In this article I argue that the Chinese state is responding to tensions wrought by high-speed growth by attempting to develop a form of technocratic biopolitics I refer to as ‘just-in-time (JIT) urbanization’. Mirroring techniques of the Toyota Production System (of which JIT is a constituent element), large Chinese cities have sought to avoid the costs associated with the production and warehousing of surplus populations. Under this system, migrants are granted access to local citizenship and public education for their children if they fulfill a specific, state-determined, need in the labor market. The hope is to be able to precisely deploy specific kinds of labor power as needed, at as low a cost as possible, while avoiding waste, overpopulation, and (presumed) attendant political chaos. The social consequence of this approach is that nominally public resources such as education have been funneled to elites in what I term an ‘inverted means test’.
AlexanderPChanA (2004) Does China have an apartheid pass system?Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies30(4): 609–629.
2.
AnagnostA (1997) Neo-Malthusian fantasy and national Ttranscendence. In: National Past-Times: Narrative, Representation, and Power in Modern China. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 117–136.
3.
BarchiesiF (2011) Precarious Liberation: Workers, the State, and Contested Social Citizenship in Postapartheid South Africa. Albany, NY: Suny Press.
4.
BaumanZ (2004) Wasted Lives: Modernity and its Outcasts. Cambridge: Polity.
5.
BradshawYW (1987) Urbanization and underdevelopment: A global study of modernization, urban bias, and economic dependency. American Sociological Review52: 224–239.
6.
ChanKW (2009) The Chinese hukou system at 50. Eurasian Geography and Economics50(2): 197–221.
7.
DenningM (2010) Wageless life. New Left Review66: 79–97.
8.
DuttonM (2006) Policing the Chinese household: A comparison of modern and ancient forms. Economy and Society17(2): 37–41.
9.
FischerAM (2008) ‘Population invasion’ versus urban exclusion in the Tibetan areas of Western China. Population and Development Review34(4): 631–662.
10.
FoucaultM (2003) ‘Society Must Be Defended’: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976. New York, NY: Picador.
11.
GeX (2009) ‘Liang wei zhu’ zhengce zhong de zhengfu touru zeren tanxi. Research in Educational Development2: 1–7.
12.
GidwaniVReddyRN (2011) The afterlives of ‘waste’: Notes from India for a minor history of capitalist surplus. Antipode43(5): 1625–1658.
13.
GreenhalghSWincklerEA (2005) Governing China’s population: From Leninist to Neoliberal Biopolitics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14.
HartK (1973) Informal income opportunities and urban employment in Ghana. The Journal of Modern African Studies11(1): 61–89.
15.
HuangPCC (2009) China’s neglected informal economy: Reality and theory. Modern China35(4): 405–438.
16.
HungH (2015) The China Boom: Why China Will Not Rule the World. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
17.
Joniak-LuthiA (2013) Han migration to Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region: Between state schemes and migrants’ strategies. Zeitschrift Fur Ethnologie138: 155–174.
18.
LiTM (2010) To make live or let die? Rural dispossession and the protection of surplus populations. Antipode41(s1): 66–93.
19.
LipsetSM (1959) Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. The American Political Science Review53(1): 69–105.
20.
LoganJRFangYZhangZ (2009) Access to housing in urban China. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research33(4): 914–935.
21.
MarshallTH (1950) Citizenship and Social Class (Vol. 11). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
MbembeA (2003) Necropolitics. Public Culture15(1): 11–40.
23.
McIntyreMNastHJ (2011) Bio(necro)polis: Marx, surplus populations, and the spatial dialectics of reproduction and ‘race’. Antipode43(5): 1465–1488.
24.
MezzadraSNeilsonB (2012) Between inclusion and exclusion: On the topology of global space and borders. Theory, Culture & Society29(4–5): 58–75.
25.
MezzadraSNeilsonB (2013) Border as Method, or, the Multiplication of Labor. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
26.
MolotchH (1976) The city as a growth machine: Toward a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology82: 309–332.
27.
MondenY (2011) Toyota Production System: An Integrated Approach to Just-in Time. New York, NY: CRC Press.
28.
NaughtonB (1992) Implications of the state monopoly over industry and its relaxation. Modern China18(1): 14–41.
29.
OhnoT (1988) Toyota Production system: Beyond Large-Scale Production. Portland, OR: Productivity Press.
30.
ParsonsT (1964) Evolutionary universals in society. American Sociological Review29(3): 339–357.
31.
SassenS (2014) Expulsions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
SurakK (2013) Guestworker regimes: A taxonomy. The New Left Review84: 84–102.
33.
TokmanVE (1978) An exploration into the nature of informal–formal sector relationships. World Development6(9): 1065–1075.
34.
WallaceJL (2014) Cities and Stability: Urbanization, Redistribution, and Regime Survival in China. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
35.
WangF-L (2005) Organizing through Division and Exclusion: China’s Hukou System. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
36.
WolpeH (1972) Capitalism and cheap labour-power in South Africa: From segregation to apartheid 1. Economy and Society1(4): 425–456.
37.
WomackJPJonesDT (2010) Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
38.
YatesM (2011) The human-as-waste, the labor rheory of value and disposability in contemporary capitalism. Antipode43(5): 1679–1695.
39.
ZhangL (2001) Strangers in the City: Reconfigurations of Space, Power, and Social Networks within China’s Floating Population. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
40.
ZhangL (2005) Migrant enclaves and impacts of redevelopment policy in Chinese cities. In: MaLJCWuF (eds) Restructuring the Chinese City: Changing Society, Economy and Space. London: Routledge, 218–233.
