The aim of neoliberal environmentalism was to unleash the market to protect the environment; but as it turns out, things are getting worse on our way to catastrophe. Despite persistent failures, neoliberal environmentalism remains prevalent—and apparently without alternative. This paper directs focus on an often-overlooked dimension of this apparent stasis: the nexus of self and society in advanced capitalism, as shown in the linkage between neoliberal environmentalism and the autonomous ecoconsumer. Marcuse’s concept of repressive desublimation is engaged to better understand how environmentalist desire is currently being thwarted in ways that inhibit movement toward socioecological emancipation. The paper provides an illustrative example of desublimated environmentalist desire in the current recycling crisis.
AdornoTW (1973) Negative Dialectics. New York, NY: Continuum.
2.
AllenA (2015) Are we driven? Critical theory and psychoanalysis reconsidered. Critical Horizons16(4): 311–328.
3.
AndersonTLLealDR (2001) Free Market Environmentalism. New York, NY: Palgrave.
4.
ArzuagaF (2018) Socially necessary superfluity: Adorno and Marx on the crises of labor and the individual. Philosophy and Social Criticism45(7): 819–843.
BakkerK (2007) The “Commons” versus the “Commodity”: alter-globalization, anti-privatization and the human right to water in the global south. Antipode39(3): 430–455.
7.
BederS (2001) Research note-neoliberal think tanks and free market environmentalism. Environmental Politics10(2): 128–133.
8.
BernsteinS (2001) The Compromise of Liberal Environmentalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
9.
BlauJ (2017) The Paris Agreement: Climate Change, Solidarity, and Human Rights. New York: Palgrave.
10.
BoltanskiLChiapelloE (2005) The New Spirit of Capitalism. Brooklyn, NY: Verso.
11.
BourzacK (2018) Dire warnings sounded about climate change: scientists cautioned that the world must cut carbon emissions soon to avoid calamity. Chemical & Engineering News96(49): 35–35.
12.
BrownW (2005) Edgework: Critical Essays on Knowledge and Politics. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
13.
BrownW (2015) Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. London: MIT Press.
14.
BrownW (2019) In the Ruins of Neoliberalism: The Rise of Antidemocratic Politics in the West. New York: Columbia University Press.
15.
BrulleRJ (2000) Agency, Democracy, and Nature: The U.S. Environmental Movement from a Critical Theory Perspective. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
16.
CastreeN (2010) Neoliberalism and the biophysical environment: a synthesis and evaluation of the research. Environment and Planning: Advances in Research1(1): 5–45.
17.
CavallettoG (2007) Crossing the Psycho-Social Divide: Freud, Weber, Adorno and Elias. New York: Routledge.
18.
CipletDRobertsJT (2017) Climate change and the transition to neoliberal environmental governance. Global Environmental Change46(1): 148–156.
19.
ClementMT (2010) ‘Let them build sea walls’: ecological crisis, economic crisis and the political economic opportunity structure. Critical Sociology37(4): 447–463.
20.
ColeDH (2002) Pollution and Property: Comparing Ownership Institutions for Environmental Protection. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
21.
CoplandS (2019) Anti-politics and global climate inaction: the case of the Australian carbon tax. Critical Sociology46(4–5): 623–641.
22.
CorsonC (2010) Shifting environmental governance in a neoliberal world: US AID for conservation. Antipode42(3): 576–602.
DunlapASullivanS (2020) A faultline in neoliberal environmental governance scholarship? Or, why accumulation-by-alienation matters. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space3(2): 552–579.
25.
EhrenbergA (2015) The Weariness of the Self: Diagnosing the History of Depression in the Contemporary Age. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
26.
FeenbergA (1996) The commoner-Ehrlich debate: environmentalism and the politics of survival. In MacauleyD (ed.), Minding Nature: The Philosophers of Ecology. New York: The Guilford Press, 257–282.
27.
FlynnAHackingN (2019) Setting standards for a circular economy: a challenge too far for neoliberal environmental governance?Journal of Cleaner Production212(1): 1256–1267.
28.
FreudS (1961 [1930]) Civilization and Its Discontents. New York: W.W. Norton.
29.
FreyRS (2015) Breaking ships in the world-system: an analysis of two ship breaking capitals, Alang India and Chittagong, Bangladesh. Journal of World-Systems Research21(1): 25–49.
30.
GandeshaS (2018) “Identifying with the aggressor”: from the authoritarian to neoliberal personality. Constellations25(1): 147–164.
HarveyD (2007) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33.
HobsbawmEJ (1994) The Age of Extremes: A History of the World, 1914–1991. New York: Pantheon Books.
34.
HonnethA (2007) “The work of negativity: a psychoanalytical revision of the theory of recognition,” In: DerantyJP (ed.), Recognition, Work and Politics: New Directions in French Critical Theory. Leiden: Brill.
35.
HorneRE (2009) Limits to labels: the role of eco-labels in the assessment of product sustainability and routes to sustainable consumption. International Journal of Consumer Studies33(2): 175–182.
36.
JohnsonB (2014) Carbon Nation: Fossil Fuels in the Making of American Culture. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
37.
JohnstonSF (2018) Alvin Weinberg and the promotion of the technological fix. Technology and Culture59(3): 620–651.
38.
LangmanL (1992) Neon cages: shopping for subjectivity. In: SchieldsR (ed.), Lifestyle Shopping: The Subject of Consumption. London: Routledge, 40–82.
39.
LangmanL (2003) From subject to citizen to consumer: embodiment and the mediation of hegemony. In: BrownRH (ed.), The Politics of Selfhood: Bodies and Identities in Global Capitalism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 167–188.
40.
LangmanL (2009) The dialect of enlightened selfhood. In: DahmsHF (ed.), Current Perspectives in Social Theory, Vol 26, Nature, Knowledge and Negation. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 261–281.
41.
LangmanL (2015) Why is assent willing? Culture, character and consciousness. Critical Sociology41(3): 463–481.
42.
LaveR (2012) Neoliberalism and the production of environmental knowledge. Environment & Society: Advances in Research3(1): 19–38.
43.
LewisTL (2018) Globalizing the treadmill of production: a solutions-oriented application to Ecuador. Environmental Sociology5(3): 219–231.
44.
LiX (2013) A comparative analysis of hybrid care advertisements in the USA and China: desire, globalization, and environment. Environmental Communication7(4): 512–528.
45.
MacBrideS (2011) Recycling Reconsidered: The Present Failure and Future Promise of Environmental Action in the United States. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
46.
MarcuseH (1955) Eros and Civilization: A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud. Boston: Beacon Press.
47.
MarcuseH (1964) One Dimensional Man. Boston: Beacon Press.
48.
MarxK (1973 [1857/1958]) Grundrisse. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
49.
McDonaldMGoughBWearingS, et al. (2017) Social psychology, consumer culture and neoliberal political economy. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior47(3): 363–379.
50.
McGuiganJ (2014) The neoliberal self. Culture Unbound6(1): 223–240.
51.
MeadowsDHMeadowsDlRandersJ, et al. (1972) The Limits to Growth; A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books.
52.
MelathopolousAPStonerAM (2015) Critique and transformation: on the hypothetical nature of ecosystem service value and its neo-Marxist, liberal and pragmatist criticisms. Ecological Economics117(1): 173–181.
53.
OkerekeC (2007) Global Justice and Neoliberal Environmental Governance. New York, NY: Routledge.
54.
OpieJ (1998) Nature’s Nation: An Environmental History of the United States. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
55.
PellowD (2000) Environmental inequality formation: toward a theory of environmental injustice. American Behavioral Scientist43(4): 581–601.
56.
PlehweD (2015) The politics of policy think-tanks: organizing expertise, legitimacy and counter-expertise in policy networks. In: FischerF (ed.), Handbook of Critical Policy Studies. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 358–379.
57.
PostoneM (1978) Necessity, labor, and time: a reinterpretation of the marxian critique of capitalism. Social Science Research45(4): 739–799.
58.
PostoneM (1993) Time, Labor, and Social Domination: A Reinterpretation of Marx’s Critical Theory. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
59.
PrietoMBauerC (2012) Hydroelectric power generation in Chile: an institutional critique of the neutrality of market mechanisms. Water International37(2): 131–146.
60.
SchnaibergA (1980) The Environment, from Surplus to Scarcity. New York: Oxford University Press.
61.
SchnaibergA (1997) Paradoxes and contradictions: a contextual framework for “How I Learned to Suspect Recycling”. Humanity and Society21(3): 223–239.
62.
SchnaibergAGouldK (2000) Environment and society: the enduring conflict. West Cladwell, NJ: Blackburn Press.
SmithT (1995) The case against free market environmentalism. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics8(2): 126–144.
65.
SteffenWGrinevaldJCrutzenP, et al. (2020) The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A369(1938): 842–867.
66.
StonerAM (2014) Sociobiophysicality and the necessity of critical theory: moving beyond prevailing conceptions of environmental sociology in the USA. Critical Sociology40(4): 621–642.
67.
StonerAM (2020) Critical Reflections on America’s green new deal: capital, labor, and the dynamics of contemporary social change. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism. Available at: doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2020.1775860 [Accessed 15 September 2020].
68.
StonerAMMelathopolousAP (2015) Freedom in the Anthropocene: Twentieth-Century Helplessness in the Face of Climate Change. New York: Palgrave.
69.
StonerAMMelathopolousAP (2016) If climate ‘changes everything’, why does so much remain the same. Logos15(1). Available at: http://logosjournal.com/2016/stoner [Accessed 15 September 2020].
70.
SzazA (2007) Shopping Our Way to Safety: How We Changed from Protecting the Environment to Protecting Ourselves. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
71.
TestaFIraldoFVaccariA, et al. (2015) Why eco-labels can be effective marketing tools: evidence from a study on Italian consumers. Business Statefy and the Environment24(4): 252–265.
72.
ThompsonMJ (2016) The Domestication of Critical Theory. London: Roman and Littlefield.
73.
ToppeJBrandaliseLTRojoCA, et al. (2014) Evolution of Critical Success Factors in the Eco-Friendly Market. Anais do II SINGEP e I S2IS. Available at: http://repositorio.uninove.br/xmlui/handle/123456789/418 [Accessed 30 June 2020].
