This article explores the production of human rights discourse by examining the organization and social actors involved in its construction. The author proposes a triad constellation configuration for situating the varied engagements of human rights by different constituencies at the United Nations level: dominant understandings, counterpublic approaches, and social praxis. Dominant understandings are affiliated with the Western-legal apparatus, counterpublic approaches embrace antiracist and feminist epistemologies, and social praxis is about the mediation between the first two constellations. This article argues that the social praxis constellation is where the discourse of human rights can be inventive and dynamic because an envisioning of human rights moves beyond the rubric of civil, political, social, economic, and cultural rights.
AlexanderM (2012) The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: The New Press.
2.
ArmalineWGlasbergDS (2009) What will states really do for us? The human rights enterprise and pressure from below. Societies Without Borders4(3): 430–451.
3.
ArmalineWGlasbergDPurkayasthaB (eds) (2012) Human Rights in Our Own Backyard: Injustice and Resistance in the United States. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
4.
BarshRL (1996) Indigenous peoples and the UN Commission on Human Rights: A case of the immovable object and the irresistible force. Human Rights Quarterly18(4): 782–813.
5.
BlaserM (2014) Ontology and indigeneity: On the political ontology of heterogeneous assemblages. Cultural Geographies21(1): 49–58.
6.
BremsE (2003) Protecting the human rights of women. In: LyonsGMayallJ (eds) International Human Rights in the 21st Century. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 100–137.
7.
CollinsD. (2010) New directions in feminism and human rights: An introduction. International Feminist Journal of Politics12(3–4): 298–318.
8.
de la CadenaM (2010) Indigenous cosmopolitics in the Andes: Conceptual reflections beyond ‘politics’. Cultural Anthropology25(2): 334–370.
9.
de Sousa SantosB (2002) Toward a multicultural conception of human rights. In: Hernández-TruyolB (ed.) Moral Imperialism: A Critical Anthology. New York: New York University Press, 39–60.
10.
EscobarA (2010) Latin America at a crossroads. Cultural Studies24(1): 1–65.
11.
FaceCWWobagaZ (2013) Indigenous Nations’ Rights in the Balance: An Analysis of the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. St. Paul, MN: Living Justice Press.
12.
FalcónS (2009) Invoking human rights and transnational activism in racial justice struggles at home: US antiracist activists and the UN Committee to Eliminate Racial Discrimination. Societies Without Borders4(3): 295–316.
13.
FernandesL (2013) Transnational Feminism in the United States. New York: New York University Press.
14.
FregosoRL (2014) For a pluriversal declaration of human rights. American Quarterly66(3): 583–608.
15.
IshayM (2008) The History of Human Rights: From Ancient Times to the Globalization Era. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
LugonesM (2010) Toward a decolonial feminism. Hypatia25(4): 742–759.
17.
Mary McLeod Bethune Papers: The Bethune Foundation Collection, Part 1: Writings, Diaries, Scrapbooks, Biographical Materials, and Files on the National Youth Administration and Women’s Organizations, 1918–1955, Reel 9: Scrapbooks cont., ‘Report Negro Shut Out of World Organizations’ by Edgar G. Brown (date and newspaper unknown), Folder #17 (Scrapbook), Frame 00078 in microfilm.
18.
MignoloW (2009) Who speaks for the ‘human’ in human rights?Hispanic Issues On Line5(1): 7–24.
19.
PulitanoE (ed.) (2012) Indigenous Rights in the Age of the UN Declaration. New York: Cambridge University Press.
SpeedSCollierJF (2000) Limiting indigenous autonomy in Chiapas, Mexico: The state government’s use of human rights. Human Rights Quarterly22(4): 877–905.
22.
ThayerM (2009) Making Transnational Feminism: Rural Women, NGO Activists, and Northern Donors in Brazil. New York: Routledge.
23.
TuckEYangKW (2012) Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education, & Society1(1): 1–40.
United Nations, Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Human Rights (nd, a) Treaty bodies: Monitoring the core international human rights treaties. Available at: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/treaty/index.htm (accessed 18 March 2012).
ZwingelS (2012) How do norms travel? Theorizing international women’s rights in transnational perspective. International Studies Quarterly56(1): 115–129.
