Purpose: To examine the rate of compliance with National Surgical Infection Prevention Project performance measures and compliance with American Society of Health-System Pharmacists guidelines for procedures not covered by these measures and to evaluate noncompliance for explanatory factors.Methods: A retrospective review of all patients receiving prophylactic antibiotics for Class I (clean) or Class II (clean-contaminated) surgical procedures. Information collected included antibiotic ordered, antibiotic given, dose of antibiotic, time of administration, time of incision, time of closure, duration of procedure, need for re-dosing during the procedure, documentation of re-dosing administered, and antibiotic discontinuation.Results:Choice of antibiotic for prophylaxis was appropriate in 99% of the 568 procedures. Antibiotic was administered too early in 94 of 527 (17.8%) patients. Prophylactic antibiotics were inappropriately continued for more than 24 hours in 43 of 216 (20%) patients undergoing noncardiothoracic procedures and for more than 48 hours in 4 of 10 (40%) in patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery.Conclusion:Although improvements in key performance measures related to prophylactic antibiotic agent selection, timing of administration, and discontinuation have been made compared to data collected in a larger multicenter study conducted at the beginning of this century, there remains considerable room for improvement.
Institute of Medicine.The Chasm in Quality: Select Indicators From Recent Reports. Available at: http://www.iom.edu/subpage.asp?id=14980. Accessed November 3, 2005.
2.
100k Lives Campaign.Some Is Not a Number. Soon Is Not a Time. Available at: http://www.ihi.org/IHI/Programs/Campaign/Campaign.htm?TabId=1. Accessed September 25, 2005.
3.
Nichols RLPreventing surgical site infections: a surgeon's perspective, 2001 . Emerg Infect Dis.2001:7(2): 220-224 .
4.
Bratzler DW , Houck PMAntimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project . Clin Infect Dis.2004;38: 1706-1715 .
5.
American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.ASHP therapeutic guidelines on antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery . Am J Health Syst Pharm.1999;56: 1839-1888 .
6.
Cruse PJ , Foord R.A five-year prospective study of 23,649 surgical wounds . Arch Surg.1973;107: 206-210 .
7.
Bratzler DW , Houck PM , Richards C. , et al. Use of antimicrobial prophylaxis for major surgery: baseline results from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project . Arch Surg.2005;140: 174-182 .
8.
Dellinger EP , Hausmann SM , Bratzler DW , et al. Hospitals collaborate to decrease surgical site infections . Am J Surg.2005; 190: 9-15 .
9.
Bratzler DW , Hunt DRThe Surgical Infection Prevention and Surgical Care Improvement Projects: national initiatives to improve outcomes for patients having surgery . Clin Infect Dis.2006;43: 322-330 .
