Vancomycin With Concomitant Piperacillin/Tazobactam vs. Cefepime or Meropenem Associated Acute Kidney Injury in General Ward Patients: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study

Abstract

Background: Concurrent administration of vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam (VAN+PTZ) may increase the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) in hospitalized patients. Comprehensive characterization of VAN+PTZ associated AKI and recovery patterns remains lacking in previous reports. Objective: To compare the incidence of AKI associated with VAN+PTZ compared to either cefepime (CEF) or meropenem (MER) with VAN in adult general ward patients. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective, propensity score cohort study was conducted in non-critically ill adult patients. Included patients were concurrently administered VAN+PTZ or VAN+CEF/MER. Patients developing AKI ≤48 hours following combination therapy were excluded. The primary endpoint was to compare the incidence of AKI between study groups. Multivariable Cox regression modeling in predicting AKI was also conducted. Results: A total of 3199 patients met inclusion criteria and were evaluated. The incidence of AKI in VAN+PTZ and VAN+CEF/MER groups were 16.4% and 8.7%, respectively (P < .001). The onset to AKI was 1.8 days earlier with VAN+PTZ compared to VAN+CEF/MER (P < .001). Multivariable prediction model showed concomitant VAN+PTZ was identified as an independent risk factor of developing AKI (HR 2.34, 1.82-3.01, P < .001). The VAN+PTZ group experienced significantly higher rates of severe AKI (stage II or III) compared to the VAN+CEF/MER group (P = .002). No differences in the AKI recovery patterns were found between study groups. Conclusions: Concomitant VAN+PTZ in adult general ward patients was independently associated with an increased risk of AKI overall. More severe AKI was also associated with VAN+PTZ.

Keywords

acute kidney injury nephrotoxicity piperacillin-tazobactam beta-lactam vancomycin

Introduction

Acute kidney injury (AKI) remains a common complication among adult hospitalized patients. Overall, about 20% of patients experience AKI during their hospital stay.^1,2 Mortality risk is higher in patients developing AKI compared to those without and incrementally increases with increasing severity.³ Drug-induced AKI accounts for up to 27% of cases, while contributing to death in 30% of these patients.⁴ Clinicians must remain vigilant administering nephrotoxic medications to avoid or mitigate the AKI from transpiring and/or progressing.

The concomitant administration of vancomycin (VAN) and piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ) has been recently recognized as potentially carrying a higher risk of AKI compared to monotherapy of either agent alone (VAN or PTZ) or combination VAN with other anti-pseudomonal beta-lactams including cefepime (CEF) or meropenem (MER).^5-11 However, other studies have not demonstrated an increased risk of AKI with concomitant VAN+PTZ therapy.^12-14 Major differences among these studies including AKI definitions and combining critically ill with general ward patients among cohorts as well as including early onset AKI (ie developing ≤48 hours after exposure) may explain these conflicting results.

Most previously published reports comparing the incidence of AKI associated with combination VAN+PTZ and VAN+CEF/MER in the general ward population lacked study design robustness attributed to single-center evaluations with small sample sizes. Unfortunately, none of these studies completely characterized AKI including time to onset, staging of severity including the need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), duration of AKI and/or RRT, and recovery patterns. Therefore, the purpose of this multicenter, propensity score-matched study was to compare the incidence of AKI in the adult general ward population associated with concomitant VAN+PTZ compared to VAN with either CEF or MER as well as characterize AKI development and recovery patterns.

Methods

Patients and Study Design

This was a multicenter, retrospective, propensity-matched, cohort study at a large health-system over a 2-year period (January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019). Included patients met the following criteria: (1) adults (≥18 years); (2) VAN with anti-pseudomonal β-lactam combination therapy (PTZ, CEF, or MER) started ≤48 hours of each other; (3) combination therapy duration was at least 48 consecutive hours; (4) baseline serum creatinine (SCr) recorded ≤24h after hospital admission; and (5) ≥1 vancomycin level(s) during combination therapy. Exclusion criteria were AKI developing ≤48 hours after initiation of combination therapy; PTZ, CEF, or MER administered in the same hospital admission; baseline end-stage renal disease, or pregnancy.

Vancomycin was managed by clinical pharmacists at the study sites through a standardized protocol. Pharmacists were expected to modify all initial ordered doses to provide 20-30 mg/kg up to a maximum of 2 g as a loading dose, if necessary. Also, pharmacists were able to modify subsequent maintenance doses based on the patient’s body weight and renal function (creatinine clearance) including any renal replacement therapy (eg hemodialysis). The target vancomycin serum concentration was 10-20 mcg/mL; however, a level of 15-20 mcg/mL may be appropriate for certain infections such as meningitis. The vancomycin protocol recommended clinical pharmacists should order the first vancomycin trough level just prior to the third to fifth dose. Pharmacists were permitted to obtain a vancomycin level sooner if the clinical situation warranted it such as significant renal function fluctuations. It was also recommended that pharmacists obtain subsequent vancomycin levels not to exceed 5-7 days since last level.

Broad-spectrum antibiotics including PTZ, CEF, and MER were dosed by pharmacists also using a standardized protocol based on creatinine clearance among all study sites. Furthermore, all hospitals used a standardized approach of dosing extended-infusion PTZ during the study period. The initial PTZ dose was 4.5 g infused over 30 minutes irrespective of renal function. Subsequent PTZ doses consisted of 3.375 g over 4 hours with a frequency of every 8 hours in patients with normal renal function (ie, creatinine clearance ≥20 mL/min) or every 12 hours (ie, hemodialysis or creatinine clearance <20 mL/min). Also, CEF and MER were administered as 30-minute traditional infusions. Although PTZ, CEF, and MER dosing protocols were available to standardized management, pharmacists were allowed discretion to customize dosing based patient specific parameters (infection location, extreme over- or underweight, severity of illness, and/or microbiologic sensitivity information). Lastly, empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics (PTZ, CEF, and MER) including vancomycin was at the discretion of the primary attending physician.

Data Collection

Patients were identified through the electronic health record for potential study inclusion following Institutional Review Board approval. The two study groups consisted of patients administered adjunctive VAN+PTZ or VAN with either CEF or MER. Data collection included patient characteristics (age, sex, weight, comorbidities, etc.) and other clinical covariates such as baseline SCr, antimicrobial duration, nephrotoxic agent(s) and duration, of concomitant, vancomycin characteristics (total daily dose, serum concentrations), Charlson Comorbidity Index, sepsis diagnosis, mortality, and length of stay (LOS). The follow-up period was 7 days total unless antimicrobial therapy was discontinued or the patient died or discharged prior.

Definitions

The same day of hospital admission which both beta-lactam therapy and vancomycin were administered was defined as baseline regardless of whichever of the two was initiated first. The definition and severity staging of AKI was modified from the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) published guidelines using only the SCr-based criteria since most general ward patient population at the study sites did not have foley catheters routinely placed for urine output collection.¹⁵ Patients identified with a maximum SCr increase of ≥0.3 mg/dL within 48 hours or any SCr during the follow-up period exceeded 1.5 times over baseline were defined as having AKI. The KDIGO staging criteria was modified by removing urine output to classify AKI severity in our study. The following stages were defined as follows: stage 1 AKI was a SCr increase to 1.5-1.9 times greater than baseline or SCr increase ≥0.3 mg/dL; stage II AKI was a SCr increase to 2.0-2.9 times greater than baseline; and stage III AKI was a 3-fold increase in SCr from baseline, SCr ≥4.0 mg/dL, or initiation of renal replacement therapy. Acute kidney injury recovery patterns were classified as fast (<3 days), intermediate (3-7 days), or slow (>7 days) based upon the time-period of SCr returning to either <0.3 mg/dL or <1.5 times from baseline values.^16,17 Sepsis was defined using the Sepsis-3 definition in patients with a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score ≥2 in the setting of known or suspected infection.¹⁸ All patients with a SOFA score ≥2 were considered septic since all included study patients were administered broad-spectrum antimicrobials for suspected infection. The following medications were defined as “nephrotoxic” agents based on previous reports: acyclovir, amphotericin (lipid and deoxycholate formulations), angiotensin inhibitors, carboplatin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, cefuroxime, cidofovir, cisplatin, colistimethate (systemic), cyclosporine, dapsone, foscarnet, ganciclovir, aminoglycosides (systemic), ifosfamide, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, lithium, mesalamine, methotrexate, nafcillin, sirolimus, sulfasalazine, tacrolimus, topiramate, valacyclovir, valganciclovir, and zonisamide.^16,19

Study Outcomes and Statistical Analysis

The primary outcome was the incidence of AKI associated with concomitant VAN+PTZ compared to VAN+CEF/MER. Secondary endpoints included AKI severity, incidence and duration of RRT, time to AKI onset and recovery. Other secondary aims included clinical outcomes such as in-hospital mortality and hospital LOS. A total sample size of 360 patients equally distributed in each study group (n = 180) was needed to achieve 80% power to detect a 12% difference in AKI rates assuming rates of 27% and 15% for the VAN+PTZ and VAN+CEF/MER groups, respectively. Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney U test were used for continuous data, while Fisher exact or chi squared tests were conducted for categorical data as appropriate. Propensity score matching (nearest neighbor) was performed using both clinical and demographic covariates for the primary outcome between the two study groups. The covariates included in the propensity scoring were as follows: contrast dye administration, ≥3 nephrotoxic medications administered, sepsis, >65 years, SCr at baseline, African American, female gender, and chronic kidney disease.

Cox competing risk model with cause-specific proportional hazards was used to estimate the AKI risk of VAN+PTZ compared to VAN+CEF/MER. In-hospital mortality was considered a competing risk. The full model included age, gender, baseline creatinine clearance, antimicrobial duration of each specific agent (vancomycin and beta-lactam), vancomycin average weight-based daily dose, ≥3 concomitant nephrotoxic agents, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and sepsis diagnosis. Backward stepwise selection was used to identify significant covariates. A secondary post-hoc Hosmer-Lemeshow test was conducted to assess a goodness of fit test for the robustness of our findings associating VAN+PTZ with AKI risk found in our final prediction model (See Supplemental Table 1). A propensity score balance plot was also constructed to determine equal covariate distribution between both study groups (See Supplemental Figure 1). The propensity score was also included as an additional covariate in the final regression model to address imbalances of baseline characteristics. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata software, version 15.1 (StataCorp. College Station, Texas).

Results

Baseline Characteristics

A total of 25 437 patients were identified during the study period with 3199 patients meeting inclusion criteria (Figure 1). A total of 3199 patients were included with 2146 (67.1%) and 1053 (32.9%) patients in the VAN+PTZ and VAN+CEF/MER groups, respectively. Several baseline characteristics were significantly different between study groups (Table 1). The Charlson Comorbidity Index was significantly higher in the VAN+CEF/MER group (P < .001). Also, significantly more patients in the VAN+CEF/MER group at baseline had a diagnosis of sepsis and chronic kidney disease (P < .001). No significant differences in SCr or patients with ≥3 concomitant nephrotoxic agents at baseline were found between groups. The majority of patients in both cohorts were admitted to community hospitals with the remaining patients at an academic hospital setting. No significant differences in vancomycin trough serum concentrations were found between the VAN+PTZ (17.0 ± 5.1 mcg/mL) and VAN+CEF/MER (18.1 ± 5.1 mcg/mL) (P=.06).

Figure 1.

Flow chart of patient screening and selection process.

Table 1.

Patient demographic and clinical characteristics.

Characteristic	VAN + PTZ (n= 2146)	VAN + CEF/MER (n=1053)	P Value
Age, years	56 (43-68)	60 (48-71)	<.001
Male sex	1416 (66.0)	616 (58.5)	<.001
Height, cm	172.7 (165-180.3)	172.7 (165-180.3)	.998
Actual body weight, kg	85.5 (69.9-104.3)	81.8 (68.1-101.5)	.008
Body Mass index, kg/m²	28.7 (24.4-34.4)	27.5 (23.5-32.6)	.001
Race			.538
African american	134 (6.2)	57 (5.4)
Native american	108 (5.0)	47 (4.4)
Asian	5 (.2)	1 (.1)
Caucasian	1824 (85.0)	917 (87.1)
Hispanic/Latino	3 (.1)	0 (.0)
Pacific islander	2 (.1)	0 (.0)
Other	70 (3.3)	31 (2.9)
Comorbidities
Diabetes mellitus	1063 (49.5)	530 (50.3)	.671
Heart failure	137 (6.4)	115 (10.9)	<.001
Hypertension	1052 (49.0)	566 (53.7)	.012
COPD	214 (10.0)	158 (15.0)	<.001
Hepatic dysfunction	179 (8.3)	103 (9.8)	.177
HIV/AIDS	23 (1.1)	10 (.9)	.748
Transplant	13 (.6)	48 (4.6)	<.001
Cancer	284 (13.2)	236 (22.4)	<.001
Chronic kidney disease	286 (13.3)	209 (19.8)	<.001
Anemia	824 (38.4)	479 (45.5)	<.001
Charlson comorbidity index	3.6 (1-12)	4.3 (1-12)	<.001
Baseline serum creatinine, mg/dL	.87 (.70-1.10)	.86 (.67-1.17)	.175
≥3 concomitant nephrotoxic agents	4 (.2)	4 (.4)	.452
Sepsis	369 (17.2)	276 (26.2)	<.001
Hospital setting			<.001
Academic	586 (27.3)	423 (40.2)
Community	1560 (72.7)	630 (59.8)

Abbreviations: CEF = cefepime, COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; HIV/AIDS = human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, MER = meropenem; PTZ = piperacillin/tazobactam; VAN = vancomycin.

Data presented as median (interquartile range) or n (%).

AKI Incidence and Characteristics

The AKI incidence was significantly higher in the VAN+PTZ group compared to the VAN+CEF/MER group (P < .001) (Table 2). The time to AKI occurred 1.8 days earlier in the VAN+PTZ group in comparison to the VAN+CEF/MER group (P < .001). The majority of patients in both VAN+PTZ and VAN+CEF/MER groups experienced mild AKI (Stage I). Although a significantly higher incidence of Stage I AKI was found in the VAN+CEF/MER group over VAN+PTZ (P = .002), the VAN+PTZ group experienced more severe AKI (Stage II or III), which was primarily driven by a higher incidence of Stage II (P = .001). No significant differences in AKI recovery patterns between study groups (P = .237) were observed with >90% of patients developing AKI recovered <3 days in both cohorts. The overall need for RRT was very low; no significant differences in the incidence or duration of RRT were found between study groups.

Table 2.

Outcomes associated with concomitant vancomycin and anti-pseudomonal beta-lactams.

Outcome	VAN + PTZ (n= 2146)	VAN + CEF/MER (n=1053)	P Value
AKI incidence	353 (16.4)	92 (8.7)	<.001
Time to AKI, days	4.2 (3.0-5.9)	6.0 (4.3-8.2)	<.001
AKI severity
Stage I	247 (70.0)	79 (85.9)	.002
Stage II	58 (16.4)	3 (2.3)	.001
Stage III	48 (13.6)	10 (10.9)	.489
Stage II or III	106 (30.0)	13 (14.1)	.002
AKI recovery characteristics			.237
Fast, <3 days	189 (90.4)	68 (92.0)
Intermediate, 3-7 days	14 (6.7)	2 (2.9)
Slow, >7 days	6 (2.9)	0 (.0)
Renal replacement therapy
Incidence	10 (.5)	2 (.2)	.230
Duration, days	7.3 (4.2-8.8)	3.0 (.7-5.5)	.282

Abbreviations: AKI = acute kidney injury, CEF = cefepime; MER = meropenem, PTZ = piperacillin/tazobactam; VAN = vancomycin.

Data presented as median (interquartile range) or n (%).

The final multivariable model identified concomitant VAN+PTZ as an independent risk factor of developing AKI (P < .001) (Table 3). The duration of beta-lactam use was also significantly associated with development of AKI (P < .001). Survival curves illustrating AKI as a function of combination antimicrobial exposure demonstrated VAN+PTZ was associated with higher AKI rates compared to VAN+CEF/MER (P = .036) (Figure 2).

Table 3.

Stepwise Multivariate Cox Regression Analysis Predicting Acute Kidney Injury.

Variable	Hazards ratio	95% CI	P Value
Concomitant vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam administration	2.34	1.82-3.01	<.001
Beta-lactam duration	1.11	1.09-1.14	<.001
Vancomycin average daily weight-based dose	.99	.98-.99	.023

Figure 2.

Unadjusted kaplan-meier survival analysis of acute kidney injury.

Mortality and Length of Stay Outcomes

In-hospital mortality was very low although a significant difference was found between VAN+PTZ (0.3%) and VAN+CEF/MER (1.0%) (P = .017). Also, hospital length of stay in the VAN+PTZ and VAN+CEF/MER groups were 7.3 (5.2, 10.7) and 8.2 (5.9, 11.8) days, respectively (P < .0001).

Discussion

To our knowledge, this was the first large multicenter, propensity-score matching study conducted exclusively in general ward patients to evaluate AKI incidence, severity, and recovery characteristics receiving VAN+PTZ or VAN+CEF/MER. Concomitant VAN+PTZ was identified as an independent risk factor for AKI in our final model and sensitivity analysis. Although most AKI cases were considered mild (Stage I) for both study groups, higher rates of stage II/III AKI were found with VAN+PTZ over VAN+CEF/MER. In addition, time to AKI was found to have a significantly more rapid onset with VAN+PTZ regimen as compared to VAN+CEF/MER. No differences were noted in the need for RRT nor duration of RRT. Although routine use of extended-infusion PTZ was administered at the study sites, this dosing strategy has not been shown to impact AKI rates compared to traditional 30-minute infusions.^13,20 Although clinical outcomes between groups were significantly different favoring VAN+PTZ, caution is warranted in interpreting these results considering the overall mortality rate was low.

Multiple studies have investigated AKI rates associated with broad-spectrum beta-lactam agents, namely CEF and/or MER, against PTZ with concomitant VAN. Although conflicting evidence currently exists associating an increased AKI risk with VAN+PTZ, most published studies have demonstrated a relationship. Moenster et al,¹² first reported the incidence of AKI with VAN+PTZ (29.3%) and VAN+CEF (13.3%) during a retrospective review of osteomyelitis treatment in diabetics, although failing to achieve statistical significance (P = .09). Subsequent retrospective studies have found an increase AKI rate with VAN+PTZ ranging from 21.4 – 36.4%.^10,11,21 Conversely, Al Yami et al, failed to demonstrate a significant difference in the incidence of AKI when comparing VAN+PTZ (7.4%) vs VAN+MER (5.3%).¹⁴ In two separate prospective cohort studies, VAN+PTZ was associated with a 29.8-37.3% incidence of AKI as compared to a combined comparator group of cefepime/meropenem with a 7.7-8.8% incidence of AKI.^8,22 Although most studies evaluating the use of VAN+PTZ and AKI development suggest an association, it must be noted these results included a mixture of ICU and non-ICU (general ward) patient populations. In addition, various AKI definitions (AKIN vs RIFLE vs KDIGO) were used among these reports as well as inconsistent inclusion/exclusion criteria. These important differences may explain to the lower incidence of AKI with VAN+PTZ therapy found in our study (16.4%) as compared to 20-30% in these previously published studies.^6,8,10,11,21

Comprehensive characterization of AKI associated with VAN+PTZ is lacking. Our study found the time to AKI was significantly shorter with VAN+PTZ (4.2 vs 6 days), which was a similar to the findings or other previously published reports suggesting onset to AKI may occur 3-5 days after initiation of therapy.¹¹ Considering the estimated time period for developing VAN+PTZ-induced AKI, patients with early onset AKI <48 hours after initiation were excluded as an attempt to mitigate bias from other causes than the agents being investigated. One other study also excluded patients who developed AKI within 48 hours of hospital admission to potentially reduce AKI resulting from acute illness rather than antimicrobial nephrotoxicity.¹⁰ Our findings further support the importance of de-escalation practices by antimicrobial stewardship programs about 72 hours following concomitant VAN+PTZ therapy as a method to potentially avoid unwarranted nephrotoxic risk. Furthermore, our study found most AKI cases were considered mild (Stage I KDIGO) with more severe (stage II or III) AKI developing with VAN+PTZ. This is consistent to another recent report suggesting a greater risk of more severe AKI (AKIN and RIFLE) with VAN+PTZ was shown irrespective of the severity staging criteria used.¹¹ The few studies in non-critically ill patients evaluating the need for RRT found no differences between groups, which is also consistent with our findings.^11,21,22 Our study found no significant differences between AKI recovery patterns between groups. Also, the majority of AKI was transient with resolution occurring within 3 days. This is in contrast to another study reporting over 60% of patient in both groups did not recover during the evaluation period.²¹

This study had several limitations. The retrospective study design may introduce a risk of bias. Another limitation was exclusively relying on SCr to identify AKI. Given our general ward patient population, UOP was not routinely measured and consequently unavailable to compliment AKI diagnosis. Another important limitation of this study was using SCr as the lone biomarker to define AKI. An alternative viewpoint was proposed suggesting SCr elevation may occur with VAN+PTZ in the absence of kidney injury as a result of decreased renal secretion of SCr.²³ This may have impacted our ability to accurately identify patients with AKI rather than VAN+PTZ-induced SCr fluctuations. Furthermore, our study sites only reported vancomycin serum trough concentrations as the primary method of monitoring vancomycin therapy for safety and efficacy. Recently published clinical practice guidelines recommend the area under the curve/minimum inhibitory concentration ratio as preferred pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target for both safety and efficacy.²⁴ Nonetheless, it should be noted the mean vancomycin serum trough concentration in our study was >15 mcg/mL. This may have biased AKI risk associated with vancomycin over the combination therapy.

Conclusion

Concomitant administration of VAN+PTZ in an adult general ward patient population was identified as an independent risk factor for developing AKI. The incidence of more severe AKI was higher with VAN+PTZ over VAN+CEF/MER. Further research is warranted on AKI risk associated with antimicrobial combination therapy.

Supplemental Material

Supplemental Material - Vancomycin With Concomitant Piperacillin/Tazobactam vs. Cefepime or Meropenem Associated Acute Kidney Injury in General Ward Patients: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study

Supplemental Material for Vancomycin With Concomitant Piperacillin/Tazobactam vs. Cefepime or Meropenem Associated Acute Kidney Injury in General Ward Patients: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study by Ivan A. Komerdelj, PharmD, Mitchell S. Buckley, PharmD, FASHP, FCCM, FCCP, BCCCP, Paul A. D’Alessio, PharmD, Delia S. Ziadat, PharmD, BCPS, Emir Kobic, PharmD, BCIDP, Pooja Rangan, MBBS, MPH, Sumit K. Agarwal, MBBS, MBA, Nicole C. Tinta, PharmD, MBA, BCPS, Melanie J. Yerondopoulos, PharmD, BCCCP, and Sandra L. Kane-Gill, PharmD, MSc, FCCM in Journal of Pharmacy Practice.

Footnotes

Author’s Note

This original research was accepted as an abstract for poster presentation at the 2021 American College of Clinical Pharmacy Annual Meeting.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

Mitchell S. Buckley, PharmD, FASHP, FCCM, FCCP, BCCCP

Supplemental Material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

Susantitaphong

Cruz

Cerda

, et al. World incidence of AKI: a meta-analysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8:1482-1493. Epub 2013/06/08. doi:10.2215/CJN.00710113.

Wang

Muntner

Chertow

Warnock

. Acute kidney injury and mortality in hospitalized patients. Am J Nephrol. 2012;35:349-355. Epub 2012/04/05. doi:10.1159/000337487.

Bamoulid

Philippot

Kazory

, et al. Acute kidney injury in non-critical care setting: elaboration and validation of an in-hospital death prognosis score. BMC Nephrol. 2019;20:419. Epub 2019/11/23. doi:10.1186/s12882-019-1610-9.

Guo

Yao

, et al. Clinical Characteristics of Hospitalized Patients with Drug-Induced Acute Kidney Injury and Associated Risk Factors: A Case-Control Study. BioMed Res Int. 2020;2020:9742754-9742758. Epub 2020/10/06. doi:10.1155/2020/9742754.

Burgess

Drew

. Comparison of the incidence of vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity in hospitalized patients with and without concomitant piperacillin-tazobactam. Pharmacotherapy. 2014;34:670-676. Epub 2014/05/24. doi:10.1002/phar.1442.

Jeon

Staley

Klinker

Hincapie Castillo

Winterstein

. Acute kidney injury risk associated with piperacillin/tazobactam compared with cefepime during vancomycin therapy in hospitalised patients: a cohort study stratified by baseline kidney function. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2017;50:63-67. Epub 2017/05/20. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.02.023.

Luther

Timbrook

Caffrey

Dosa

Lodise

LaPlante

. Vancomycin Plus Piperacillin-Tazobactam and Acute Kidney Injury in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Crit Care Med. 2018;46:12-20. Epub 2017/11/01. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000002769.

Peyko

Smalley

Cohen

. Prospective Comparison of Acute Kidney Injury During Treatment With the Combination of Piperacillin-Tazobactam and Vancomycin Versus the Combination of Cefepime or Meropenem and Vancomycin. J Pharm Pract. 2017;30:209-213. Epub 2016/02/26. doi:10.1177/0897190016628960.

Rutter

Burgess

. Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Treated with IV Beta-Lactam/Beta-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations. Pharmacotherapy. 2017;37:593-598. Epub 2017/03/02. doi:10.1002/phar.1918.

10.

Rutter

Cox

Martin

Burgess

. Nephrotoxicity during Vancomycin Therapy in Combination with Piperacillin-Tazobactam or Cefepime. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61:e02089. Epub 2016/11/30. doi:10.1128/AAC.02089-16.

11.

Navalkele

Pogue

Karino

, et al. Risk of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients on Concomitant Vancomycin and Piperacillin-Tazobactam Compared to Those on Vancomycin and Cefepime. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64:116-123. Epub 2016/12/18. doi:10.1093/cid/ciw709.

12.

Moenster

Linneman

Finnegan

Hand

Thomas

McDonald

. Acute renal failure associated with vancomycin and beta-lactams for the treatment of osteomyelitis in diabetics: piperacillin-tazobactam as compared with cefepime. Clinical microbiology and infection; 2014;20:O384-O389. Epub 2013/10/15. doi:10.1111/1469-0691.12410.

13.

Karino

Kaye

Navalkele

, et al. Epidemiology of Acute Kidney Injury among Patients Receiving Concomitant Vancomycin and Piperacillin-Tazobactam: Opportunities for Antimicrobial Stewardship. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60:3743-3750. Epub 2016/04/14. doi:10.1128/AAC.03011-15.

14.

Al Yami

. Comparison of the incidence of acute kidney injury during treatment with vancomycin in combination with piperacillin-tazobactam or with meropenem. J Infect Public Health. 2017;10:770-773. Epub 2017/02/18. doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2016.11.007.

15.

Palevsky

Liu

Brophy

, et al. KDOQI US commentary on the 2012 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013;61:649-672. Epub 2013/03/19. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.02.349.

16.

Buckley

Hartsock

Berry

, et al. Comparison of acute kidney injury risk associated with vancomycin and concomitant piperacillin/tazobactam or cefepime in the intensive care unit. J Crit Care. 2018;48:32-38. Epub 2018/09/03. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.08.007.

17.

Heung

Steffick

Zivin

, et al. Acute Kidney Injury Recovery Pattern and Subsequent Risk of CKD: An Analysis of Veterans Health Administration Data. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;67:742-752. Epub 2015/12/23. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.10.019.

18.

Singer

Deutschman

Seymour

, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315:801-810. Epub 2016/02/24. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0287.

19.

Goldstein

Mottes

Simpson

, et al. A sustained quality improvement program reduces nephrotoxic medication-associated acute kidney injury. Kidney Int. 2016;90:212-221. Epub 2016/05/25. doi:10.1016/j.kint.2016.03.031.

20.

Cotner

Rutter

Burgess

Wallace

Martin

Burgess

. Influence of beta-Lactam Infusion Strategy on Acute Kidney Injury. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61:e00871. Epub 2017/08/02. doi:10.1128/AAC.00871-17.

21.

Gomes

Smotherman

Birch

, et al. Comparison of acute kidney injury during treatment with vancomycin in combination with piperacillin-tazobactam or cefepime. Pharmacotherapy. 2014;34:662-669. Epub 2014/04/23. doi:10.1002/phar.1428.

22.

Mullins

Kramer

Bartel

Catlin

Gilder

. Comparison of the Nephrotoxicity of Vancomycin in Combination With Cefepime, Meropenem, or Piperacillin/Tazobactam: A Prospective, Multicenter Study. Ann Pharmacother. 2018;52:639-644. Epub 2018/02/15. doi:10.1177/1060028018757497.

23.

Avedissian

Pais

Liu

Rhodes

Scheetz

. Piperacillin-Tazobactam Added to Vancomycin Increases Risk for Acute Kidney Injury: Fact or Fiction? Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71:426-432. Epub 2019/12/14. doi:10.1093/cid/ciz1189.

24.

Rybak

Lodise

, et al. Therapeutic Monitoring of Vancomycin for Serious Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections: A Revised Consensus Guideline and Review by the American Society of Health-system Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71:1361-1364. Epub 2020/07/14. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa303.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB