Abstract
This paper argues that postmodernism represents a contemporary manifestation of a long-standing political despair among Western intellectuals. It shows commonality with various "power-conflict" perspectives of the past, as well as associated connections with well-known theses of "post-industrialism." The strength of postmodernism partly rests on its identification of several gaps in Marxist historical theory. In the end, however, the fundamental stance of postmodernism fails because of its dematerialization of symbols and their exchange. Postmodern social theory is thus understood as no more than a mode of Idealist philosophy, a status that renders it essentially useless as a basis for social change and that places it in the camp of political reaction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
