This article argues that U.S. education reforms for “failing” schools are strikingly similar to a domestic Structural Adjustment Program; and that comparing the two clarifies: how K–12 schools are neoliberalized and how neoliberalism’s key feature is the making of a larger yet less democratic state. The study contrasts with the scholarship claiming that reforms epitomized by the “No Child Left Behind Act” are neoliberal because they stem from interests in privatization for capital accumulation. The analysis focuses on a “failing” school navigating federal reforms in New York State, drawing on education policy, school documents, ethnography, and interviews. It shows how the neoliberal state took power from local school authorities, and largely did not shrink the state via privatization. This work illustrates how neoliberal reforms for “failing” schools are at least as much about power as they are about profits and demonstrates the large-scale continuity in neoliberal restructuring strategies and outcomes.
AnyonJ (2014) Radical Possibilities: Public Policy, Urban Education, and a New Social Movement. New York, NY: Routledge.
2.
AppleMW (2007) Ideological success, educational failure? On the politics of No Child Left Behind. Journal of Teacher Education58(2): 108–116.
3.
AuW (2009) Unequal by Design: High-Stakes Testing and the Standardization of Inequality. New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
BabbSLCarruthersBG (2008) Conditionality: forms, function, and history. Annual Review of Law and Social Science4: 13–29.
5.
BelloW (2001) Structural adjustment programmes. In: GoldsmithEManderJ (eds) The Case Against the Global Economy: And for a Turn Towards Localization. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis, 127–134.
6.
BrennerNTheodoreN (2002) Cities and the geographies of ‘actually existing neoliberalism.’ In: BrennerNTheodoreN (eds) Spaces of Neoliberalism: Urban Restructuring in North America and Western Europe. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2–32.
7.
BrownW (2019) In the Ruins of Neoliberalism: The Rise of Antidemocratic Politics in the West. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
8.
Center for Research and Education Outcomes, CREDO, at Stanford University (2017) Lights Off: Practice and Impact of Closing Low-Performing Schools, Volume I. Report. Available at: http://credo.stanford.edu [Accessed 30 December 2020].
9.
Darling-HammondL (2007) Race, inequality and educational accountability: the irony of ‘No Child Left Behind. Race Ethnicity and Education10(30): 245–260.
10.
DebrayEH (2005) A comprehensive high school and a shift in New York State policy: a study of early implementation. The High School Journal89(1): 18–45.
11.
DowneyDBvon HippelPTHughesM (2008) Are “Failing” schools really failing? Using seasonal comparison to evaluate school effectiveness. Sociology of Education81(3): 242–270.
12.
EwingEL (2018) Ghosts in the School Yard: Racism and School Closings on Chicago’s South SideChicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13.
FabricantMFineM (2013) Changing Politics of Education: Privatization and the Dispossessed Lives Left Behind. New York, NY: Paradigm Publishers.
14.
FerraraB (2004) A comprehensive state response to school violence: The New York safe schools against violence act. In: HanksJC (ed.) School Violence: From Discipline to Due Process. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association, 57–80.
15.
FineBSaad-FilhoA (2017) Thirteen things you need to know about neoliberalism. Critical Sociology43(4–5): 685–706.
16.
FrankenbergEOrfieldG (eds) (2012) The Resegregation of Suburban Schools: A Hidden Crisis in American Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
17.
GilmoreRW (2007) Golden Gulag: Prisons, Surplus, Crisis, and Opposition in Globalizing California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
18.
GirouxH (2004) The Terror of Neoliberalism: Cultural Politics and the Promise of Democracy. New York, NY: Routledge.
19.
GreerS (2014) Structural adjustment comes to Europe: lessons for the Eurozone from the conditionality debates. Global Social Policy14(1): 51–71.
20.
HarveyD (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
21.
HurshD (2007) Exacerbating inequality: the failed promise of the No Child Left Behind Act. Race Ethnicity and Education10(3): 295–308.
22.
HurshD (2020) The editor’s introduction: the end of neoliberalism. Policy Futures in Education18(1): 1–8.
23.
KentikelenisAEStubbsTHKingLP (2016) IMF conditionality and development policy space, 1985–2014. Review of International Political Economy23(4): 543–582.
KozolJ (2005) The Shame of the Nation: The Restoration of Apartheid Schooling in America. New York, NY: Crown Publishing.
26.
LarnerW (2000) Neo-liberalism: policy, ideology, governmentality. Studies in Political Economy63(1): 5–25.
27.
LipmanP (2011) The New Political Economy of Urban Education: Neoliberalism, Race, and the Right to the City. New York, NY: Routledge.
28.
MedinaJ (2014) Hardship makes a new home in the suburbs. New York Times, 9May.
29.
MichaelsE (2020) Beyond academic achievement outcomes: the impact of school on the immigrant political incorporation of undocumented Latinx youth. Youth & Society52(7): 1285–1311.
New York State Education Department (2015b) Student Assessments and Associated Growth Models for Teacher and Principal Evaluation, Form C. RFQ: Teacher and Principal Evaluation Service Provider – Assessments (App Period: 2015–16). Available at: http://usny.nysed.gov/rttt/teachers-leaders/assessments/docs/nwea-map-slo-assessment.pdf [Accessed 9 March 2018].
New York State Education Department (2015f) School Receivership Demonstrable Improvement Indicators. Accountability office Webinar, Ira Schwartz. 18September. Available at: http://www.p12.nysed.gov/accountability/de/SchoolReceivership.html [Accessed 1 December 2017].
New York State Education Department (2018) Race to the Top: Lists of Approved Student Assessments for Use by School Districts and BOCES in Teacher and Principal Evaluations under Education Law §3012-d. 7March. Available at: http://usny.nysed.gov/rttt/teachers-leaders/assessments/approved-list-3012-d.html [Accessed 8 March 2018].
43.
New York State Senate (2015) Amendment of Section 211-f of the education law, as added by section 1 2 of subpart H of part EE of chapter 56 of the laws of 2015. Takeover and restructuring [failing] OF STRUGGLING schools. 17April. Available at: http://legislation.nysenate.gov/pdf/bills/2015/A7013 [Accessed 3 November 2017].
NogueraP (2013) The achievement gap and the schools we need: creating the conditions where race and class no longer predict student achievement. In: KatzMBRoseM (eds) Public Education Under Siege. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 180–193.
46.
NogueraPA (2016) There’s a way to Help Inner-City Schools. Obama’s New Education Law Isn’t It. Kristina Rizga Interview with Pedro Noguera. Mother Jones, 8January.
47.
NogueraPASyeedE (2020) City Schools and the American Dream 2: The Enduring Promise of Public Education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
48.
OrfieldM (2002) American Metropolitics: The New Suburban Reality. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
49.
OwensACandipanJ (2019) Social and spatial inequalities of educational opportunity: a portrait of schools serving high- and low-income neighbourhoods in US metropolitan areas. Urban Studies56(15): 3178–3197.
50.
OwensASundermanGL (2006) School Accountability Under NCLB: Aid or Obstacle for Measuring Racial Equity?Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
51.
PicowerBMayorgaE (eds) (2015) What’s Race Got to Do with It? How Current School Reform Policy Maintains Racial and Economic Inequality. New York: NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
52.
RavitchD (2016) The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice are Undermining Education. New York, NY: Basic Books.
53.
ReardonSFKalogridesDShoresK (2019) The geography of racial/ethnic test score gaps. American Journal of Sociology124(4): 1164–1221.
United States Department of Education (2010) U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Service, State and Local Implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act, Volume IX-Accountability Under NCLB: Final Report, Washington, DC. January. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED508912.pdf [Accessed 23 September 2020].
WacquantL (2009) The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
60.
WacquantL (2010) Crafting the neoliberal state: workfare, prisonfare, and social insecuritySociological Forum25(2): 197–220.
61.
WeisT (2004) Restructuring and redundancy: the impacts and illogic of neoliberal agricultural reforms in Jamaica.Journal of Agrarian Change4(4): 461–491.
62.
WelnerKGCarterPL (2013) Achievement gaps arise from opportunity gaps. In: CarterPLWelnerKG (eds) Closing the Opportunity Gap: What American Must Do to Give Every Child an Even Chance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–10.
