This essay engages two issues: (1) the possibility of a theory of dependence that accounts for resistance and accords resistance by social agents causal significance in historical processes; and (2) the importance of culture in the resistance to social change offered by social actors. I understand dependent development as an historical process that subaltern classes resist and shape in their resisting. The practical consequence of resistance is that it renders the historical process patently open-ended. Throughout, my effort is to understand how superstructural representations fit with production relations as they are organized, lived, and contested. I conclude that cultural representations must be interrogated as active arenas of class conflict and instruments of either exploitation and concession or resistance and liberation.
Anderson, Perry.1980. Arguments Within English Marxism. London: New Left Books.
3.
Aronowitz, S.1981. "A Metatheoretical Critique of Immanuel Wallerstein's The Modem World System." Theory and Society10:469-502.
4.
Aston, T.H., and C.H.E. Philpin, eds. 1985. The Brenner Debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Brenner, R.1976. "Agrarian Class Structure and Economic Development in Pre-Industrial Europe." Past and Present70:30-75.
6.
. 1977. "The Origins of Capitalist Development: A Critique of Neo-Smithian Marxism." New Left Review104:25-92.
7.
. 1982. "The Agrarian Roots of Capitalism." Past and Present97:16-113.
8.
Burawoy, Michael.1985. The Politics of Production: Factory Regimes under Capitalism and Socialism. London: Verso Press .
9.
Cardoso, F.H. and Faletto, E.1979. Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley. University of California Press .
10.
Cohen, GA1978. Karl Marx's Theory of History: A Defense. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
Davidson, A.1984. "Gramsci, The Peasantry, and Popular Culture." Journal of Peasant Studies11(4):139-154.
12.
Evans, P.1979. Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State and Local Capital in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
13.
Fariss, Nancy.1984. Maya Society Under Colonial Rule: The Collective Enterprise of Survival. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
Frank, Andre Gunder.1969. Latin America: Underdevelopment or Revolution . New York: Monthly Review Press .
15.
Geertz, C.1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
16.
Ginzberg, Carlo.1980. The Cheese and the Worms. Baltimore : John Hopkins University Press.
17.
Gismondi, M.1985. "The Gift of Theory. A Critique of the Histoire de Mentalite ." Social History10(2):211-230.
18.
Gross, D.1983. "Fetishism and Functionalism: The Political Economy of Capitalist Development in Latin America." Comparative Studies in Society and History25(4):694-702.
19.
Hill, Christopher.1972. The World Turned Upside Down: Radical Ideas During the English Revolution. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
20.
. 1975. Change and Continuity in Seventeenth Century England. London: Weidenfield and Nicolson.
21.
Hilton, Rodney, ed. 1978. The Transition from Feudalism to Capitalism. London: Verso.
22.
. 1984. "Feudalism in Europe: Problems for Historical Materialists ." New Left Review147:84-95.
23.
Hobsbawm, Eric.1971. "From Social History to the History of Society ." Daedalus100:21-45.
24.
. 1978. "Comment" Review1:162.
25.
Kaye, Harvey.1983. "History and Social Theory: Notes on the Contribution of British Marxist Historiography to our Understanding of Class." Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology20(2):167-192.
26.
. 1984. The British Marxist Historians. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
27.
Kimmel, Michael.1985. "Beyond Dependency: Development and Resistance in Latin America." Insurgent Sociologist12(4):67-80.
28.
Lazonick, William.1974. "Karl Marx and Enclosures in England." Review of Radical Political Economy6:1-59.
29.
Maiguashca, Juan.1982. "The Standpoint of the Indian: An Epistemological and Methodological Breakthrough." North/South: The Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies7:105-111.
30.
Medick, Hans.1987. "Missionaries in a Row Boat?: Ethnological Ways of Knowing as a Challenge to Social History." Comparative Studies in Society and History (Spring):76-98.
31.
Mills, C. Wright.1959. The Sociological Imagination. New York : Oxford University Press.
32.
Munck, Ronaldo.1984. Politics and Dependency in the Third World: The Case of Latin America. London: Zed Books .
33.
Nash, June.1979. We Eat The Mines and The Mines Eat Us. New York: Columbia University Press.
34.
Ortner, Sheri.1984. "Anthropological Theory Since the 1960s." Comparative Studies in Society and History26(1):126-166.
35.
Ranger, Terence.1986. "Resistance in Africa: From Nationalist Revolt to Agrarian Protest." In Gary Y. Okihiro (ed.), In Resistance: Studies in African, Caribbean, and Afro-American History . Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
36.
Taussig, M.1980. The Devil and Commodity Fetishism in South America . Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press .
37.
Thompson, E.P.1963. The Making of the English Working Class. New York: Vintage.
38.
. 1967. "Time, Work-Discipline and Industrial Capitalism." Past and Present38:56-97.
39.
. 1971. "The Moral Economy of the Crowd" Past and Present50:77-136. . 1975. Whigs and Hunters. New York: Pantheon Books.
40.
. 1978. The Poverty of Theory. New York: Monthly Review Press.
41.
________. 1978b. "Folklore, Anthropology, and Social History." Indian Historical Review3:247-266.
42.
. 1978c. "Eighteenth-century English Society. Class Struggle Without Class?" Social History3(2):133-163.
43.
Wachtel, Nathan.1977. The Vision of the Vanquished: The Spanish Conquest of Peru Through Indian Eyes. New York: Barnes & Nobel.
44.
Wallerstein, Immanuel.1979. The Modern World System. New York: Academic Press.
45.
Wolf, E.1983. Europe and the People Without History. Berkeley. University of California Press .
46.
Wood, E.1981. "The Separation of the Economic and the Political ." New Left Review127:66-95.
47.
. 1982. "The Politics of Theory and the Concept of Class: E.P. Thompson and his Critics." Studies in Political Economy9:45-75.
48.
. 1984. "Marxism and the Course of History." New Left Review147:95-108.
49.
_____. Forthcoming. "Falling Between the Cracks: E.P. Thompson and the Debate on Base/Superstructure ." In K. McClelland and J.H. Kaye, eds., E.P. Thompson: Critical Debates. Cambridge: Polity Press .
