Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026-1
How the Islamic Republic Has Responded to Everyday Resistance Against the Mandatory Hijab: Making Sense of Five Pro-Hijab Contentions in Iran (1988–2022)
How do gender anxieties shape pro-state and/or state-led contentions (SLCs)? Taking cues from several theoretical and methodological traditions, I develop a gender-driven theory of SLCs. Drawing on anxieties on the hijab among revolutionary pro-state (aka pro-regime) actors, factions, and organizations in Iran from 1988 until 2022, I discuss how the Islamic Republic (IR) responded to everyday grassroots resistance against pro-mandatory hijab policies. The IR’s various contentions include pro-hijab rallies; violent actions by individuals with vague ties to the various bodies of the IR; strict policies; harsh rhetoric; and non-threatening, non-violent performances. Building on my own unique longitudinal newspaper data set, I demonstrate how these five types of SLC shaped the IR’s hijab ideology, albeit with occasional flexibilities. Highlighting SLCs is important because research on everyday resistance by ordinary civilians has overlooked various contentions by states, which yield consequential outcomes. Going beyond pro-state street rallies, I argue that the growing research on state-led mobilizations must take various gendered policies, rhetoric, performances, and individual acts of violence into consideration.
AmentaENealCChiarelloE, et al. (2010) The political consequences of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology36: 287–307.
6.
AndersonACammettM (2020) The dynamics of state-mobilized movements: insights from Egypt. In: EkiertGPerryEJXiaojunY (eds) Ruling by Other Means: State-mobilized Movements (RBOM). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.261–290.
BiroliFCaminottiM (2020) The conservative Backlash against gender in Latin America. Politics & Gender16: 1–38.
12.
BjarnegårdEZetterbergP (2016) Gender equality reforms on an uneven playing field: candidate selection and quota implementation in electoral authoritarian Tanzania. Government and Opposition51(3): 464–486.
13.
BonikowskiB (2017) Ethno-nationalist ethnonationalist populism and the mobilization of collective resentment. The British Journal of Sociology68(S1): S181–S213.
14.
BussDE (2004) Finding the homosexual in women’s rights. International Feminist Journal of Politics6(2): 257–284.
15.
Careaga-PérezG (2016) Moral panic and gender ideology in Latin America. Religion and Gender6(2): 251–255.
16.
CharradMM (2011) Gender in the Middle East: Islam, state, agency. Annual Review of Sociology37: 417–437.
17.
CliffordB (2012) The Global Right Wing and the Clash of World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
DavidANanesS (2011) The women’s quota in Jordan’s municipal councils: international and domestic dimensions. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy32: 275–304.
19.
DietzeGRothJ (2020) Right-wing populism and gender: a preliminary cartography of an emergent field of research. In: DietzeGRothJ (eds) Right-Wing Populism and Gender: European Perspectives and beyond (RWPG). New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 7–21.
20.
DukalskisAGerschewskiJ (2020) Adapting or freezing? Ideological reactions of communist regimes to a post-communist world. Government and Opposition55: 511–532.
FassihiAN (2020) Women’s rights as neo-orientalism: a netnographic analysis of ‘my stealthy freedom’ online movement. PhD Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
23.
FraserN (1989) Unruly Practice: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
24.
GolkarS (2015) Captive Society: The Basij Militia and Social Control in Iran. New York: Columbia University Press; Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
GraffAKapurRWaltersSD (2019) Introduction: gender and the rise of the global right. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society44(3): 541–560.
27.
HamidiNFarajiM (2008) Sabke-Zendegi va Pushesh-e Zanan dar Tehran. Faslname Tahghighat-e Farhangi1: 165–192.
28.
HandlinS (2020) Mirroring opposition threats: the logic of state mobilization in Bolivarian Venezuela. In: EkiertGPerryEJYanX (eds) Ruling by Other Means State-Mobilized Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.217–238.
29.
HarknessG (2019) Hijab micropractices: the strategic and situational use of clothing by Qatari women. Sociological Forum34(1): 71–90.
30.
HemmentJ (2015) Youth Politics in Putin’s Russia: Producing Patriots and Entrepreneurs. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
HtunM (2003) Sex and the State: Abortion, Divorce, and the Family Under Latin American Dictatorships and Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jomhuri-e Islami Newspaper (2007) Digitized archive was available at the Center for Research Libraries, Tehran, Iran, 28May.
36.
KalhorS (2017) Modiryat-e Hijab Dar Jomhuri-e Islami: Barresi-e Syasathay-e Jomhuri-e Islami Darbarey-e Hijab and the Bad-hijabi. Tehran, Iran: Arma Publication.
37.
Kayhan Newspaper (n.d.) Digitized archive was available at the Center for Research Libraries, Tehran, Iran, 7 January (No. 15833, 1997, p.14; 8 March 1999, No. 16464, p.14; 11 May 1999, No. 16504, p.2; 11 October 2001, No. 17208, p.15; 4 September 2005, No. 18036, p. 3; 10 March 2005, No. 18189, p.6; 8 September 2005, No. 18327, p.2; 7 March 2006. No. 18471, p.14). Available at: http://ddsnext.crl.edu/titles/30437#?c=1&m=0&s=0&cv=0
38.
KovátsE (2020) Post-socialist conditions and the Orbán Government’s gender politics between 2010 and 2019 in Hungary. In: DietzeGRothJ (eds) Right-Wing Populism and Gender: European Perspectives and Beyond (RWPG). New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 75–99.
39.
KovátsEPetőA (2017) Anti-gender discourse in Hungary: a discourse without a movement? In: KuharRPaternotteD (eds) Anti-Gender Campaign in Europe: Mobilizing against Equality (AGCE). London; New York: Rowman & Littlefield International, pp. 117–131.
40.
McDonnellDCabreraL (2018) The right-wing populism of India’s Bharatiya Janata Party (and why comparativists should care). Democratization26(3): 484–501.
41.
MachinDMayrA (2013) How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
42.
McVeighREstepK (2020) The Politics of Losing: Trump, the Klan, and the Mainstreaming of Resentment. New York: Columbia University Press.
MoaddelM (2020) The Clash of Values: Islamic Fundamentalism Versus Liberal Nationalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
45.
MoghadamVM (1993) Modernizing Women: Gender and Social Change in the Middle East. Boulder, CO; London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
46.
MoghadamVM (2020) Gender regimes in the Middle East and North Africa: the power of feminist movements. Social Politics27(3): 467–485.
47.
MoghadamVMHaghighatjooF (2016) Women and political leadership in an authoritarian context: a case study of the sixth parliament in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Politics & Gender12: 168–197.
48.
MorganKJOrloffAS (2017) Introduction: the many hands of the state. In: MorganKJOrloffAS (eds) The Many Hands of the State: Theorizing Political Authority and Social Control. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.1–32.
49.
MurrayJW (1998) The ideological gender apparatus and human (non)being. Women and Language21(1): 28–32.
50.
MyersDJCanigliaBS (2004) All the rioting that’s fit to print: selection effects in national newspaper coverage of civil disorders, 1968-1969. American Sociological Review69(4): 519–543.
51.
PalmerDANingR (2020) The resurrection of Lei Feng: rebuilding the Chinese party-state’s infrastructure of volunteer mobilization. In: PerryEEkiertGYanX (eds) Ruling by Other Means: State-Mobilized Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.314–345.
52.
Panjarih Weekly (2010) Physical copy was available at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Special report no. 47, 19 June, p.3. Tehran, Iran.
53.
PetőA (2015) ‘Anti-gender’ mobilisational discourse of conservative and far right parties as a challenge to progressive politics. In: KovátsEPõimM (eds) Gender as Symbolic Glue: The Position and Role of Conservative and Far Right Parties in the Anti-Gender Mobilizations in Europe. Budapest: Foundation for European Progressive Studies (FEPS), pp. 126–312.
54.
PourmokhtariN (2022) Presence-as-resistance: feminist activism and the politics of social contestation in Iran. Journal of International Women’s Studies24(7): 2.
55.
RadnitzS (2010) Weapons of the Wealthy: Predatory Regimes and Elite-Led Protests in Central Asia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
56.
Rafi’poorF (1997) Tose’ va Tazad: Kossheshi dar Jahat-e Tahlil-e Enghelab-e Islami and Masael-e Ejtemaeei-e Iran. Tehran, Iran: Shahid Beheshti University.
57.
RahbariLDierickxSCoeneG, et al. (2021) Transnational solidarity with which Muslim women? The case of the my Stealthy Freedom and world hijab day campaigns. Politics & Gender17: 112–135.
58.
Risalat Newspaper (1988) Microfilm reels were available at Princeton University, Tehran, Iran, 30 October (No. 813, p.1; 4 April 1989, No. 939, p.12; 15 April 1989, No. 946, p.2; 12 July 1994, No. 2458, p.4; 21 November 1994, No. 2569, p.4).
59.
RobertsonGB (2011) The Politics of Protest in Hybrid Regimes: Managing Dissent in Post-Communist Russia. New York: Cambridge University Press.
60.
SaeidiS (2022) Women and the Islamic Republic: How Gendered Citizenship Conditions the Iranian State. New York: Cambridge University Press.
61.
SauerB (2020) Authoritarian right-wing populism as masculinist identity politics: the role of affects. In: DietzeGRothJ (eds) Right-Wing Populism and Gender: European Perspectives and beyond (RWPG). New York: Columbia University Press, pp.23–40.
62.
ScottJC (1990) Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven, CT; London: Yale University Press.
63.
SeddighiGTafakoriS (2016) Transnational mediation of state gendered violence: the case of Iran. Feminist Media Studies16(5): 925–928.
64.
SedghiH (2007) Women and Politics in Iran: Veiling, Unveiling, and Reveiling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65.
ShahidianH (2002) Women in Iran: Emerging Voices in the Women’s Movement. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
66.
ShahrokniN (2020) Women in Place: The Politics of Gender Segregation in Iran. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
67.
SilitskiV (2010) ‘Survival of the fittest’: domestic and international dimensions of the authoritarian reaction in the former Soviet Union following the colored revolutions. Communist and Post-Communist Studies43(4): 339–350.
68.
SilvanK (2020) From Komsomol to the Republican Youth Union: building a pro-presidential mass youth organisation in post-soviet Belarus. Europe-Asia Studies72(8): 1305–1328.
69.
SmythRSobolevASobolevaI (2014) A well-organized play: symbolic politics and the effect of the pro-Putin rallies. Problems of Post-Communism60(2): 24–39.
70.
Sobh (1997) Physical copy was available at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Tehran, Iran, no. 67, March, p.44.
71.
SouleSAEarlJ (2005) A movement society evaluated: collective protest in the United States, 1960-1986. Mobilization: An International Quarterly10(3): 345–364.
72.
TajaliM (2022) Women’s substantive representation in the Islamic Republic of Iran: the potential of women critical actors. Politics & Gender19: 66–96.
73.
TarrowS (2021) Movements and Parties: Critical Connections in American Political Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
74.
TeimouriA (2022) The Mahdavi Society: the rise of millennialism in Iran as the cultural outcome of social movements. Middle East Critique31(2): 125–145.
75.
TeimouriA (2024) The long cultural backlash movement: pro-regime social justice mobilizations, discourses and policies in Iran (1995–2010). International Social Science Journal. Epub ahead of print 21June. DOI: 10.1111/issj.12518.
76.
TillyC (1986) The Contentious French. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
77.
TillyC (2006) Regimes and Repertoires. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
78.
TorabA (2007) Performing Islam: Gender and Ritual in Islam. Leiden: Brill.
79.
Tus Newspaper (1998) Physical copy was available at the University of Chicago, Tehran, Iran, no. 22, 19 August, p.4.
80.
VerlooMLombardoE (2007) Contested gender equality and policy variety in Europe: introducing a critical frame analysis approach. In: VerlooM (ed.) Multiple Meanings of Gender Equality: A Critical Frame Analysis of Gender Policies in Europe. Budapest: Central European University Press, pp. 21–49.
81.
WalbySTowersJ (2017) Measuring violence to end violence: mainstreaming gender. Journal of Gender-Based Violence1(1): 11–31.
82.
YabanciB (2021) Work for the nation, obey the state, praise the ummah: Turkey’s Government-oriented youth organizations in cultivating a new nation. Ethnopolitics20(4): 467–499.
83.
YuenS (2023) The institutional foundation of countermobilization: elites and pro-regime grassroots organizations in post-handover Hong Kong. Government and Opposition58: 316–337.
84.
Zan Newspaper (1998) Physical copy was available at the University of Chicago, Tehran, Iran, no. 0, 27 July, p.2.
