Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring remains a cornerstone in the management of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), yet its utility as a dynamic predictor of outcomes continues to evolve. We aimed to examine the role of serial ICP measurements as a potential predictor of outcomes after TBI, to combine ICP data with cerebrovascular reactivity metrics, and to highlight emerging trends in ICP modeling such as machine learning-based predictive models. We conducted a rigorous scoping review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines to investigate the utility of ICP monitoring as a dynamic predictor of outcomes following TBI. A systematic search of major databases identified relevant studies published between January 1, 1998, and August 1, 2024. Two reviewers identified relevant articles, and conflicts were adjudicated by a third. Data from the included studies were abstracted and synthesized. Analysis of 29 studies (N = 5,743 patients) revealed significant associations between specific ICP patterns and clinical outcomes. Key findings included threshold-dependent mortality predictions, the value of early monitoring patterns (i.e., patterns observed within the first 72 h post-injury), and the enhancement of predictive accuracy through integration with cerebrovascular reactivity indices. Many studies now explore ICP as a multidimensional metric rather than a straightforward number, but overarching conclusions are limited by inter-study variability in analysis. The integration of advanced monitoring techniques, the use of features capturing the temporal complexity of ICP, and machine learning approaches show promise in enhancing the predictive value of ICP monitoring as a new form of precision medicine. These findings support strong associations between specific ICP dynamic patterns and mortality and functional outcomes. Standardization of protocols and validation in diverse populations remain important challenges to address in future studies.
MaasAIR, MenonDK, David AdelsonPD, et al.; InTBIR Participants and Investigators. Traumatic brain injury: Integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research. Lancet Neurol, 2017; 16(12):987–1048; doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30371-X
2.
BouzatP, SalaN, PayenJF, et al.Beyond intracranial pressure: Optimization of cerebral blood flow, oxygen, and substrate delivery after traumatic brain injury. Ann Intensive Care, 2013; 3(1):23–29; doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-3-23
3.
BernardF. Neurotrauma and intracranial pressure management. Crit Care Clin, 2023; 39(1):103–121; doi: 10.1016/J.CCC.2022.08.002
4.
FarahvarA, GerberLM, ChiuYL, et al.Response to intracranial hypertension treatment as a predictor of death in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg, 2011; 114(5):1471–1478; doi: 10.3171/2010.11.JNS101116
5.
ChesnutRM, TemkinN, CarneyN, et al.; Global Neurotrauma Research Group. A trial of intracranial-pressure monitoring in traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med, 2012; 367(26):2471–2481; doi: 10.1056/NEJMOA1207363
DewanMC, RattaniA, GuptaS, et al.Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg, 2019; 130(4):1080–1097; doi: 10.3171/2017.10.JNS17352
8.
CarneyN, TottenAM, O’ReillyC, et al.Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury, Fourth Edition. Neurosurgery, 2017; 80(1):6–15; doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001432
9.
GaoL, SmielewskiP, CzosnykaM, et al.Cerebrovascular signal complexity six hours after intensive care unit admission correlates with outcome after severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma, 2016; 33(22):2011–2018; doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4228
10.
FuP, YuanQ, LvK, et al.First intracranial pressure monitoring or first operation: Which one is better? World Neurosurg, 2020; 133:e105–e114; doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.08.166
11.
SteinKY, FroeseL, SekhonM, et al.Intracranial pressure-derived cerebrovascular reactivity indices and their critical thresholds: A Canadian high resolution-traumatic brain injury validation study. J Neurotrauma, 2024; 41(7–8):910–923; doi: 10.1089/neu.2023.0374
12.
HawrylukGWJ, AguileraS, BukiA, et al.A management algorithm for patients with intracranial pressure monitoring: The Seattle International Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference (SIBICC). Intensive Care Med, 2019; 45(12):1783–1794; doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05805-9
13.
MoreiraS, DiasMC, CorreiaMV. Plateau waves of intracranial pressure: Methods for automatic detection and prediction. Acta Neurochir (Suppl 2021); 131:249–253; doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-59436-7_47
14.
TriccoAC, LillieE, ZarinW, et al.PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med, 2018; 169(7):467–473; doi: 10.7326/M18-0850/SUPPL_FILE/M18-0850
15.
AndrewsPJD, SinclairHL, RodriguezAet al.Hypothermia for intracranial hypertension after traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med, 2015; 373(25):2403–2412; doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1507581
16.
AnsteyJR, TacconeFS, UdyAAet al.Early osmotherapy in severe traumatic brain injury: an international multicenter study. J Neurotrauma, 2020; 37(1):178–184; doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6399
17.
AriesMJH, CzosnykaM, BudohoskiKPet al.Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular reactivity using pulse waveform of intracranial pressure. Neurocrit Care, 2012; 17(1):67–76; doi: 10.1007/s12028-012-9687-z
18.
BadriS, ChenJ, BarberJet al.Mortality and long-term functional outcome associated with intracranial pressure after traumatic brain injury. Intensive Care Med, 2012; 38(11):1800–1809; doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2655-4
19.
BalestreriM, CzosnykaM, HutchinsonPet al.Impact of intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure on severe disability and mortality after head injury. Neurocrit Care, 2006; 4(1):8–13; doi: 10.1385/NCC:4:1:008
20.
BeqiriE, ErcoleARI, AriesMJHet al.Towards autoregulation-oriented management after traumatic brain injury: increasing the reliability and stability of the CPPopt algorithm. J Clin Monit Comput, 2023; 37(4):963–976; doi: 10.1007/s10877-023-01009-1
21.
BeqiriE, ZeilerFA, ErcoleARIet al.The lower limit of reactivity as a potential individualised cerebral perfusion pressure target in traumatic brain injury: a CENTER-TBI high-resolution sub-study analysis. Crit Care, 2023; 27(1):194; doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04485-8
22.
ChangJJ, KepplingerD, MetterEJet al.Time thresholds for using pressure reactivity index in neuroprognostication for patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Neurosurgery, 2024; 95(2):297–304; doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002876
23.
FanJY, KirknessC, ViciniP, et al.An approach to determining intracranial pressure variability capable of predicting decreased intracranial adaptive capacity in patients with traumatic brain injury. Biol Res Nurs, 2010; 11(4):317–324; doi: 10.1177/1099800409349164
24.
FlynnLMC, RhodesJ, AndrewsPJD. Therapeutic hypothermia reduces intracranial pressure and partial brain oxygen tension in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: preliminary data from the eurotherm3235 trial. Ther Hypothermia Temp Manag, 2015; 5(3):143–151; doi: 10.1089/ther.2015.0002
25.
GaoLEI, SmielewskiP, LiPet al.Signal information prediction of mortality identifies unique patient subsets after severe traumatic brain injury: a decision-tree analysis approach. J Neurotrauma, 2020; 37(7):1011–1019; doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6631
26.
JahnsFP, MirozJP, MessererM, et al.Quantitative pupillometry for the monitoring of intracranial hypertension in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Crit Care, 2019; 23(1):155; doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2436-3
27.
KahramanS, DuttonRP, HuPet al.Automated measurement of "pressure times time dose" of intracranial hypertension best predicts outcome after severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma, 2010; 69(1):110–118; doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c99853
28.
KaramanosE, TeixeiraPG, SivrikozE, et al.Intracranial pressure versus cerebral perfusion pressure as a marker of outcomes in severe head injury: A prospective evaluation. Am J Surg, 2014; 208(3):363–371; doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.10.026
29.
KasotakisG, MichailidouM, BramosAet al.Intraparenchymal vs extracranial ventricular drain intracranial pressure monitors in traumatic brain injury: less is more?. J Am Coll Surg, 2012; 214(6):950–957; doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.03.004
30.
LiuHUA, WangW, ChengFet al.External ventricular drains versus intraparenchymal intracranial pressure monitors in traumatic brain injury: a prospective observational study. World Neurosurg, 2015; 83(5):794–800; doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.12.040
31.
MajdanM, MauritzW, WilbacherI, et al.Timing and duration of intracranial hypertension versus outcomes after severe traumatic brain injury. Minerva Anestesiol, 2014; 80(12):1261–1272.
32.
MariniCP, StollerC, ShahO, et al.The impact of early flow and brain oxygen crisis on the outcome of patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Am J Surg, 2014; 208(6):1071–1077; discussion 1076; doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.08.003
33.
MartinM, LoboD, BitotVet al.Prediction of early intracranial hypertension after severe traumatic brain injury: a prospective study. World Neurosurg, 2019; 127:e1242–e1248; doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.121
34.
NarotamPK, MorrisonJF, NathooN. Brain tissue oxygen monitoring in traumatic brain injury and major trauma: Outcome analysis of a brain tissue oxygen-directed therapy. J Neurosurg, 2009; 111(4):672–682; doi: 10.3171/2009.4.JNS081150
35.
PetkusV, PreiksaitisA, ChaleckasE, et al.Optimal cerebral perfusion pressure: Targeted treatment for severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma, 2020; 37(2):389–396; doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6551
36.
PetzoldA, GreenAJE, KeirGet al.Role of serum S100B as an early predictor of high intracranial pressure and mortality in brain injury: a pilot study. Crit Care Med, 2002; 30(12):2705–2710; doi: 10.1097/00003246-200212000-00015
37.
SteinDM, BrennerM, HuPFet al.Timing of intracranial hypertension following severe traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care, 2013; 18(3):332–340; doi: 10.1007/s12028-013-9832-3
38.
YuanQ, LiuHUA, WuXet al.Predictive value of initial intracranial pressure for refractory intracranial hypertension in persons with traumatic brain injury: a prospective observational study. Brain Inj, 2013; 27(6):664–670; doi: 10.3109/02699052.2013.775497
39.
ValléeF, NougueH, CartaillerJ, et al.The ICEBERG: A score and visual representation to track the severity of traumatic brain injury: Design principles and preliminary results. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2022; 93(2):229–237; doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003515
40.
RoozenbeekB, LingsmaHF, LeckyFE, et al.; Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN). Prediction of outcome after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: External validation of the International Mission on Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials (IMPACT) and Corticoid Randomisation After Significant Head injury (CRASH) prognostic models. Crit Care Med, 2012; 40(5):1609–1617; doi: 10.1097/CCM.0B013E31824519CE
41.
SteyerbergEW, MushkudianiN, PerelP, et al.Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: Development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics. PLoS Med, 2008; 5(8):e165; discussion e165; doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050165
42.
HarrisonDA, GriggsKA, PrabhuG, et al.; Risk Adjustment In Neurocritical care (RAIN) Study Investigators. External validation and recalibration of risk prediction models for acute traumatic brain injury among critically ill adult patients in the United Kingdom. J Neurotrauma, 2015; 32(19):1522–1537; doi: 10.1089/NEU.2014.3628
43.
SunH, LingsmaHF, SteyerbergEW, et al.External validation of the international mission for prognosis and analysis of clinical trials in traumatic brain injury: Prognostic models for traumatic brain injury on the study of the neuroprotective activity of progesterone in severe traumatic brain injuries trial. J Neurotrauma, 2016; 33(16):1535–1543; doi: 10.1089/NEU.2015.4164
44.
YueJK, LeeYM, SunX, et al.; The TRACK-TBI Investigators. Performance of the IMPACT and CRASH prognostic models for traumatic brain injury in a contemporary multicenter cohort: A TRACK-TBI study. J Neurosurg, 2024; 141(2):417–429; doi: 10.3171/2023.11.JNS231425
45.
CrashTC. Final results of MRC CRASH, a randomised placebo-controlled trial of intravenous corticosteroid in adults with head injury—outcomes at 6 months. The Lancet, 2005; 365(9475):1957–1959; doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66552-X
46.
ButcherI, McHughGS, LuJ, et al.Prognostic value of cause of injury in traumatic brain injury: Results from The IMPACT Study. J Neurotrauma, 2007; 24(2):281–286; doi: 10.1089/NEU.2006.0030
47.
GhaderiH, ForemanB, ReddyCK, et al.Discovery of generalizable TBI phenotypes using multivariate time-series clustering. Comput Biol Med, 2024; 180:108997; doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108997
48.
CohenMJ, GrossmanAD, MorabitoD, et al.Identification of complex metabolic states in critically injured patients using bioinformatic cluster analysis. Crit Care, 2010; 14(1):R10; doi: 10.1186/cc8864
49.
PetzoldA, KeirG, KerrM, et al.Early identification of secondary brain damage in subarachnoid hemorrhage: A role for glial fibrillary acidic protein. J Neurotrauma, 2006; 23(7):1179–1184; doi: 10.1089/NEU.2006.23.1179
50.
GüizaF, DepreitereB, PiperI, et al.Novel methods to predict increased intracranial pressure during intensive care and long-term neurologic outcome after traumatic brain injury: Development and validation in a multicenter dataset. Crit Care Med, 2013; 41(2):554–564; doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182742d0a
51.
PetrovD, MirandaSP, BaluR, et al.Prediction of intracranial pressure crises after severe traumatic brain injury using machine learning algorithms. J Neurosurg, 2023; 139(2):528–535; doi: 10.3171/2022.12.JNS221860
52.
BarritS, Al BarajrajiM, El HadweS, et al.; Neurocore-iMMM Research Group. Intracranial multimodal monitoring in neurocritical care (Neurocore-iMMM): an open, decentralized consensus. Crit Care, 2024; 28(1):427; doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05211-8
