Building on the writing acts approach, recent research on urban revolts, and the literature on political graffiti, the present manuscript aims to make sense of the role of graffiti during the 2019 outbreak in Santiago, Chile. Based on a collection of outbreak photographs, the graffiti in them, and a content analysis of the writing acts embedded in graffiti, we find the outbreak was an “autonomist politics” event. The outbreak, that is, was noticeably marked by the absence of a unifying and coherent ideology and by anti-hierarchical and anti-authoritarian impulses, features associated with autonomist politics. Our findings similarly suggest that outbreak graffiti animated boundary—and identity—making; promoted courses of action; communicated the social and political needs of protesters; and evinced the mobilization of protesters as emotional. Importantly, our analysis also suggests outbreak graffiti projects a prefiguring of a more democratic future for Chilean society.
AbramsB (2023) The Rise of the Masses: Spontaneous Mobilization and Contentious Politics. University of Chicago Press. DOI: 10.7208/Chicago/9780226826820.001.0001.
2.
AcostaAMartínezE (eds) (2009) El buen vivir: Una vía para el desarrollo. Abya-Yala.
3.
AlbertMHahnelR (1991) The Political Economy of Participatory Economics. Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv131bvr2.
4.
AndronS (2024) Urban Surfaces, Graffiti, and the Right to the City. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781003456070.
5.
ArceM (2008) The repoliticization of collective action after neoliberalism in Peru. Latin American Politics and Society50(3): 37–62. DOI: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2008.00021.
6.
AuyeroJ (2002) Los cambios en el repertorio de la protesta social en la Argentina. Desarrollo económico42(166): 187–210. DOI: 10.2307/3455940.
7.
BeissingerMR (2022) The Revolutionary City: Urbanization and the Global Transformation of Rebellion. Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv2175r9q.
8.
Campos MedinaL (2020) EVADE! Reflexiones en torno a la potencia de un escrito. Universum (Talca)35(1): 18–44. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-23762020000100018.
9.
CamposR (2015) Youth, graffiti, and the aestheticization of transgression. Social Analysis59(3): 17–40. DOI: 10.3167/sa.2015.590302.
10.
Casas-Cordero GonzalezR (2024). La dimensión ritual de la violencia durante el estallido social en valparaíso [Master thesis, Universidad de Chile].
11.
CaseBS (2022) Street Rebellion: Resistance Beyond Violence and Nonviolence. AK Press.
12.
ChaffeeLG (1989) Political graffiti and wall painting in greater Buenos Aires: an alternative communication system. Studies in Latin American Popular Culture8: 37–60.
13.
ChaffeeLG (1993) Political Protest and Street Art: Popular Tools for Democratization in Hispanic Countries. Greenwood Press. DOI: 10.5040/9788400698248.
14.
CorreaMM (2023) Contextual graffiti and collective action frames at the Chilean social outbreak in 2019. Linguistic Landscape9(4): 387–412. DOI: 10.1075/ll.22002.mir.
15.
DabèneO (2020) Street Art and Democracy in Latin America. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-26913-5.
16.
Dargent-BocanegraERousseauS (2021) Perú 2020: ¿El quiebre de la continuidad?Revista de ciencia política (Santiago)41(2): 377–400. DOI: 10.4067/s0718-090x2021005000112.
17.
DelbreilhF (2015) Writing acts and writing performativity. In: CislaruG (ed.) Writing(s) at the Crossroads: The Process-Product Interface. John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.203–227. DOI: 10.1075/z.194.11del.
18.
DentonREJr (1980) The rhetorical functions of slogans: classifications and characteristics. Communication Quarterly28(2): 10–18. DOI: 10.1080/01463378009369362.
19.
DuránMFG (2020) Estallido social y una nueva Constitución para Chile. Lom ediciones.
20.
DürmullerU (1988) Sociolinguistic aspects of mural sprayscripts (graffiti). Sociolinguistics17(1): 1–16.
21.
EarleL (2012) From insurgent to transgressive citizenship: housing, social movements, and the politics of rights in São Paolo. Mobilization: An International Quarterly2(2): 129–147. DOI: 10.1017/s0022216x11001118.
FalkR (2010) Anarchism without ‘anarchism’: searching for progressive politics in the early 21st century. Millennium39(2): 381–398. DOI: 10.1177/0305829810384305.
24.
FlemingJ (2020) Graffiti futures. Journal of Early Modern Studies9: 29–36.
25.
FoolenA (2015) Expressives. In: RiemerN (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Semantics. Routledge, pp.473–490. DOI: 10.4324/9781315685533.
26.
ForanJ (1993) Theories of revolution revisited: toward a fourth generation?Sociological Theory11(1): 1–20.
27.
ForanJ (2005) Taking Power: On the Origins of Third World Revolutions. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511488979.
28.
ForanJKlouzalLRiveraJP (1997) Who makes revolutions? Class, gender, and race in the Mexican, Cuban, and Nicaraguan revolutions. Research in Social Movements, Conflict, and Change20: 1–60.
29.
FraenkelB (2006) Actes écrits, actes oraux: la performativité à l’épreuve de l’écriture. Études de communication29: 69–93. DOI: 10.4000/edc.369.
30.
FraenkelB (2007) Actes d’écriture: Quand écrire c’est faire. Langage & Société 121–122: 101–112. DOI: 10.3917/ls.121.0101.
31.
FraenkelB (2010) Writing acts: when writing is doing. In: BartonDPapenU (eds) The Anthropology of Writing: Understanding Textually Mediated Worlds. Continuum, pp.33–43.
32.
FraenkelB (2017) Actos de escritura: Cuando escribir es hacer (trans. SalinasMA). Thémata. Revista de filosofía56: 319–329.
33.
FuentesCSajuriaJ (2023) El proceso fallido. Editorial Catalonia.
34.
GoodwinJSkocpolT (1989) Explaining revolutions in the contemporary Third World. Politics & Society17(4): 489–509.
35.
GrossJD (2023) Words of the Prophets: Graffiti as Political Protest in Greece, Italy, Poland, and the United States. Brill. DOI: 10.1163/9789004535206.
36.
HanauerDI (2011) The discursive construction of the separation wall at Abu Dis: graffiti as political discourse. Journal of Language and Politics10(3): 301–321. DOI: 10.1075/jlp.10.3.01han.
JohnstonHNoakesJA (2005) Frames of Protest: Social Movements and the Framing Perspective. Rowman & Littlefield.
39.
JoignantASommaNMGarretónM, et al. (2024) The singularity of the social uprising. In: JoignantASommaN (eds) Social Protest and Conflict in Radical Neoliberalism: Chile, 2008–2020. Springer Nature Switzerland, pp.33–48. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-58132-8_3.
40.
KlimovaS (2009) Speech act theory and protest discourse: normative claims in the communicative repertoire of three Russian movements. In: JohnstonH (ed.) Culture, Social Movements, and Protest. Ashgate Publishing, pp.105–133. DOI: 10.4324/9781315258676-14.
41.
LasernaROrtegoJ (2003) Reflexiones sobre violencia, conflicto, y diálogo social en Bolivia. Boletín8 (Cochabamba: Centro de Estudios de la Realidad Económica y Social).
42.
LennonJ (2014) Assembling a revolution: graffiti, Cairo and the Arab spring. Cultural Studies Review20(1): 237–275. DOI: 10.5130/csr.v20i1.3203.
43.
MarkoffJLazarHCaseBS, et al. (2024) The Anarchist Turn in Twenty-First Century Leftwing Activism. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781009495219.
44.
MárquezFGuiñezÁH (2021) La revuelta de los insurrectos contra el abuso y la desigualdad. Las protestas en Santiago de Chile en octubre de 2019. Antipoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología44: 197–213. DOI: 10.7440/antipoda44.2021.09.
45.
MárquezFColimilMJaraD, et al. (2020) Cuando las paredes hablan. Rastros del estallido social en el metro Baquedano, Santiago de Chile. Praxis Arqueológica1(1): 98–118. DOI: 10.11565/pa.v1i1.10.
46.
Martínez LópezM (2002) Okupaciones de viviendas y centros sociales: Autogestión, contracultura y conflictos urbanos. Virus.
47.
MartínezMCRodríguezJD (2023) Estallido social y Primera Línea: ¿Reconfiguraciones en la movilización social?Boletín OACEP9: 61–70.
48.
MiklavcicA (2008) Slogans and graffiti: postmemory among youth in the Italo–Slovenian borderland. American Ethnologist35(3): 440–453. DOI: 10.1111/j.1548-1425.2008.00045.x.
49.
Movimiento de Pobladores en Lucha (MPL) (2011) Siete y cuatro: El retorno de los pobladores. Editorial Quimant.
50.
NavarroFTrombenC (2019) ‘Estamos en guerra contra un enemigo poderoso, implacable’: los discursos de Sebastián Piñera y la revuelta popular en Chile. Literatura y lingüística, (40): 295–324. DOI: 10.29344/0717621x.40.2083.
51.
NepstadSE (2004) Convictions of the Soul: Religion, Culture, and Agency in the Central America Solidarity Movement. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/0195169239.001.0001.
52.
NicoareaG (2018) Counter-narratives of the new Egyptian street: contesting authority through graffiti. In: CastoroMVasilikouC (eds) Urban Artscapes: Essays on Political and Cultural Contexts. McFarland, pp.131–153.
53.
OliverAMSteinbergP (1993) Information and revolutionary ritual in Intifada graffiti. In: CohenAAWolfsfeldG (eds) Framing the Intifada: People and Media. Ablex Publishing Corporation, pp.1–26.
54.
PalestiniSMedelRM (2025) The ‘withdrawn citizen’: making sense of the failed constitutional process in Chile. Bulletin of Latin American Research. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1111/blar.70019.
55.
ParkinsonJ (2012) Democracy and Public Space: The Physical Sites of Democratic Performance. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199214563.001.0001.
56.
PennycookA (2009) Linguistic landscapes and the transgressive semiotics of graffiti. In: ShohamyEGorterD (eds) Linguistic Landscapes: Expanding the Scenery. Routledge, pp.302–312. DOI: 10.4324/9780203930960-29.
57.
PeteetJ (1996) The writing on the walls: the graffiti of the Intifada. Cultural Anthropology11(2): 139–159. DOI: 10.1525/can.1996.11.2.02a00010.
58.
PileS (2013) Introduction: opposition, political identities and spaces of resistance. In: PileSKeithM (eds) Geographies of Resistance. Routledge, pp.1–32. DOI: 10.4324/9781315824659-1.
59.
Puente-IzurietaF (2021) La protesta juvenil en las Jornadas de octubre-2019 en Ecuador: contexto, motivos y repertorios. Universitas-XXI, Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas (34): 215–234. DOI: 10.17163/uni.n34.2021.10.
60.
ReedJPPitcherS (2015) Religion and revolutionary we-ness: religious discourse, speech acts, and collective identity in prerevolutionary Nicaragua. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion54(3): 477–500. DOI: 10.1111/jssr.12213.
61.
Restrepo-SanínJ (2022) Colombia 2021: between crises and hope. Revista de Ciencia Política42(2): 255–280. DOI: 10.4067/s0718-090x2022005000118.
62.
Rivera-AguileraGImasMJiménez-DíazL (2021) Jóvenes, multitud y estallido social en Chile. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud19(2): 230–252. DOI: 10.11600/rlcsnj.19.2.4543.
63.
RodriguezAClairRP (1999) Graffiti as communication: exploring the discursive tensions of anonymous texts. Southern Journal of Communication65(1): 1–15. DOI: 10.1080/10417949909373152.
64.
RossiFM (2017) The Poor’s Struggle for Political Incorporation: The Piquetero Movement in Argentina. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1080/14742837.2019.1629283.
65.
RossiFMSommaNMDonosoS (2025) Defining and explaining modes of protesting: a comparative-historical analysis of Argentina and Chile. Studies in Comparative International Development (2025). DOI: 10.1007/s12116-025-09480-4.
66.
Rozas-BugueñoJ (2024) Between hope and disaffection: the Chilean constitution-making process and the intermediation crisis. Political Science & Politics57(2): 274–281. DOI: 10.1017/S1049096523001130.
67.
SánchezG (2024) ‘Chile woke up’ (and I can fall asleep no more): the fantasmatic organisation of the desire for change. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society29(3): 412–428. DOI: 10.1057/s41282-024-00462-4.
68.
SearleJR (2002) Consciousness and language. Cambridge University Press.
69.
SerafisDKitisEDArchakisA (2018) Graffiti slogans and the construction of collective identity: evidence from the anti-austerity protests in Greece. Text & Talk38(6): 775–797. DOI: 10.1515/text-2018-0023.
70.
SewellWHJr (2001) Space in contentious politics. In: AminzadeRRGoldstoneJAMcAdamD, et al. (eds) Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics. Cambridge University Press, pp.51–88. DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511815331.004.
71.
SilvaE (2009) Challenging Neoliberalism in Latin America. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511803222.
72.
SommaNMBargstedMDisi PavlicR, et al. (2021) No water in the oasis: the Chilean spring of 2019–2020. Social Movement Studies20(4): 495–502. DOI: 10.1080/14742837.2020.1727737.
73.
SouzaML (2023) Autonomist movements in Latin America. In: RossiFM (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Latin American Social Movements. Oxford University Press, pp.505–520. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190870362.013.26.
74.
StarrA (2006) ‘Excepting barricades erected to prevent us from peacefully assembling’: so-called ‘violence’ in the global north alterglobalization movement. Social Movement Studies5(1): 61–81. DOI: 10.1080/14742830600621233.
75.
SteinbergM (1999) The talk and back talk of collective action: a dialogic analysis of repertoires of discourse among nineteenth-century English cotton spinners. American Journal of Sociology105(3): 736–780. DOI: 10.1086/210359.
76.
SullivanA (2013) Multiple propositions, contextual variability, and the semantics/pragmatics interface. Synthese190(14): 2773–2800. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-012-0084-0.
77.
TapiaR (2025) When ideology trumps deliberation: evidence from Chile’s 2022 constitutional proposal. Political Science & Politics. DOI: 10.1017/S1049096525101601.
78.
ThompsonAK (2010) Black Bloc, White Riot: Anti-Globalization and the Genealogy of Dissent. AK Press.
79.
TillyC (1986) The Contentious French. Harvard University Press. DOI: 10.4159/Harvard.9780674433984.
80.
TillyC (2004) Social Movements, 1768–2004. Paradigm. DOI: 10.4324/9781315632063.
81.
TillyC (2008) Contentious Performances. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511804366.
82.
ÜnsayY (2021) The Voice of Walls: A Grounded Theory Study of the Gezi Movement’s Graffiti. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Freiburg].
83.
VandervekenD (1990) Meaning and Speech Acts, Vol. I: Principles of Language Use. Cambridge University Press.
84.
Van De VeldeC (2024) The power of slogans: using protest writings in social movement research. Social Movement Studies23(5): 569–588. DOI: 10.1080/14742837.2022.2084065.
85.
Van DijkTA (2023) Analyzing frame analysis: a critical review of framing studies in social movement research. Discourse Studies25(2): 153–178. DOI: 10.1177/14614456231155080.
86.
Van TreeckB (2003) Styles—Typografie als Mittel zur Identitätsbildung. In: AndroutsopoulosJ (ed.) HipHop: Globale Kultur—Lokale Praktiken. Transcript Verlag, pp.102–110. DOI: 10.1515/9783839401149-006.
87.
Vélez-MayaMMShafirIPCárdenasJF (2025) Estallido académico del levantamiento social en Chile (2019–2022): abordajes desde el campo de la memoria. Athenea Digital. Revista de pensamiento e investigación social25(1): e3703.
88.
VilchesF (2023) Desobediencia es habitar la revuelta (Grafiti, Santiago de Chile, noviembre 2019): Revisitando la rebelión de los artefactos en el Chile del siglo XXI. Inquiries into Art, History, and the Visual4(2): 273–293.
89.
VogelBArthurCLeppEO’DriscollD, et al. (2020) Reading socio-political and spatial dynamics through graffiti in conflict-affected societies. Third World Quarterly41(12): 2148–2168. DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2020.1810009.
90.
WaldnerLKDobratzBA (2013) Graffiti as a form of contentious political participation. Sociology Compass7(5): 377–389. DOI: 10.1111/soc4.12036.
91.
WalshC (2010) Development as Buen Vivir: institutional arrangements and (de)colonial entanglements. Development53(1): 15–21. DOI: 10.1057/dev.2009.93.
92.
WilliamsDM (2017) Black Flags and Social Movements: A Sociological Analysis of Movement Anarchism. Manchester University Press. DOI: 10.7228/Manchester/9781526105547.0001.
YatesL (2015) Rethinking prefiguration: alternatives, micropolitics and goals in social movements. Social Movement Studies14(1): 1–21. DOI: 10.1080/14742837.2013.870883.
95.
ZaimakisYOikonomakisL (2021) Walls of resistance in critical times: a reflection on political graffiti and visual protest in southern Europe and Latin America. In: Political Graffiti in Critical Times: The Aesthetics of Street Politics. Berghahn Books, pp.74–101. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv2tsxk6z.7.
96.
ZhangHChanBHS (2021) Protest graffiti, social movements and changing participation frameworks: the case of Macao. Journal of Language and Politics20(4): 515–538. DOI: 10.1075/jlp.20036.zha.
97.
ZúñigaCLouisWAsúnR, et al. (2021) The Chilean transition: achievements, shortcomings, and consequences for the current democracy. In: LópezWLTaylorLK (eds) Transitioning to Peace: Promoting Global Social Justice and Non-Violence. Springer International Publishing, pp.135–151. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-77688-6_8.
