murine model of wound healing. J Vis Exp, 2013(75):e50265; doi: 10.3791/50265
WatzlawickR, AntonicA, SenaES, et al.Outcome heterogeneity and bias in acute experimental spinal cord injury: A meta-analysis. Neurology, 2019; 93(1):e40–e51; doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007718
92.
FouadK, PopovichPG, KoppMA, et al.The neuroanatomical-functional paradox in spinal cord injury. Nat Rev Neurol, 2021; 17(1):53–62; doi: 10.1038/s41582-020-00436-x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
