Is socialism still relevant for sociology? Sociology and socialism are entwined logically and historically. But today, American sociology seems mostly silent about socialism. This essay argues that socialism should be placed back on the agenda of sociology. First, I argue that socialism is both a relevant social and political fact in the United States, and is superior to social justice as a framework for envisioning emancipatory alternatives. Second, I review the sociological literature on socialism since Erik Olin Wright’s 2012 real utopias address. I find that both mainstream and critical sociologists have neglected the study of contemporary socialist politics, both in the US and abroad, and that Wright’s real utopias project has had little resonance in mainstream sociology. Third, I make a proposal for a ‘sociology of socialism’ which emphasizes the comparative study of socialist organizations and movements. I conclude that contemporary socialism is not relevant for sociology but that it could be again, and that a disciplinary reengagement with socialism is both timely and urgent in the face of rising neo-fascism.
AckermanEF (2021) Origins of the Mass Party: Dispossession and the Party-Form in Mexico and Bolivia in Comparative Perspective. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
2.
AdlerPS (2019) The 99 Percent Economy: How Democratic Socialism Can Overcome the Crises of Capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
AgarwalS (2024) Bivalent hegemony: how Hindu nationalists appeal to caste-oppressed people in communist-ruled Kerala. Politics & Society52(3): 335–375. DOI: 10.1177/00323292231183801.
AltamuraCOliverB (2022) Who feels the Bern? An analysis of support for Bernie Sanders in the 2020 Democratic primary. American Politics Research50(5): 643–656. DOI: 10.1177/1532673X221112390.
7.
AmentaECarenNChiarelloE, et al. (2010) The political consequences of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology36(1): 287–307. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120029.
8.
AndersonKB (2025) The Late Marx’s Revolutionary Roads: Colonialism, Gender, and Indigenous Communism. New York: Verso.
AnriaSBentancurVPRodríguezRP, et al. (2022) Agents of representation: the organic connection between society and leftist parties in Bolivia and Uruguay. Politics & Society50(3): 384–412. DOI: 10.1177/00323292211042442.
11.
ArmstrongEABernsteinM (2008) Culture, power and institutions: a multi-institutional politics approach to social movements. Sociological Theory26(1): 74–99. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00319.x.
12.
BandauF (2023) What explains the electoral crisis of social democracy? A systematic review of the literature. Government and Opposition58(1): 183–205. DOI: 10.1017/gov.2022.10.
13.
BannisterR (2003) Sociology. In: RossDPorterTM (eds) The Cambridge History of Science: Volume 7: The Modern Social Sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp.329–353.
14.
BarnesCC (2020) Democratic socialists on social media: cohesion, fragmentation, and normative strategies. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique18(1): 32–47. DOI: 10.31269/triplec.v18i1.1136.
15.
BirchJ (2020) The rise of socialism in the United States: American ‘exceptionalism’ and the left after 2016. In: BrundeniusC (ed.) Reflections on Socialism in the Twenty-First Century. London, UK: Springer, pp.103–130.
16.
BlancE (2022) Revolutionary Social Democracy: Working-Class Politics Across the Russian Empire (1882–1917). Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.
17.
BlockFHockettR (eds) (2022) Democratizing Finance: Restructuring Credit to Transform Society. New York: Verso.
18.
BloomJMartinWEJr. (2016) Black Against Empire: The History and Politics of the Black Panther Party, With a New Preface. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
19.
BottomoreT (1984) Sociology and Socialism. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
20.
BrancoRMiróJNatiliM (2024) Back from the cold? Progressive politics and social policy paradigms in southern Europe after the great recession. Politics & Society52(4): 630–661. DOI: 10.1177/00323292241226806.
21.
BrayLAShriverTEAdamsAE (2019) Mobilizing grievances in an authoritarian setting: threat and emotion in the 1953 Plzeň Uprising. Sociological Perspectives62(1): 77–95. DOI: 10.1177/0731121418791771.
BurawoyM (2005) The critical turn to public sociology. Critical Sociology31(3): 313–326.
24.
BurawoyM (2021) Living sociology: on being in the world one studies. Annual Review of Sociology47: 17–40. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-072320-101856.
25.
CampbellCJohnsonJ (2018) Trends in the association between a college education and political tolerance, 1976–2016. Socius4: 1–3. DOI: 10.1177/2378023118805858.
26.
CarnevaliEYstehedeAP (2022) Is socialism back? A review of contemporary economic literature. Journal of Economic Surveys37(2): 239–270. DOI: 10.1111/joes.12488.
27.
ChibberV (2022) Confronting Capitalism: How the World Works and How to Change It. New York, NY: Verso.
de LeonCDesaiMTuğalC (eds) (2015) Building Blocs: How Parties Organize Society. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
30.
della PortaDFernandezJKoukiH, et al. (2017) Movement Parties Against Austerity. New York, NY: Wiley.
31.
DesaiM (2001) Party formation, political power, and the capacity for reform: comparing left parties in Kerala and West Bengal, India. Social Forces80(1): 37–60.
32.
DolgonC (2024) The Oxford Handbook of Sociology for Social Justice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
33.
DurkheimE (1985) Readings from Emile Durkheim. London, UK: Routledge.
34.
EidlinB (2016) Why is there no labor party in the United States? Political articulation and the Canadian comparison, 1932 to 1948. American Sociological Review81(3): 488–516. DOI: 10.1177/0003122416643758.
35.
EidlinB (2018) Labor and the Class Idea in the United States and Canada. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
EmirbayerMNobleM (2013) The peculiar convergence of Jeffrey Alexander and Erik Olin Wright. Theory and Society42(6): 617–645. DOI: 10.1007/s11186-013-9201-4.
38.
Esping-AndersenG (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
FeaginJR (2001) Social justice and sociology: agendas for the twenty-first century. American Sociological Review66(1): 1–20.
41.
FerrerasI (2023) Democratizing the corporation: the bicameral firm as real utopia. Politics & Society51(2): 188–224. DOI: 10.1177/00323292231168708.
42.
FisherD (2019) American Resistance: From the Women’s March to the Blue Wave. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
43.
FreelonDMarwickAKreissD (2020) False equivalencies: online activism from left to right. Science369(6508): 1197–1201. DOI: 10.1126/science.abb2428.
44.
GallinatA (2022) The anthropology of post-socialism: theoretical legacies and conceptual futures–an introduction. Critique of Anthropology42(2): 103–113. DOI: 10.1177/0308275X221095943.
45.
GastilJWrightEO (eds) (2019) Legislature by Lot: Transformative Designs for Deliberative Governance. New York: Verso.
46.
GautneyH (2018) Crashing the Party: From the Bernie Sanders Campaign to a Progressive Movement. New York: Verso.
47.
GerasN (2017 [1989]) The controversy about Marx and Justice. In: GerasN (ed.) Literature of Revolution: Essays on Marxism. New York, NY: Verso, pp.3–58.
48.
GethinAMartínez-ToledanoCPikettyT (2022) Brahmin left versus merchant right: changing political cleavages in 21 Western democracies, 1948–2020. The Quarterly Journal of Economics137(1): 1–48. DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjab036.
49.
GiddensADuneierMAppelbaumRP, et al. (2020) Introduction to Sociology. 12th ed.New York: Norton.
50.
HansenMNToftM (2021) Wealth accumulation and opportunity hoarding: class-origin wealth gaps over a quarter of a century in a Scandinavian country. American Sociological Review86(4): 603–638. DOI: 10.1177/00031224211020012.
HetlandG (2024) The art of the impossible: Utopia and instrumentalism in contemporary electoral politics. Theory and Society53(3): 513–546. DOI: 10.1007/s11186-024-09546-7.
HobsbawmE (2012) How to Change the World: Reflections on Marx and Marxism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
56.
IsmailF (2018) Polar opposites? NGOs, left parties and the fight for social change in Nepal. Critical Sociology42(4–5): 623–642. DOI: 10.1177/0896920517715765.
KeisterLABorelliEP (2012) Market transition: an assessment of the state of the field. Sociological Perspectives55(2): 267–294. DOI: 10.1525/sop.2012.55.2.267.
59.
KenworthyL (2019) Social Democratic Capitalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
60.
KenworthyL (2022) Would Democratic Socialism Be Better?Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
61.
KorpiW (1983) The Democratic Class Struggle. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
62.
LeiYW (2020) Revisiting China’s social volcano: attitudes toward inequality and political trust in China. Socius6: 1–21. DOI: 10.1177/2378023120915382.
63.
LipsetSMMarksG (2000) It Didn’t Happen Here: Why Socialism Failed in the United States. New York, NY: Norton.
LoweryG (2020) The rise of the Democratic Socialists of America: a qualitative analysis of the contributing factors to insurgent mobilization. Unpublished dissertation, University of Tennessee. Available at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/6079/
66.
LuxemburgR (2008 [1898]) Reform or revolution. In: LuxemburgR (ed.) The Essential Rosa Luxemburg. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books, pp.41–104.
ManzaJMcCarthyMA (2011) The neo-Marxist legacy in American sociology. Annual Review of Sociology37: 155–183. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150145.
69.
MartinJLJuddN (2020) Tasks for the political sociology of the next ten years. In: de LeonCMartinIWMisraJ, et al. (eds) The New Handbook of Political Sociology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp.243–266.
70.
McAdamD (2007) From relevance to irrelevance: the curious impact of the sixties on public sociology. In: CalhounC (ed.) Sociology in America: A History. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp.411–426.
71.
McCarthyMADesanMH (2023) The problem of class abstractionism. Sociological Theory41(1): 3–26. DOI: 10.1177/07352751231152489.
72.
MelcherCRLindsaySC (2024) What do American socialists really believe? Polarization, ideology, and the problem of socialist identifiers. Critical Sociology0(0). DOI: 10.1177/08969205241281752.
73.
MeyerDSTarrowS (eds) (2018) The Resistance: The Dawn of the Anti-Trump Opposition Movement. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
74.
MilibandR (1977) Marxism and Politics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
75.
MilkmanR (2017) A new political generation: millennials and the post-2008 wave of protest. American Sociological Review82(1): 1–31. DOI: 10.1177/0003122416681031.
76.
MisraJ (2025) Sociological solutions: Building communities of hope, justice, and joy. American Sociological Review90(1): 1–25. DOI: 10.1177/00031224241302828.
77.
MudgeSL (2018) Leftism Reinvented: Western Parties from Socialism to Neoliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
78.
MudgeSLChenAS (2014) Political parties and the sociological imagination: past, present, and future directions. Annual Review of Sociology40(1): 305–330.
79.
OnoHLeeKS (2013) Welfare states and the redistribution of happiness. Social Forces92(2): 789–814. DOI: 10.1093/sf/sot094.
80.
OsinskyPElorantaJ (2014) Why did the communists win or lose? A comparative analysis of the revolutionary civil wars in Russia, Finland, Spain, and China. Sociological Forum29(2): 318–341. DOI: 10.1111/socf.12086.
81.
ParetMLevensonZ (2025) Communists and black liberation movements: divergent trajectories in the United States and South Africa, 1939–1969. Social Forces103(4): 1374–1392. DOI: 10.1093/sf/soae171.
RileyD (2020) Real utopia or abstract empiricism? Comment on Burawoy and Wright. New Left Review121: 99–107.
88.
RileyD (2022) Microverses: Observations from a Shattered Present. New York, NY: Verso.
89.
RobinsonNJ (2022) Hostile territory: mobilizing resources and finding opportunities in the contemporary US democratic socialist movement. Unpublished dissertation, Harvard University. Available at: https://dash.lib.harvard.edu/handle/1/37372129
90.
RomeroM (2020) Sociology engaged in social justice. American Sociological Review85(1): 1–30. DOI: 10.1177/0003122419893677.
SchwadelPGarneauCRH (2017) The diffusion of tolerance: birth Cohort changes in the effects of education and income on political tolerance. Sociological Forum32(4): 748–769. DOI: 10.1111/socf.12374.
95.
ShusterSMCampos-CastilloCMadaniN, et al. (2024) Who supports Bernie? Analyzing identity and ideological variation on Twitter during the 2020 democratic primaries. PLoS ONE19(4): e0294735. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294735.
96.
SicaATurnerS (eds) (2005) The Disobedient Generation: Social Theorists in the Sixties. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
97.
SimpserASlaterDWittenbergJ (2018) Dead but not gone: contemporary legacies of communism, imperialism, and authoritarianism. Annual Review of Political Science21: 419–439. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-062615-020900.
TreimanDJWalderAG (2019) The impact of class labels on life chances in China. American Journal of Sociology124(4): 1125–1163. DOI: 10.1086/701715.
106.
TriplettJ (2022) Articulating the Pueblo Cubano: women’s politicization and productivity in revolutionary Cuba, 1959 to 1969. American Sociological Review81(1): 80–104. DOI: 10.1177/00031224211060836.
107.
TwengeJMCarterNTCampbellWK (2015) Time period, generational, and age differences in tolerance for controversial beliefs and lifestyles in the United States, 1972–2012. Social Forces94(1): 379–399. DOI: 10.1093/sf/sov050.
108.
UsmaniACleggA (2019) The economic origins of mass incarceration. Catalyst3(3): 9–53.
109.
UsmaniU (2018) Democracy and the class struggle. American Journal of Sociology124(3): 664–704. DOI: 10.1086/700235.
110.
van der LindenM (2023) Introduction to volume I. In: van der LindenM (ed.) The Cambridge History of Socialism. Vol. 1. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp.1–39.
111.
VinsonAH (2022) A ‘social science of solutions’ for healthcare. Contexts21(4): 8–13. DOI: 10.1177/15365042221131073.
112.
WaldAM (2017) The New York Intellectuals: The Rise and Decline of the Anti-Stalinist Left from the 1930s to the 1980s. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
113.
WalderAG (2015) China Under Mao: A Revolution Derailed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
114.
WalderAG (2019) Agents of Disorder Inside China’s Cultural Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
115.
WalderAGIsaacsonALuQ (2015) After state socialism: the political origins of transitional recessions. American Sociological Review80(2): 444–468. DOI: 10.1177/0003122414568649/
116.
WilliamsCL (2021) Life support: the problems of working for a living. American Sociological Review86(2): 191–200. DOI: 10.1177/0003122421997063.
117.
WilliamsR (2014) Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. 2nd ed.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
118.
WrightEO (2013) Transforming capitalism through real utopias. American Sociological Review78(1): 1–25. DOI: 10.1177/0003122412468882.
119.
WuX (2019) Inequality and social stratification in postsocialist China. Annual Review of Sociology45: 363–382. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-073018-022516.
120.
XuX (2013) Belonging before believing: group ethos and bloc recruitment in the making of Chinese communism. American Sociological Review78(5): 773–796. DOI: 10.1177/0003122413500784.
121.
ZhouXXieY (2019) Market transition, industrialization, and social mobility trends in postrevolution China. American Journal of Sociology124(6): 1810–1847. DOI: 10.1086/703346.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
