Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The use of on-line education (OLE) to deliver higher education using learning management systems (LMS) has received growing critical attention for its reliance on precarious faculty, high dropout and failure rates, and as a form of privatization. While these critiques are well grounded, they overlook the role of OLE as a strategy for rationalizing teaching and deskilling academic labor in order to produce more self-disciplined precarious “platform” workers who can labor remotely under the control of algorithmic management. To recompose the power of academic workers, new tactics, strategies, and objectives based on an analysis of the new technical composition of capital in higher education are needed.

Keywords

academic labor algorithmic management edtech learning management systems on-line education rationalization of labor unbundling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alimahomed-Wilson

Ness

(eds) (2018) Choke Points: Logistics Workers Disrupting the Global Supply Chain. London: Pluto Press.

Bailey

(2020) Disaster capitalism, online instruction, and what COVID-19 is teaching us about public schools and teachers. Nancy Bailey’s Education Website. Available at: https://nancyebailey.com/2020/03/16/disaster-capitalism-online-instruction-and-what-covid-19-is-teaching-us-about-public-schools-and-teachers/ (accessed 8 July 2020).

Bay View Analytics (2020) The great (forced) shift to remote learning: a survey of instructors and campus leaders. Available at: http://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/2020_IHE_BayViewAnalytics_webcast.pdf

BCG (2020a) A Blueprint for Digital Education. Boston Consulting Group. Available at: https://www.bcg.com/en-us/industries/public-sector/successfully-transitioning-digital-education.aspx (accessed 8 July 2020).

BCG (2020b) Education Experts: Nithya Vaduganathan. Boston Consulting Group. Available at: https://www.bcg.com/en-us/about/people/experts/Vaduganathan-Nithya.aspx (accessed 8 July 2020).

BCG and ASU (2018) Making Digital Learning Work: Successful Strategies From Six Leading Universities and Community Colleges. Report, Boston Consulting Group and Arizona State University. Available at: https://edplus.asu.edu/sites/default/files/BCG-Making-Digital-Learning-Work-Apr-2018%20.pdf (accessed 8 July 2020).

Berg

(2019) Academic knowledge production, neoliberalization and the falling rate of use values in the academy. Fennia: International Journal of Geography 197(2): 177–182.

Berg

Huijbens

Larsen

(2016) Producing anxiety in the neoliberal university. Canadian Geographer/LeGéographe canadien xx(xx): 1–13.

Bonacich

(2003) Pulling the plug: labor and the global supply chain. New Labor Forum, Summer 12(2): 41–48.

10.

Braverman

(1974) Labor and Monopoly Capital. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.

11.

Business Insider (2019) HolonIQ Press release. Global Education Technology Market to Reach $341B by 2025, January 24. Available at: https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/global-education-technology-market-to-reach-341b-by-2025-1027892295# (accessed 8 July 2020).

12.

Carey

(2016) The End of College: Creating the Future of Learning and the University of Everywhere. New York, NY: Riverhead Books.

13.

Cash

Boyce

(2017) Cutting class: on schoolwork, entropy, and everyday resistance in higher education. In: Nocella

Juergensmeyer

(eds) Fighting Academic Repression and Neoliberal Education: Resistance, Reclaiming, Organizing, and Black Lives Matter in Education. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

14.

Christensen

Horn

Caldera

, et al. (2011, February) Disrupting College: How Disruptive Innovation can Deliver Quality and Affordability to Postsecondary Education. Center for American Progress and Innosight Institute.

15.

Cleaver

(2019) 33 Lessons on Capital: Reading Marx Politically. London: Pluto Press.

16.

Conlin

Herbst

Coy

(2010) The disposable worker. Bloomberg Businessweek. Available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2010-01-07/the-disposable-worker (accessed 8 July 2020).

17.

Craig

(2015) College Disrupted: The Great Unbundling of Higher Education. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.

18.

Czerniewicz

(2018) Unbundling and rebundling higher education in an age of inequality. Educause Review, October 29. Available at: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2018/10/unbundling-and-rebundling-higher-education-in-an-age-of-inequality (accessed 8 July 2020).

19.

De Angelis

Harvie

(2009) “Cognitive capitalism” and the rat-race: how capital measures immaterial labour in British universities. Historical Materialism 17: 3–30.

20.

Delaney

(2019) Digital transformation empowers student learning in higher education. EdTech, 25 February. Available at: https://edtechmagazine.com/higher/article/2019/02/digital-transformation-empowers-student-learning-higher-education (accessed 8 July 2020).

21.

Empire Logistics (2016) Supply Chain Research’s blog. Available at: https://libcom.org/blog/empire-logistics (accessed 8 July 2020).

22.

Ernst & Young (2012) Report, University of the Future: A Thousand Year Old Industry on the Cusp of Profound Change. Ernst & Young.

23.

Foucault

(1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of a Prison. New York, NY: Vintage.

24.

Gehrke

Kezar

(2015) Unbundling the faculty role in higher education: utilizing historical, theoretical, and empirical frameworks to inform future research. In: Paulsen

(ed.) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. New York, NY: Springer, 93–150.

25.

GradeInflation.com (2016) Grade Inflation at American Colleges and Universities. Available at: http://www.gradeinflation.com/ (accessed 8 July 2020).

26.

Grant

(1976) Student as worker: wages for homework. The Chevron 5 March, 14–15.

27.

Hall

(2018) The Uberficaton of the University. Incite Items for Educational Iconoclasm Item 02, June. Available at: https://inciteseminars.com/tag/education/page/2/ (accessed 8 July 2020).

28.

Harvie

(1999) Alienation, class and enclosure in UK universities. Capital & Class 24(2): 103–132. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242318502_Alienation_Class_and_Enclosure_in_UK_Universities (accessed 8 July 2020).

29.

Harvie

(2006) Value production and struggle in the classroom: teachers within, against and beyond capital. Capital & Class 88(1): 1–32. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/27247410_Value_production_and_struggle_in_the_classroom_Teachers_within_against_and_beyond_capital (accessed 8 July 2020).

30.

Haw

(2019) Will AI replace university lecturers? Not if we make it clear why humans matter. The Guardian, 6 September. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2019/sep/06/will-ai-replace-university-lecturers-not-if-we-make-it-clear-why-humans-matter (accessed 8 July 2020).

31.

Hill

(2019) Instructure: plans to expand beyond Canvas LMS into machine learning and AI. eLiterate. Available at: https://eliterate.us/instructure-plans-to-expand-beyond-canvas-lms-into-machine-learning-and-ai/ (accessed 8 July 2020).

32.

Hogan

Williamson

(2020) Commercialisation and privatisation in/of education in the context of Covid-19. Education International. Available at: https://issuu.com/educationinternational/docs/2020_eiresearch_gr_commercialisation_privatisation?fr=sZDJkYjE1ODA2MTQ (accessed 19 July 2020).

33.

Holon

(2020) The online degree market is one of the fastest-growing segments of global higher education, which we forecast will reach $74B in 2025. Available at: https://www.holoniq.com/notes/74b-online-degree-market-in-2025-up-from-36b-in-2019/ (accessed 8 July 2020).

34.

Ivancheva

(2020) The casualization, digitalization, and outsourcing of academic labour: a wake-up call for trade unions. Focaal Blog 20 March. Available at: https://www.focaalblog.com/2020/03/20/mariya-ivancheva-the-casualization-digitalization-and-outsourcing-of-academic-labour-a-wake-up-call-for-trade-unions/ (accessed 8 July 2020).

35.

Ivancheva

Swartz

(2020) Universities go online during the pandemic: who reaps the profits? Corona Times 19 May. Available at: https://www.coronatimes.net/universities-go-online-pandemic-profits/ (accessed 8 July 2020).

36.

Johnson

Mejia

(2014) Online learning and student outcomes in California’s community colleges. Public Policy Institute of California. Available at: https://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/report/R_514HJR.pdf (accessed 8 July 2020).

37.

Kaplan

(nd) Bridging the chasm: defining success beyond traditional academics. EdSurge. Available at: https://www.edsurge.com/research/guides/bridging-the-chasm-defining-success-beyond-traditional-academics (accessed 8 July 2020).

38.

Marachi

Carpenter

(unpublished paper) Silicon Valley, philanthro-capitalism, and policy shifts from teachers to tech.

39.

Marachi

Quill

(2020) The case of Canvas: longitudinal datafication through learning management systems. Teaching in Higher Education 25(4): 418–434.

40.

Martinez

(2013) A conceptual foundation for understanding innovation in american community colleges. In: Glasper

de los Santos

(eds) Disruptive Innovation and the Community College (League for Innovation in the Community College). Available at: https://www.league.org/sites/default/files/private_data/imported/occasional_papers/Disruptive_Innovation_and_the_Community_College.pdf (accessed 20 July 2020).

41.

Marx

(1867[1976]) Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Volume 1. New York, NY: Vintage.

42.

Mazoué

(2012) The deconstructed campus: a reply to critics. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 24: 74–95.

43.

McCowan

(2017) Higher education, unbundling, and the end of the university as we know it. Oxford Review of Education 43(6): 733–748.

44.

Mcfarlane

(2011) The morphing of academic practice: unbundling and the rise of the para-academic. Higher Education Quarterly 65(1): 59–73.

45.

McKenzie

(2019) Chatting with chatbots. Inside Higher Ed, September 6. Available at: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2019/09/06/expansion-chatbots-higher-ed (accessed 8 July 2020).

46.

National Center for Education Statistics (2011) Report, Learning at a Distance: Undergraduate Enrollment in Sistance Education Courses and Degree Programs. Available at: https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2012154 (accessed 8 July 2020).

47.

National Center for Education Statistics (2019) Report, Number and Percentage of Students Enrolled in Degree-Granting Postsecondary Institutions, by Distance Education Participation, and Level of Enrollment and Control of Institution: Fall 2017. Available at: https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=80 (accessed 8 July 2020).

48.

Ness

(2015) Southern Insurgency: The Coming of the Global Working Class. London: Pluto Press.

49.

Noble

(1979) Social choice in machine design: the case of the automatically controlled machine tools. In: Zimbalist

(ed.) Case Studies on the Labor Process. NY: Monthly Review, 18–50.

50.

Noble

(1993) Progress Without People: In Defense of Luddism. Chicago, IL: Charles H. Kerr.

51.

Noble

(2003) Digital Diploma Mills: The Automation of Higher Education. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.

52.

Online Learning Consortium (2020) OLC’s historical timeline. Available at: https://onlinelearningconsortium.org/about/pioneering-higher-educations-digital-future-timeline/ (accessed 8 July 2020).

53.

Ovetz

(1996) The global entrepreneurialization of the universities. Capital & Class 58: 113–151.

54.

Ovetz

(2015a) Migrant mindworkers and the new division of academic labour. Working USA 18(3): 331–347.

55.

Ovetz

(2015b) When Hephaestus fell to earth: Harry Braverman and the division of labour in academia. Labour Studies Journal 40(3): 243–261.

56.

Ovetz

(2015c) The New Jim Crow in Higher Education: On-Line Education and the Community Colleges. People, Place, and Power, Long Beach, 1–4 April. Long Beach: Pacific Sociological Association.

57.

Ovetz

(2017) Click to save and return to course: on line education, adjunctification, and the disciplining of academic labour in the social factory. Work, Organisation, Labour and Globalisation Spring 11(1): 48–70.

58.

Ovetz

(2020a) The university is a business: interview with a faculty member on strike in the UK. Organizing Work. Available at: https://organizing.work/2020/03/the-university-is-a-business-interview-with-a-faculty-member-on-strike-in-the-uk/ (accessed 8 July 2020).

59.

Ovetz

(2020b) Workers’ Inquiry and Global Class Struggle: Strategies, Tactics, Objectives. London: Pluto Press.

60.

Ovetz

(forthcoming) Zoombombing higher education: resisting the online-ification of the university. In: Ramirez

Lieber

Fehrle

(eds) (De)automating the Future. Leiden: Brill.

61.

Rhoades

(2013) Disruptive innovations for adjunct faculty: common sense for the common good. Thought & Action Fall. Available at: https://www.nea.org/assets/docs/HE/k-pg71_TA2013Rhoades_SF.pdf (accessed 8 July 2020).

62.

Rhoades

Slaughter

(2004) Academic Capitalism in the New Eeconomy: Challenges and Choices. American Academic, 37–60.

63.

San Jose State University (2020) Reports, Canvas user satisfaction Spring 2015 and Fall 2019. Available at: https://www.sjsu.edu/ecampus/teaching-tools/canvas/canvas-statistics/canvas-user-satisfaction/ (accessed 8 July 2020).

64.

Sandeen

(2014) Report, Unbundling Versus Designing Faculty Roles. Presidential Innovation Lab White Paper Series. American Council on Education/Center for Education Attainment and Innovation. Available at: https://www.acenet.edu/Documents/Signals-and-Shifts-in-the-Postsecondary-Landscape.pdf (accessed 8 July 2020).

65.

Slaughter

Rhoades

(2004) Academic Capitalism and the New Economy. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

66.

Smith

(2008) The unbundling and rebundling of the faculty role in e-learning community college courses. Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.

67.

The Analogue University (2019) Correlation in the data university: understanding and challenging targets-based performance-management in higher education. ACME: An International Journal of Critical Geographies 18(6): 1184–1206.

68.

The Economist (2015) The on-demand economy: workers on tap. The rise of the on-demand economy poses difficult questions for workers, companies and politicians, 3 January. Available at: http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21637393-rise-demand-economy-poses-difficult-questions-workers-companies-and (accessed 8 July 2020).

69.

The Unbundled University (2017) Briefing no. 2 December. Available at: https://unbundleduni.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/79/2017/12/pamphlet2_APPROVED_forpublish.pdf (accessed 8 July 2020).

70.

The Wages for Students (1975) Wages for Students. A self-published pamphlet in the form of a blue book. Available at: http://zerowork.org/WagesForStudents.html (accessed 20 July 2020).

71.

Thornton

(2013) Community colleges: ready to disrupt again! In: Glasper

de los Santos

(eds) Disruptive Innovation and the Community College. League for Innovation in the Community College. Available at: https://www.league.org/sites/default/files/private_data/imported/occasional_papers/Disruptive_Innovation_and_the_Community_College.pdf (accessed 20 July 2020).

72.

Troutt

(1979) Unbundling instruction: opportunity for community colleges. Peabody Journal of Education 56(4): 253–259.

73.

Ullrich

(2019) In itself but not yet for itself—Organising the new academic precariat. In: Baier

Canepa

Golemis

(eds) The Radical Left in Europe—Rediscovering Hope. Transform! Europe. London: Merlin Press.

74.

van Dijck

(2014) Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society 12(2): 197–208.

75.

Williamson

(2020) Datafication and automation in higher education during and after the Covid-19 crisis. Code Acts in Education. Available at: https://codeactsineducation.wordpress.com/2020/05/06/datafication-automation-he-covid19-crisis/ (accessed 19 July 2020).

76.

Williamson

Bayne

Shay

(2020) The datafication of teaching in higher education: critical issues and perspectives. Teaching in Higher Education 25(4): 351–365.

77.

Woodcock

(2016) Working the Phones: Control and Resistance in Call Centres. London: Pluto Press.

78.

Woodcock

Englert

(2018) Looking back in anger: the UCU strikes. Notes From Below, 30 August. Republished from The Worker and The Union 3. Available at: https://notesfrombelow.org/article/looking-back-anger-ucu-strikes (accessed 8 July 2020).

79.

Young

(2018) Do online courses really save money? A new study explores ROI for colleges and students. EdSurge, 12 April. Available at: https://www.edsurge.com/news/2018-04-12-do-online-courses-really-save-money-a-new-study-explores-roi-for-colleges-and-students (accessed 8 July 2020).

The Algorithmic University: On-Line Education,Learning Management Systems,and the Struggle over Academic Labor

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References