The 2013 publication of Vivek Chibber’s book Postcolonial Theory and the Specter of Capital has reignited debates over the relative merits and demerits of Marxism and postcolonialism. This article reviews the debate and raises some critical questions about Chibber’s engagement with questions pertaining to universalism and capitalist development. Focusing on Chibber’s critique of Dipesh Chakrabarty’s Provincializing Europe, the article contends that whereas Chibber is right in arguing for a concept of universal history, the approach he offers towards this end pushes in the direction of Eurocentrism. As an alternative, the article proposes the possibility of crafting passages from Marxism to postcolonialism in order to move beyond Eurocentrism in the historical-sociological study of capitalist development.
AnievasANisanciogluK (2013) What’s at stake in the transition debate? Rethinking the origins of capitalism and the ‘rise of the West’. Millennium42(1): 78–102.
2.
ArrighiG (1994) The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power and the Origins of Our Times. London: Verso.
3.
BanajiJ (2010) Theory as History: Essays on Modes of Production and Exploitation. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
4.
BarkerC (2006) Beyond Trotsky: Extending combined and uneven development. In: DunnBRadiceH (eds) 100 Years of Permanent Revolution: Results and Prospects. London: Pluto Press, 72–87.
5.
BhambraGK (2007) Rethinking Modernity: Postcolonialism and the Sociological Imagination. London: Palgrave.
6.
BhambraGK (2010a) Historical sociology, international relations, and connected histories. Cambridge Review of International Affairs23(1): 127–143.
7.
BhambraGK (2010b) Historical sociology, modernity and postcolonial critique. The American Historical Review116(3): 653–662.
8.
BhambraGK (2011) Talking among themselves? Weberian and Marxist historical sociologies as dialogues without others. Millennium39(3): 667–681.
9.
BlautJM (1994) Robert Brenner in the tunnel of time. Antipode26(4): 351–374.
10.
BoatcăMCostaS (2012) Postcolonial sociology: A research agenda. In: BoatcăMCostaSRodríguezEG (eds) Decolonizing European Sociology: Transdisciplinary Approaches. London: Routledge.
11.
BoothD (1985) Marxism and development sociology: Interpreting the impasse. World Development13(7): 761–787.
12.
BrewerJ (1989) Sinews of Power: War, Money and the English State, 1688–1783. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
ChakrabartyD (2000) Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
ChatterjeeP (2013) Subaltern studies and capital. Economic and Political WeeklyXLVIII(37): 69–75.
15.
ChibberV (2007) Sidelining the West?New Left Review47: 130–141.
16.
ChibberV (2013) Postcolonial Theory and the Specter of Capital. London: Verso.
17.
ChibberV (2014) Revisiting Subaltern Studies. Economic and Political WeeklyXLIX(9): 82–85.
18.
EscobarA (1995) Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
GoJ (2013a) For a postcolonial sociology. Theory & Society42(1): 25–55.
20.
GoJ (2013b) Introduction: Entangling postcoloniality and sociological thought. Political Power and Social Theory24: 3–31.
21.
HellerH (2011) The Birth of Capitalism: A 21st Century Perspective. London: Pluto Press.
22.
HobsonJ (2011) What’s at stake in the neo-Trotskyist debate? Towards a non-eurocentric historical sociology of uneven and combined development. Millennium40(1): 147–166.
KaiwarV (2004) Towards orientalism and nativism. Historical Materialism12(2): 189–247.
25.
KielyR (1995) Marxism, post-Marxism and development fetishism. Capital and Class19(1): 73–101.
26.
KielyR (1999) The last refuge of the noble savage? A critical assessment of post-development theory. The European Journal of Development Research11: 30–55.
27.
LarrainJ (1991) Theories of Development: Capitalism, Colonialism and Dependency. Cambridge: Polity Press.
28.
LazarusN (2002) The fetish of the West in postcolonial theory. In: BartolovichCLazarusN (eds) Marxism, Modernity and Postcolonial Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 43–64.
29.
LazarusN (2011) What postcolonial theory doesn’t say. Race and Class: 53(1): 3–27.
30.
LazarusNVarmaR (2010) Marxism and postcolonialism. In: BidetJKouvelakisS (eds) Critical Companion to Contemporary Marxism. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 309–332.
31.
LebowitzM (2003) Beyond Capital: Marx’s Political Economy of the Working Class. London: Palgrave.
32.
LevienM (2014) Subalternists scrutinized. European Journal of Sociology54(3): 485–497.
33.
MarxK (1990) Capital: A Critique of Political Economy – Volume 1. London: Penguin Books.
34.
MatinK (2013) Redeeming the universal: Postcolonialism and the inner life of Eurocentrism. European Journal of International Relations19(2): 353–377.
35.
MezzadraS (2014) Review essay: Postcolonial Theory and the Specter of Capital. Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies16(6): 916–925.
36.
MurphetJ (2014) No alternative. The Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry1(1): 157–163.
37.
O’HanlonRWashbrookD (1992) After orientalism: Culture, criticism, and politics in the third world. Comparative Studies in Society and History34(1): 141–167.
38.
PradellaL (2013) Imperialism and capitalist development. Historical Materialism21(2): 117–147.
39.
PrakashG (1990) Writing post-orientalist histories of the third world. Comparative Studies in Society and History32(2): 383–408.
40.
PrakashG (1992) Can the subaltern ride? A reply to O’Hanlon and Washbrook. Comparative Studies in Society and History34(1): 168–184.
41.
PurakayasthaAS (2014) Postcolonial theory and the specter of capital. Postcolonial Writing50(3): 369–370.
42.
RosenbergJ (2006) Why is there no international historical sociology?European Journal of International Relations12(3): 307–340.
43.
RosenbergJ (2010) Basic problems in the theory of uneven and combined development part 2: Unevenness and political multiplicity. Cambridge Review of International Affairs23(1): 165–189.
44.
San JuanE (2002) Postcolonialism and the problematic of uneven development. In: BartolovichCLazarusN (eds) Marxism, Modernity and Postcolonial Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 221–239.
45.
SarkarS (1994) Orientalism revisited: Saidian frameworks in the writing of modern Indian history. Oxford Literary Review16(1–2): 205–224.
46.
SpivakGC (2014) Postcolonial theory and the specter of capital. Cambridge Review of International Affairs27(1): 184–198.
47.
SubrahmanyamS (1997) Connected histories: Notes towards a reconfiguration of early modern Eurasia. Modern Asian Studies31(3): 735–762.
48.
TanselCB (2014) Deafening silence? Marxism, international historical sociology and the spectre of Eurocentrism. European Journal of International Relations21(1): 76–100.
