Was the populist moment of the 2010s also a redistributive moment, marked by popular support for equalizing incomes? To what extent did support for redistribution align with exclusionary values that scholars frequently associate with right-wing populism? Building on the neo-Gramscian theory of Stuart Hall, we use the World Values Survey to track post-2008 shifts in what we call ‘value articulations’: specific combinations of attitudes, in this case towards redistribution and the inclusion or exclusion of immigrants and racial or ethnic others. Support for redistribution increased across the globe after 2008. Exclusionary values remained relatively constant, but they increasingly combined with support for redistribution. Inclusionary and exclusionary redistributors shared a distrust of major institutions, but differed on the importance of democracy and cultural issues such as homosexuality and abortion. Our findings illuminate the contours of an unfolding struggle between inclusionary and exclusionary forces on the terrain of economic redistribution.
AfonsoARennwaldL (2018) Social class and the changing welfare state agenda of radical right parties in Europe. In: ManowPPalierBSchwanderH (eds) Welfare Democracies and Party Politics: Explaining Electoral Dynamics in Times of Changing Welfare Capitalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp.171–94.
2.
AlesinaAStantchevaSEdoardoT (2018) Intergenerational mobility and preferences for redistribution. American Economic Review108(2): 521–554.
3.
BacciniLSattlerT (2024) Austerity, economic vulnerability, and populism. American Journal of Political Science. Epub ahead of print 7 June 2023. DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12865.
4.
BenanavA (2019) Automation and the future of work—I. New Left Review119: 5–38.
5.
BonikowskiB (2017) Ethno-nationalist populism and the mobilization of collective resentment. The British Journal of Sociology68(S1): S181–S213.
6.
BorrielloAJägerA (2023) The Populist Moment: The Left After the Great Recession. London: Verso.
7.
BrownJ (2020) Neoliberalization, de-democratization, and populist responses in Western Europe, the US, and Latin America. Critical Sociology46(7–8), 1173–1187.
8.
BrownJ (2022) Deepening Democracy in Post-neoliberal Bolivia and Venezuela: Advances and Setbacks. New York: Routledge
9.
BrubakerR (2017) Why populism?Theory and Society46: 357–385.
10.
BurgoonBRuduijnM (2021) ‘Immigrantization’ of welfare politics? Anti-immigration and welfare attitudes in context. West European Politics44(2): 177–203.
11.
ByunY (2019) Government redistribution and public opinion: a matter of contention or consensus?International Journal of Sociology49(3): 204–221.
12.
CarejaRHarrisE (2022) Thirty years of welfare Chauvinism research: findings and challenges. Journal of European Social Policy32(2): 212–224.
13.
CherlinA (2019) In the shadow of sparrow’s point: racialized labor in the White and Black working classes. Working Paper, Russell Sage Foundation.
14.
ColantoneIStanigP (2019) The surge of economic nationalism in Western Europe. Journal of Economic Perspectives33(4): 128–151.
15.
DallingerU (2010) Public support for redistribution: what explains cross-national differences?Journal of European Social Policy20(4): 333–349.
16.
DavisM (2016) Election 2016. New Left Review103: 5–8.
17.
de LangeS (2007) A new winning formula? The programmatic appeal of the radical right. Party Politics13(4): 411–435.
18.
de LeonCDesaiMTugalC (2015) Building Blocs: How Parties Organize Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
19.
della PortaD (2015) Social Movements in Times of Austerity: Bringing Capitalism Back into Protest Analysis. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
20.
DunnJ (2019) The challenge of populism: why populist politics spreads in the world. Populism2(1): 53–67.
21.
EichengreenB (2018) The Populist Temptation: Economic Grievance and Political Reaction in the Modern Era. New York: Oxford.
22.
EvansP (2020) The rise of twenty-first century exclusionary regimes. International Sociology35(6): 581–589.
23.
FernandezJJJaime-CastilloAM (2017) The institutional foundation of social class differences in pro-redistribution attitudes: a cross-national analysis, 1985–2010. Social Forces96(3): 1009–1038.
24.
FetzerT (2019) Did austerity cause Brexit?American Economic Review109(11): 3849–3886.
25.
FraserN (2017) From progressive neoliberalism to Trump—and beyond. American Affairs1(4): 99–113.
26.
Garcia-SanchezEOsborneDWillisGB, et al. (2020) Attitudes towards redistribution and the interplay between perceptions and beliefs about inequality. British Journal of Social-Psychology59: 111–136.
27.
GidronNHallPA (2017) The politics of social status: economic and cultural roots of the populist right. The British Journal of Sociology68(S1): S57–S84.
28.
GramsciA (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York, NY: International Publishers.
29.
GramsciA (1988) Some aspects of the southern question. In: ForgacsD (ed.) The Antonio Gramsci Reader. New York: New York University Press, pp.171–185.
30.
HallS (1979) The great moving right show. Marxism Today, January. pp.14–20.
31.
HallS (1988) The Hard Road to Renewal: Thatcherism and the Crisis of the Left. London: Verso.
32.
HallS (2016) Cultural Studies 1983: A Theoretical History. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
33.
HallS (2021 [1983]) The problem of ideology: Marxism without guarantees. In: McLennanG (ed.) Selected Writings on Marxism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp.134–157.
34.
HarteveldE (2016) Winning the ‘losers’ but losing the ‘winners’? The electoral consequences of the radical right moving to the economic left. Electoral Studies44: 225–234.
35.
HarveyD (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
HoogheLMarksG (2018) Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy25(1): 109–135.
37.
HopkinJ (2020) Anti-System Politics: The Crisis of Market Liberalism in Rich Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
JansenRS (2011) Populist mobilization: a new theoretical approach to populism. Sociological Theory29(2): 75–96.
40.
JudisJB (2016) The Populist Explosion: How the Great Recession Transformed American and European Politics. New York: Columbia Global Reports.
41.
KulinJEgerMAHjermM (2016) Immigration or welfare: the progressive’s dilemma revisited. Socius2: 1–15.
42.
LaclauE (2005) On Populist Reason. London Verso.
43.
LaclauEMouffeC (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
44.
LamontMParkBYAyala-HurtadoE (2017) Trump’s electoral speeches and his appeal to the American white working class. British Journal of Sociology68(S1): S153–S180.
45.
LefkofridiZMichelE (2017) The electoral politics of solidarity: the welfare agendas of radical right parties. In: BantingKKymlickaW (eds) The Strains of Commitment: The Political Sources of Solidarity in Diverse Societies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp.233–267.
46.
LeonhardtD (2019) Republicans for redistribution. New York Times, June12.
47.
LevienMParetM (2012) A second double-movement?: Polanyi and shifting global opinions on neoliberalism. International Sociology27(6): 724–744.
48.
MijsJJB (2019) The paradox of inequality: income inequality and belief in meritocracy go hand in hand. Socio-Economic Review19(1): 7–35.
49.
MoffittB (2016) The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
50.
MorganSLLeeJ (2018) Trump voters and the White working class. Sociological Science5: 234–245.
51.
MouffeC (2018) For a Left Populism. London: Verso.
52.
MuddeC (2004) The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition39(4): 542–563.
53.
MuddeCKaltwasserCR (2018) Studying populism in comparative perspective: reflections on the contemporary and future research agenda. Comparative Political Studies51(13): 1667–1693.
54.
MüllerJ (2016) What is Populism?Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
55.
NorrisPInglehartR (2019) Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56.
OmiMWinantH (2014) Racial Formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s. 3rd ed.New York: Routledge.
57.
OserJHoogheM (2018) Give me your tired, your poor? Support for social citizenship rights in the United States and Europe. Sociological Perspectives61(1): 14–38.
58.
PikettyT (2014) Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
59.
PolanyiK (1944) The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
60.
PrzeworksiA (2018) Crises of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61.
Rhodes-PurdyMNavarreRUtychS (2023) The Age of Discontent: Populism, Extremism, and Conspiracy Theories Since in Contemporary Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62.
RileyD (2010) The Civic Foundations of Fascism in Europe: Italy, Spain, and Romania 1870–1945. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
63.
RileyD (2015) Coda: Hegemony and democracy in Gramsci’s prison notebooks. In: de LeonCDesaiMTugalC (eds) Building Blocs: How Parties Organize Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp.175–186.
64.
RileyDDesaiM (2007) The passive revolutionary route to the modern world: Italy and India in comparative perspective. Comparative Studies in Society and History49(4): 815–847.
65.
RobertsKM (2017) State of the field: party politics in hard times: comparative perspectives on the European and Latin American economic crises. European Journal of Political Research56(2): 218–233.
66.
RobertsKM (2019) Crises of representation and populist challenges to liberal democracy. Chinese Political Science Review4(2): 188–199.
67.
RodrikD (2018) Populism and the economics of globalization. Journal of International Business Policy1: 12–33.
68.
RodrikD (2021) Why does globalization fuel populism? Economics, culture, and the rise of right-wing populism. Annual Review of Economics13(1): 133–70.
69.
RooduijnMBurgoonBVan ElsasEJ, et al. (2017) Radical distinction: support for radical left and radical right parties in Europe. European Union Politics18(4): 536–59.
70.
Schmidt-CatranA (2016) Economic inequality and public demand for redistribution: combining cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence. Socio-Economic Review14(1): 119–140.
71.
SchmitterPC (2019) ‘Real-existing’ democracy and its discontents: sources, conditions, causes, symptoms, and prospects. Chinese Political Science Review4(2): 149–163.
72.
SteinJ (2017) The Bernie voters who defected to Trump, explained by a political scientist. Vox, August24, 2017.
73.
SwankDBetzH (2003) Globalization, the welfare state and right-wing populism in Western Europe. Socio-Economic Review1(2): 215–245.
74.
TrumpK (2023) Income inequality is unrelated to perceived inequality and support for redistribution. Social Science Quarterly104(2): 180–188.
75.
TugalC (2009) Passive Revolution: Absorbing the Islamic Challenge to Capitalism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
76.
Van HauwaertSMVan KesselS (2018) Beyond protest and discontent: a cross-national analysis of the effect of populist attitudes and issue positions on populist party support. European Journal of Political Research57: 68–92.
77.
WeylandK (2001) Clarifying a contested concept: populism in the study of Latin American politics. Comparative Politics34(1): 1–22.
