Transnational Capital and the Transformation of the State: Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)

Abstract

The fate of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), currently under negotiation, has been called into question. At issue is the inclusion of the investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanism that has been included in the NAFTA, CAFTA, and many bilateral agreements. Authorizing corporations and investors to bring disputes directly against governments for adopting regulations negatively impacting market share or future profitability, this mechanism has generated significant opposition, particularly in Europe. This paper probes the factors driving the struggle over this political project. Revealing the mechanisms operating to secure the inclusion of ISDS in the TTIP, these findings contribute to the interdisciplinary debates that have emerged around the rise of a transnational capital class and the transformation of the state. These developments have significant normative implications, the analysis of which contributes to a critical tradition that seeks to uncover processes that have been naturalized and reveal strategies for political contestation.

Keywords

Globalization ISDS neoliberalism political economy transnational trade agreements TTIP

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akhtar

Weiss

(2013) U.S. International Investment Agreements: Issues for Congress: Report (April). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.

Alter-EU (2009) A Captive Commission: The Role of the Financial Industry in Shaping EU Regulation: Report. Available (consulted 10 July 2016) at: http://alter-eu.org/documents/2009/11/captive-commission-financial-industry-shaping-eu-regulation

Alter-EU (2016) Member State Offices in Brussels: Wide Open to Corporate Lobbyists. Available (consulted 20 July 2016) at: http://www.alter-eu.org/member-state-offices-in-brussels-wide-open-to-corporate-lobbyists

Ames

(2015) ISDS: The most toxic acronym in Europe. Politico, 17 September. Available (consulted 15 July 2016) at: http://www.politico.eu/article/isds-the-most-toxic-acronym-in-europe/

Aries

(2016) Jose Manuel Barroso’s new job at Goldman Sachs angers EU. Politico, 12 July. Available (consulted 29 July 2016) at: http://www.alter-eu.org/member-state-offices-in-brussels-wide-open-to-corporate-lobbyists

Barbière

(2015) France and Germany to form united front against ISDS. EurActiv.com , 12 October. Available (consulted 12 February 2016) at: http://www.euractiv.com/sections/trade-society/france-and-germany-form-united-front-against-isds-311267

BBC (2014) Profile: EU’s Jean-Claude Juncker, 15 July. Available (consulted 9 February 2014) at: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-27679170

Bergsten

Henning

(1996) Global Economic Leadership and the Group of Seven. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute Press.

Bieler

Morton

(2004) A critical theory route to hegemony, world order and historical change: Neo-Gramscian perspectives in international relations. Capital & Class 28(1): 85–113.

10.

Bilderberg

Meetings

Steering

Committee

(n.d.) Available (consulted 15 February 2016) at: http://www.bilderbergmeetings.org/steering-committee.html

11.

Blythe

(2002) Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

12.

Boyce

(1993) The democratic deficit of the European Community. Parliamentary Affairs 44(4): 458–77.

13.

Brooks

(2002) Regulatory takings: Where environmental protection and private property collide. Natural Resources & Environment 17(1): 7–13, 57–61.

14.

Cameron

Tomlin

(2000) The Making of NAFTA: How the Deal Was Done. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

15.

Carroll

Carson

(2006) Neoliberalism, capitalist class formation and the global network of corporations and policy groups. In: Neunhöffer

Plehwe

Walpen

(eds) Neoliberal Hegemony: A Global Critique. New York, NY: Routledge, 51–69.

16.

Center for Public Integrity (1993) The Trading Game: Inside Lobbying for the North American Free Trade Agreement, Washington, DC: Center for Public Integrity.

17.

Chase

(2011) The United States, European Union, and International Investment: GMF Policy Brief, 29 December. Available (consulted 15 January 2016) at: http://www.gmfus.org/publications/united-states-european-union-and-international-investment

18.

Chase

(2015) TTIP, investor-state dispute settlement and the rule of law. European View 14: 217–229.

19.

Chase-Dunn

(1998) Global Formation: Structures of the World-Economy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

20.

Chevron Corporation (2013) Comments on proposed transatlantic trade and investment partnership. Available (consulted 9 February 2016) at: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=USTR-2013–0019–0054

21.

Ciel.org (2016) Letter to Schulz, 7 July. Available (consulted 20 July 2016) at: http://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/TTIP-letter-to-Schulz-FINAL.pdf

22.

Coffey International Development (2014) Evaluation of DG Trade’s Civil Society Dialogue: Final Report, 22 July. Available (consulted 2 February 2016) at: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2016/january/tradoc_154190.pdf

23.

Common Cause (2015) The Political Money Behind the Trans-Pacific Partnership: Issue Brief. Available (consulted 12 July 2016) at: file:///Users/shawn/Downloads/the-political-money-behind-trans-pacific-partnership.pdf

24.

Corporate Observatory (2016) The Zombie ISDS: Rebranded as ICS, Rights for Corporations to Sue States Refuse to Die: Report, March. Available (consulted 12 July 2016) at: http://corporateeurope.org/sites/default/files/attachments/the_zombie_isds_0.pdf

25.

Cox

(1987) Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

26.

Crisp

(2015) European Parliament Committee signals opposition to ISDS. EurActive, 14 January. Available (consulted 9 February 2016) at: http://www.euractiv.com/section/trade-society/news/european-parliament-committee-signals-opposition-to-isds/

27.

De Bièvre

Dür

(2009) Inclusion without influence? NGOs in European trade policy. Journal of Public Policy 27(1): 79–101.

28.

Desai

(1994) Second-hand dealers in ideas: Think-tanks and Thatcherite hegemony. New Left Review I(203): 27–64.

29.

Desai

(2006) Neoliberalism and cultural nationalism: A danse macabre. In: Neunhöffer

Plehwe

Walpen

(eds) Neoliberal Hegemony: A Global Critique. New York, NY: Routledge, 225–235.

30.

Dolzer

(2002) Indirect expropriations: New developments? NYU Environmental Law Journal 64(11): 64–80.

31.

Drake

(2012) U.S. trade and economic policy: American workers need more than strong chapters. The Labor Lawyer 27(3): 455–470.

32.

ESF (European Services Forum) (2015) Hearing in the framework of the EESC opinion on investment protection and ISDS in EU trade and investment agreements: Presentation, 3 February. Available (consulted 1 August 2016) at: http://www.esf.be/new/who-we-are/what-we-do/news/

33.

EurActiv (2014) Brussels wants to hear more on TTIP investor-state dispute clause, 22 January. Available (consulted 24 February 2016) at: http://www.euractiv.com/section/trade-society/news/brussels-wants-to-hear-more-on-ttip-investor-state-dispute-clause/

34.

EurActiv (2015) Interview with Socialists and Democrats Group President Gianni Pittelli, 3 July. Available (consulted 12 December 2015) at: http://www.euractiv.com/sections/trade-society/pittella-isds-dead-eucanada-trade-deal-must-be-reopened-315977

35.

European Commission (2014) Online Public Consultation on Investment Protection and Investor-to-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Agreement (TTIP). Brussels: European Commission. Available (consulted 18 November 2015) at: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2014/july/tradoc_152693.pdf

36.

European Commission (2015a) Online Public Consultation on Investment Protection and Investor-to-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). Brussels: European Commission. Available (consulted 5 February 2016) at: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015/january/tradoc_153044.pdf

37.

European Commission (2015b) Commission Proposes New Investment Court System for TTIP and Other EU Trade and Investment Negotiations. Brussels: European Commission. Available (consulted 4 December 2015) at: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-15–5651_en.htm

38.

European Commission (2015c) Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: Trade in Services, Investment, and E-commerce. Brussels: European Commission. Available (consulted 5 February 2016) at: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015/september/tradoc_153807.pdf

39.

European Parliament (2011a) Resolution on the Future European International Investment Policy. Brussels: European Parliament. Available (consulted 29 December 2015) at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P7-TA-2011–0141+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN

40.

European Parliament (2011b) Legislative Resolution (on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing transitional arrangements for bilateral investment agreements between Member States and third countries). Brussels: European Parliament. Available (consulted 29 December 2015) at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P7-%20TA-2011–0206+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN

41.

European Parliament (2013) Plenary text (amendment 3) adopted 23 May. Available (consulted 9 February 2016) at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P7-TA-2013-0219+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN

42.

European People’s Party (2016) Who is Jean-Claude Juncker? Available (consulted 8 February 2016) at: Juncker.epp.eu/who-jean-claude-juncker

43.

European Round Table (ERT) (1996) Benchmarking for Policy-Makers: The Way to Competitiveness, Growth and Job Creation. Brussels: European Round Table of Industrialists.

44.

Gill

(1991) Reflections on global order and sociohistorical time. Alternatives 16(3): 275–314.

45.

Gill

(1995) Globalization, market civilization, and disciplinary neoliberalism. Millennium Journal of International Studies 24: 399–423.

46.

Gill

(1997) Transformation and innovation in the study of world order. In: Stephen Gill and James H Mittelman (eds) Innovation and Transformation in International Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 5–24.

47.

Gindin

Panitch

(2005) Superintending global capital. New Left Review 35.

48.

Gindin

Panitch

(2013) The Making of Global Capitalism: The Political Economy of American Empire. London: Verso.

49.

Gramsci

(1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks, trans. Hoare

Smith

. New York, NY: International Publications.

50.

Harvey

(1989) The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

51.

Harvey

(2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

52.

Helleiner

(1994) States and the Reemergence of Global Finance. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

53.

House of Commons Standing Committee, Ottawa, Canada (1994) Report on Plain Packaging of Tobacco Products. Available (consulted 12 July 2016) at: http://www.smoke-free.ca/plain-packaging/documents/1994/industryresponse-1994-canada/Smrm97c00-HIlls.pdf

54.

Jessop

(1990) State Theory. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

55.

Jessop

(2002) The Future of the Capitalist State. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

56.

Kleinheisterkamp

(2014) Is there a need for investor-state arbitration in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)? Available (consulted 1 August 2016) at: SSRN 2410188

57.

Kolo

Waelde

(2001) Environmental regulation, investment protection and ‘regulatory takings’ in international law. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 50(4): 811–848.

58.

Kotz

McDonough

Reich

(1994) Social Structures of Accumulation: The Political Economy of Growth and Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

59.

Neunhöffer

Plehwe

Walpen

(2006) Reconsidering neoliberal hegemony. In: Neunhöffer

Plehwe

Walpen

(eds) Neoliberal Hegemony: A Global Critique. New York, NY: Routledge, 1–24.

60.

Nielsen

(2016a) TTIP investor court illegal, say German judges. EuObserver, 4 February. Available (consulted 8 February 2016) at: https://euobserver.com/economic/132142

61.

Nielsen

(2016b) EU defends TTIP investor court after German backlash. EuObserver, 17 February. Available (consulted 15 May 2016) at: https://euobserver.com/economic/132295

62.

Nielsen

(2016c) EU ignores MEP demands on US free trade deal, NGOs say. EuObserver, 7 July. Available (consulted 20 July 2016) at: https://euobserver.com/economic/134238

63.

Official Journal of the European Union (2010) 30 March. Available (consulted 29 December 2015) at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2010:083:SOM:EN:HTML

64.

Overbeek

Van der Pijl

(1993) Restructuring hegemony: Neoliberalism and the unmaking of the post-war order. In: Overbeek

(ed.) Restructuring Hegemony in the Global Political Economy: The Rise of Transnational Neoliberalism in the 1980s. London: Routledge, 1–27.

65.

Palmer

(2013) After long build-up, U.S.-EU free trade talks finally begin. Reuters, 8 July. Available (consulted 12 December 2015) at: http://www.reuters.com/assets/print?aid=USL2N0F71XS20130708

66.

Panitch

(2000) The new imperial state. New Left Review II(2): 5–20.

67.

Physicians for a Smoke-Free Canada (2008) The Plot Against Plain Packaging: Report. Available (consulted 12 July 2016) at: http://www.smokefree.ca/plainpackaging/documents/1994/industryresponse-1994-canada/Smrm97c00-HIlls.pdf

68.

Poulantzas

(1975) Classes in Contemporary Capitalism. London: NLB.

69.

Poulantzas

(1976) The capitalist state: A reply to Miliband and Laclau. New Left Review I(95): 63–83.

70.

Robert

(2015) European Parliament backs TTIP, rejects ISDS. EurActiv, 13 July. Available (consulted 14 June 2016) at: http://www.euractiv.com/section/global-europe/news/european-parliament-backs-ttip-rejects-isds/

71.

Robinson

(2001) Social theory and globalization: The rise of a transnational state. Theory and Society 30(2): 157–200.

72.

Robinson

(2004) A Theory of Global Capitalism. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

73.

Ruggie

(1982) International regimes, transactions and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization 36(2): 379–416.

74.

Seattle to Brussels Network (2015) ISDS: Courting foreign investors: Why the Commission’s proposal for an ‘Investment Court System’ still fails to address the key problems of foreign investors’ privileges: Analysis, 29 September. Available (consulted 12 July 2016) at: http://www.s2bnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/S2B_ISDS.pdf

75.

Serfati

(2004) American military power – global public good or competitive advantage. In: Van der Pijl

Assassi

Wigan

(eds) Global Regulation: Managing Crises After the Imperial Turn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

76.

Serfati

(2015) The transatlantic bloc of states and the political economy of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. Organization, Labour & Globalisation 9(1): 7–37.

77.

Sidley Austin

LLC

(n.d.) Praise for Sidley Austin’s International Arbitration Practice. Available (consulted 6 August 2015) at: http://www.sidley.com/internationalarbitrationpracticepraise/

78.

Sklair

(1995) Sociology of the Global System. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

79.

Sklair

(2001) The Transnational Capital Class. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

80.

Skocpol

(1979) States and Social Revolutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

81.

Smith

(1991) The Idea Brokers. New York, NY: The Free Press.

82.

Spiegel International (2011) Vattenfall vs. Germany: Nuclear phase-out faces billion Euro lawsuit, 2 November. Available (consulted 20 July 2016) at: http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/vattenfall-vs-

83.

Strange

(1988) States and Markets: An Introduction to Political Economy. London: Pinter.

84.

The Economist (2014) The arbitration game, 11 October. Available (consulted 12 July 2016) at: http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21623756-governments-are-souring-treaties-protect-foreign-investors-arbitration

85.

Trans Atlantic Consumer Dialogue (2016) Response to the European Commission’s Investor-State Dispute Settlement Reform Proposal, January. Available (consulted 9 February 2016) at: http://tacd.org/

86.

Transnational Institute (2013) A transatlantic corporate bill of rights, July. Available (consulted 9 February 2016) at: https://www.opendemocracy.net/ournhs/corporate-europe-observatory-transnational-institute/transatlantic-corporate-bill-of-rights

87.

UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development) (2016) World Investment Report. New York: United Nations. Available (consulted 3 July 2016) at: http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2016_Overview_en.pdf

88.

United States Chamber of Commerce (2013) 10 May Statement of the US Chamber of Commerce on the Transatlantic Trade & Investment Partnership to the Office of the US Trade Representative. Available (consulted 19 December 2015) at: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=USTR-2013-0019-0241

89.

United States Department of State (2016) TransCanada Corp & TransCanada Pipelines Ltd v. United States. Washington, DC: US Department of State. Available (consulted 29 July 2016) at: http://www.state.gov/s/l/c71937.htm

90.

United States Department of State Advisory Committee on International Economic Policy (2009) Report of the Advisory Committee on International Economic Policy Regarding the Model Bilateral Investment Treaty. Washington, DC: US Department of State.

91.

United States-European Union Association Joint Statement on European Commission Release of the TTIP Consultation Report (2015) Available (consulted 10 February 2016) at: http://www.transatlanticbusiness.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/US-EU-Association-Joint-Investment-Statement-1-13-2015-FINAL.pdf

92.

Van Apeldoorn

(1998) Transnationalization and the restructuring of Europe’s socioeconomic order. International Journal of Political Economy 28(1): 12–53.

93.

Van der Pijl

(1984) The Making of the Atlantic Ruling Class. London: Verso.

94.

Van der Pijl

(1998) Transnational Classes and International Relations. New York, NY: Routledge.

95.

Van Harten

(2005) Private authority and transnational governance: The contours of the international system of investor protection. Review of International Political Economy 12(4): 600–623.

96.

Verdun

(1998) The institutional design of EMU: A democratic deficit? Journal of Public Policy 18(2): 107–132.

97.

Wallerstein

(1974) The Modern World System. New York, NY: Academic Press.

98.

White House (2015) Remarks by the President on Trade, 8 May. Available (consulted 2 July 2016) at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/05/08/remarks-president-trade

99.

World Trade Institute (2016) TTIP and the EU Member States: Report. World Trade Institute, University of Bern. Available (consulted 15 July 2016) at: http://www.wti.org/media/filer_public/03/b8/03b803d4-e200-4841-9c58-f6612f4a7316/ttip_report_def.pdf