Following recent debates between Vivek Chibber and leading postcolonial theorists, I probe into what is missing in these exchanges. I focus on the figure of the ‘tribal’ in modern India in Ranajit Guha’s Elementary Aspects of Peasant Insurgency in Colonial India and Alpa Shah’s In the Shadows of the State, both of which claim to offer emic perspectives on subaltern politics and history. Yet both works, despite their undeniable differences, display a striking universalism that puts them, paradoxically, in the company of Chibber. This universalism, which we may call the resisting subject, is about the Other and about us simultaneously, the former constituted by the latter as an abstract object of analysis and as a key symbol of intellectual vanguardism. Are we not better off abandoning such universalisms and searching for ways in which Marxist theories of culture can be melded with postcolonial theories of capitalism?
Abu-LughodL (1990) The romance of resistance: Tracing transformations of power through Bedouin women. American Ethnologist17(1): 41–55.
2.
AdasM (1979) Prophets of Rebellion: Millenarian Protest Movements Against the European Colonial Order. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
3.
ArnoldD (1982) Rebellious hillmen: The Gudem-Rampa risings, 1839–1924. In: GuhaR (ed.) Subaltern Studies I: Writings on South Asian History & Society. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 88–142.
4.
BanerjeeP (2006) Politics of Time: “Primitives” and History-Writing in a Colonial Society. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
5.
BenhabibS (2007) Another universalism: On the unity and diversity of human rights. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association81(2): 7–32.
6.
BessireL (2014) The rise of indigenous hypermarginality: Native culture as a neoliberal politics of life. Current Anthropology55(3): 276–295.
7.
BéteilleA (1998) The idea of indigenous people. Current Anthropology39(2): 187–192.
8.
BhadraG (1983) Two frontier uprisings in Mughal India. In: GuhaR (ed.) Subaltern Studies II. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 43–59.
9.
BhargavaR (1992) Individualism in Social Science: Forms and Limits of a Methodology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
10.
ChakrabartyD (2000a) Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
ChakrabartyD (2000b) Subaltern Studies and postcolonial historiography. Nepantla1(1): 9–32.
12.
ChandavarkarR (1997) ‘The Making of the Working Class’: E. P. Thompson and Indian history. History Workshop Journal43: 177–196.
13.
ChandraU (2013a) Going primitive: The ethics of indigenous rights activism in contemporary Jharkhand. South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal7. Available (accessed 30 April 2016) at: http://samaj.revues.org/3600
14.
ChandraU (2013b) Beyond subalternity: Land, community, and the state in contemporary Jharkhand. Contemporary South Asia21(1): 52–61.
15.
ChandraU (2016) Flaming fields and forest fires: Agrarian transformations and the making of Birsa Munda’s rebellion. Indian Economic and Social History Review53(1): 69–98.
16.
ChariS (2004) Fraternal Capital: Peasant-Workers, Self-Made Men, and Globalization in Provincial India. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
17.
ChatterjeeP (2013) Subaltern studies and capital. Economic & Political Weekly47(37): 69–75.
18.
ChibberV (2013a) Postcolonial Theory and the Specter of Capital. London: Verso.
DamodaranV (2012) Globalisation and sacred adivasi landscapes of eastern India. In: DalyPWinterT (eds) Routledge Handbook of Heritage in Asia. Abingdon: Routledge, 311–327.
22.
DattaKK (1940) The Santal Insurrection of 1855-57. Calcutta: University of Calcutta.
23.
De la CadenaMStarnO (eds) (2007) Indigenous Experience Today. New York, NY: Berg.
24.
De NeveG (2005) Everyday Politics of Labour: Working Lives in India’s Informal Economy. New Delhi: Social Science Press.
25.
DoveMR (2006) Indigenous people and environmental politics. Annual Review of Anthropology35: 191–208.
26.
DurkheimE (1912/2001) The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life (Trans. CosmanC). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
ElsterJ (2007) Explaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
28.
FletcherR (2001) What are we fighting for?: Rethinking resistance in a Pewenche community in Chile. The Journal of Peasant Studies28(3): 37–66.
29.
GhoshK (2006) The modernity of Primitive India: Adivasi ethnicity in Jharkhand and the formation of a national modern. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
30.
GidwaniV (2008) Capital, Interrupted: Agrarian Development and the Politics of Work in India. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
31.
GledhillJ (1994) Power and its Disguises: Anthropological Perspectives on Politics. London: Pluto Press.
32.
GledhillJ (2012) A case for rethinking resistance. In: GledhillJSchellPA (eds) New Approaches to Resistance in Brazil and Mexico. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1–20.
33.
GraeberDR (2004) Fragments of an Anarchist Anthropology. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.
34.
GuhaR (1982) On some aspects of the historiography of colonial India. In: GuhaR (ed.) Subaltern Studies I: Writings on South Asian History & Society. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1–8.
35.
GuhaR (1983/1999) Elementary Aspects of Peasant Insurgency in Colonial India. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Harriss-WhiteB (2003) India Working: Essays on Economy and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Harriss-WhiteBBasileEDixitA. (eds) (2013) Dalits and Adivasis in India’s Business Economy: Three Essays and an Atlas. New Delhi: Three Essays Collective.
39.
HeiderK (1988) The Rashomon effect: When ethnographers disagree. American Anthropologist90(1): 73–81.
40.
HobsbawmEJ (1959) Primitive Rebels: Studies in Archaic Forms of Social Movement in the 19th and 20th Centuries. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
41.
HodgsonDL (2011) Becoming Indigenous, Becoming Masai: Postcolonial Politics in a Neoliberal World. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
42.
JhaJC (1964) The Kol Insurrection of Chota-Nagpur. Calcutta: Thacker, Spink & Co.
43.
KarlssonBG (2003) Anthropology and the ‘indigenous slot’: Claims to and debates about indigenous peoples’ status in India. Critique of Anthropology23(4): 403–423.
44.
KarlssonBGSubbaTB (eds) (2006) Indigeneity in India. London: Kegan Paul.
45.
KuperA (2003) The return of the native. Current Anthropology44(3): 389–402.
46.
LiTM (2010) Indigeneity, capitalism, and the management of dispossession. Current Anthropology51(3): 385–414.
47.
LiTM (2014) Land’s End: Capitalist Relations on an Indigenous Frontier. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
48.
MamdaniM (2012) What is a tribe?London Review of Books34(17): 20–22.
49.
McCormackF (2012) Indigeneity as process: Māori claims and neoliberalism. Social Identities18(4): 417–434.
50.
MertonRK (1949) Social Theory and Social Structure. New York, NY: The Free Press.
51.
MuehlmannS (2009) How do real Indians fish?: Neoliberal multiculturalism and contested indigeneities in the Colorado delta. American Anthropologist111(4): 468–479.
52.
NilsenAG (2010) Dispossession and Resistance in India: The River and the Rage. London: Routledge.
53.
OrtnerS (1973) On key symbols. American Anthropologist75(5): 1338–1346.
54.
OrtnerS (1995) Resistance and the problem of ethnographic refusal. Comparative Studies in Society and History37(1): 173–193.
55.
PadelFDasS (2010) Out of this Earth: East India Adivasis and the Aluminium Cartel. New Delhi: Orient Blackswan.
56.
PandeyG (1982) Peasant revolt and Indian nationalism: The peasant movement in Awadh, 1919–1922. In: GuhaR (ed.) Subaltern Studies I: Writings on South Asian History & Society. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 143–197.
SarkarT (1985) Jitu Santal’s movement in Malda, 1924–1932: A study in tribal protest. In: GuhaR (ed.) Subaltern Studies IV. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 136–164.
59.
SayerA (2000) Realism and Social Science. London: SAGE.
60.
ScottJC (1976) The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
61.
ScottJC (1999) Foreword. In: GuhaR, Elementary Aspects of Peasant Insurgency in Colonial India. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, ix–xiv.
ShahA (2010) In the Shadows of the State: Indigenous Politics, Environmentalism, and Insurgency in Jharkhand, India. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
64.
ShapiroIWendtA (1992) The difference that realism makes: Social science and the politics of consent. Politics & Society20(2): 197–223.
65.
SinghKS (1966) The Dust-Storm and the Hanging Mist: A Study of Birsa Munda and His Movement in Chotanagpur, 1874–1901. Calcutta: Firma KL Mukhopadhyay.
66.
SpivakGC (1988) Can the subaltern speak? In: NelsonCGrossbergL (eds) Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 271–316.
67.
SundarN (ed.) (2009) Legal Grounds: Natural Resources, Identity, and the Law in Jharkhand. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
68.
TheodossopoulosD (2014) On de-pathologizing resistance. History and Anthropology25(4): 415–430.
69.
TsingAL (2004) Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
70.
UrlaJHelepololeiJ (2014) The ethnography of resistance then and now: On thickness and activist engagement in the twenty-first century. History and Anthropology25(4): 431–451.
71.
van der VeerP (2013) The value of comparison. The 2013 Lewis Henry Morgan Lecture, University of Rochester, 13November. Available (accessed 30 April 2016) at: http://www.haujournal.org/haunet/vanderveer.php
72.
WedeenL (2009) Ethnography as an interpretive exercise. In: Edward Schatz (ed.) Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 75–93.
73.
YasharDJ (ed.) (2005) Contesting Citizenship in Latin America: The Rise of Indigenous Movements and the Postliberal Challenge. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
