A vast amount of literature on social media has researched how content creators develop practices to present themselves and play the ‘visibility game’ (Cotter, 2019). Similarly, platformization of work has led to algorithmic control through the logic of ratings and visibility. This article studies how platforms shape the practices of workers who carry out services in domestic spaces. We conducted a qualitative content analysis of 36 profiles in cleaning, care, and accommodation platforms in Spain complemented by 10 in-depth interviews with workers. Similarly to what has been found for social media, we observed how workers manage their profiles following a presentation logic, including disclosing personal information and knowledge, achieving desired results in terms of metrics, and interpreting and surpassing the clients’ expectations. Thus, the work process is geared toward satisfying clients and platforms to access working opportunities, resulting in double the work and showing how visibility permeates and shapes a variety of sectors.
Álvarez-HernándezGPérez-ZapataO (2021) Plataformización y gestión ‘platafórmica’: una discusión de las condiciones de trabajo en una plataforma cualificada. Revista Española de Sociología30(3): 1–16.
2.
Báez LagunaÉ (2021) El retorno del derecho laboral. a propósito de la ‘Ley Rider’ y el caso GLOVO. Revista de Estudios Jurídicos y Criminológicos4: 235–259.
3.
Banet-WeiserS (2021) Gender, social media, and the labor of authenticity. American Quarterly73(1): 141–144.
4.
BellesiaFMattarelliEBertolottiF, et al. (2019) Platforms as entrepreneurial incubators? How online labor markets shape work identity. Journal of Managerial Psychology34(4): 246–268.
5.
BishopS (2018) Anxiety, panic and self-optimization: inequalities and the YouTube algorithm. Convergence24(1): 69–84.
6.
BishopS (2023) Influencer creep: how artists strategically navigate the platformisation of art worlds. New Media & Society. Epub ahead of print 24 October. DOI: 10.1177/14614448231206090.
7.
BodóB (2021) Mediated trust: a theoretical framework to address the trustworthiness of technological trust mediators. New Media & Society23(9): 2668–2690.
8.
BraunVClarkeV (2012) Thematic analysis. In: CooperHCamicPMLongDL, et al. (eds) APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, Vol. 2. Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological, and Biological. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp.57–71.
9.
BucherT (2012) Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook. New Media & Society14(7): 1164–1180.
10.
CasilliAPosadaJ (2019) The platformization of labor and society. In: GrahamMDuttonWH (eds) Society and the Internet: How Networks of Information and Communication Are Changing Our Lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.293–306.
11.
ChanNK (2019) The rating game: the discipline of Uber’s user-generated ratings. Surveillance & Society17(1/2): 183–190.
12.
ChanNK (2022) Algorithmic precarity and metric power: managing the affective measures and customers in the gig economy. Big Data & Society9(2): 1–13.
13.
ChengMFoleyC (2019) Algorithmic management: the case of Airbnb. International Journal of Hospitality Management83: 33–36.
14.
CostaE (2018) Affordances-in-practice: an ethnographic critique of social media logic and context collapse. New Media & Society20(10): 3641–3656.
15.
CotterK (2019) Playing the visibility game: how digital influencers and algorithms negotiate influence on Instagram. New Media & Society21(4): 895–913.
16.
Das AcevedoD (2017) Invisible bosses for invisible workers, or why the sharing economy is actually minimally disruptive. University of Chicago Legal Forum2017: 35–62.
17.
De KloetJPoellTGuohuaZ, et al. (2019) The platformization of Chinese society: infrastructure, governance, and practice. Chinese Journal of Communication12(3): 249–256.
18.
Díez PratFRanz MartínR (2020) Mi experiencia como repartidor de Deliveroo y el intento por articular nuestra lucha desde la estructura sindical de UGT. Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales17(2): 187–193.
19.
Digital Future Society (2021) Home care and digital platforms in Spain. Report, Digital Future Society, Barcelona, February.
20.
DuffyBEHundE (2019) Gendered visibility on social media: navigating Instagram’s authenticity bind. International Journal of Communication13: 4983–5002.
21.
DuffyBEPruchniewskaUScolereL (2017) Platform-specific self-branding: imagined affordances of the social media ecology. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on social media & society, Toronto, ON, Canada, 28–30 July, pp.5:1–5:9. New York: ACM.
22.
GilJSequeraJ (2018) Expansión de la ciudad turística y nuevas resistencias. El caso de Airbnb en Madrid. EMPIRIA. Revista de Metodología de las Ciencias Sociales41: 15–32.
23.
GillespieT (2010) The politics of platforms. New Media & Society12(3): 347–364.
24.
GillespieT (2014) The relevance of algorithms. In: GillespieTBoczkowskiPJFootKA (eds) Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp.167–194.
25.
GlotfelterA (2019) Algorithmic circulation: how content creators navigate the effects of algorithms on their work. Computers and Composition54: 102521.
26.
GriesbachKReichAElliott-NegriL, et al. (2019) Algorithmic control in platform food delivery work. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World5: 1–15.
27.
GruszkaKBöhmM (2022) Out of sight, out of mind? (In)visibility of/in platform-mediated work. New Media & Society24(8): 1852–1871.
28.
HelmondA (2015) The platformization of the web: making web data platform ready. Social Media + Society1(2): 1–11.
29.
International Labour Office (2021) Making decent work a reality for domestic workers: Progress and prospects ten years after the adoption of the domestic workers convention, 2011. No. 189. Geneva: International Labour Organisation (ILO).
30.
JabagiNCroteauAAudebrandL, et al. (2019) Gig-workers’ motivation: thinking beyond carrots and sticks. Journal of Managerial Psychology34(4): 192–213.
31.
KelloggKCValentineMAChristinA (2020) Algorithms at work: the new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals14(1): 366–410.
32.
KesslerS (2018) Gigged: The Gig Economy, the End of the Job and the Future of Work. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
33.
KlawitterEHargittaiE (2018) ‘It’s like learning a whole other language’: the role of algorithmic skills in the curation of creative goods. International Journal of Communication12: 3490–3510.
34.
KreinerGEAshforthBESlussDM (2006) Identity dynamics in occupational dirty work: integrating social identity and system justification perspectives. Organization Science17(5): 619–636.
35.
LenziO (2023) Plataformas digitales y empleo doméstico en España: ¿una oportunidad para el trabajo decente?Lex Social: Revista de Derechos Sociales13(2): 1–26.
36.
MaffieMD (2020) Are we ‘sharing’or ‘gig-ing’? A classification system for online platforms. Industrial Relations Journal51(6): 536–555.
37.
MarwickAE (2013) Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity, and Branding in the Social Media Age. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
38.
MerriamSBTisdellEJ (2015) Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
39.
Morandeira-ArcaJCarolloIMIzagirre-OlaizolaJ, et al. (2023) ¿Es Airbnb una comunidad entre iguales? La profesionalización de las plataformas de economía colaborativa en España. REVESCO: Revista de estudios cooperativos145: 92554.
40.
NewlandsGLutCFieselerC (2019) The conditioning function of rating mechanisms for consumers in the sharing economy. Internet Research29(5): 1090–1108.
41.
NieborgDBPoellTVan DijckJ (2022) Platforms and platformization. In: FlewTHoltJThomasJ (eds) The Sage handbook of the digital media economy. London: Sage, pp.29–49.
42.
Pérez GuerreroMLRodríguez-PiñeroRoyo M (2021) Social security for Spain’s platform workers: self-employed or employee status?International Social Security Review74(3–4): 177–194.
43.
PetreCDuffyBEHundE (2019) ‘Gaming the system’: platform paternalism and the politics of algorithmic visibility. Social Media+ Society5(4): 1–12.
44.
PoellTNieborgDBDuffyBE (2022) Platforms and Cultural Production. Cambridge: Polity Press.
45.
PoellTNieborgDBVan DijckJ (2019) Platformisation. Internet Policy Review8(4): 1–13.
46.
PooleyJ (2010) The consuming self: from flappers to Facebook. In: AronczykMPowersD (eds) Blowing Up the Brand: Critical Perspectives on Promotional Culture. New York: Peter Lang, pp.71–89.
47.
RavalNDourishP (2016) Standing out from the crowd: emotional labor, body labor, and temporal labor in ridesharing. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work, San Francisco, CA, 27 February–2 March.
48.
RavenelleAJ (2017) Sharing economy workers: selling, not sharing. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society10(2): 281–295.
49.
Rodríguez-ModroñoPAgenjo-CalderónALópez-IgualP (2022) Platform work in the domestic and home care sector: new mechanisms of invisibility and exploitation of women migrant workers. Gender & Development30(3): 619–635.
50.
Rodríguez-ModroñoPAgenjo-CalderónALópez-IgualP (2023) A feminist political economic analysis of platform capitalism in the care sector. Review of Radical Political Economics55(4): 629–638.
51.
RosenblatA (2018) Uberland: How Algorithms Are Rewriting the Rules of Work. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
52.
RosenblatAStarkL (2016) Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries: a case study of Uber’s drivers. International Journal of Communication10(2016): 3758–3784.
53.
SalisburyMPooleyJD (2017) The #nofilter self: the contest for authenticity among social networking sites, 2002–2016. Social Sciences6(1): 10.
54.
ShapiroA (2018) Between autonomy and control: strategies of arbitrage in the ‘on-demand’ economy. New Media & Society20(8): 2954–2971.
SutherlandWJarrahiMHDunnM, et al. (2020) Work precarity and gig literacies in online freelancing. Work, Employment and Society34(3): 457–475.
57.
TiconaJ (2022) Red flags, sob stories, and scams: the contested meaning of governance on carework labor platforms. New Media & Society24(7): 1548–1566.
58.
TiconaJMateescuA (2018) Trusted strangers: carework platforms’ cultural entrepreneurship in the on-demand economy. New Media & Society20(11): 4384–4404.
59.
Valenzuela-BustosAGálvez-MozoAAlcalde-GonzalezV (2023) Invisible room attendants: outsourcing as a dispositive of (in)visibility and the resistance of Las Kellys in Spain. Work, Employment and Society37(6): 1646–1663.
60.
Van DoornN (2017) Platform labor: on the gendered and racialized exploitation of low-income service work in the ‘on-demand’ economy. Information, Communication & Society20(6): 898–914.
61.
Van DoornN (2020) Stepping stone or dead end? The ambiguities of platform-mediated domestic work under conditions of austerity. Comparative landscapes of austerity and the Gig economy: New York and Berlin. In: BainesDCunninghamI (eds) Working in the Context of Austerity. Bristol: Bristol University Press, pp.49–70.
62.
WoodcockJ (2020) The algorithmic panopticon at Deliveroo: measurement, precarity, and the illusion of control. Ephemera20(3): 67–95.
