Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Depression is a common and under-recognized disease state usually treated in the outpatient setting. Since it does not usually require sophisticated laboratory tests or physical evaluations as a component of monitoring, depression is a condition that can be managed by pharmacists in any setting. Due to depression’s high prevalence, pharmacists must be aware of the usual presentation so they can better identify patients in need of treatment. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders(DSMIV) describes specific criteria needed for the diagnosis of depression to be made. The diagnostic criteria in DSM-IV are essentially the target symptoms used to monitor changes in a patient’s status. Psychometric rating scales assess the severity of psychiatric symptoms in a standardized manner. Several rating scales are currently available to assess depression, including the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, Beck Depression Inventory and Zung Self-Rating Scale. Rating scales can help pharmacists assess a change in symptoms or determine the baseline severity of symptoms. They also provide a framework to gather information from the patient. By understanding the presentation of depression and simple ways to assess it, pharmacists can be proactive in treating this common and sometimes life-threatening psychiatric disorder.

Keywords

assessment evaluation depression rating scales

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Regier DA , Boyd JH , Burke JD , et al. One-month prevalence of mental disorders in the U.S. based on five epidemiological catchment area sites. Arch Gen Psychiatry.1988; 45:977–986.

2. Simon, G . Can depression be managed appropriately in primary care? J Clin Psychiatry.1998; 59 (suppl 2):3–8.

3.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Revised.Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2000.

4. Hamilton M . A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry.1960; 23:56–62.

5. Maier W , Phillipp M , Heuser I , et al. Improving depression severity assessment—I.Reliability, internal validity and sensitivity to change of three observer depression scales. J Psychiatr Res.1988; 22(1): 3–12.

6. Maier W , Heuser I , Philipp M , et al. Improving depression severity assessment—II.Content, concurrent and external validity of three observer depression rating scales. J Psychiatr Res.1988; 22(1):13–19.

7. Montgomery SA , AsbergM . A new depression rating scale designed to be sensitive to change. Brit J Psychiat.1979; 134:382–389.

8. Beck AT , Ward CH , Mendelson M , et al. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961; 4:53–63.

9. Zung WWK . Aself-rating depression scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry.1965; 12:63–70.

Tools and Techniques for Evaluating Depression

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References