Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Despite expert opinions favoring a switch of oral contracepwho were surveyed, 37% favored the acquisition of OCs with-tives (OCs) from prescription to over-the-counter (OTC) staout a prescription. Women associated the OTC system for obtus, limited empirical evidence currently exists for indicating taining OCs with increased likelihood of adverse medical a consumer preference for nonprescription OCs. The objec-consequences and the prescription-only system with an intive of this study was to measure perceptions of women re-creased likelihood of pregnancy avoidance. Women who pregarding nonprescription OCs and to assess their preference ferred nonprescription pills reported more favorable attifor acquiring OCs without a prescription. A cross-sectional tudes toward their use and stronger intentions to buy them survey research design employing a combination of mail and without a prescription. Perceptions of OC benefits seem to telephone survey methodologies was used to measure per-play a more significant role in decisions to favor nonprescripceptions, beliefs, and attitudes of a randomly selected sample tion pills than the perceptions of OC risks for those women of university women (N = 500) regarding the consequences of who preferred OTC pills. Currently, the support for nonpre-using OCs with and without a prescription. Of the women scription OCs among women is only moderate.

Keywords

Oral contraceptives birth control pills nonprescription OTC attitudes

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

The Alan Guttmacher Institute. Facts in brief. Available at: http://www.agi-usa.org/pubs/fb_contr_use.html. Accessed June 1,2005.

Trussell J , Stewart F , Potts M , Guest F , Ellertson C.

Should oral contraceptives be available without prescription?

Am J Pub Health. 1993;83:1094-1099.

Grimes D.

Over-the-counter oral contraceptives: an immodest proposal?

Am J Pub Health. 1993;83:1092-1094.

Potts M , Denny C. Safety implications of transferring the oral contraceptive from prescription-only to over-the-counter status. Drug Safety. 1995;13:333-337.

Hutchings J , Winkler JL , Fuller TS , et al. When the morning after is Sunday: pharmacist prescribing of emergency contraceptive pills. J Am Women’s Assoc. 1998;53:223-232.

Marciante KD , Gardner JS , Veenstra, DL , Sullivan SD . Modeling the cost and outcomes of pharmacist-prescribed emergency contraception. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:1443-1445.

Ellertson C , Trussell J , Stewart FH , et al. Should emergency contraceptive pills be available without prescription? J Am Women’s Assoc. 1998;53:226-230.

Blanchard K. Improving women’s access to emergency contraception: innovative information and service delivery strategies. J Am Women’s Assoc. 1998;53:223-241.

Harrison-Woolrych M , Duncan A , Howe J , Smith C. Improving access to emergency contraception: allowing pharmacy sales should help reduce unwanted pregnancies. BMJ. 2001;322:186-187.

10.

Trussell J , Stewart F , Guest F , Hatcher RA . Emergency contraceptive pills: a simple proposal to reduce unintended pregnancies. Fam Plann Perpect. 1992;24:269-273.

11.

Taylor H , Leitman R , Santana L. Survey of and barriers to pill use. In: Samuels SE , Smith MD , eds. The Pill: From Prescription to Over the Counter. Menlo Park, Calif: Kaiser Family Foundation; 1994:53-74.

12.

Gallup Poll: Women’S Attitudes Toward Oral Contraceptives and Other Forms of Birth Control. Princeton, NJ: The Gallup Organization, 1994.

13.

Nayak RA , Kimberlin CL , Brushwood DB , Hepler CD . Influence of attitudes and subjective norms on behavioral intention to acquire oral contraceptives over-the-counter. J Social Adm Pharm. 2001;18:185-192.

14.

Nayak RA , Brushwood DB , Kimberlin CL . Influence of outcome evaluations, beliefs, and subjective norms on intention to acquire oral contraceptives over-the-counter [conference paper]. J Amer Pharm Assoc. 2000;40(suppl):303-303.

15.

Agresti A , Finlay B. Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences. 2nd ed. San Francisco, Calif: Dellen Publishing; 1986.

16.

Dillman D. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons, 1978.

17.

Stevens J. Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc; 1992.

18.

California Senate Bill: SB 1169.

19.

Collaborative drug therapy agreement to promote public health. Program for Appropriate Technology in Health (PATH) Web site. Available at: http://www.path.org/files/ECT_agrment_pubhlth.pdf. Accessed June 1, 2004.

20.

Grimes DA , Raymond EG , Scott Jones B. Emergency contraception over-the-counter: the medical and legal imperatives. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:151-155.

21.

Grimes DA . Emergency contraception: expanding opportunities for primary prevention. N Eng J Med. 1997;337:1077-1079.

22.

Foubister V. OTC emergency contraceptives pushed, but not imminent. AMNews. March 5, 2002. Available at: http://www.amaassn.org/amednews/2001/03/05/prsc0305.htm. Accessed July 21, 2004.

23.

Shelton, DL . Wider availability urged for emergency contraceptives. AMNews. December 11, 2000. Available at: http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2000/12/11/hlsa1211.htm. Accessed July 21, 2004.

Should Oral Contraceptives Be Sold Without a Prescription? An Analysis of Women’s Risk and Benefit Perceptions Regarding Nonprescription Birth Control Pills

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References